Nake nula wauŋ welo! Flying Tiger Comics - comics, graphic novels and books for the new Aeon
Showing posts with label control systems. Show all posts
Showing posts with label control systems. Show all posts
Sunday, February 16, 2014
Thursday, February 13, 2014
You’re no John Stuart Mill » The Spectator
You’re no John Stuart Mill » The Spectator
***
Politicians of all parties are part of a power elite who are rulers for life, sponsored for life by taxes stolen from us.
They would no more remove big government from our lives than dogbark the chinese national anthem underwater.
Next is the government’s pre-election pledge to make
changes to section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act, the
Labor-enacted hate speech law that was used (illiberally) to go after
Andrew Bolt… Recall that this section has four triggers that undercut
free speech. Those triggers are the words ‘insult’, ‘offend’,
‘humiliate’ and ‘intimidate’....
But rather than get rid of all four, and repeal the entirety of 18C (which analogously did happen in Canada federally), the talk now
is of how the government might keep the prohibitory words ‘humiliate’
and ‘intimidate’ and either repeal or replace ‘offend’ and ‘insult’. Let
me be blunt. Such a craven compromise is in no way at all the choice of
a government committed to free speech. It basically is window dressing,
leaving the Labor inroads into free speech pretty much where they are.
Try this test Mr Attorney-General. Tell us precisely what the difference
is between offending or insulting someone and humiliating someone. The
fact is our AG cannot differentiate them… So if this government opts for
this sort of half-hearted compromise, it cannot with a straight face
also pretend such cosmetic changes somehow meet its free speech pledge.
Same trial, same judge, same Andrew Bolt, and Bolt still loses if all
that is changed is that the focus is on ‘humiliate’ rather than ‘offend’
or ‘insult’.
I won’t even bother here to do more than mention that the
Attorney-General rather incredibly seems to be mooting adding, yes
adding, some brand new speech restricting criminal law provision — the old one being for him too narrowly drawn or something. Why, you might wonder, are we hearing
these backtracking noises? Alas, I fear the government just can’t be bothered to take on the vested interests.
***
Politicians of all parties are part of a power elite who are rulers for life, sponsored for life by taxes stolen from us.
They would no more remove big government from our lives than dogbark the chinese national anthem underwater.
Tuesday, February 11, 2014
Monday, January 27, 2014
Exposed: Sandy Hook shooter’s biggest threat still lives « Jon Rappoport's Blog
Exposed: Sandy Hook shooter’s biggest threat still lives « Jon Rappoport's Blog
Exposed: Sandy Hook shooter’s biggest threat still lives
by Jon Rappoport
January 26, 2014
www.nomorefakenews.com
Adam Lanza, the purported Sandy Hook
School shooter, is the subject of an ongoing investigation in
Connecticut. No, it’s not a police probe, it’s about “mental health.”
The investigation is all about Lanza’s
medical history, what diagnoses were made, who the doctors were, what
psychiatric drugs they prescribed Lanza.
The Governor of Connecticut is
ultimately in charge, in order to make recommendations about improving
“mental health” in the state and preventing future violent tragedies.
But the inquiry has stalled. And stalled.
Despite multiple agencies apparently
having possession of Lanza’s medical/psychiatric history, these reports
have been held close to the vest and not released.
Why?
Exposed: Sandy Hook shooter’s biggest threat still lives
Exposed: Sandy Hook shooter’s biggest threat still lives
by Jon Rappoport
January 26, 2014
www.nomorefakenews.com
Adam Lanza, the purported Sandy Hook
School shooter, is the subject of an ongoing investigation in
Connecticut. No, it’s not a police probe, it’s about “mental health.”
The investigation is all about Lanza’s
medical history, what diagnoses were made, who the doctors were, what
psychiatric drugs they prescribed Lanza.
The Governor of Connecticut is
ultimately in charge, in order to make recommendations about improving
“mental health” in the state and preventing future violent tragedies.
But the inquiry has stalled. And stalled.
Despite multiple agencies apparently
having possession of Lanza’s medical/psychiatric history, these reports
have been held close to the vest and not released.
Why?
Monday, January 20, 2014
Saturday, January 18, 2014
Friday, January 10, 2014
Wednesday, January 1, 2014
Wednesday, December 25, 2013
Wednesday, December 18, 2013
Sunday, December 15, 2013
Saturday, December 7, 2013
Thursday, December 5, 2013
Monday, November 25, 2013
Friday, November 8, 2013
Thursday, November 7, 2013
Sofia Smallstorm - Unraveling Sandy Hook
Don't ban guns! Ban crazy people!
And who defines who is crazy? The DIA via the DSM. Which was, and still is, developed for the military. It has zero credibility when you look at it, and even rebel psychiatrists are saying so.
Gun control is the Hegelian double blind to lead us to oppression via psychiatric oppression.
That's Brave New World folks.
And who defines who is crazy? The DIA via the DSM. Which was, and still is, developed for the military. It has zero credibility when you look at it, and even rebel psychiatrists are saying so.
Gun control is the Hegelian double blind to lead us to oppression via psychiatric oppression.
That's Brave New World folks.
Saturday, November 2, 2013
Friday, November 1, 2013
JFK: assassinating his character
WHY IT MATTERS:
Attacks on JFK's character, made by CIA controlled lapdog media, are a more subtle way of justifying the action taken against him by the murder conspiracy criminal participants.
It's a way to say that this guy was bad and deserved to die.
Two things.
1. being a victim of the CIA doesn't make you a good guy or a saint. Whitlam for example is a slimefuck.
2. it's still wrong for extra-legal means, especially murder, to be used to replace a head of state, whatever that head's character. Ballots not bullets.
and
3. the public murder of JFK was also a clear terror act, a communication by the junta behind the coup that this was what you got for trying to go into competition with them and to terrorise the populace with a public display of violence.
Attacks on JFK's character, made by CIA controlled lapdog media, are a more subtle way of justifying the action taken against him by the murder conspiracy criminal participants.
It's a way to say that this guy was bad and deserved to die.
Two things.
1. being a victim of the CIA doesn't make you a good guy or a saint. Whitlam for example is a slimefuck.
2. it's still wrong for extra-legal means, especially murder, to be used to replace a head of state, whatever that head's character. Ballots not bullets.
and
3. the public murder of JFK was also a clear terror act, a communication by the junta behind the coup that this was what you got for trying to go into competition with them and to terrorise the populace with a public display of violence.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
