Showing posts with label oswalds. Show all posts
Showing posts with label oswalds. Show all posts

Sunday, January 26, 2014

Identical Strangers: HuffPo catches up with an article published here over a year ago: 'I'm Not A Lookalike' Project Showcases Strangers Who Look Like Twins (PHOTOS)

'I'm Not A Lookalike' Project Showcases Strangers Who Look Like Twins (PHOTOS)



The real question about identical strangers is, when they are living a mile away from each other and belong to the same mothers' group, why didn't ANYONE at some point EVER say, "jeebus prison showering christ you two are identical!" huh?



Seems very odd no one would remark on it.



Nancy Lanza and Ann E Haddad for example.



I wonder if the whole doppelganger photo project is nothing more than case management to cover the use of lookalikes in intel operations- going back to the many Lee Harvey Oswalds and James Earl Ray lookalike who kindly provided him with a passport for his government funded overseas travel?

StumbleUpon

Sunday, January 5, 2014

Inconvenient Truth #60: The Sandy Hook Police Report | It Was Only A Dream

Inconvenient Truth #60: The Sandy Hook Police Report | It Was Only A Dream

1. From CFS-12-00704597 State Police Report, talking about Adam Lanza’s body when inspected at the school ON THE DAY OF THE SHOOTING: (please go to the documents pages 32 – 34 on the left side navigation)

“Located on the floor east of the shooter was a “Glock 10″ semi-automatic pistol…one round was partially loaded in the chamber, with a magazine of 8 rounds remaining…the pistol was approximately 3 feet from the suspect….the pistol had numerous hairs to the front sight area of the pistol…consistent in color with that of the shooter…A black colored canvas hat was located on the floor northeast of the suspect…This hat had blood stains hairs and a hole consistent with a bullet hole in the forward portion of the top of the hat…”
NOW PAY ATTENTION TO THE NEXT LINES:
“This hole was consistent with having been worn by the shooter at the time the shooter received a bullet to the RIGHT REAR LOWER PORTION OF HIS HEAD WHICH EXITED OUT THE TOP PORTION OF HIS HEAD AND HAT“.
Did you catch that?  A kill  shot to the lower rear of the head…who shoots themselves in the BACK OF THE HEAD?
Also, it seemingly conflicts with the following note from the autopsy report on Adam which was done later:
 (from 00101146 report, showing anatomic findings of victims and Adam Lanza) – “Adam Lanza died from “intraoral gunshot wound with extensive injury to skull and brain”…
Note the word “Intraoral“, which if  you go to any online dictionary and look the word up, it says “within the mouth, inside the mouth; situated, occurring, or performed within the mouth”…the report is saying he put the gun in his mouth and pulled the trigger, but the FIRST REPORT from the scene says the shot was to the lower right back of the head and exited through the top of his head
2.  Also, from the 00122616 report, on the Bushmaster Rifle:
Swabbing was done on all parts of the rifle and cartridges (this rifle was in the school with him and was said by the coroner to have been the source of the shots fired that day, later proved not true)…here are the results of DNA comparisons to Adam Lanza and his mother:
From the conclusion in the report of the DNA samples taken from the rifle (all DNA samples taken, not just some): (go to page 5-6 of the report via left navigation)
“The results showed that only ONE DNA sample was from Adam Lanza, and that was the sample they took from HIS LIVER.  ALL DNA SAMPLES FROM THE RIFLE WERE FOUND NOT TO HAVE ORIGINATED FROM EITHER NANCY LANZA OR ADAM LANZA.  HOWEVER, A CHECK OF THE CONNECTICUT AND NATIONAL CONVICTED OFFENDER DNA Database DID HAVE A MATCH…”
However, even more mysterious and really very shocking, is that one of the items being tested, right along with the guns and bullet’s Adam is to have used in the school, was an envelope containing a Christmas card and hand-written note address to the students of SHES (Sandy Hook Elementary School).  This is detailed in “Sec 12 – CT State Police Forensic Laboratory Reports“, and it is extremely important to understand that this HAD to be either ON Adam or in the car, as the whole batch of evidence in this report concerned SWABBED DNA that was tested to see if it matched Nancy or Adam.  You can begin reading about this card at the top of page 13, and be sure to read everything from this point in the document on.  The envelope’s flap (both sides), Card, and adhesive side of the stamp were all found to have DNA.  It DID NOT MATCH ADAM OR NANCY, BUT DID MATCH SOMEONE IN THE CONVICTED FELON DNA DATABASE.  WHY HAS THE MSM NOT DEMANDED AN EXPLANATION OF THIS “HAND-WRITTEN NOTE” AND CARD IN AN ENVELOPE THAT PRESUMABLY WAS FOUND ON ADAM AND DOES NOT HAVE EITHER HIS OR HIS MOTHER’S DNA, BUT A CONVICTED FELON OF UNKNOWN IDENTITY?   AND WHAT DID THE CARD AND NOTE SAY?
  This is critical to the case yet is totally unexplained.
StumbleUpon

Monday, November 25, 2013

Betsy McGee: 10 steps to avoid being the next false flag Patsy

StumbleUpon

Thursday, November 14, 2013

Lee Harvey Oswald: Career CIA Operative | Veterans Today

Lee Harvey Oswald: Career CIA Operative | Veterans Today

Lee Harvey Oswald worked for the CIA (and FBI and Army and most likely Naval Intelligence) from the late fifties when the CIA recruited him from the Marine Corps until his murder on November 24, 1963 by Dallas nightclub owner Jack Ruby. A clear appreciation of Lee Harvey Oswald’s role as an intelligence operative is key to understanding the JFK assassination conspiracy and cover-up. Although more than 20 years old, in my opinion Matthew Smith’s JFK: The Second Plot offers the most comprehensive account of Oswald’s CIA career.
 
StumbleUpon

Friday, November 1, 2013

Flying Tiger Comics: Search results for jfk

Flying Tiger Comics: Search results for jfk

JFK: it's the fiftieth anniversary of the JFK murder conspiracy which ushered in the American coup d'etat by the Third Force.

It's also the twentieth anniversary of the first abandonment of the outer forms of the American Republic, which will be a much slower process, pace Machiavelli.

Might be an idea to bookmark this entry. Use a Paperclip.

StumbleUpon

Tuesday, October 29, 2013

JFK: Oh Really?

"It is difficult to imagine a person who watched Jac kRuby shoot Lee Harvey Oswald before live television cameras, turning to his wife or children and commenting, "That was an extraordinary message we just received."

-Tony Schwarz, The Responsive Chord

***

I'd suggest, forcefully, and especially given CIA and DIA investment in the lapdog media, that the Ruby shooting was a DELIBERATE message, not to mention a way to tidy up a RFK agent who would otherwise surely reveal his right wing credentials, his CIA employment and his FBI informer status before the world's media.

For those playing along at home:

1. Jack Ruby was a frequent hypnotic subject

2. Oswald was a CIA asset, part of the Returned Defector Program

3. Ruby was let into the kill zone by police he knew. Police he knew well.

4. One of the two police officers accompanying Oswald held on to the victim's trousers to prevent him dodging or escaping

5. Ruby called one of the police he knew prior to the shooting to try and sabotage his own assignment

6. Ruby later said that if Adlai Stevenson had been Vice President JFK would never have been murdered- a clear implication of LBJ's involvement

7. Oswald was making a beeline for Ruby's apartment when he returned to his lodging after the execution style hit on JFK

8. Ruby has a double of Oswald as one of his homosexual boyfriends

9. Jack Ruby was a direct lackey of Carlos Marcello

10. Ruby hosted stag nights for Dallas police, sheriffs and DA officers including the DA himself



StumbleUpon

Wednesday, September 18, 2013

BBC News - Navy Yard: Swat team 'stood down' at mass shooting scene

BBC News - Navy Yard: Swat team 'stood down' at mass shooting scene

One of the first teams of heavily armed police to respond to Monday's shooting in Washington DC was ordered to stand down by superiors, the BBC can reveal.

A tactical response team of the Capitol Police, a force that guards the US Capitol complex, was told to leave the scene by a supervisor instead of aiding municipal officers.

The Capitol Police department said senior officials were investigating.

Aaron Alexis, 34, killed 12 people at the Washington Navy Yard.

"I don't think it's a far stretch to say that some lives may have been saved if we were allowed to intervene," a Capitol Police source familiar with the incident told the BBC.

***

Things that make you go hm.

It's becoming the "lone gunman" of the twenty first century:

1. drill involving same alleged facts going on at the same time at the same place

2. swat teams stood down, already operating in the drill before "going live"

3. second shooter announced, before he disappears into the mist like bigfoot

4. first shooter a lone nut / high achiever

5. EMS seem to stand around doing nothing whilst civilians not in on the joke rush to help

6. surprisingly cheerful media and witnesses laughing away before the cameras roll

7. lapdog media uniformity of reportage. No scoops, no contrarian insights, no thinking the unthinkable - consensus reality

8. over and done in one crime scenes- the event happens and then it's all rolled neatly up in a blanket with unholy and highly improbable haste

9. shooter never makes it to trial - compare to the muslim terrorist at Fort Hood - shot and wounded so he could be captured and tried. The other kind of shooter never makes it. This is a change from the Secret Team approach of the 1960s. They learned from their earlier mistakes.

10. manipulated images and subliminals

11. "truthers" ie intel assets who come out with doodlebug crazy assertions that create noise to signal problems for genuine truthseekers and researchers

12. deliberately absurd element or elements of the event built into it so it self invalidates

13. the man who knew too much: the witness with all the answers- before anyone could know them

14. military and especially military mind control / extreme research connection to shooter


Shooter Bingo.
StumbleUpon

Sunday, September 15, 2013

Wednesday, January 23, 2013

JFK: Judyth Vary Baker


Judyth Vary Baker Judyth Vary in high school lab with micewas once a promising science student who dreamed of finding a cure for cancer, but strayed from a path of mainstream scholarship at the University of Florida to a life of espionage in New Orleans with Lee Harvey Oswald.
In her memoir, Me & Lee – How I came to know, love and lose Lee Harvey Oswald, Judyth offers extensive documentation of how she came to be involved with cancer research at such a young age, the personalities who recruited her to move to New Orleans in 1963, how she was hired there – along with Lee Oswald – by Reily Coffee Co. and fired the same afternoon Lee was arrested for disturbing the peace on Canal Street, and how she became a participant in the development of a biological weapon that Oswald was to smuggle into Cuba to eliminate Fidel Castro. Judyth Vary Baker's last paycheck from Reily Coffee, August 9, 1963, the same afternoon that Oswald was arrested on Canal St.
Judyth shows the evidence and relates – from her first-hand experience – all she knows about the Kennedy assassination, her love affair with Lee Oswald over the summer of '63, her conversations with him as late as Lee Harvey Oswald is shot by Jack Rubytwo days before JFK's death, his role as a deep-"Lee was a government agent" – Marguerite Oswald, Lee Harvey Oswald's mothercover intelligence agent who was framed for an assassination he was actually trying to prevent, and how he was silenced by his old friend Jack Ruby.

***

I don't put credence in Judyth Baker's interpretation of her relationship with Lee Oswald, and I don't think her tale is unembellished. However, the gravamen of it- that she was squired by Lee Oswald- I accept on the evidence to hand at this date.

However, I don't believe that the evidence supports that Oswald treated her as anything more than his assignment as an intelligence agent.

Marina Oswald accused him of having affairs- and Baker's relationship with Oswald was certainly physical.

My instinct is that Baker was being managed by Lee Oswald, basically he was her contact agent and was keeping this extremely young and actually extremely naive ideological young woman under control. She was certainly thrown aside by the scientists the moment she expressed moral concerns over their insane nightmare fuel work. But of course- after they had accessed her inspired genius information on viral cancer transmission. Used up- and thrown away.
 
StumbleUpon

Tuesday, January 22, 2013

JFK: Oswald as the patsy

Despite all the evidence from the Warren Commission, the HSCA and the Church Committee, despite all the other documented evidence in the last fifty years, even now talking about JFK is almost impossible without running into nuts still pushing their same crazy theories about Oswald.

I refer of course to the sad souls who claim Oswald assassinated JFK.

Oswald went to work on the day of the assassination as though nothing was going to happen. He'd already made reports to both the CIA and FBI about the right-wing groups he'd joined or infiltrated, and he had washed his hands of Marina after she refused to move into the new apartment with him.

WE know that the FBI and CIA suppressed or destroyed the notes he sent. WE know how closely the oswald doubles were stalking him to make the legend work. HE had no idea.

Hence, when confronted in the police station by the lapdog media already repeating the accusation that he was the presidential assassin, voice print analysis indicates:

1. he didn't shoot anyone;

2. he had prior knowledge of the assassination- of course he did, he frantically reported on it and helped changed JFK's public movement pattern in Chicago and Miami;

3. he was suprised that they were going forward with making him the patsy.

StumbleUpon

Saturday, January 12, 2013

Framing the Patsy: The Case of Lee Harvey Oswald

Framing the Patsy: The Case of Lee Harvey Oswald

Framing the Patsy: The Case of Lee Harvey Oswald


by Jim Fetzer and Jim Marrs


The deliberate dissemination of false information about JFK continues to this day. Professor Hany Farid, a member of the computer science faculty at Dartmouth, affords a stunning illustration, where he injected himself into a long-running dispute concerning the authenticity of photographs related to the assassination of President John F. Kennedy. These photos reportedly of the accused assassin Lee Harvey Oswald are collectively known as “the backyard photographs.” What Farid has done, however, simply perpetuates the fraud.

Claiming to have studied one feature of one of these photographs and declaring his support for their authenticity, Farid’s analysis immediately raised the ire of many assassination researchers, who for years have known the photos are clever fakes.

In an article published in The Huffington Post (November 5, 2009), however, Fraid  asserts his conclusion that it is “extremely unlikely” that backyard photographs of Oswald are fake, based upon his digital analysis of the shadows.

Apparently referring to the more famous of the backyard photos — the one published on the cover of Life on February 21, 1964 nearly eight months before the Warren Commission handpicked by Kennedy’s successor, Lyndon B. Johnson, concluded that Oswald was the lone assassin — Farid says, “You can never really prove an image is real, but the evidence that people have pointed to that the photo is fake is incorrect. As an academic and a scientist, I don’t like to say it’s absolutely authentic … but it’s extremely unlikely to have been a fake.”

Farid, who has previously conducted research on how poorly the human visual system can be at correctly judging how shadows are cast, admitted, “[W]e are really bad at judging shadows. I’m bad at it and this is what I do for a living.”

Despite this caveat, Farid jumped feet first into the controversy of the backyard photos, causing further tumult in the issue. While his announcement of no fakery, propelled by an unquestioning mass media, caused a sensation with some segments of the public, serious students of the photos expressed dismay and concern that Farid had further muddied the issue without seriously delving into the abundant literature on the issue, which remains quite important as the Life cover-photo was successfully used to convince the public of Oswald’s guilt.

Most researchers into the backyard photos, which includes an official with the Canadian Defense Department and a retired British detective expert, consider the evidence of fakery to be simply overwhelming. But Farid appears to be unaware that other experts have studied them before him.
To appreciate the magnitude of the issue, consider the words of Robert Blakey, now a professor of law at Notre Dame but who served as Chief Counsel to the House Select Committee on Assassinations (HSCA) during its reinvestigation of the deaths of JFK and of Martin Luther King, Jr., in 1977-78. Speaking to the committee about these very photographs, Blakey stated,

“If [the backyard photographs] are invalid, how they were produced poses far-reaching questions in the area of conspiracy, for they evince a degree of technical sophistication that would almost necessarily raise the possibility that [someone] conspired not only to kill the President, but to make Oswald a patsy.”

It might be recalled that Oswald himself used that same word — “patsy” — meaning a person set up to take the blame for a crime. In light of the major importance of the backyard photograph issue, Farid immediately drew critics, who claimed his research was superficial and not as definitive as he implied.

No Literature Search
If Farid had only conducted a literature search, he would have known that the shadows were but one of multiple indications of fakery and that, even if he were right about the shadows, he would be wrong about the photos.  Unfortunately, neither the news reporters nor the professor seems to have known enough to appreciate that his conclusion is contradicted by multiple lines of proof, including digital analyses, which are easily accessible — even by Google!

Such proofs include that the chin in the photos is not Oswald’s chin; that there is an insert line between the chin and the lower lip; that the finger tips of one hand are missing; and that the figure in the image is too short to be Oswald.  Farid’s involvement therefore raises serious questions about the integrity of his research and the abuse of his standing as a Dartmouth professor to make public pronouncements impressionable to a wide general audience.

According to the Manchester, NH, Union Leader (November 6-7, 2009), Farid created a 3-dimensional model of Oswald’s head using a computer program called “Facegen” to determine if he could replicate the shadow beneath his nose by manipulating a source of light that simulated the sun. He said he had a difficult time until he realized that he had modeled the neck “too thin”.

Farid told the Union Leader that, given the technology available 46 years ago, “there is no way someone would have been able to get the internal and external elements of the photo just right in order to fabricate not only the one photo, but two others in the series.” But his own conclusions make it difficult to believe that he was even aware of, much less that he had studied, even two of them.
The professor could have learned much more had he only conducted a search of the literature.

Even YouTube includes this documentary, FAKE: The Forged Photograph that Framed Lee Harvey Oswald. One of the most interesting has been posted by Judyth Vary Baker, whom we believe to be who she claims — a cancer researcher who became acquainted with Oswald in New Orleans.
In her study, she notes that digitizing a backyard photo creates a problem of trustworthiness, where the strongest conclusion he is justified in drawing is that the pixels in the copy of a copy of a copy he analyzed were not tampered with. He simply reconstructed portions of a backyard photo — we do not know which one he chose — but only seems to have reconstructed the head and neck, not a full figure corresponding to the image.

Nor does he appear to have used the sun as his light source, which means that his “conclusion” is based upon a flawed methodology. Since digital photography did not exist in 1963, it is also relatively effortless to state — with a high degree of confidence — that no digital tampering of the original photos took place.

Misleading JFK Studies
The manipulation of the scene and pre-positioning of the elements to achieve a desired effect is reminiscent of a recent Discovery Channel program, “Inside the Target Car”, in which a rifle anchored to scaffolding was fired into a carefully-designed wooden box representing Kennedy’s limousine striking dummies with gelatin heads. The resultant splatter of matter was then studied in an attempt to prove the Warren Commission’s theory of one bullet causing seven wounds to both Kennedy and Texas Gov. John Connally.

The program assured its audience that all the elements were exactly the same as in Dealey Plaza in 1963 — except that a modern telescopic sight was used for greater accuracy. Of course, Oswald did not have the advantage of a modern telescopic sight and no mention was made of the fact that, even according to the official version of the assassination, Oswald was firing at a target moving laterally and downhill away from him with tree branches obscuring the line of sight.

And this is far from the only time that “documentaries” and other studies that claim to have vindicated The Warren Report (1964) have appeared, many of which attempt to support the “magic bullet” theory, even though it has not only been proven to be false but is not even anatomically possible. If you have any doubt, Google “Reasoning about Assassinations”. And there are many more.

There appear to have been at least four photos — plus a negative and a missing color transparency — in the entire set. We suspect Farid thought there was only one. Oswald’s face is tilted in different directions in different photos, yet the v-shaped shadow under the nose never varies, which is an obvious indication of fakery. Since he studied the nose shadow, he should have discovered this.
The most charitable interpretation of his work is that he naively assumed that the shadow beneath the figure’s nose in the image that was published in Life was the basis for rejecting the photographs as fakes — and nothing else.


Had Farid simply entered the words, “backyard photographs, Oswald”, on Google, he would have found a study entitled, “EXAMPLES OF DIGITAL EVIDENCE ANALYSIS AND PRESENTATION // BACKYARD PHOTOS EVIDENCE OR FAKERY // PRESENTED BY RALPH THOMAS”. It should have captured his attention, since Farid was planning to do a digital analysis himself.


Thomas illustrates and explains not only that there is an apparent inconsistency in the shadow of the nose in relation to the shadow of the body but also that the body shadows in different photos indicates they were taken at different times. And, under the heading, “Close Ups Of The Two Faces”, he makes key points about two of the backyard photographs:

For many years researchers have said these faces were faked. (1) A fine line runs through the chin. (2) The shadows appear to be the same under the nose. (3) The second head has merely been tilted to fit into the rest of the photo. (4) Although taken just seconds or minutes apart, the tilt of the head on the second photo also tilts the nose shadow.

Under the heading, “Overlay Of The Two Faces”, he also explains that, when the second face is turned into a transparency and titled to the same angle of the first one and the photos are overlaid on top of each other, (5) they match up perfectly, as indeed he shows in an additional third photo. But this would be impossible if the photos were authentic.

These studies contradict Farid — even about the shadows that he claims to have studied. They raise serious questions about the integrity of Farid’s research and suggest he considered only a single aspect of a single photograph. And this is far from the only contrary evidence that a Google search would have produced.

Ignoring Expert Testimony
The day following the assassination two photographs and the negative to one of these were found by Dallas police in the garage of the Irving home where Oswald’s wife was staying. These two were designated as Warren Commission Exhibits (CE) 133-A and B.

In 1976 the Senate Intelligence Committee discovered yet another backyard photo in the hands of the widow of a Dallas policeman. Mrs. Roscoe White said her husband once told her the picture would be very valuable some day. In this heretofore unknown version of the backyard photo, Oswald is depicted holding the rifle in his left hand and newspapers in his right.

This is the same pose used by Dallas police in reenacting the photo for the Warren Commission — clear evidence that authorities were aware of the suppressed picture long before it became known to the public. This photo has been identified as CE 133-C by researchers.

In the same study, Thomas himself provides a summary of far more detailed testimony from Jack White, a longtime analyst of JFK photos and films, who presented his findings of fakery to the HSCA but which the HSCA chose to disregard. Here are his observations:

1) STANDING OFF CENTER: White concluded that Oswald is standing off center and outside the weight bearing alignment of his feet. A person could not stand in such a position.

2) PROPORTIONS: When the body proportions are brought into alignment from the knees to the head by adjusting the size of the photographs, one head is much larger than the other.

3) OVERALL BODY SHADOWS: Although the photos were supposed to have been taken just seconds apart, the overall body shadows in the photographs are all different. In 133-A the photograph has a 10 o’clock shadow, 133-B a 12 o’clock shadow and 133-C a 10 o’clock shadow again.

4) ARM AND ELBOWS: White said that the elbow is too high in one photograph and the elbow doesn’t show up on the one photograph of the arm were Oswald is holding the rifle. Attempts to duplicate this pose have been unsuccessful.

5) HANDS AND FINGERS: In the photographs, the left hand and finger looks normal. Yet the right hand is missing fingernails and the hand appears too stubby to be normal.

6) WATCH: The photographs reveal that Oswald is wearing a watch but all witnesses have stated that Oswald did not wear and didn’t own a watch. No watch was found among the possessions of Oswald and he was not wearing one when he was arrested.

7) RIFLE: When the photographs are blown up to the actual height of Oswald that was 5’9″, the rifle in the photograph is too long. When the rifle is adjusted in the photograph to it’s proper length, Oswald’s height is six inches too short.

8) SCOPE: White noted that in the photograph the rear end of the rifle scope is missing and pants wrinkles appear where the end of the scope is supposed to be, raising the prospect that the photo was retouched before being found by the Dallas police.

9) FACE: The face shows Oswald with a broad flat chin but Oswald’s Dallas Police mug shots depicted him with a pointed and cleft chin. There is a line that breaks up the grain of the photograph that runs across the chin that many say is where a cut took place to paste Oswald’s face onto the photograph. This strongly supports Oswald’s complaint to police that someone had pasted his face onto another’s body.

10) PHOTOGRAPHIC OVERLAY: When Mr. White took 133-A and 133-B, adjusted and overlaid them, nothing in the background or figure matched up as expected in two separate photos made moments apart with a handheld camera, as stated in the official testimony. However, the face of Oswald was a complete match on both photographs. This could only be explained if someone made a composite photo by pasting the same Oswald face on both pictures.

11) FACE SHADOWS: Both photos show the same V-shaped shadow below the nose. However, on one of the photos Oswald’s head is tilted but the shadow does not adjust for this tilt.

12) NECK SHADOWS: On one of the photos there is light on the right side of the neck but the same photo shows the rifle casting a shadow in the opposite angle.

13) COLLAR SIZE: The figure’s collar size can be determined from the photograph using a mathematical formula, which came out to size 16. Oswald wore a size 14-1/2 collar and all his clothes found among his personal belongings were in the 14.5 to 15-inch range.

14) BACKGROUNDS: White determined that one photograph had the top cropped off and the other photograph had the bottom cropped off making it appear as if they were two separate pictures. However, except for small differences, the backgrounds matched on both photographs, meaning the camera never changed position which contradicts the official story of Oswald’s wife reluctantly walking into the backyard to take the photo.

15) SMALL DIFFERENCES: For many months White was puzzled by the small differences he noted in the backgrounds as they were not off by much. After looking at the photographs some more he determined that on the background of one, the camera appeared to be slightly tilted. He then took another copy of the photo by tilting it on a board and everything came perfectly into alignment.
An elementary “literature search” would not only have revealed to Farid that much more than the shadows he claims to have studied themselves afford multiple indications of fakery, as White notes in points (3), (11) and (12)! If he had been determined to conduct a serious and objective study, it’s difficult to imagine how he could have missed them.

Questions of Authenticity
These photos are authentic only if they are authentic in every respect. Even if he had been successful in his study of the nose shadows, disproving one out of more than a dozen proofs of photo fakery cannot show that these photos are “unlikely to have been faked”, much less that they are authentic. There turn out to have been five versions of these photographs — plus a negative of one and a separate color transparency — as we explain below.

The more we have thought about this, the more obvious it becomes that Farid was unaware of any problem besides the nose shadow or of any photos than the one he studied. Either Farid does not understand the requirements to prove their authenticity — which is absurd, since this is one of his areas of specialization — or he did not conduct a literature search and did not know the history of research on these photos. The only alternative would appear to be that he has deliberately perpetrated a fraud.

Incredible as it may seem, the photo shown here — a “ghost” image, in the words of researcher Robert Groden — was discovered in the files of the Dallas Police files more than 20 years after the fact. In his classic study, The Search for Lee Harvey Oswald (1995), Groden provides an excellent introduction to the problems with the backyard photos on pages 90-95. Indeed, 404 evidence photos that have now been released from an official archive not only include ten photographs of the backyard without figure — which would have been indispensable to fake them, which using multiple lines of proof we know was done in this case — and two “ghost” images, which suggest that they were either produced or planted by members of the Dallas Police Department.

Farid has in fact published numerous articles regarding the use of digital analysis of photographs, which suggests that he possesses the academic ability to have analyzed them properly. Even on our charitable interpretation — that he was simply unaware of other problems and had not done a search of the literature to dispel his ignorance — then at the very least we would expect that his analysis of the nose shadows would be competent.

His conclusion supports our inference. If Farid studied more than one of these photographs, as he claims, then he should have noticed that the nose shadow remains constant across different photos, an obvious indication of fakery. In fact, the figure’s entire face remains constant in these different photographs. Either he did not know there was more than one or he is deliberately deceiving us.
Clearly, Farid has violated a basic canon of scientific research, which is that all the available evidence that makes a difference to a conclusion must be taken into account. It is impossible to demonstrate that a photo is not fake by selecting one issue, excluding consideration of the rest of the evidence, and showing that it would have been possible under special conditions.

Farid focused on the nose shadow, but ignored inconsistencies between the nose shadow and the shadows the figure casts, the similarity in the nose shadow from one photograph to another, and problems with the shadows on the neck. Farid was competent to investigate the shadows, but he did not perform that task in a competent fashion. The question becomes, why was he doing this at all?

Jim Marr’s Response
The author of Crossfire: The Plot that Killed Kennedy (1989), Jim Marrs has long been persuaded that the backyard photos are indeed composites, just as Oswald asserted. When separate photographs made at different times with a hand-held camera are turned into transparencies and placed on top of each other, nothing should match. The problem is Oswald’s face (above the chin) is a near-perfect match when they are superimposed, as shown here.


The only difference that Marrs has detected is slight distortion of the mouth in one of the photos, which could have been done with retouching.

In “The Many Faces of Lee Harvey Oswald” (YouTube), Jack White has compared the thick neck and block chin of the figure with the narrow neck and pointed chin of Oswald. He also noticed a bump on the backyard figure’s wrist (CE-133A) not on Oswald.

A rookie with the Dallas Police Department, Roscoe White, had a thick neck and a block chin, like the image in the photographs, and a similar bump on his wrist.

The first, depicting a man holding a rifle up over his head with both hands, was shown by Marina to Oswald’s mother. Marguerite, the night of the assassination and then again at the Executive Inn, where Marguerite burned it and flushed it down a toilet (WC Vol. I, pp. 146-152). So that photo is no longer available.

The second is the version of CE 133-A with “Hunter of Fascists” handwritten on the back in Russian, which was found long after the assassination in the belongings left behind by George DeMohrenshildt, who appears to have been Oswald’s CIA handler and had filed several reports with the agency. Jeanne DeMohrenschildt, George’s widow, told Marrs during an interview that she had never seen the photo before and believed it was planted in their belongings while they were traveling in Haiti.

Another copy and a third version (CE-133-A and B) were both found in the garage of Ruth and Michael Paine on the Saturday following the assassination, but Marrs has observed there is a major discrepancy in the record. Detectives Guy Rose and R. S. Stovall of the Dallas Police Department told the Warren Commission that they arrived at the Paine home after noon (“about 1 p.m.” quoting Stovall in Vol. VII of the Warren Commission Supporting Volumes, p. 193) on Saturday, November 23, 1963, but only brought the backyard photos discovered in the Paine’s garage back to DPD headquarters around two hours later (Rose, WC Vol. VII, p. 231).

Yet, in his statement to the Warren Commission, Capt. Will Fritz, who was in charge of the JFK homicide, related how Oswald was brought back to his office for further interrogation at 12:30 p.m. that same day, “… in an effort to find where he was living when the picture was made of him holding a rifle which looked to be the same rifle we recovered. This picture showed [by its own internal features] to be taken near a stairway with many identifying things in the backyard…. He was placed back in jail at 1:10 p.m.” (WC Report, Appendix XI, p. 607.)

But how could Fritz have seen a backyard photo before Stovall and Rose found two of them in the garage and had brought them back to the police headquarters?

This account lends great support to the stories of Pat and Robert Hester, a husband and wife team called from home on November 22, 1963, the day of the assassination, to help process assassination-related photos for the FBI and the Dallas police at National Photo in Dallas.

Both of the Hesters told Marrs that they had seen an FBI agent with a color transparency of one of the backyard photos and that one of those Robert processed had no figure in the picture. Hester’s claim was corroborated by his wife, Patricia, who also helped process film on the day of the assassination.
Marrs believes that the FBI had the photos as early as Friday evening and either passed them to the Dallas police (who lied about finding them) or planted the photos in the Paine garage (where a thorough search of the Paine home Friday had not produced them) in order to be found by the detectives prior to the police search during which they claimed to have found the photographs.

He suspects that the fabrication of the photos can be traced back to J. Edgar Hoover, the Director of the FBI, who was intent on having proof that Oswald would have been convicted of the assassination had he lived to stand trial. And, indeed, there are multiple indications that Hoover took steps necessary to block a real investigation, which made him at least guilty as an accessory after the fact.

StumbleUpon

Sunday, January 6, 2013

9/11 ... 1959

September 11 (1959)

Lee Harvey Oswald (ONI / CIA) receives honorable discharge from USMC on grounds of compassionate necessity- requirement to tend sick mother.

Shortly after goes to USSR as part of James Jesus Angleton's Returned Defector Programme.

It only gets stranger from there. Unless of course Oswald was an intelligence asset. Which of course he was.
StumbleUpon

Friday, January 4, 2013

Lee Harvey Oswald - The Patsy

Lee Harvey Oswald - The Patsy

Was Oswald a spy?  After reviewing all available evidence, the answer to the question seems to be a resounding "yes."  The following is a quick look at some of the evidence pointing to Oswald's involvement with spy work:
  • His childhood -- a bright loner who read a wide range of books and was drawn to unpopular ideas, attracted by spy stories (the TV show "I Led Three Lives" and Ian Fleming's James Bond novels were among his favorites) -- perfectly fits the profile of persons most desired for intelligence work.
  • Oswald's Marine career is checkered with inconsistencies and unexplained events that suggest secret intelligence training.
  • His assignment to Atsugi base in Japan, which housed a large CIA facility.
  • Oswald's incredible ability with the Russian language.  Several Russians, including his wife, said he spoke like a native, yet this high-school dropout reportedly taught himself Russian from books.
  • The fact that several persons -- including a former CIA paymaster, Oswald's Marine roommate, and fellow Marine Gerry Patrick Hemming -- have suggested that Oswald worked for U.S. intelligence.
  • The manner in which Oswald traveled so easily in and out of Russia as well as the unaccounted-for funds he used suggests intelligence guidance.
  • The ability of this American "defector" to leave the Soviet Union with his Russian-born wife at a time when most Russians were being denied exit permits.
  • The ease with which this would-be defector obtained passports both in 1959 and 1963.
  • The fact that Oswald wrote a lengthy report on his activities in Russia and, later, made a detailed report to the FBI concerning his Fair Play For Cuba activities in New Orleans. 
  • Oswald's notebook contained the word "microdots," a common spy technique of photographically reducing information to a small dot.
  • Oswald's nonbinding "defection" to Russia fits perfectly the profile of an Office of Naval Intelligence program to infiltrate American servicemen into the Soviet Union during the late 1950's.
  • One of Oswald's closest contacts, George DeMohrenschildt, was himself an intelligence operative, first for the Nazis and later for the CIA.
  • One of the strongest pieces of evidence for Oswald's involvement in spy work concerns a small Minox camera found among his effects by Dallas Police.  Information developed by the Dallas Morning News in 1978 revealed the camera was not available to the public in 1963.  It may have been spy equipment issued to Oswald.  This evidence was so explosive that the FBI tried to get Dallas detectives to change their reports regarding the camera and also kept photos taken by Oswald hidden for nearly fifteen years....  Detective Rose told the Dallas Morning News:  "[FBI agents] were calling it a light meter, I know that.  But I know a camera when I see it....  The thing we got at Irving out of Oswald's seabag was a Minox camera.  No question about it.  They tried to get me to change the records because it wasn't a light meter.  I don't know why they wanted it changed, but they must have had some motive for it."  The motive may have been that the existence of the camera pointed to Oswald's intelligence connections....  The three-inch-long German-made camera was famous for being used by spies on both sides during World War II.
Note:  The above text is excerpted from the book, Crossfire: The Plot that Killed Kennedy by Jim Marrs
StumbleUpon

Thursday, November 29, 2012

» Inmate: James Holmes Told Me He Was ‘Programmed’ To Kill by “Evil” Therapist Alex Jones' Infowars: There's a war on for your mind!



» Inmate: James Holmes Told Me He Was ‘Programmed’ To Kill by “Evil” Therapist Alex Jones' Infowars: There's a war on for your mind!

Inmate: James Holmes Told Me He Was ‘Programmed’ To Kill by “Evil” Therapist








Infowars.com
November 28, 2012

An alleged inmate of ‘Batman’ massacre culprit James Holmes claims the shooter told him that he was “programmed” to carry out the massacre by an “evil” therapist.
The shocking story has gone virtually unnoticed after appearing in a blog post on the Denver Westword website last week.
After failing to interest the Arapahoe County District Attorney’s Office in his account of what happened, 38-year-old Steven Unruh has now gone public. Unruh was booked into the Arapahoe County Sheriff’s Office Detention Facility just hours before the ‘Batman’ massacre unfolded and says that he was still in the booking area when Holmes was brought in.
Unruh then claims that he was able to communicate with Holmes from a nearby cell and that Holmes appeared to show remorse for what had happened.
The most explosive element of what Unruh claims Holmes told him could – if true – shed an entirely different light on the circumstances behind the Aurora theater shooting.
“He says that Holmes told him “he felt like he was in a video game” during the shooting, that “he wasn’t on his meds” and “nobody would help him.” He says Holmes also mentioned NLP — presumably, neuro-linguistic programming, a much-scorned and outmoded approach to psychotherapy — and claimed to have been “programmed” to kill by an evil therapist.”
“When he got out to his car, he wasn’t programmed no more,” Unruh says. “It sounded kind of crazy. He was trying to run it by me, basically.”
Unruh was also given a phone number that Holmes asked him to call which connected to a bereavement counselor who says she has no acquaintance with Holmes or Unruh.

“They’re going to try to discredit my story,” Unruh told writer Alan Prendergast. “But I was able to have a four-hour talk with him. I talked him out of suicide.”

Prendergast notes that although jail authorities doubt Unruh would have had an opportunity to speak to Holmes, “certain elements of the story” ring true, including, “a description that resembles the headbanging routine that sent Holmes to the hospital last week.”

Stories about infamous killers being brainwashed into carrying out murders are almost commonplace. The most well known is probably Sirhan Sirhan, Robert F. Kennedy’s alleged assassin.
As the London Independent reported in 2005, evidence strongly indicates that Sirhan was a Manchurian candidate, a victim of mind control who was set up to be the fall guy for the murder. Sirhan was described by eyewitnesses as being in a trance-like state as he pulled the trigger.
“There was no way Sirhan Sirhan killed Kennedy,” said (Sirhan’s lawyer Larry) Teeter….He was the fall guy. His job was to get busted while the trigger man walked out. He wasn’t consciously involved in any plot. He was a patsy. He was unconscious and unaware of what was happening – he was the true Manchurian Candidate.”

The CIA’s use of mind control to create killers is a matter of historical record. MK-ULTRA was the code name for a covert, illegal CIA human research program, run by the Office of Scientific Intelligence that came to light in 1975 through investigations by the Church Committee, and by a presidential commission known as the Rockefeller Commission. 14-year CIA veteran Victor Marchetti insists that the program is ongoing and has not been abandoned.

According to his lawyers, Sirhan Sirhan “was an involuntary participant in the crimes being committed because he was subjected to sophisticated hypno programming and memory implantation techniques which rendered him unable to consciously control his thoughts and actions at the time the crimes were being committed,” and served only as a diversion for the real assassin.
The parallels between Sirhan Sirhan and James Holmes are alarming. Both were described as behaving as if in a trance or under the influence of drugs, both cannot remember any of the details of the shootings, and in both cases eyewitnesses reported more than one gunman at the scene.
In both the RFK and ‘Batman’ shootings, eyewitnesses described other shooters, dismantling the “lone wolf” narrative. According to Nina Rhodes-Hughes, another man was shooting at RFK and the authorities tried to alter her account of what happened. “What has to come out is that there was another shooter to my right,” Rhodes-Hughes said in an interview with CNN. “The truth has got to be told. No more cover-ups.” Sirhan’s lawyers also presented evidence that “two guns were fired in the assassination and that Sirhan’s revolver was not the gun that shot Kennedy.”

Similarly in the case of Holmes, eyewitnesses described two shooters, noting that one of the gas canisters was thrown from the opposite side of the theater to where the killer was standing. It has also been suggested that Holmes had an accomplice. Eyewitnesses described the killer talking on a cellphone before the shooting and then standing in the emergency exit and beckoning someone else over.

Holmes, a neuroscience student, was also fascinated with mind control. During his time at Salk Institute of Biological Studies, Holmes designed a computer program to alter mental states using flicker rates. Arizona shooter Jared Lee Loughner was also obsessed with mind control.
While there is no way to confirm Unruh’s account, he seems to have little motive in making it up out of fresh air. Added to the other unexplained inconsistencies surrounding the ‘Batman’ massacre, the story will only serve to bolster the view amongst some that the full story about the tragic events of that night has not yet come to light.
StumbleUpon

Sunday, July 22, 2012

JFKcountercoup: Shenanigans at the Dallas State Fairgrounds

JFKcountercoup: Shenanigans at the Dallas State Fairgrounds



JFK Assassination Shenanigans at the Dallas Texas State Fairgrounds
By William Kelly
The first time I ever heard about the State Fairgrounds in Dallas was during Larry Meyers’ Warren Commission testimony when he told about coming to Dallas a few weeks before the assassination, possibly for the grand opening of the Dallas Cabana, where he also stayed over the weekend of the assassination.
Meyers described how he was a salesman from Chicago who had met Jack Ruby sometime previous, and since Ruby was from Chicago too, they developed an affinity, so whenever he came to Dallas he would stop and visit Ruby at the Carousel Club.
This particular time, a few weeks before the assassination, Ruby took him over to the Dallas State Fairgrounds to meet some friends who had a failing carousel act – a tent where they showed a film called “How Hollywood Made Movies.”
Meyers said he wrote out a $500 check for Ruby to cash and share with his friends who ran the enterprise. Two of those involved, Joyce McDonald and Larry Crafard, went to work for Ruby in the following weeks, McDonald at the Carousel Club and Crafard as a handyman who became Ruby’s right-hand man, living at the Carousel Club, doing some of the duties Ruby usually did, and then helping to manage Ruby’s other club, which never gets as much attention as the Carousel. Unlike the Carousel, Ruby’s other club didn’t have the dancers, but featured music instead, usually a rock and roll band.
Crafard also bore a remarkable physical resemblance to Lee Harvey Oswald, so much so that more than once, it was later alleged that Ruby and Oswald were seen together, when it later turned out that it was actually Ruby and Crafard who were together.

Crafard may have also intentionally impersonated Oswald in one of the many instances where the accused assassin was blatantly and intentionally impersonated by others, possibly as part of the effort to frame him.


[Larry Crafard is a living witness]
Then there’s Joyce McDonald. She worked at the Fair and then worked for Ruby. When Larry Meyers returned to Dallas over the assassination weekend, he brought a young lady with him, Jean Aase (aka West), and Jean and Joyce went shopping together.
Just as a people confused Crafard and Oswald, Ruby employed two women named McDonald, and they too are often confused. As Ian Griggs notes in his book “No Case to Answer” ( JFK Lancer, 2005, p. 224) that, “Betty McDonald (Nancy Jane Mooney) This former Ruby stripper, who often appears to be confused with others of a similar name, provided an alias for Darrell Wayne Gardner when he was accused of shooting Warren Reynolds, a witness close to the murder of Officer J.D. Tippit. This occurred on 5th February 1964. Just eight days later, she was arrested in Dallas and charged with a minor public order offence. She was locked up in the City Jail and later found dead in her cell, apparently having committed suicide by hanging herself with her toreador pants. Her name inevitably appears on the list of suspicious deaths…”

According to Griggs (p. 227), then there’s “Joy Dale (Joyce Lee Witherspoon McDonald, now Joyce Gordon), who is probably the women recruited by Ruby from the State Fair and who met Larry Meyers. Griggs describes her as “One of the ‘Five exotics’ who were due to perform on 22 November 1963, she had worked for Ruby since August 1963. She is the girl on the left in a series of five photographs taken in Ruby’s office (Armstrong Exhibit Nos. 5301-A to E). She was interviewed extensively in the video Jack Ruby on Trial.”

[This may not be the Armstrong Exhibit but Joyce McDonald Gordon is a living witness]
That Ruby would recruit two employees from the Dallas State Fair was all quite coincidental, and I took it that way until a researcher sent me some Deep Background on early organized gambling in Dallas that indicated such gambling was centered around the Fairground until the Chicago mob moved in, a move that apparently included Jack Ruby. Then the Dallas organized criminal underworld shifted to Joe Civello, the Campisis and company, who were associated with Carlos Marcello in New Orleans.
StumbleUpon

Monday, January 23, 2012

JFK - forget the swine media. 10 facts.

As the fiftieth anniversary of the JFK murder conspiracy nears, it's worth remembering facts that the mainstream control media will never state. Many of the ignorant lumpen journalists are too stupid to even process such information, but here it is:

1. even the corrupt US government's official position from senate investigations is that JFK was murdered by a conspiracy.

2. acoustic, ballistic and computer analysis evidence all establish multiple shots by two or more shooters.

3. regardless of which actual shooter shot from where, there is a clear pattern of opportunities around the killing ground where JFK was shot, and there are witnesses to shooters leaving the area.

4. there are witnesses to out of place oswalds (OOPOs) indicating that the common intel practice of using doubles had been employed for Oswald. This indicates he is a patsy not an assassin.

5. there are many more witnesses to Oswald NOT being in place as an assassin. There are no witnesses placing him at the window where it is claimed he shot.

6. evidence was tampered with immediately after the murder. This also indicates conspiracy.

7. JFK was shot from the front, with a strike to his throat by either a small calibre bullet, a flechette, or a dart.

8. JFK was shot from behind and from in front with virtually simultaneous shots to the head.

9. there is photographic evidence of a shooter at the grassy knoll. This evidence is corroborative with eyewitness testimony from multiple directions.

10. Oswald was a FBI informant, a paid CIA asset and a trained linguist who was part of James Jesus Angleton's disastrous Returned Defector programme.

StumbleUpon

Thursday, December 8, 2011

Mohammed Atta | John Doe II

Mohammed Atta | John Doe II

Atta: doubles ahoy! StumbleUpon

Wednesday, December 7, 2011

The Two Ziad Jarrahs

The Two Ziad Jarrahs

The Two Ziad Jarrahs

By Paul Thompson
View the printer friendly view

DISCLAIMER: The analytical articles published on this website were written and published by “project managers” of certain investigative projects hosted by the History Commons website. Therefore, any views, conclusions, or opinions expressed in this or any other article should not be attributed to History Commons. For questions concerning an article, please contact the author(s) directly.
Ziad Samir Jarrah [CNN, 9/18/01]
Ziad Jarrah is one of the best known of the 19 9/11 hijackers. What most people don’t know, however, is that there were actually two Ziad Jarrahs: the one raised in Lebanon and whose picture has been widely circulated by the FBI, and the one who actually flew on Flight 93. The evidence of two is undeniable, and amazingly, we even have pictures of the second Jarrah.
The Other Ziad Jarrah
Jarrah was studying in this Beirut school at the same time the FBI has him living in New York City. [CBC, 10/10/01]
In 1995, a person named Ziad Jarrah rented an apartment in a three-family house on East Third Street in Brooklyn, New York. [Among the Heroes by Jere Longman, 2002, p. 90] Landlords there identified his photograph as being the same as that of the 9/11 hijacker. A Brooklyn apartment lease from March 1995 until February 1996 bears Ziad Jarrah’s name. [Boston Globe, 9/25/01] “Another man named Ihassan Jarrah lived with Ziad, drove a livery cab and paid the eight-hundred-dollar monthly rent. The men were quiet, well-mannered, said hello and good-bye. Ziad Jarrah carried a camera and told his landlords that he was a photographer. He would disappear for a few days on occasion, then reappear. Sometimes a woman who appeared to be a prostitute arrived with one of the men. ‘Me and my brother used to crack jokes that they were terrorists,’ said Jason Matos, a construction worker who lived in a basement there, and whose mother owned the house.” [Among the Heroes, by Jere Longman, 2002, p. 90]
The only problem with the above is that the real Ziad Jarrah, twenty years old at the time, was actually still in his home country of Lebanon. He was studying in a Catholic school in Beirut, and was in frequent contact with the rest of his family. His parents drove him home to be with the family nearly every weekend, and they were in frequent contact by telephone as well. [Los Angeles Times, 10/23/01] Not until April 1996 did he leave Lebanon for the first time, to study in Germany. [Boston Globe, 9/25/01] His family believes that the New York lease proves that there were two Jarrahs. [CNN, 9/18/01]
Jarrah’s New York City lease. Did the other Jarrah spell his name with an ‘i’ at the end? Curious how this photo cuts off before the end of his name. [News of the World, 9/16/01]
But this is not the only incontrovertible proof of this second, almost identical looking Ziad Jarrah.
On January 30, 2001, another man whose name was also Ziad Jarrah, was questioned for several hours at the Dubai International Airport, in the United Arab Emirates. This was done at the request of the CIA, for “suspected involvement in terrorist activities.” The CIA notified local officials that he would be arriving from Pakistan on his way back to Europe, and they wanted to know where he had been in Afghanistan and how long he had been there. [CNN, 8/1/02] During the questioning, the man “divulged that he had spent the previous ‘two months and five days’ in Pakistan and Afghanistan—- the only known acknowledgment of an Afghan visit by any of the hijackers—- and that he was returning to Florida…” [Chicago Tribune, 12/13/01] It was later reported that “investigators have confirmed that Jarrah had spent at least three weeks in January 2001 at an al-Qaeda training camp in Afghanistan.” [CNN, 8/1/02] US officials were informed of the results of the interrogation before Jarrah left the airport. “UAE and European intelligence sources told CNN that the questioning of Jarrah fits a pattern of a CIA operation begun in 1999 to track suspected al-Qaeda operatives who were traveling through the United Arab Emirates.” He was then permitted to leave, eventually going to the US.This story was confirmed by numerous UAE, US and European officials. No one has denied that he passed through Dubai on this date, but the CIA has not admitted to ever having ordered his questioning. [CNN, 8/1/02]
The only problem with this story is that the real Jarrah was somewhere else at the time. The Florida Flight Training Center, the flight school where Jarrah had been studying for the previous six months, said he was in school there until January 15. His family claimed he arrived in Lebanon to visit on January 26, five days before he supposedly passed through Dubai. His father had just undergone open-heart surgery, and Jarrah visited him every day in the hospital, for over a week. Pointing out this incident, his uncle Jamal Jarrah asked, “How could he be in two places at one time?” Furthermore, the family claims the longest Jarrah has ever gone without phoning them is ten days, back in 1997. [Among the Heroes, by Jere Longman, 2002, p. 101-102] How could he have maintained such contact in Afghanistan, the second poorest country on Earth, with virtually no communication network?
The original FBI photo of Ziad Jarrah.
These two examples are just the most glaring clues of many that someone was posing as Ziad Jarrah for years. The story of Jarrah in New York in 1995 is truly amazing, because that would have happened presumably before the 9/11 plot was even conceived, and before Mohamed Atta or most of the other 9/11 terrorists even joined al-Qaeda. Additionally, it was before Jarrah had moved to Germany so he couldn’t possibly have had come into contact with any al-Qaeda operatives yet. Yet, not only is there another Ziad Jarrah, but two looked similar enough for people in Brooklyn to confuse the two.
Incredibly, at least one photo exists that shows how similar the two Ziad Jarrahs looked. The FBI says they recovered a semi-burnt passport photo of Jarrah in the wreckage of Flight 93, in the Pennsylvania countryside. But is it really Jarrah? Compare the shape of their heads. The head of the Lebanon-born Jarrah has a much squarer top and is more elongated, while that of the other Jarrah is a bit more rounded. Still, it’s easy to see how they could be confused for each other.
The passport photo of “Ziad Jarrah” found in the wreckage of Flight 93.
How can two Jarrahs be explained, and what does it mean?
A Pattern of Deception and Stolen Identities
Jarrah may not be the only 9/11 hijacker to have a secret doppelganger, and certainly there are problems with the identities of other hijackers. The evidence is often very clear that the identities of innocents were stolen by the hijackers. To mention some of the more obvious cases:
- Ahmed Alnami is still alive and working as an administrative supervisor with Saudi Arabian Airlines, in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. [Los Angeles Times, 9/21/01] He had never lost his passport and found it “very worrying” that his identity appeared to have been stolen. [Telegraph, 9/23/01] —Saeed Alghamdi is alive and learning how to fly airplanes in Tunisia. [Los Angeles Times, 9/21/01, BBC, 9/23/01] The Telegraph notes, “The FBI had published his personal details but with a photograph of somebody else, presumably a hijacker who had ‘stolen’ his identity. CNN, however, showed a picture of the real Mr. Alghamdi.” [Telegraph, 9/23/01] —Salem Alhazmi is alive and working at a petrochemical plant in Yanbou, Saudi Arabia. [Los Angeles Times, 9/21/01, Telegraph, 9/23/01] He says his passport was stolen by a pickpocket in Cairo three years ago. [Guardian, 9/21/01] —Waleed Alshehri is alive and a pilot with Saudi Airlines, studying in Morocco. [Los Angeles Times, 9/21/01, AP, 9/22/01] He acknowledges that he attended flight training school at Dayton Beach in the United States. [BBC, 9/23/01] He also says FBI photos of the terrorist are of him. [Daily Trust, 9/24/01] —Abdulaziz Alomari is alive and working as a pilot for Saudi Arabian Airlines. [New York Times, 9/16/01, Independent, 9/17/01, BBC, 9/23/01] He claims that his passport was stolen when he was living in Denver in 1995. [Los Angeles Times, 9/21/01] “They gave my name and my date of birth, but I am not a suicide bomber. I am here. I am alive.” [Telegraph, 9/23/01]
Three different pictures of Khalid Almihdhar. Which one does not belong?
- The BBC says, “There are suggestions that another suspect, Khalid Almihdhar, may also be alive.” [BBC, 9/23/01] The Guardian says he is believed to be alive, but investigators are looking into three possibilities. Either his name was stolen for a hijacker alias, or he allowed his name to be used so that US officials would think he died, or he died in the crash. [Guardian, 9/21/01] Almihdhar is wanted for other terrorist acts, so it is not surprising that he is still hard to reach. Three pictures of Almihdhar have been released, two of one person and one of another (see photos on the right). [FBI, 2/12/02, Boston Globe, 9/27/01] —No one claims that Hamza Alghamdi is still alive, but his family says the FBI photo “has no resemblance to him at all.” [Washington Post, 9/25/01] —There are three official pictures of Majed Moqed—one of them doesn’t look at all like the other two (see the photos on the left, below). [FBI, 2/12/02, Boston Globe, 9/27/01] —There are two official pictures of Ahmed Alhaznawi—they’re of different people (see the two pictures near the bottom of this article).
How can all of these pictures be of Majed Moqed?
On September 27, 2001, after all of these stories came out in the media, FBI Director Robert Mueller still could only state, “We are fairly certain of a number of them.” [Sun Sentinel, 9/28/01] But since then the list of hijackers has not changed. On November 2, 2001, Mueller stated, “We at this point definitely know the 19 hijackers who were responsible,” and claimed that they were sticking with the names and photos released in late September. [AP, 11/03/02] Yet in a number of cases, such as Ahmed Alnami and Waleed Alshehri, all the released pictures are clearly wrong!
It is clear that many—and perhaps all—of the hijackers were using stolen identities. This is not so surprising. “The primer that Osama bin Laden’s organization gave to would-be terrorists included rules for an undercover member: Don’t reveal your true name.” [Miami Herald, 9/22/01] Yet over and over we hear of the 9/11 hijackers using their real names for everything, even buying their plane tickets in their supposed real names. “In the end, they left a curiously obvious trail—- from martial arts manuals, maps, a Koran, Internet and credit card fingerprints. Maybe they were sloppy, maybe they didn’t care, maybe it was a gesture of contempt of a culture they considered weak and corrupt.” [Miami Herald, 9/22/01] Why not consider that maybe it was done on purpose? The surprising thing is not that they used stolen identities: the surprise is that the FBI continues to believe in the false trail of evidence and the false identities.
The Demonization of Jarrah
Because the FBI refuses to admit the possibility that Jarrah’s identity may have been wrong, the real, Lebanese-born Jarrah has already been convicted in the court of public opinion. Everything the mainstream media writes about him assumes that he is guilty and tries to retroactively explain how he did what he did. He needs to be turned into a monster, because presumably only a monster could commit such a horrible act. Take for instance this description by New York Times reporter Jere Longman:
Another Lee Harvey Oswald? [CBC, 10/10/01]
“If there was any retrospect giveaway in Jarrah’s face, it was in his halted smile, neither a smirk nor a grin of graciousness or delight, but a resolve on unforeseen circumstance. It resembled the pasty-murderer look that Lee Harvey Oswald had in his pursed lips of history altered.” [Among the Heroes, by Jere Longman, 2002, p. 84]
Anyone can look at the picture of Jarrah here on the left, and see that his smile resembles Lee Harvey Oswald’s no more than anyone else’s. But anything that makes him look like an evil terrorist is accepted easily, and anything that conflicts with that image is only grudgingly accepted, if reported at all. Chances are many facts regarding Jarrah are as twisted as the description of his smile, but even through this biased filter reporters have found very little evidence to prove that Jarrah was a terrorist.
Said the Boston Globe: “Of all the dozens of mysteries still swirling around this month’s devastating terrorist attacks, the life of alleged hijacker Jarrah has emerged as one of the more perplexing. From Lebanon to Germany to the United States, there are few clues as to why he would have joined a terrorist organization, much less commandeered an airplane in a suicidal mission that claimed dozens of innocent lives as well as his own.” [Boston Globe, 9/25/01]
A report in the Los Angeles Times contended, “Little, if anything, is known about the personal lives of most of the suspects. Of the 19, only alleged organizer Mohamed Atta and Jarrah left behind a long trail of acquaintances. But family and friends say the Ziad Jarrah they knew exhibited none of the smoldering political resentments or cultural conservatism of Atta. Instead, they recall Jarrah as quiet, pampered, a little lazy and madly in love. How, they ask, do you convert a happy, intelligent young man with little religious or political conviction into a suicidal foot soldier in a holy war? With no answers, they are left to speculate that he was brainwashed or coerced.” [Los Angeles Times, 10/23/01]
Convicted by the FBI
One way to explain the Jarrah puzzle is to simply make false claims and invent evidence against him. Authorities originally publicly claimed that Jarrah attended the same school in Hamburg as Mohamed Atta, Marwan Alshehhi and other known terrorists. Only after Jarrah’s family provided documentation showing that Jarrah had attended a different technical school, a claim confirmed by the school itself, did the authorities back down from their assertion. [CNN, 9/18/01] On October 23, 2001, Ashcroft claimed that Jarrah lived in the same apartment as Mohamed Atta and Marwan Alshehhi. [CNN, 10/25/01] On the same day, the Los Angeles Times showed that to be a lie: “Federal authorities in Germany have withdrawn assertions that Jarrah at one time lived at or frequented the Hamburg apartment rented by the three. ‘He never lived with the others. He had three different apartments during his time in Hamburg, but none in common with any of the other suspects,’ a senior German official told The Times. ‘The only information we have connecting the three Hamburg suspects is the FBI’s assertion that there is a connection… We have come across absolutely no evidence of our own.’” [Los Angeles Times, 10/23/01] Nonetheless, such claims continue to be made, despite a lack of evidence. For instance, in May 2002, the New York Times claimed that Jarrah was a frequent visitor to the apartment where Atta, Alshehhi and others lived, without providing any evidence to back it up. [New York Times, 5/1/02]
Another technique is to move the behavior of other hijackers onto Jarrah. For instance, compare this statement of Charles Lisa, a Florida landlord of Jarrah’s, reported on September 15, 2001: “When they left I asked them for a forwarding address,” Lisa said. “But Ahmed [Alhaznawi] just smiled at me and said ‘I’ll send you a postcard.’” [Miami Herald, 9/15/01] By September 23, Jarrah now said it: “I said, ‘Ziad, you might have some money coming back at you. Where can I get a hold of you?’” Mr. Lisa recalled. “He said, ‘I’ll send you a postcard.’” [New York Times, 9/23/01]
In October 2001, New Yorker reporter Seymour Hersh provided a rare, inside look at the 9/11 investigation: “Many of the investigators believe that some of the initial clues that were uncovered about the terrorists’ identities and preparations, such as flight manuals, were meant to be found. A former high-level intelligence official told me, ‘Whatever trail was left was left deliberately—for the FBI to chase.’” [New Yorker, 10/1/01] Nearly a year later, it appears those investigators who questioned the hijackers’ cover identities have lost out, and the FBI has fallen hook, line and sinker for their cover stories. Some evidence tying Jarrah to the other terrorists may in fact have been falsified, as will be described below. Why the FBI would so strongly support the false identities of the 9/11 hijackers and let the real hijackers go free is a separate and much greater mystery that goes beyond the scope of this essay.
Upbringing in Lebanon
A school portrait of a young Jarrah, from about the time he was supposed to be hanging out with prostitutes in New York City.
To fully understand the mystery of Ziad Jarrah and the tragedy of his stolen past, we need to look at the life of the real Ziad in closer detail.
Ziad Jarrah was born on May 11, 1975 into a wealthy family in the town of Almarj, in the Bekaa Valley of Lebanon. He was the only son of father Samir, a local government official, and mother Nasisa, a schoolteacher. He wanted for little. “He loved sports, particularly swimming and basketball. He adored—and was doted on by—his two sisters, Dania, now 29, and Nisren, 24.” [Boston Globe, 9/25/01] As a young man he rarely attended mosque on Fridays and was indifferent to politics. [CBC, 10/10/01] His whole family is Muslim but not particularly devout. In fact, believing education more important than religion, they sent their son to a series of exclusive, Christian schools. As Ziad matured, he appeared neither political nor religious. He drank alcohol and had girlfriends. “No one in the family has this kind of radical belief,” said Jamal Jarrah. [Boston Globe, 9/25/01] At the time, Lebanon was engaged in a decades-long civil war. But “his family insists he was shielded from the hardships and showed no interest in politics. Jarrah attended Christian schools, graduating from a French high school, where he became fluent in French and English.” [Los Angeles Times, 10/23/01] He took disabled kids camping and volunteered in an anti-drug program. [Among the Heroes, by Jere Longman, 2002, p. 85] A British journalist reported, “Everyone I spoke to in Almarj told me that Ziad was a happy, secular youth, that he never showed any interest in religion and never visited the mosque for prayers, that he liked women even if he was at times reserved and shy.” [Independent, 9/16/01]
The Move to Germany
Jarrah and his cousin Salim. [CBC, 10/10/01]
“He was not a good student. He hid his poor grades from his parents as much as possible, and when he couldn’t hide them any longer and he confessed, Ziad’s father arranged to have him tutored in math, physics and chemistry. Even then, Ziad flunked his high school finals. Two years later he was able to graduate from a public high school. In his teens he dreamed of becoming a pilot, but that seemed out of the question; his family decided that he should go overseas to get a solid education.” [Inside 9-11: What Really Happened, by Der Spiegel editors, 2002, p. 246-7]
Ziad Jarrah moved to Greifswald, in the former East Germany, in April 1996. He went there with his cousin Salim, and they lived together for a year and a half. The Los Angeles Times called the two “more like twins than cousins” and they remained in close contact for the rest of Ziad’s life. [Los Angeles Times, 10/23/01]
He needed to study German in Greifswald before he could start upon a career. “He was just a lovely, kind young man,” recounted Gudrun Schimpfky of Greifswald’s Arndt University, Jarrah’s German teacher in a program that brought them together six to eight hours a day, five days a week. [Los Angeles Times, 10/23/01]
Girlfriend Aisel Senguen
Jarrah’s girlfriend Aisel Senguen. [CBC, 10/10/01]
While in Greifswald, he met fellow student Aisel Senguen. Soon they were dating—the beginning of a five year relationship that ended only with Jarrah’s death. Senguen is from a Turkish family, and is described as very Western in her ways. [CBC, 10/10/01] They lived together when they were in the same town. “I used to criticize him for living with her. By our religion, this living together before marriage is not allowed,” recalled Abdullah Al-Makhadi, a classmate of Senguen’s at Greifswald. [Los Angeles Times, 10/23/01] Needless to say, it is not common for Muslim suicidal terrorists to live with their girlfriends out of wedlock.
Looking back, people try to find any clue that might indicate that Jarrah had turned into a Muslim fanatic. One such clue frequently cited is that Senguen would later complain he grew more conservative and possessive. He wanted her to wear a head scarf, stop going to parties, and the like. [Among the Heroes, by Jere Longman, 2002, p. 89] But close friend Mahmoud Ali, who last spoke to Jarrah in July 2001, dismissed notions that this meant he had become a religious radical. “We Arab men are very jealous about our women, that’s all,” said Ali. “We try to tell them what to do, and they just ignore us.” [Los Angeles Times, 10/23/01]
Ali says that, in addition to calling his family frequently, Jarrah was in touch with Senguen nearly everyday. Like Senguen, he refuses to believe that Jarrah was a terrorist. “There is nothing in his character that would allow him to do this—- not from his past, not from his family, not from his country,” Ali said. [Los Angeles Times, 10/23/01]
Training to Be an Engineer
Rosemarie Canel’s painting of Jarrah. [CBC, 10/10/01]
In 1997 Jarrah registered at the University of Applied Sciences in Hamburg to study aeronautical engineering, and aircraft construction and design. [CBC, 10/10/01] Apparently his parents didn’t want him to be a pilot, so he chose a related profession. He moved in with Rosemarie Canel, an elderly German lady who remembered him as a quiet and courteous tenant who had few visitors and spent his nights studying or watching TV. On weekends he would leave to stay with Senguen, first in Greifswald and later in Bochum, where she moved in 1999 to study medicine. [Los Angeles Times, 10/23/01] His landlady said of him, “He was such a bright young man, totally European.” [Inside 9-11: What Really Happened, by Der Spiegel editors, 2002, p. 191] She liked him so much, she painted a portrait of him, which he took home as a gift to his mother. [CBC, 10/10/01] Later, when she moved to another part of Hamburg, he moved with her to the new location.
Who Did He Know?
Jere Longman alleged, “It was in Germany that his views seemed to harden into a kernel of hatred that would germinate in terrorism and suicidal martyrdom.” [Among the Heroes, by Jere Longman, 2002, p. 87] But what is the evidence for this statement? 9/11 hijackers Mohamed Atta and Marwan Alshehhi were living in Hamburg at the same time, as were many other Muslim immigrants later accused of al-Qaeda connections. The key question is, did Jarrah meet them, and become converted to their cause somehow?
Zakariya Essabar, now believed to be an al-Qaeda terrorist with ties to Atta’s cell, studied at the same university as Jarrah, and the two worked at the same car dealership in Hamburg as a school internship in the summer of 1998. [Washington Post, 10/23/01] The best evidence of that are claims of a photo that shows Jarrah at the 1999 wedding of a Said Bahaji. Bahaji was a fugitive known to espouse fanatic views, and who once roomed with hijackers Atta and Alshehhi. [Los Angeles Times, 10/23/01] There supposedly is a photo where Ramzi Binalshibh, Zakariya Essabar, Bahaji, Marwan Alshehhi and Jarrah can be seen together. [Washington Post, 10/23/01] Supposedly, he shows up in a video from the wedding as well. [New York Times, 10/25/01] But we don’t even know which Jarrah this is, or how well Jarrah knew these people. Neither the video nor the photograph has been made public. Finally, Jarrah’s landlady Canel also claims that sometimes Jarrah would spend the night with friends in Harburg, the part of Hamburg where Atta and Alshehhi lived. [Among the Heroes, by Jere Longman, 2002, p. 89]
Certainly, it’s likely that at some point he would have run into some al-Qaeda terrorists. There are about 80,000 Muslims in Hamburg, the vast majority of them Turkish. Only about five to six percent—4,000 to 4,800—are Arabic. Around 2,500 of the 80,000 are considered dangerous radicals, and only 270 of the radicals are considered Arabic or Iranian. [Boston Globe, 9/25/01, New York Times, 9/17/01] Terrorists like Essabar were studying at the same university. So it would have been surprising if the Arabic speaking Jarrah didn’t come into contact with at least one of them.
Jarrah, the Terrorist?
But did he become one of them? German authorities believe Atta recruited him in 1999. [St. Petersburg Times, 9/27/01] Did Jarrah show any signs by then of becoming radical? Where is the “kernel of hatred” ?
Melih Demir, a fellow student at the university, was stunned at the accusation that Jarrah was a terrorist. “He was very happy all the time, making jokes. We could make jokes about him and… I can’t believe that he did something like this.” [Sunday Herald, 9/23/01] Classmate Michael Gotzmann, who was in a study group with Jarrah, also had a hard time believing he was one of the hijackers. “He never said anything bad about America,” he told Der Spiegel magazine. “To the contrary, he loved America, and said he always planned to go and study there.” [Boston Globe, 9/25/01]
Gotzmann described Jarrah as devoutly Muslim but not rabid about his politics, a man who prayed five times a day but was open in his views and wanted to continue his studies in the United States. However, others don’t see him as even that religious. Jarrah rarely attended Friday prayers and never prayed five times daily, said classmate Abdullah Al-Makhadi. “He was a weak Muslim, I must say.” [Los Angeles Times, 10/23/01] Even a housemate and friend in Florida later said he never saw Jarrah pray. [Los Angeles Times, 10/23/01]
“Jarrah spoke of a debilitated Lebanon and how the Israelis had cut off the water supply to his native country.” [Among the Heroes, by Jere Longman, 2002, p. 87] These are hardly radical positions, and in fact it would be pretty strange for any Lebanese person not to have some views on Lebanon’s civil war and Israel’s invasion of that country in the 1980s.
Jere Longman in his book conceded that other acquaintances in Germany agreed that Jarrah lacked radical political or religious views. Notwithstanding, he wrote, “This was consistent… with the al-Qaeda training manual, which instructed its members to avoid provocative religious or political remarks.” [Among the Heroes, by Jere Longman, 2002, p. 87] So, in other words, if he had radical views that means he was a terrorist, and if he didn’t have radical views, that also means he was a terrorist!
“He is not known to ever have attended the Steindamm mosque that is the alleged meeting place of the other suspects and their purported associates from Osama bin Laden’s al-Qaeda network.” His girlfriend Senguen said she never heard him mention the name Atta or anyone else from the FBI’s list of suspects. [Los Angeles Times, 10/23/01] His family contended that Jarrah and Senguen spoke nearly every day, and shared everything. Surely she would have noticed a phase between a political Jarrah and extremist Jarrah just cleverly pretending to be apolitical?
Jarrah Drops Out
Jarrah was apparently having trouble with his schooling—at best he was considered a mediocre student. [St. Petersburg Times, 9/27/01] Salim Jarrah said he believed his cousin had decided to go to flight school because he simply did not want to invest the time required to earn a German doctorate in aviation engineering, which could take up to a decade. [Los Angeles Times, 10/23/01] His landlady believed that by the summer of 1999 he was spending most of his time in the German city of Bochum with his girlfriend Senguen. In September 1999, he dropped out of school after attending only one class. [CBC, 10/10/01] Other reports contended it was in the middle of the semester. In any case, he told his friends that he was going to learn to fly in America—his dream since childhood. [Inside 9-11: What Really Happened, by Der Spiegel editors, 2002, p. 258]
What happened next is a matter of dispute. CNN reported, “Jarrah’s family said he had spent some time in Afghanistan 18 months ago.” [CNN, 9/18/01] Jere Longman said, “Some family members suspect he was in Pakistan or Afghanistan; others vehemently disagree and won’t even admit he was ever out of touch.” [Inside 9-11: What Really Happened, by Der Spiegel editors, 2002, p. 192] Note how his family must be wrong; they can’t “admit” the “truth” that Jarrah went to Afghanistan.
The official story goes further, asserting that Jarrah had disappeared for up to five weeks (recall the family says they’ve never been out of touch more than 10 days). It alleges that the family was notified by Jarrah’s girlfriend that she had heard he had gone to Afghanistan. The family then contacted friends in Peshawar on the Pakistani-Afghan border, the official story argues, and implored them to help get him to leave. But his father and other family members completely denied this story. [Independent, 9/16/01] They countered that the story was made up out of whole cloth. Said his uncle, “The rumor [that he went to Afghanistan] as I understand, sticks to Ziad, just to complete the story.” [Australian Broadcasting Corp., 9/18/01] Attorney General John Ashcroft has claimed that all nineteen of the September 11 hijackers had trained in camps in Afghanistan [Ashcroft News Conference, 12/11/01]—so obviously there needs to be a story of Jarrah in Afghanistan.
Where’s the Other Jarrah?
By this time another Jarrah could have been shadowing him. Perhaps he ran into some Muslim radicals in Hamburg and one of them noticed a striking similarity between both his name and face and that of the terrorist/ photographer Jarrah who lived in New York City back in 1995. Add the fact that he wanted to become a pilot. It would have been too good of an opportunity to pass up. Perhaps the names were close but not the same—the family can’t understand why his name sometimes appears as Jarrahi, when he never spelled his name that way (his name on the flight manifest shows up as Jarrahi, which investigators say may be a typo [Boston Globe, 9/25/01]). It could be that this other Jarrah and/or others, were manipulating the real Jarrah to make sure his actions followed a certain pattern. The fake Jarrah probably was learning to copy the real Jarrah’s behavior, skills and appearance.
In 1999, the presumably fake Ziad Jarrah got a pilot’s license in Hamburg—the same license the real Jarrah would get in Florida later. [St. Petersburg Times, 9/27/01] It’s hard to see how the real Jarrah could have gotten this license without his girlfriend or family knowing, why he wouldn’t have told them, and where he would have found the time. Later, when he began flight training on single engine aircraft in Florida, he certainly didn’t have the skills to indicate he already had a license for flying a single engine aircraft. [Boston Globe, 9/25/01] FFTC owner Arne Kruithof explained: “We had to do more to get him ready than others… His flight skills seemed to be a little bit out there.” Even after 200 hours of flying, Kruithof could only charitably say, “He was a guy who needed some more.” [Among the Heroes, by Jere Longman, 2002, p. 91] Other students at FFTC were so frightened of Jarrah’s flying skills that they refused to be in a plane if he was at the controls. [Among the Heroes by Jere Longman, 2002, p. 92]
This US student visa was issued to Jarrah on May 21, 2000. But is it the real Jarrah, or the fake? Compare the round head with the passport photo and other pictures of Jarrah above. [CBC, 10/10/01]
Some time around February 2000, he lost his passport while waiting for a visa to go to the US. This was only two or three months after Atta and Alshehhi lost their passports. [Inside 9-11: What Really Happened, by Der Spiegel editors, 2002, p. 257-258] Investigators say all three were trying to cleanse their travel documents of visas that might arouse suspicion. [Los Angeles Times, 10/23/01] Could it be that someone stole his passport, as part of a trail of evidence designed to link him to the 9/11 attacks? Could the fake Jarrah have even used the real Jarrah’s missing passport to enter the US?
Jarrah’s Move to Florida
The real Jarrah arrived in Atlanta on June 27, 2000. He was enrolled at the Florida Flight Training Center from June 2000 to January 15, 2001 [Among the Heroes, by Jere Longman, 2002, p. 90-91] The fact that he studied in southern Florida, the same place where many other terrorist pilots studied, is not actually that surprising. Most foreign students who study flying in the US do so in southern Florida, where the cost of living is cheap and the weather and terrain are ideal to learn how to fly. Flight schools are so numerous in Florida that the state calls itself the “aviation state.” [Los Angeles Times, 9/27/01] Many of these schools have 80% or more foreign students, and a number of them are advertised frequently in Hamburg. Samir Jarrah explained, “He had told me last year that he had a choice of courses – in France or in America – and it was me who told him to go to the States.” [Independent, 9/16/01] Unfortunate choice for Ziad!
We know it was the real Jarrah studying in Florida because of what others say about him. Those who met Jarrah at the flight school also say they can’t see him as a terrorist. [Los Angeles Times, 10/23/01] “Our entire staff does not believe that he had bad intentions,” FFTC President Arne Kruithof told the Los Angeles Times. “Let’s put it this way: Everybody interviewed here on this guy was in shock, because he was a friend to all of us. I don’t think there’s anyone in the time that he was here that could say anything negative about him; on the contrary, he would help everybody,” added Kruithof, who insisted that Jarrah’s demeanor was “not faked.” [Los Angeles Times, 10/23/01] “Not just nice, but he had qualities you look for in a dear friend, someone you trust,” Kruithof said. Jarrah always looked him in the eye and offered a firm handshake and a friendly smile. [Among the Heroes by Jere Longman, 2002, p. 92]
Kruithof said Jarrah would have a beer or two, “but not three,” and he made “seemingly benign” jokes about how fat and lazy Americans were (again, notice the desperation to find any evidence making him appear evil). He certainly could have been a more devout Muslim and turned down even one beer without drawing suspicion. Osama bin Laden would not let his men smoke cigarettes, and drinking alcohol would have led to banishment from the ranks of his al-Qaeda movement. [Independent, 9/16/01]
Jarrah roomed with three other men, including a twenty-three-year-old German flight student, Thorsten Biermann. [Among the Heroes, by Jere Longman, 2002, p. 91] Biermann found him to be “just a normal person, like anyone else.” [Los Angeles Times, 10/23/01] Jarrah would sometimes talk to Biermann about Lebanon, speaking in German with almost no accent. [Among the Heroes, by Jere Longman, 2002, p. 92]
The other Ziad Jarrah must have also moved to Florida, and continued to shadow him. It has been claimed that while living with Biermann and others in Venice, Jarrah kept another apartment in Venice but didn’t sleep in it. [Among the Heroes by Jere Longman, 2002, p. 92] This makes no sense at all unless the other Jarrah was living in the other apartment, leaving a double paper trail to puzzle investigators. Eyewitness accounts of him also vary. “Later, people would not even agree on how tall he was, or how heavy he was, whether he stood five foot eight or five foot eleven, whether he weighed one hundred seventy pounds or one hundred ninety.” [Among the Heroes, by Jere Longman, 2002, p. 84]
Jarrah dancing with his family in Lebanon, January 2001.
Back to Lebanon
In mid-January 2001, Jarrah left the flight school, saying he was returning to Germany. [Among the Heroes, by Jere Longman, 2002, p. 93] (Note that he’s already supposed to have been in Afghanistan since late November!) He returned to Lebanon for what would be his last time with his father, who underwent open-heart surgery. [CBC, 10/10/01]
More of Jarrah dancing in 2001. Does this look like a man determined to kill himself? [BBC, 9/24/01]
“He looked after his dad and went to the hospital every day,” recounted uncle Jamal. “He was so normal. His personality and his life bore no relation to the kind of things that happened.” To prove the point, they released a video of Jarrah dancing at a wedding party; two stills are shown here (for the entire video, look at this website). Friends and relatives who saw him at this wedding strongly agree that “the ordinary person they knew—- reliable, responsible, witty, ambitious—- could never, never have been part of the diabolical terrorist attacks.” [Sunday Herald, 9/23/01]
Again, it’s hard to see a Muslim radical. Compare him to Atta, who wouldn’t even listen to any form of music except prayer chants, much less dance.
He then visited his girlfriend in Bochum, Germany in March. [Los Angeles Times, 10/23/01]
Return to Florida
When he came back to Florida in April, he moved from Venice, on the west coast, to Hollywood, on the east, near Fort Lauderdale. He stayed in a Hollywood apartment until June 22. [Among the Heroes, by Jere Longman, 2002, p. 93] This is the same town Atta and Alshehhi lived in at the time, but no evidence ties Jarrah to either of them in Florida. [Los Angeles Times, 10/23/01] Could they have been shadowing him, using others to befriend him and influence him?
It appears that his girlfriend may have visited him in Florida when he returned. [Los Angeles Times, 10/23/01] That would hardly seem to be smart if he was hiding a great secret in Florida.
Martial Arts Training
Shortly after coming back to Florida, he began taking self-defense classes one mile from where he lived. It’s not clear if this was the real Jarrah, or someone imitating him. One strange fact is that he told his trainer that he was from Saudi Arabia. [Among the Heroes, by Jere Longman, 2002, p. 94] There’s no conceivable reason why he would do this—both before and after this, he told his landlords and other people that he met he was from Lebanon. Could this have been a truthful slip by the other Jarrah?
On the other hand, whoever it was, the person certainly acted like the real Jarrah. Bert Rodriguez, Jarrah’s personal trainer from May to August, told the Associated Press that Jarrah was “the nicest guy in the world. Very humble, very soft-spoken.” [AP, 9/21/01] “I liked the guy. He was very humble, very quiet … and he didn’t want to be in a situation where he would get picked on.” [CBC, 10/10/01] The sessions ran for an hour, one on one between teacher and pupil. “He did his best but he was very timid,” Rodriguez said. “You could have never told that he was in any way, shape or form a radical of any kind.” [AP, 9/21/01] “You need a certain fire in you to commit certain acts. My sense of him was that he was more of a follower.” [Sunday Herald, 9/23/01] That sounds like the real Jarrah, or at least a very good imitation. Did he have friends at the time who talked him into doing this seemingly harmless activity which only looks sinister in retrospect? If so, why would he have said he was from Saudi Arabia?
At different gyms, some other hijackers were also weight lifting and training, especially in early September. But were they actually training, thinking they would need the skills to survive in a matter of days, or were they just making a cover story? Three of them—Waleed Alshehri, Wail Alshehri and Satam al-Suqami—“simply clustered around a small circuit of machines, never asking for help and, according to a trainer, never pushing any weights. ‘You know, I don’t actually remember them ever doing anything,’ said the trainer, Joe Farnoly. ‘They would just stand around and watch people.’” [New York Times, 9/23/01]
Rodriguez also said that he noticed that Jarrah was practicing moves he was learning on others, so he offered to give Jarrah a lesson to him and his friends at a special rate. Jarrah declined, saying, “The guys are traveling.” [Among the Heroes, by Jere Longman, 2002, p. 97] Who would these guys be, if this was the real Jarrah? Are they the same as the hijackers who refused to push weights? It’s very unclear who Jarrah’s friends were at this time.
Ahmed Alhaznawi is either the man on the right or the man on the left. Both pictures have been released by the FBI. His appears to be another case of stolen identity.
Enter Ahmed Alhaznawi
On June 22, Jarrah moved to an apartment in Lauderdale-by-the-Sea where his roommate was Ahmed Alhaznawi, another of the suspected 9/11 hijackers. [CBC, 10/10/01] “Alhaznawi was twenty and was from Saudi Arabia, the son of a mosque prayer leader. He reportedly trained in bin Laden’s camps in Afghanistan and recruited two distant cousins, Ahmed and Hamza Alghamdi.” [Among the Heroes, by Jere Longman, 2002, p. 98]
Jarrah had never previously been associated with Alhaznawi. [Los Angeles Times, 10/23/01] Yet suddenly, “they seemed so inseparable that their landlord initially wondered whether they were lovers.” [Among the Heroes, by Jere Longman, 2002, p. 98] Alhaznawi drove Jarrah’s car, and took him to appointments. [St. Petersburg Times, 9/27/01]
Was this the real Jarrah, or the impostor? From what his landlord Charles Lisa says, he still sounds like the same Jarrah. For instance, “He was too happy a man for a guy who knew he was going to die in the next ten days or so.” [Among the Heroes, by Jere Longman, 2002, p. 97]
In June he traveled to Las Vegas. His uncle in Lebanon describes the trip as a gambling junket, but it also provides another possible vague connection with other hijackers. Atta, Alshehhi and three other suspects also made trips to Las Vegas between May and August. However, they don’t appear to have been in Las Vegas at the same time as Jarrah. [Los Angeles Times, 10/23/01]
Jarrah Keeps Close Ties
In mid-July, Jarrah saw his Turkish girlfriend Senguen for what would be the last time. He returned to Florida in less than a week. Then Senguen went to Lebanon to attend Jarrah’s sister’s wedding and meet her future in-laws. [Los Angeles Times, 10/23/01]
The Independent noted that Jarrah did not attend, and accusingly questioned, “Too busy to bring his fiancée to meet his family? Busy doing what?” [Independent, 9/16/01] Busy with his studies, it turns out. Records show that Jarrah took his test for his pilot’s license for a single engine aircraft on July 30 (which he passed), while the wedding was on August 2. [Los Angeles Times, 10/23/01]
The Time Grows Close
On August 17, Jarrah took a flight to test his proficiency at an airport in Fort Lauderdale. Five days later, investigators said Jarrah purchased diagrams of the cockpit instruments on a Boeing 757. He also came to possess flight manuals for Boeing 757 and 767 aircraft. [Among the Heroes, by Jere Longman, 2002, p. 97-98] These are just a few of the examples of planted evidence, which date back to his time in Germany. The last time Jarrah’s landlord in Lauderdale-by-the-Sea saw him was at the very end of August. [Among the Heroes, by Jere Longman, 2002, p. 99-100]
On August 27, Jarrah spent three nights in a hotel in a suburb outside Washington. The same day he left, hijacker Nawaf Alhazmi checked into the same hotel. [Miami Herald, 9/22/01] Two other hijackers stayed at a hotel about a mile away between August 23 and 30.
On September 5, Ziad Jarrah and his apparent friend Ahmed Alhaznawi booked one-way tickets on a September 7 flight to Newark. [CBC, 10/10/01] Note that while he may have flown to Newark, no evidence has been released that he actually bought a ticket for the hijacked plane. His name (spelled Jarrahi) appears to have been on the flight manifest [Boston Globe, 9/25/01], but presumably that would be the other Jarrah, carrying the passport that had the picture showing the differently shaped head.
On September 9, 2001, Jarrah apparently stayed at the same hotel as hijacker Marwan Alshehhi, also near Washington. [St. Petersburg Times, 9/27/01]
On September 9, he made his final phone call to his family. He confirmed receipt of the money sent on the 4th. The family reported he was cheerful and normal. [CBC, 10/10/01]
One of the Jarrahs pulled over for a speeding ticket. Unfortunately, there is no video of what the driver looked like. [CNN, 1/9/02]
Two Red Mitsubishis
Something else very curious happened on September 9. A state trooper stopped Jarrah’s car in Maryland near the Delaware border after observing him driving 90 mph in a 65 mph zone a few minutes after midnight. The car was a red Mitsubishi. Jarrah had bought a red Mitsubishi in 2000 in Florida. [St. Petersburg Times, 9/27/01] However, that was a 1991 Eclipse, and this Mitsubishi was a 2001 Galant. [Among the Heroes, by Jere Longman, 2002, p. 101] The vehicle stopped in Maryland was a rental car with New Jersey tags, rented near the Newark Airport. [CNN, 1/9/02] The driver was carrying a valid Virginia driver’s license, which listed a Springfield, Virginia address. [Delaware News Journal, 1/9/02]
Did Jarrah just like red Mitsubishis so much that he wanted to rent the same kind of car he already had? Or was someone trying to imitate Jarrah but was unable to hide the fact that the car was a rental? Why a ticket at such a strange hour, and so close to September 11? Could it be that his double was trying to make sure records would show Jarrah was near Washington? Or was it the real Jarrah who had somehow been hoodwinked into coming north by his supposed friend Alhaznawi? If he went to Newark with Alhaznawi, why does he appear to have been alone when the car was stopped?
Future Plans
Perhaps Alhaznawi or someone else was manipulating Jarrah. It’s striking that even at this late date no witnesses actually saw Jarrah with any of the hijackers, only in close proximity in time or location (with the exception of his rooming with Alhaznawi, if that was the real Jarrah who roomed with him and if the landlord can be believed). But whatever the case, it certainly appears that he didn’t think he was going to die or be a wanted man anytime soon.
On his September 9 phone call to his family, he confirmed that he and his girlfriend would be in Beirut on September 22 for another family wedding—- this time Salim’s younger sister. [Los Angeles Times, 10/23/01] He said he had completed his studies, and would try to get a good job in Lebanon. [Al-Watan, 10/1/01] “It makes no sense,” says his uncle, who recalled, “he said he had even bought a new suit for the occasion.” [Boston Globe, 9/25/01] One might say Jarrah was simply lying, except that his landlord in Florida noticed that in June, Jarrah actually did drop off a new suit to be tailored. [Among the Heroes, by Jere Longman, 2002, p. 97]
Jarrah also confirmed to his family that he had received seven hundred dollars sent to him on top of his usual two-thousand-dollar monthly allowance. He had asked for the money for “fun.” [Among the Heroes, by Jere Longman, 2002, p. 102] People have pointed to this transfer of money as proof that he needed last-minute money for the terrorist attacks. But this makes no sense, because the terrorists had plenty of available money from other sources. A number of them even wired a total of $15,000 back to the United Arab Emirates around September 9, because they had more than they could spend. His family sees this transfer as evidence that he was planning a vacation before making his next career move.
Jarrah’s present, still waiting for him with German license and sticker. [CBC, 10/10/01]
The family had bought Jarrah a new Model 300 Mercedes-Benz on September 9. On the phone they joked that one of his sisters would take the car if he didn’t come home soon enough. [Among the Heroes, by Jere Longman, 2002, p. 102] They also talked about his own wedding with Aisel planned for the following summer. [Sunday Herald, 9/23/01] The tragic ironies keep piling up. He had talked in recent months for the first time about not only getting married, but having a child. [Inside 9-11: What Really Happened, by Der Spiegel editors, 2002, p. 191] His father had also recently bought land for a mansion he planned to build for his son and daughter-in-law. [Inside 9-11: What Really Happened, by Der Spiegel editors, 2002, p. 249]
If Jarrah was planning on making himself a martyr, it’s understandable that he might not be able to say that to his dearly loved family and girlfriend. But to lead them on with plans of marriage and children, saying he would be visiting within two weeks, letting them buy property and a car for him—it seems inexplicably sadistic and completely unnecessary. Clearly he had no idea he was about to die. These facts also raise the question of how al-Qaeda could have trusted such a man for such a vital mission, when the pull of wife, child, friends, and parents could have caused him to change his mind at any time.
He continued to call Senguen nearly every day, as he always did. [Inside 9-11: What Really Happened, by Der Spiegel editors, 2002, p. 191] Mahmoud Ali, the family friend, said Senguen called him on September 11 and told him that she had just spoken to Jarrah—- about an hour before he boarded United Flight 93 (stories that he called from the cockpit of Flight 93 are clearly exaggerations). She described the conversation as pleasant and normal, although it is unclear whether she knew he was flying that day. [Los Angeles Times, 10/23/01] According to a CBC interview with his uncle, his family didn’t have the faintest suspicion that Jarrah was being tied to the 9/11 attacks until they were told several days after September 11 (listen to the 22-minute interview here).
And then on September 11, he vanished. His girlfriend Senguen alerted the police a few days later, calling to report him missing. German federal police said they found a suitcase of “airplane-related documents” in her home (note how that is made to sound vaguely ominous, but of course someone training to be a pilot would have some “airplane-related documents” !). A few days after September 11, Senguen checked into a witness protection program and dropped out of sight, leaving many questions about Jarrah unanswered. She later called Jarrah’s family and the FBI, and insisted that Jarrah was not acquainted with any of the other alleged hijackers, which presumably included Alhaznawi. [Boston Globe, 9/25/01]
The Work Permit
However, the story of Jarrah doesn’t end there. A number of curious items have appeared since his death. In the Flight 93 wreckage, as explained previously, a half-burned copy of his passport was found. [CNN, 8/1/02] This is not that remarkable, since a lot of documents have been recovered from the wreckage. But what is remarkable is another document that was also found in the wreckage: an old German work permit of Jarrah’s distant cousin, Assem Omar Jarrah. Why on earth would Jarrah have been carrying this document with him at all—what possible use could it have except as scratch paper? Yet because of this document, German weekly Der Spiegel claimed that investigators had discovered the records of the former East German Stassi secret service, showing that Assem served with the Libyan secret service and collaborated with Palestinian terrorist mastermind Abu Nidal in the 1980s. If this is true, and Ziad Jarrah really was a terrorist, then it would be even more inexplicable that he would be carrying documents exposing the illicit past of his distant cousin. [An-Nadar, 11/8/01]
A possible explanation for this rather odd event is that the real terrorists were shadowing Jarrah and looked very closely into his life during the years they monitored him. They somehow discovered that he had a distant cousin who was connected to espionage or terrorism or at least that the Stassi had made some claims to that effect. Assem Omar Jarrah did say he gave this work permit to Ziad, but did not say when. [An-Nadar, 11/8/01] At some point, someone must have then stolen it from Ziad. And finally, on or after September 11, someone must have planted it at the Flight 93 wreckage site, to make sure that investigators would discover this link. The odds otherwise—that Jarrah had this useless document with him, that it was one of the few possessions of his surviving the crash; and that his distant cousin would turn out to have terrorist ties—must be astronomical.
The Lost Letter
In another surprise discovery, in early November a four-page letter written by Jarrah on September 10 to his girlfriend Aisel was found by US authorities. Presumably, it had been sent to the wrong address, and thus eventually returned to the US. [CNN, 1/9/02] Why Jarrah would suddenly forget the address of where his girlfriend had lived since early 1999 is not explained. Only a few quotes from this letter have been made public. He says, “I have done what I had to do,” and “You should be very proud because this is an honor and in the end will bring happiness to everyone.” This has been taken as proof that he knew he was going to be a martyr. [Los Angeles Times, 11/18/01]
But setting aside the possibility that the whole letter is a forgery, there is the possibility that these two sentences could have been taken out of context. He had just gotten his pilot’s license—could he be talking about that? His father says, “Ziad wanted to become a pilot since he was five years old. He didn’t care whether he would be a civilian or a military pilot. He was crazy about airplanes. The only books he ever borrowed from the library were about airplanes. I stopped him from being a pilot. I only have one son and I was afraid that he would crash.” [Wall Street Journal, 9/18/01] It appears that Jarrah may have tricked his parents into thinking he was still studying to be an aeronautical engineer and would be continuing his classes in Hamburg after taking some aeronautical courses in the US. [Independent, 9/16/01, Wall Street Journal, 9/18/01] So this letter may have been a coming out of sorts—the sentences could easily refer to him revealing that he was following his dream to be a pilot over his father’s wishes, something that in the end would make his family proud.
In any case, if it is a suicide letter, it’s a strange one, because he also “talks of plans for a future meeting, as Jarrah tells her to ‘hold on to what you have until we see each other again.’” Even stranger, the package also contained papers about Jarrah’s flight training and scuba-diving instruction. [Los Angeles Times, 11/18/01] Scuba-diving lessons? More typical behavior of a terrorist and a martyr? The scuba diving could easily explain his “unexplained trips” to the nearby Bahamas, since there is good scuba diving there but none in the greater Miami area where he lived. [Among the Heroes, by Jere Longman, 2002, p. 91-92]
Jarrah’s father Samir. [BBC, 9/24/01] “My boy was just a normal person. He would never do this. There may have been another Ziad Jarrah on the plane.” [Independent, 9/16/01]
The Cockpit Voice Recorder
Though it hasn’t been made public, the cockpit voice recorder for Flight 93 did survive. A few snippets were released; you can listen to them on this website. Jarrah is said to have spoken English with a German accent. [Sunday Herald, 9/23/01] He is also said to have been the pilot whose voice can be heard in these recordings. Given his accent, it should be easy to determine if the voice was his or not. His uncle Jamal explained, “‘Ziad was not a hijacker… To this day they have no proof Ziad was the pilot.’ What about the cockpit voice recorder? ‘That’s not Ziad’s voice.’ What about the good-bye letter to Aisel, the kick-boxing lessons in Florida, the message on Atta’s cell phone? What about all the documents about death in martyrdom? ‘Fabricated. False. Inventions.’ But why? ‘The Americans shot down the plane, so they’ve got to make it look hijacked.’” [Inside 9-11: What Really Happened, by Der Spiegel editors, 2002, p. 247-8]
The Remains of Jarrah
Terrorist or dupe, was the real Jarrah actually on Flight 93? DNA remains would be able to answer that question. In December 2001, US officials announced that everyone on Flight 93 had been positively identified through their DNA, except for the four hijackers. Their remains are grouped by common DNA. Because they don’t have any DNA to check them by, “The death certificates will list each as ‘John Doe.’” [Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, 12/20/01] The other accused hijackers were all from Saudi Arabia, and virtually no information and certainly no DNA has yet come out for them. But Jarrah’s family has said, “We are ready to cooperate with the authorities.” [Independent, 9/16/01] They would like to know if their son was a terrorist and murderer. In mid-August 2002, a new report on the victims’ remains noted the DNA still had not been checked, because “little attention has been paid to the terrorists’ remains.” [AP, 8/16/02]
As one reporter put it, Ziad Jarrah is “no neat fit into any conspiracy puzzle, with no clear motivation or any obvious ties to an identifiable organization.” [Australian Broadcasting Corp., 9/18/01] Clearly the terrorists were brilliant in stealing identities and keeping their true identities hidden. Probably each case was slightly different, and with Jarrah they had the incredible luck of a look-alike with a similar name. The FBI investigators made their work easy. For instance, according to an FBI document given to German police, the FBI initially put Jarrah and the three other accused hijackers on the hijacker list simply because theirs were the only Arabic sounding names on the flight manifest. [Los Angeles Times, 10/23/01] But still, the terrorists made mistakes. Numerous clues pointing to a doppelganger for Jarrah, including solid evidence that he was in two places at once on more than one occasion, has been ignored or brushed aside by the media and the FBI investigation. Until we get smart enough to see through the cover stories and stolen identities, we will never know who the real hijackers were, and never really understand what happened on September 11.
StumbleUpon
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...