Nake nula wauŋ welo! Flying Tiger Comics - comics, graphic novels and books for the new Aeon
Friday, May 31, 2013
Thursday, May 30, 2013
Police mount operation to protect Anjem Choudary. None for Tommy Robinson | Gates of Vienna
Police mount operation to protect Anjem Choudary. None for Tommy Robinson | Gates of Vienna
Published: 8 hrs ago
Choudary’s wife and children were driven away under police escort to a secret address, while officers were left to guard the house.
There was no sign of Choudary himself, and a neighbour said he had been seen slipping out early yesterday morning.
Links … Choudary with killer Michael Adebolajo in 2007
BBC
ExclusiveBy GARY O’SHEA and MIKE SULLIVANPublished: 8 hrs ago
POLICE yesterday rushed to the home of hate preacher Anjem Choudary — to protect him and his family.
Officers helped them flee their home and go into hiding amid fears they could be attacked by a mob seeking vengeance for the murder of soldier Lee Rigby.Choudary’s wife and children were driven away under police escort to a secret address, while officers were left to guard the house.
There was no sign of Choudary himself, and a neighbour said he had been seen slipping out early yesterday morning.
Wednesday, May 29, 2013
Frontiers of Zoology: Sample Comparisons for Latin-American Cryptids
Frontiers of Zoology: Sample Comparisons for Latin-American Cryptids
Best Wishes, Dale D.
 |
| Cryptid Bat Photo, 2003 in Brazil; estimated as Eagle-sized |
Best Wishes, Dale D.
Prime Minister Julia Gillard hit by another sandwich during Lyneham High School visit | Herald Sun
Prime Minister Julia Gillard hit by another sandwich during Lyneham High School visit | Herald Sun
PRIME Minister Julia Gillard has had a sandwich thrown at her during a school visit for the second time this month.
Ms Gillard was walking in a crowded foyer at Lyneham High School - where she was announcing the ACT had signed up to her Gonski reforms - when the salami sandwich was thrown.
It was lobbed from behind, over the top of her head, and landed at her feet.
***
the truest poll of all.
This SCOAMF can't go soon enough and if she doesn't watch her step people are going to be throwing more than sandwiches at her. Now that even dipshits can recognise her malignant evil the cowardly rentseekers of the socialist movement should replace her and go to the election.
PRIME Minister Julia Gillard has had a sandwich thrown at her during a school visit for the second time this month.
Ms Gillard was walking in a crowded foyer at Lyneham High School - where she was announcing the ACT had signed up to her Gonski reforms - when the salami sandwich was thrown.
It was lobbed from behind, over the top of her head, and landed at her feet.
***
the truest poll of all.
This SCOAMF can't go soon enough and if she doesn't watch her step people are going to be throwing more than sandwiches at her. Now that even dipshits can recognise her malignant evil the cowardly rentseekers of the socialist movement should replace her and go to the election.
Election 2013: Season of the Witch
Tuesday, May 28, 2013
Monday, May 27, 2013
Hacking: Chinese spies steal ASIO blueprints | Information, Gadgets, Mobile Phones News & Reviews | News.com.au
Hacking: Chinese spies steal ASIO blueprints | Information, Gadgets, Mobile Phones News & Reviews | News.com.au
SECRET and highly sensitive blueprints outlining the layout of Australia's top spy agency's new headquarters have been stolen by Chinese hackers, the ABC says.
The documents contained details of the ASIO building's floor plans, communication cabling layouts, server locations and security systems, potentially putting the entire organisation at risk, Monday night's Four Corners program alleges.
It is unclear precisely when the alleged theft took place, or if there have been diplomatic ramifications from the embarrassing breach.
But it comes amid deepening concern about widespread, aggressive state-sponsored hacking by China, with further allegations that its cyber spies have recently obtained sensitive Australian military secrets and foreign affairs documents.
SECRET and highly sensitive blueprints outlining the layout of Australia's top spy agency's new headquarters have been stolen by Chinese hackers, the ABC says.
The documents contained details of the ASIO building's floor plans, communication cabling layouts, server locations and security systems, potentially putting the entire organisation at risk, Monday night's Four Corners program alleges.
It is unclear precisely when the alleged theft took place, or if there have been diplomatic ramifications from the embarrassing breach.
But it comes amid deepening concern about widespread, aggressive state-sponsored hacking by China, with further allegations that its cyber spies have recently obtained sensitive Australian military secrets and foreign affairs documents.
An MCG of boat people every four years | Herald Sun Andrew Bolt Blog
An MCG of boat people every four years | Herald Sun Andrew Bolt Blog
No third world immigration without compulsory sterilisation.
And plenty of bacon sandwiches and feminism lectures.
No third world immigration without compulsory sterilisation.
And plenty of bacon sandwiches and feminism lectures.
Enoch Powell's 'Rivers of Blood' speech - Telegraph
Enoch Powell's 'Rivers of Blood' speech - Telegraph
This is the full text of Enoch Powell's so-called 'Rivers of Blood' speech, which was delivered to a Conservative Association meeting in Birmingham on April 20 1968.
The supreme function of statesmanship is to provide against preventable evils. In seeking to do so, it encounters obstacles which are deeply rooted in human nature.
One is that by the very order of things such evils are not demonstrable until they have occurred: at each stage in their onset there is room for doubt and for dispute whether they be real or imaginary. By the same token, they attract little attention in comparison with current troubles, which are both indisputable and pressing: whence the besetting temptation of all politics to concern itself with the immediate present at the expense of the future.
Above all, people are disposed to mistake predicting troubles for causing troubles and even for desiring troubles: "If only," they love to think, "if only people wouldn't talk about it, it probably wouldn't happen."
Perhaps this habit goes back to the primitive belief that the word and the thing, the name and the object, are identical.
At all events, the discussion of future grave but, with effort now, avoidable evils is the most unpopular and at the same time the most necessary occupation for the politician. Those who knowingly shirk it deserve, and not infrequently receive, the curses of those who come after.
A week or two ago I fell into conversation with a constituent, a middle-aged, quite ordinary working man employed in one of our nationalised industries.
After a sentence or two about the weather, he suddenly said: "If I had the money to go, I wouldn't stay in this country." I made some deprecatory reply to the effect that even this government wouldn't last for ever; but he took no notice, and continued: "I have three children, all of them been through grammar school and two of them married now, with family. I shan't be satisfied till I have seen them all settled overseas. In this country in 15 or 20 years' time the black man will have the whip hand over the white man."
I can already hear the chorus of execration. How dare I say such a horrible thing? How dare I stir up trouble and inflame feelings by repeating such a conversation?
The answer is that I do not have the right not to do so. Here is a decent, ordinary fellow Englishman, who in broad daylight in my own town says to me, his Member of Parliament, that his country will not be worth living in for his children.
I simply do not have the right to shrug my shoulders and think about something else. What he is saying, thousands and hundreds of thousands are saying and thinking - not throughout Great Britain, perhaps, but in the areas that are already undergoing the total transformation to which there is no parallel in a thousand years of English history.
In 15 or 20 years, on present trends, there will be in this country three and a half million Commonwealth immigrants and their descendants. That is not my figure. That is the official figure given to parliament by the spokesman of the Registrar General's Office.
There is no comparable official figure for the year 2000, but it must be in the region of five to seven million, approximately one-tenth of the whole population, and approaching that of Greater London. Of course, it will not be evenly distributed from Margate to Aberystwyth and from Penzance to Aberdeen. Whole areas, towns and parts of towns across England will be occupied by sections of the immigrant and immigrant-descended population.
As time goes on, the proportion of this total who are immigrant descendants, those born in England, who arrived here by exactly the same route as the rest of us, will rapidly increase. Already by 1985 the native-born would constitute the majority. It is this fact which creates the extreme urgency of action now, of just that kind of action which is hardest for politicians to take, action where the difficulties lie in the present but the evils to be prevented or minimised lie several parliaments ahead.
The natural and rational first question with a nation confronted by such a prospect is to ask: "How can its dimensions be reduced?" Granted it be not wholly preventable, can it be limited, bearing in mind that numbers are of the essence: the significance and consequences of an alien element introduced into a country or population are profoundly different according to whether that element is 1 per cent or 10 per cent.
The answers to the simple and rational question are equally simple and rational: by stopping, or virtually stopping, further inflow, and by promoting the maximum outflow. Both answers are part of the official policy of the Conservative Party.
It almost passes belief that at this moment 20 or 30 additional immigrant children are arriving from overseas in Wolverhampton alone every week - and that means 15 or 20 additional families a decade or two hence. Those whom the gods wish to destroy, they first make mad. We must be mad, literally mad, as a nation to be permitting the annual inflow of some 50,000 dependants, who are for the most part the material of the future growth of the immigrant-descended population. It is like watching a nation busily engaged in heaping up its own funeral pyre. So insane are we that we actually permit unmarried persons to immigrate for the purpose of founding a family with spouses and fiancés whom they have never seen.
Let no one suppose that the flow of dependants will automatically tail off. On the contrary, even at the present admission rate of only 5,000 a year by voucher, there is sufficient for a further 25,000 dependants per annum ad infinitum, without taking into account the huge reservoir of existing relations in this country - and I am making no allowance at all for fraudulent entry.
In these circumstances nothing will suffice but that the total inflow for settlement should be reduced at once to negligible proportions, and that the necessary legislative and administrative measures be taken without delay.
I stress the words "for settlement." This has nothing to do with the entry of Commonwealth citizens, any more than of aliens, into this country, for the purposes of study or of improving their qualifications, like (for instance) the Commonwealth doctors who, to the advantage of their own countries, have enabled our hospital service to be expanded faster than would otherwise have been possible. They are not, and never have been, immigrants.
I turn to re-emigration. If all immigration ended tomorrow, the rate of growth of the immigrant and immigrant-descended population would be substantially reduced, but the prospective size of this element in the population would still leave the basic character of the national danger unaffected. This can only be tackled while a considerable proportion of the total still comprises persons who entered this country during the last ten years or so.
Hence the urgency of implementing now the second element of the Conservative Party's policy: the encouragement of re-emigration.
Nobody can make an estimate of the numbers which, with generous assistance, would choose either to return to their countries of origin or to go to other countries anxious to receive the manpower and the skills they represent.
Nobody knows, because no such policy has yet been attempted. I can only say that, even at present, immigrants in my own constituency from time to time come to me, asking if I can find them assistance to return home. If such a policy were adopted and pursued with the determination which the gravity of the alternative justifies, the resultant outflow could appreciably alter the prospects.
The third element of the Conservative Party's policy is that all who are in this country as citizens should be equal before the law and that there shall be no discrimination or difference made between them by public authority. As Mr Heath has put it we will have no "first-class citizens" and "second-class citizens." This does not mean that the immigrant and his descendent should be elevated into a privileged or special class or that the citizen should be denied his right to discriminate in the management of his own affairs between one fellow-citizen and another or that he should be subjected to imposition as to his reasons and motive for behaving in one lawful manner rather than another.
There could be no grosser misconception of the realities than is entertained by those who vociferously demand legislation as they call it "against discrimination", whether they be leader-writers of the same kidney and sometimes on the same newspapers which year after year in the 1930s tried to blind this country to the rising peril which confronted it, or archbishops who live in palaces, faring delicately with the bedclothes pulled right up over their heads. They have got it exactly and diametrically wrong.
The discrimination and the deprivation, the sense of alarm and of resentment, lies not with the immigrant population but with those among whom they have come and are still coming.
This is why to enact legislation of the kind before parliament at this moment is to risk throwing a match on to gunpowder. The kindest thing that can be said about those who propose and support it is that they know not what they do.
Nothing is more misleading than comparison between the Commonwealth immigrant in Britain and the American Negro. The Negro population of the United States, which was already in existence before the United States became a nation, started literally as slaves and were later given the franchise and other rights of citizenship, to the exercise of which they have only gradually and still incompletely come. The Commonwealth immigrant came to Britain as a full citizen, to a country which knew no discrimination between one citizen and another, and he entered instantly into the possession of the rights of every citizen, from the vote to free treatment under the National Health Service.
Whatever drawbacks attended the immigrants arose not from the law or from public policy or from administration, but from those personal circumstances and accidents which cause, and always will cause, the fortunes and experience of one man to be different from another's.
But while, to the immigrant, entry to this country was admission to privileges and opportunities eagerly sought, the impact upon the existing population was very different. For reasons which they could not comprehend, and in pursuance of a decision by default, on which they were never consulted, they found themselves made strangers in their own country.
They found their wives unable to obtain hospital beds in childbirth, their children unable to obtain school places, their homes and neighbourhoods changed beyond recognition, their plans and prospects for the future defeated; at work they found that employers hesitated to apply to the immigrant worker the standards of discipline and competence required of the native-born worker; they began to hear, as time went by, more and more voices which told them that they were now the unwanted. They now learn that a one-way privilege is to be established by act of parliament; a law which cannot, and is not intended to, operate to protect them or redress their grievances is to be enacted to give the stranger, the disgruntled and the agent-provocateur the power to pillory them for their private actions.
In the hundreds upon hundreds of letters I received when I last spoke on this subject two or three months ago, there was one striking feature which was largely new and which I find ominous. All Members of Parliament are used to the typical anonymous correspondent; but what surprised and alarmed me was the high proportion of ordinary, decent, sensible people, writing a rational and often well-educated letter, who believed that they had to omit their address because it was dangerous to have committed themselves to paper to a Member of Parliament agreeing with the views I had expressed, and that they would risk penalties or reprisals if they were known to have done so. The sense of being a persecuted minority which is growing among ordinary English people in the areas of the country which are affected is something that those without direct experience can hardly imagine.
I am going to allow just one of those hundreds of people to speak for me:
“Eight years ago in a respectable street in Wolverhampton a house was sold to a Negro. Now only one white (a woman old-age pensioner) lives there. This is her story. She lost her husband and both her sons in the war. So she turned her seven-roomed house, her only asset, into a boarding house. She worked hard and did well, paid off her mortgage and began to put something by for her old age. Then the immigrants moved in. With growing fear, she saw one house after another taken over. The quiet street became a place of noise and confusion. Regretfully, her white tenants moved out.
“The day after the last one left, she was awakened at 7am by two Negroes who wanted to use her 'phone to contact their employer. When she refused, as she would have refused any stranger at such an hour, she was abused and feared she would have been attacked but for the chain on her door.
Immigrant families have tried to rent rooms in her house, but she always refused. Her little store of money went, and after paying rates, she has less than £2 per week. “She went to apply for a rate reduction and was seen by a young girl, who on hearing she had a seven-roomed house, suggested she should let part of it. When she said the only people she could get were Negroes, the girl said, "Racial prejudice won't get you anywhere in this country." So she went home.
“The telephone is her lifeline. Her family pay the bill, and help her out as best they can. Immigrants have offered to buy her house - at a price which the prospective landlord would be able to recover from his tenants in weeks, or at most a few months. She is becoming afraid to go out. Windows are broken. She finds excreta pushed through her letter box. When she goes to the shops, she is followed by children, charming, wide-grinning piccaninnies. They cannot speak English, but one word they know. "Racialist," they chant. When the new Race Relations Bill is passed, this woman is convinced she will go to prison. And is she so wrong? I begin to wonder.”
The other dangerous delusion from which those who are wilfully or otherwise blind to realities suffer, is summed up in the word "integration." To be integrated into a population means to become for all practical purposes indistinguishable from its other members.
Now, at all times, where there are marked physical differences, especially of colour, integration is difficult though, over a period, not impossible. There are among the Commonwealth immigrants who have come to live here in the last fifteen years or so, many thousands whose wish and purpose is to be integrated and whose every thought and endeavour is bent in that direction.
But to imagine that such a thing enters the heads of a great and growing majority of immigrants and their descendants is a ludicrous misconception, and a dangerous one.
We are on the verge here of a change. Hitherto it has been force of circumstance and of background which has rendered the very idea of integration inaccessible to the greater part of the immigrant population - that they never conceived or intended such a thing, and that their numbers and physical concentration meant the pressures towards integration which normally bear upon any small minority did not operate.
Now we are seeing the growth of positive forces acting against integration, of vested interests in the preservation and sharpening of racial and religious differences, with a view to the exercise of actual domination, first over fellow-immigrants and then over the rest of the population. The cloud no bigger than a man's hand, that can so rapidly overcast the sky, has been visible recently in Wolverhampton and has shown signs of spreading quickly. The words I am about to use, verbatim as they appeared in the local press on 17 February, are not mine, but those of a Labour Member of Parliament who is a minister in the present government:
'The Sikh communities' campaign to maintain customs inappropriate in Britain is much to be regretted. Working in Britain, particularly in the public services, they should be prepared to accept the terms and conditions of their employment. To claim special communal rights (or should one say rites?) leads to a dangerous fragmentation within society. This communalism is a canker; whether practised by one colour or another it is to be strongly condemned.'
All credit to John Stonehouse for having had the insight to perceive that, and the courage to say it.
For these dangerous and divisive elements the legislation proposed in the Race Relations Bill is the very pabulum they need to flourish. Here is the means of showing that the immigrant communities can organise to consolidate their members, to agitate and campaign against their fellow citizens, and to overawe and dominate the rest with the legal weapons which the ignorant and the ill-informed have provided. As I look ahead, I am filled with foreboding; like the Roman, I seem to see "the River Tiber foaming with much blood."
That tragic and intractable phenomenon which we watch with horror on the other side of the Atlantic but which there is interwoven with the history and existence of the States itself, is coming upon us here by our own volition and our own neglect. Indeed, it has all but come. In numerical terms, it will be of American proportions long before the end of the century.
Only resolute and urgent action will avert it even now. Whether there will be the public will to demand and obtain that action, I do not know. All I know is that to see, and not to speak, would be the great betrayal.
A week or two ago I fell into conversation with a constituent, a middle-aged, quite ordinary working man employed in one of our nationalised industries.
After a sentence or two about the weather, he suddenly said: "If I had the money to go, I wouldn't stay in this country." I made some deprecatory reply to the effect that even this government wouldn't last for ever; but he took no notice, and continued: "I have three children, all of them been through grammar school and two of them married now, with family. I shan't be satisfied till I have seen them all settled overseas. In this country in 15 or 20 years' time the black man will have the whip hand over the white man."
I can already hear the chorus of execration. How dare I say such a horrible thing? How dare I stir up trouble and inflame feelings by repeating such a conversation?
The answer is that I do not have the right not to do so. Here is a decent, ordinary fellow Englishman, who in broad daylight in my own town says to me, his Member of Parliament, that his country will not be worth living in for his children.
I simply do not have the right to shrug my shoulders and think about something else. What he is saying, thousands and hundreds of thousands are saying and thinking - not throughout Great Britain, perhaps, but in the areas that are already undergoing the total transformation to which there is no parallel in a thousand years of English history.
In 15 or 20 years, on present trends, there will be in this country three and a half million Commonwealth immigrants and their descendants. That is not my figure. That is the official figure given to parliament by the spokesman of the Registrar General's Office.
There is no comparable official figure for the year 2000, but it must be in the region of five to seven million, approximately one-tenth of the whole population, and approaching that of Greater London. Of course, it will not be evenly distributed from Margate to Aberystwyth and from Penzance to Aberdeen. Whole areas, towns and parts of towns across England will be occupied by sections of the immigrant and immigrant-descended population.
As time goes on, the proportion of this total who are immigrant descendants, those born in England, who arrived here by exactly the same route as the rest of us, will rapidly increase. Already by 1985 the native-born would constitute the majority. It is this fact which creates the extreme urgency of action now, of just that kind of action which is hardest for politicians to take, action where the difficulties lie in the present but the evils to be prevented or minimised lie several parliaments ahead.
The natural and rational first question with a nation confronted by such a prospect is to ask: "How can its dimensions be reduced?" Granted it be not wholly preventable, can it be limited, bearing in mind that numbers are of the essence: the significance and consequences of an alien element introduced into a country or population are profoundly different according to whether that element is 1 per cent or 10 per cent.
The answers to the simple and rational question are equally simple and rational: by stopping, or virtually stopping, further inflow, and by promoting the maximum outflow. Both answers are part of the official policy of the Conservative Party.
It almost passes belief that at this moment 20 or 30 additional immigrant children are arriving from overseas in Wolverhampton alone every week - and that means 15 or 20 additional families a decade or two hence. Those whom the gods wish to destroy, they first make mad. We must be mad, literally mad, as a nation to be permitting the annual inflow of some 50,000 dependants, who are for the most part the material of the future growth of the immigrant-descended population. It is like watching a nation busily engaged in heaping up its own funeral pyre. So insane are we that we actually permit unmarried persons to immigrate for the purpose of founding a family with spouses and fiancés whom they have never seen.
Let no one suppose that the flow of dependants will automatically tail off. On the contrary, even at the present admission rate of only 5,000 a year by voucher, there is sufficient for a further 25,000 dependants per annum ad infinitum, without taking into account the huge reservoir of existing relations in this country - and I am making no allowance at all for fraudulent entry.
In these circumstances nothing will suffice but that the total inflow for settlement should be reduced at once to negligible proportions, and that the necessary legislative and administrative measures be taken without delay.
I stress the words "for settlement." This has nothing to do with the entry of Commonwealth citizens, any more than of aliens, into this country, for the purposes of study or of improving their qualifications, like (for instance) the Commonwealth doctors who, to the advantage of their own countries, have enabled our hospital service to be expanded faster than would otherwise have been possible. They are not, and never have been, immigrants.
I turn to re-emigration. If all immigration ended tomorrow, the rate of growth of the immigrant and immigrant-descended population would be substantially reduced, but the prospective size of this element in the population would still leave the basic character of the national danger unaffected. This can only be tackled while a considerable proportion of the total still comprises persons who entered this country during the last ten years or so.
Hence the urgency of implementing now the second element of the Conservative Party's policy: the encouragement of re-emigration.
Nobody can make an estimate of the numbers which, with generous assistance, would choose either to return to their countries of origin or to go to other countries anxious to receive the manpower and the skills they represent.
Nobody knows, because no such policy has yet been attempted. I can only say that, even at present, immigrants in my own constituency from time to time come to me, asking if I can find them assistance to return home. If such a policy were adopted and pursued with the determination which the gravity of the alternative justifies, the resultant outflow could appreciably alter the prospects.
The third element of the Conservative Party's policy is that all who are in this country as citizens should be equal before the law and that there shall be no discrimination or difference made between them by public authority. As Mr Heath has put it we will have no "first-class citizens" and "second-class citizens." This does not mean that the immigrant and his descendent should be elevated into a privileged or special class or that the citizen should be denied his right to discriminate in the management of his own affairs between one fellow-citizen and another or that he should be subjected to imposition as to his reasons and motive for behaving in one lawful manner rather than another.
There could be no grosser misconception of the realities than is entertained by those who vociferously demand legislation as they call it "against discrimination", whether they be leader-writers of the same kidney and sometimes on the same newspapers which year after year in the 1930s tried to blind this country to the rising peril which confronted it, or archbishops who live in palaces, faring delicately with the bedclothes pulled right up over their heads. They have got it exactly and diametrically wrong.
The discrimination and the deprivation, the sense of alarm and of resentment, lies not with the immigrant population but with those among whom they have come and are still coming.
This is why to enact legislation of the kind before parliament at this moment is to risk throwing a match on to gunpowder. The kindest thing that can be said about those who propose and support it is that they know not what they do.
Nothing is more misleading than comparison between the Commonwealth immigrant in Britain and the American Negro. The Negro population of the United States, which was already in existence before the United States became a nation, started literally as slaves and were later given the franchise and other rights of citizenship, to the exercise of which they have only gradually and still incompletely come. The Commonwealth immigrant came to Britain as a full citizen, to a country which knew no discrimination between one citizen and another, and he entered instantly into the possession of the rights of every citizen, from the vote to free treatment under the National Health Service.
Whatever drawbacks attended the immigrants arose not from the law or from public policy or from administration, but from those personal circumstances and accidents which cause, and always will cause, the fortunes and experience of one man to be different from another's.
But while, to the immigrant, entry to this country was admission to privileges and opportunities eagerly sought, the impact upon the existing population was very different. For reasons which they could not comprehend, and in pursuance of a decision by default, on which they were never consulted, they found themselves made strangers in their own country.
They found their wives unable to obtain hospital beds in childbirth, their children unable to obtain school places, their homes and neighbourhoods changed beyond recognition, their plans and prospects for the future defeated; at work they found that employers hesitated to apply to the immigrant worker the standards of discipline and competence required of the native-born worker; they began to hear, as time went by, more and more voices which told them that they were now the unwanted. They now learn that a one-way privilege is to be established by act of parliament; a law which cannot, and is not intended to, operate to protect them or redress their grievances is to be enacted to give the stranger, the disgruntled and the agent-provocateur the power to pillory them for their private actions.
In the hundreds upon hundreds of letters I received when I last spoke on this subject two or three months ago, there was one striking feature which was largely new and which I find ominous. All Members of Parliament are used to the typical anonymous correspondent; but what surprised and alarmed me was the high proportion of ordinary, decent, sensible people, writing a rational and often well-educated letter, who believed that they had to omit their address because it was dangerous to have committed themselves to paper to a Member of Parliament agreeing with the views I had expressed, and that they would risk penalties or reprisals if they were known to have done so. The sense of being a persecuted minority which is growing among ordinary English people in the areas of the country which are affected is something that those without direct experience can hardly imagine.
I am going to allow just one of those hundreds of people to speak for me:
“Eight years ago in a respectable street in Wolverhampton a house was sold to a Negro. Now only one white (a woman old-age pensioner) lives there. This is her story. She lost her husband and both her sons in the war. So she turned her seven-roomed house, her only asset, into a boarding house. She worked hard and did well, paid off her mortgage and began to put something by for her old age. Then the immigrants moved in. With growing fear, she saw one house after another taken over. The quiet street became a place of noise and confusion. Regretfully, her white tenants moved out.
“The day after the last one left, she was awakened at 7am by two Negroes who wanted to use her 'phone to contact their employer. When she refused, as she would have refused any stranger at such an hour, she was abused and feared she would have been attacked but for the chain on her door.
Immigrant families have tried to rent rooms in her house, but she always refused. Her little store of money went, and after paying rates, she has less than £2 per week. “She went to apply for a rate reduction and was seen by a young girl, who on hearing she had a seven-roomed house, suggested she should let part of it. When she said the only people she could get were Negroes, the girl said, "Racial prejudice won't get you anywhere in this country." So she went home.
“The telephone is her lifeline. Her family pay the bill, and help her out as best they can. Immigrants have offered to buy her house - at a price which the prospective landlord would be able to recover from his tenants in weeks, or at most a few months. She is becoming afraid to go out. Windows are broken. She finds excreta pushed through her letter box. When she goes to the shops, she is followed by children, charming, wide-grinning piccaninnies. They cannot speak English, but one word they know. "Racialist," they chant. When the new Race Relations Bill is passed, this woman is convinced she will go to prison. And is she so wrong? I begin to wonder.”
The other dangerous delusion from which those who are wilfully or otherwise blind to realities suffer, is summed up in the word "integration." To be integrated into a population means to become for all practical purposes indistinguishable from its other members.
Now, at all times, where there are marked physical differences, especially of colour, integration is difficult though, over a period, not impossible. There are among the Commonwealth immigrants who have come to live here in the last fifteen years or so, many thousands whose wish and purpose is to be integrated and whose every thought and endeavour is bent in that direction.
But to imagine that such a thing enters the heads of a great and growing majority of immigrants and their descendants is a ludicrous misconception, and a dangerous one.
We are on the verge here of a change. Hitherto it has been force of circumstance and of background which has rendered the very idea of integration inaccessible to the greater part of the immigrant population - that they never conceived or intended such a thing, and that their numbers and physical concentration meant the pressures towards integration which normally bear upon any small minority did not operate.
Now we are seeing the growth of positive forces acting against integration, of vested interests in the preservation and sharpening of racial and religious differences, with a view to the exercise of actual domination, first over fellow-immigrants and then over the rest of the population. The cloud no bigger than a man's hand, that can so rapidly overcast the sky, has been visible recently in Wolverhampton and has shown signs of spreading quickly. The words I am about to use, verbatim as they appeared in the local press on 17 February, are not mine, but those of a Labour Member of Parliament who is a minister in the present government:
'The Sikh communities' campaign to maintain customs inappropriate in Britain is much to be regretted. Working in Britain, particularly in the public services, they should be prepared to accept the terms and conditions of their employment. To claim special communal rights (or should one say rites?) leads to a dangerous fragmentation within society. This communalism is a canker; whether practised by one colour or another it is to be strongly condemned.'
All credit to John Stonehouse for having had the insight to perceive that, and the courage to say it.
For these dangerous and divisive elements the legislation proposed in the Race Relations Bill is the very pabulum they need to flourish. Here is the means of showing that the immigrant communities can organise to consolidate their members, to agitate and campaign against their fellow citizens, and to overawe and dominate the rest with the legal weapons which the ignorant and the ill-informed have provided. As I look ahead, I am filled with foreboding; like the Roman, I seem to see "the River Tiber foaming with much blood."
That tragic and intractable phenomenon which we watch with horror on the other side of the Atlantic but which there is interwoven with the history and existence of the States itself, is coming upon us here by our own volition and our own neglect. Indeed, it has all but come. In numerical terms, it will be of American proportions long before the end of the century.
Only resolute and urgent action will avert it even now. Whether there will be the public will to demand and obtain that action, I do not know. All I know is that to see, and not to speak, would be the great betrayal.
The attempt to destroy the individual | Jon Rappoport's Blog
The attempt to destroy the individual | Jon Rappoport's Blog
“A bureau operates on opposite principles of inventing needs to justify its existence. Bureaucracy is wrong as a cancer, a turning away from the human evolutionary direction of infinite potentials and differentiation and independent spontaneous action to the complete parasitism of a virus…Bureaus die when the structure of the state collapse. They are as helpless and unfit for independent existence as a displaced tapeworm, or a virus that has killed the host.”
“After a shooting spree, they always want to take the guns away from the people who didn’t do it. I sure as hell wouldn’t want to live in a society where the only people allowed guns are the police and the military.”
“There is simply no room left for ‘freedom from the tyranny of government’ since city dwellers depend on it for food, power, water, transportation, protection, and welfare. Your right to live where you want, with companions of your choosing, under laws to which you agree, died in the eighteenth century with Captain Mission. Only a miracle or a disaster could restore it.”
The author? William S. Burroughs. But not to worry, he was crazy. Of course he was. He didn’t profess utter loyalty to the mass of humanity. He didn’t prostrate himself before “the greater good.” He didn’t preach unity and togetherness.
“A bureau operates on opposite principles of inventing needs to justify its existence. Bureaucracy is wrong as a cancer, a turning away from the human evolutionary direction of infinite potentials and differentiation and independent spontaneous action to the complete parasitism of a virus…Bureaus die when the structure of the state collapse. They are as helpless and unfit for independent existence as a displaced tapeworm, or a virus that has killed the host.”
“After a shooting spree, they always want to take the guns away from the people who didn’t do it. I sure as hell wouldn’t want to live in a society where the only people allowed guns are the police and the military.”
“There is simply no room left for ‘freedom from the tyranny of government’ since city dwellers depend on it for food, power, water, transportation, protection, and welfare. Your right to live where you want, with companions of your choosing, under laws to which you agree, died in the eighteenth century with Captain Mission. Only a miracle or a disaster could restore it.”
The author? William S. Burroughs. But not to worry, he was crazy. Of course he was. He didn’t profess utter loyalty to the mass of humanity. He didn’t prostrate himself before “the greater good.” He didn’t preach unity and togetherness.
Lest we forget, part 3: Labour's secret plan to lure immigrants was borderline treason – and plain stupid – Telegraph Blogs
Labour's secret plan to lure immigrants was borderline treason – and plain stupid – Telegraph Blogs
Incredible. I am stunned. Back in October Andrew Neather, a former Labour party speechwriter, let the cat out the bag when he said that the Government had encouraged immigration “to rub the Right’s nose in diversity”. But while Neather quickly backtracked, documents now released under the Freedom of Information Act suggest that he was telling the truth. Rather than being the result only of incompetence or a short-term economic measure to reduce inflation, Labour’s policy of runaway immigration was a deliberate and cynical attempt to change the face of British society.
***
there's no borderline about it. It was anti-white genocide and TREASON.
And it still is.
Incredible. I am stunned. Back in October Andrew Neather, a former Labour party speechwriter, let the cat out the bag when he said that the Government had encouraged immigration “to rub the Right’s nose in diversity”. But while Neather quickly backtracked, documents now released under the Freedom of Information Act suggest that he was telling the truth. Rather than being the result only of incompetence or a short-term economic measure to reduce inflation, Labour’s policy of runaway immigration was a deliberate and cynical attempt to change the face of British society.
***
there's no borderline about it. It was anti-white genocide and TREASON.
And it still is.
Sunday, May 26, 2013
Fears raised of new asylum surge as two African boats intercepted in two days | Perth Now
Fears raised of new asylum surge as two African boats intercepted in two days | Perth Now
A SUDDEN influx of African asylum seekers on two boats in two days has sparked new questions about Australia's border protection.
Three vessels carrying Africans have now arrived this month with the boats, detected near Christmas Island, leaving from Indonesia.
A vessel spotted by federal police at Christmas Island on Friday had 33 Congolese, Somali and Sudanese asylum seekers on board and two Indonesian crew.
Another was intercepted by HMAS Larrakia north of Christmas Island on Saturday with 30 Somali asylum seekers and three Indonesian crew on board.
The third vessel carrying Africans arrived about a week ago.
So few Africans have previously arrived on boats there are no statistics available from the Department of Immigration which breakdown African arrivals.
***
Thank God! I think we were all getting worried about whether we had enough black rapists and murderers in our community. This latest flood should tide us over until Christmas.
Now we just need to top up on paki white girl grooming sex gangs and filthy diseased subcontinentals, and we should be well on the way to destroying the country.
A SUDDEN influx of African asylum seekers on two boats in two days has sparked new questions about Australia's border protection.
Three vessels carrying Africans have now arrived this month with the boats, detected near Christmas Island, leaving from Indonesia.
A vessel spotted by federal police at Christmas Island on Friday had 33 Congolese, Somali and Sudanese asylum seekers on board and two Indonesian crew.
Another was intercepted by HMAS Larrakia north of Christmas Island on Saturday with 30 Somali asylum seekers and three Indonesian crew on board.
The third vessel carrying Africans arrived about a week ago.
So few Africans have previously arrived on boats there are no statistics available from the Department of Immigration which breakdown African arrivals.
***
Thank God! I think we were all getting worried about whether we had enough black rapists and murderers in our community. This latest flood should tide us over until Christmas.
Now we just need to top up on paki white girl grooming sex gangs and filthy diseased subcontinentals, and we should be well on the way to destroying the country.
Girlyman Bolt strikes again: Column - We need immigration, not colonisation | Herald Sun Andrew Bolt Blog
Column - We need immigration, not colonisation | Herald Sun Andrew Bolt Blog
With a perpetual lazy bastard underclass to provide for we in fact do NOT need ANY immigration.
Immigration, like handouts to the third world, is another dated concept from the communists of the 1940s.
We need to close our borders, draw up the drawbridge, kill invaders, and set our own house in order.
Immigration is a privilege, not a right.
And the UN refugee convention is a communist weapon to destroy white countries. As proven over the last week.
With a perpetual lazy bastard underclass to provide for we in fact do NOT need ANY immigration.
Immigration, like handouts to the third world, is another dated concept from the communists of the 1940s.
We need to close our borders, draw up the drawbridge, kill invaders, and set our own house in order.
Immigration is a privilege, not a right.
And the UN refugee convention is a communist weapon to destroy white countries. As proven over the last week.
They think you will never break the chain. They should think again. - Michael Smith News
They think you will never break the chain. They should think again. - Michael Smith News
We must never ever forget what Gillard has done to Australia. Today we learn that illegal boats are now arriving from AFRICA. Two 2 boats in the last TWO DAYS!!! We have a choice. Either vote LNP or Labor. Get rid of the Greens; get rid of Oakeshott and Windsor as it was these two that GAVE US GILLARD. And remember it was KATTER that voted with the government on critical issues MORE THAN HE VOTED WITH THE LNP. He went missing from the chamber when a no confidence vote was passed. The LNP won that vote 73 to 70. They needed 76. His vote would have sent a message to his electorate that he supported this. PLEASE REMEMBER VOTERS IN KENNEDY!!! Your Member Katter VOTES with LABOR. Can you imagine the wrath she will inflict on those like Michael, Bolt, News Ltd, the miners, IPA, etc if she gets back in? And please, please make sure your details are correct on the electoral roll and don't rely on the online database. And one more thing. I am sick and tired of Bolt and other conservative journos whining about Tony Abbott being light on in policies. Get off his back. The alternative is frightening and Bolt should realise this!!!
We must never ever forget what Gillard has done to Australia. Today we learn that illegal boats are now arriving from AFRICA. Two 2 boats in the last TWO DAYS!!! We have a choice. Either vote LNP or Labor. Get rid of the Greens; get rid of Oakeshott and Windsor as it was these two that GAVE US GILLARD. And remember it was KATTER that voted with the government on critical issues MORE THAN HE VOTED WITH THE LNP. He went missing from the chamber when a no confidence vote was passed. The LNP won that vote 73 to 70. They needed 76. His vote would have sent a message to his electorate that he supported this. PLEASE REMEMBER VOTERS IN KENNEDY!!! Your Member Katter VOTES with LABOR. Can you imagine the wrath she will inflict on those like Michael, Bolt, News Ltd, the miners, IPA, etc if she gets back in? And please, please make sure your details are correct on the electoral roll and don't rely on the online database. And one more thing. I am sick and tired of Bolt and other conservative journos whining about Tony Abbott being light on in policies. Get off his back. The alternative is frightening and Bolt should realise this!!!
Chinese Melamine and American Vioxx: A Comparison | The American Conservative
Chinese Melamine and American Vioxx: A Comparison | The American Conservative
China’s leaders may not be democratically elected, but they pay close attention to strong popular sentiment. Once pressed, they quickly launched a national police investigation which led to a series of arrests and uncovered evidence that this widespread system of food adulteration had been protected by bribe-taking government officials. Long prison sentences were freely handed out and a couple of the guiltiest culprits were eventually tried and executed for their role, measures that gradually assuaged popular anger. Indeed, the former head of the Chinese FDA had been executed for corruption in late 2007 under similar circumstances.
Throughout these events, American media coverage was extensive, with numerous front-page stories in our leading newspapers. Journalists discovered that similar methods of dangerous chemical adulteration had been used to produce Chinese pet food for export, and many family dogs in America had suffered or died as a result. With heavy coverage on talk radio and cable news shows, phrases such as “Chinese baby formula” or “Chinese pet food” became angry slurs, and there was talk of banning whole categories of imports from a country whose product safety standards were obviously so far below those found in Western societies. The legitimate concerns of ordinary Americans were fanned by local media coverage that sometimes bordered on the hysterical.
However, the American media reaction had been quite different during an earlier health scandal much closer to home.
China’s leaders may not be democratically elected, but they pay close attention to strong popular sentiment. Once pressed, they quickly launched a national police investigation which led to a series of arrests and uncovered evidence that this widespread system of food adulteration had been protected by bribe-taking government officials. Long prison sentences were freely handed out and a couple of the guiltiest culprits were eventually tried and executed for their role, measures that gradually assuaged popular anger. Indeed, the former head of the Chinese FDA had been executed for corruption in late 2007 under similar circumstances.
Throughout these events, American media coverage was extensive, with numerous front-page stories in our leading newspapers. Journalists discovered that similar methods of dangerous chemical adulteration had been used to produce Chinese pet food for export, and many family dogs in America had suffered or died as a result. With heavy coverage on talk radio and cable news shows, phrases such as “Chinese baby formula” or “Chinese pet food” became angry slurs, and there was talk of banning whole categories of imports from a country whose product safety standards were obviously so far below those found in Western societies. The legitimate concerns of ordinary Americans were fanned by local media coverage that sometimes bordered on the hysterical.
However, the American media reaction had been quite different during an earlier health scandal much closer to home.
Our American Pravda | The American Conservative
Our American Pravda | The American Conservative
The notion of the American government being infiltrated and substantially controlled by agents of a foreign power has been the stuff of endless Hollywood movies and television shows, but for various reasons such popular channels have never been employed to bring the true-life historical example to wide attention. I doubt if even one American in a hundred today is familiar with the name “Harry Dexter White” or dozens of similar agents.
The realization that the world is often quite different from what is presented in our leading newspapers and magazines is not an easy conclusion for most educated Americans to accept, or at least that was true in my own case. For decades, I have closely read the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, and one or two other major newspapers every morning, supplemented by a wide variety of weekly or monthly opinion magazines. Their biases in certain areas had always been apparent to me. But I felt confident that by comparing and contrasting the claims of these different publications and applying some common sense, I could obtain a reasonably accurate version of reality. I was mistaken.
Aside from the evidence of our own senses, almost everything we know about the past or the news of today comes from bits of ink on paper or colored pixels on a screen, and fortunately over the last decade or two the growth of the Internet has vastly widened the range of information available to us in that latter category. Even if the overwhelming majority of the unorthodox claims provided by such non-traditional web-based sources is incorrect, at least there now exists the possibility of extracting vital nuggets of truth from vast mountains of falsehood. Certainly the events of the past dozen years have forced me to completely recalibrate my own reality-detection apparatus.
The notion of the American government being infiltrated and substantially controlled by agents of a foreign power has been the stuff of endless Hollywood movies and television shows, but for various reasons such popular channels have never been employed to bring the true-life historical example to wide attention. I doubt if even one American in a hundred today is familiar with the name “Harry Dexter White” or dozens of similar agents.
The realization that the world is often quite different from what is presented in our leading newspapers and magazines is not an easy conclusion for most educated Americans to accept, or at least that was true in my own case. For decades, I have closely read the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, and one or two other major newspapers every morning, supplemented by a wide variety of weekly or monthly opinion magazines. Their biases in certain areas had always been apparent to me. But I felt confident that by comparing and contrasting the claims of these different publications and applying some common sense, I could obtain a reasonably accurate version of reality. I was mistaken.
Aside from the evidence of our own senses, almost everything we know about the past or the news of today comes from bits of ink on paper or colored pixels on a screen, and fortunately over the last decade or two the growth of the Internet has vastly widened the range of information available to us in that latter category. Even if the overwhelming majority of the unorthodox claims provided by such non-traditional web-based sources is incorrect, at least there now exists the possibility of extracting vital nuggets of truth from vast mountains of falsehood. Certainly the events of the past dozen years have forced me to completely recalibrate my own reality-detection apparatus.
Saturday, May 25, 2013
Are we ABSOLUTELY sure the horse has bolted? Yes? Good. Now let's close the stable door and do our usual coverup.
BBC News - Extremism taskforce to be set up after Woolwich
David Cameron is to set up a taskforce to "look again" at the government's strategy for dealing with extremism and radicalisation in the wake of the killing of a soldier in Woolwich.
David Cameron is to set up a taskforce to "look again" at the government's strategy for dealing with extremism and radicalisation in the wake of the killing of a soldier in Woolwich.
Friday, May 24, 2013
Lest we forget, part 2
Gorillas in our midst
BBC News - Woolwich attack: MI5 'offered job to suspect'
MI5 asked Woolwich murder suspect Michael Adebolajo if he wanted to work for them about six months before the killing, a childhood friend has said.
***
What exactly is it that the out of control police and intel services do these days? It certainly isn't of any fucking benefit to the citizenry. If it was, there'd be a snowdrift of dead islamic savages instead of all this fannying around.
MI5 asked Woolwich murder suspect Michael Adebolajo if he wanted to work for them about six months before the killing, a childhood friend has said.
***
What exactly is it that the out of control police and intel services do these days? It certainly isn't of any fucking benefit to the citizenry. If it was, there'd be a snowdrift of dead islamic savages instead of all this fannying around.
THought Police dhimmify outraged English as elite continue to pander to islamic savages
Woolwich attacks: Man charged with making 'racist or anti-religious' Facebook comments about British soldier¿s death | Mail Online
A 23-year-old and a 22-year-old, both from Bristol, were held under the Public Order Act on suspicion of inciting racial or religious hatred.
Detective Inspector Ed Yaxley, of Avon and Somerset Police, said: 'On Wednesday evening, we were contacted by people concerned about comments made on social media accounts.
'We began inquiries into the comments and at around 3.20am two men, aged 23 and 22, were detained at two addresses in Bristol.
'The men were arrested under the Public Order Act on suspicion of inciting racial or religious hatred. Our inquiries into these comments continue.
'These comments were directed against a section of our community. Comments such as these are completely unacceptable and only cause more harm to our community in Bristol.
'People should stop and think about what they say on social media before making statements as the consequences could be serious.'
Police confirmed the two men were later released on bail pending further inquiries.
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2330180/Woolwich-attacks-Man-charged-making-racist-anti-religious-Facebook-comments-British-soldier-s-death.html#ixzz2UGckJnsG
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
A 23-year-old and a 22-year-old, both from Bristol, were held under the Public Order Act on suspicion of inciting racial or religious hatred.
Detective Inspector Ed Yaxley, of Avon and Somerset Police, said: 'On Wednesday evening, we were contacted by people concerned about comments made on social media accounts.
'We began inquiries into the comments and at around 3.20am two men, aged 23 and 22, were detained at two addresses in Bristol.
'The men were arrested under the Public Order Act on suspicion of inciting racial or religious hatred. Our inquiries into these comments continue.
'These comments were directed against a section of our community. Comments such as these are completely unacceptable and only cause more harm to our community in Bristol.
'People should stop and think about what they say on social media before making statements as the consequences could be serious.'
Police confirmed the two men were later released on bail pending further inquiries.
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2330180/Woolwich-attacks-Man-charged-making-racist-anti-religious-Facebook-comments-British-soldier-s-death.html#ixzz2UGckJnsG
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
Kyle Sanidlandstein and Jackie Ovitch
It's all a bit baffling why even gillard would bother with the brainless leavings of radio. When considering sandilands and "o" it's hard to see the appeal.
One is just a life support system for a pair of tits, and as for Jackie O it's hard to see what his claim to fame is.
One is just a life support system for a pair of tits, and as for Jackie O it's hard to see what his claim to fame is.
A warning to Internet assassins | Herald Sun Andrew Bolt Blog
A warning to Internet assassins | Herald Sun Andrew Bolt Blog
A couple of warnings to internet trolls:
A couple of warnings to internet trolls:
A tweet published by Sally Bercow about Tory peer Lord McAlpine was libellous, [Britain’s] High Court has ruled.And:
The wife of Commons Speaker John Bercow tweeted two days after BBC Newsnight wrongly linked a “leading Conservative politician” to sex abuse claims.
Amid widespread speculation about his identity, she wrote: “Why is Lord McAlpine trending. *innocent face*.”
ONE of Australia’s leading plastic surgeons, Chris Moss, ... has brought a legal action in the Victorian Supreme Court against Craig Rodda, the managing director of a marketing agency, which he claims has driven business away from his practice…
The posts which began late last year on Australia’s largest on-line plastic surgery forum alleged that authentic positive reviews of Dr Moss’ work were fake and had been written by his own staff…
“I was shocked and appalled by the threads containing (false) suggestions that I was dishonest, unprofessional, overcharged clients and that my surgical work was not a high standard ...,” Dr Moss said in an affidavit.
Dr Moss alleges that an individual operating from an IP address at Mr Rodda’s home had created seven different pseudonyms to criticise his work on the forum and encourage others to follow suit.
Dr Moss alleges the posts were made on the instructions of competitors as there were recommendations to other plastic surgeons…
Mr Rodda told The Weekend Australian that the posts were made from his IP address but claimed he was not the author. He said that his defacto wife had admitted making the posts but had done so “innocently for the purposes of research”.
Here it comes! Leftist Islamopandering to whining Muslim ‘sensibilities’ vs First Amendment free speech rights | BARE NAKED ISLAM
Here it comes! Leftist Islamopandering to whining Muslim ‘sensibilities’ vs First Amendment free speech rights | BARE NAKED ISLAM
The U.S. Supreme Court has held there are very limited circumstances in which those rights can be restricted. So it’s disturbing to see the FBI and federal prosecutor in Eastern Tennessee leading a special meeting in response to an offensive Internet posting.
Julia Gillard on 18 April in Geelong - under Tony Abbott there'd be no car industry in Geelong.,
Michael Smith News
THE gloves have come off in the battle to win over Geelong voters, with Prime Minister Julia Gillard claiming Opposition Leader Tony Abbott wasn't capable of making a plan to save local manufacturing jobs.
In an attack on the eve of Mr Abbott's appearance tonight at the Geelong Advertiser /Sky News People's Forum, Ms Gillard said the Coalition's plan for the automotive sector was "laughable" and would cost 1500 jobs in the region.
"There will be no car industry in Geelong," Ms Gillard told the Geelong Advertiser in an exclusive interview.
"Not only would it kill the jobs of today, it would rob the jobs of tomorrow through advanced manufacturing."
Geelong and the marginal seat of Corangamite have become the focus for both leaders in the past 48-hours ahead of Mr Abbott's forum appearance in front of 100 uncommitted voters in the seat tonight.
A Coalition government would take $500 million out of the current $1.5 billion New Car Plan and has promised a Productivity Commission review into the sector after 2015.
THE gloves have come off in the battle to win over Geelong voters, with Prime Minister Julia Gillard claiming Opposition Leader Tony Abbott wasn't capable of making a plan to save local manufacturing jobs.
In an attack on the eve of Mr Abbott's appearance tonight at the Geelong Advertiser /Sky News People's Forum, Ms Gillard said the Coalition's plan for the automotive sector was "laughable" and would cost 1500 jobs in the region.
"There will be no car industry in Geelong," Ms Gillard told the Geelong Advertiser in an exclusive interview.
"Not only would it kill the jobs of today, it would rob the jobs of tomorrow through advanced manufacturing."
Geelong and the marginal seat of Corangamite have become the focus for both leaders in the past 48-hours ahead of Mr Abbott's forum appearance in front of 100 uncommitted voters in the seat tonight.
A Coalition government would take $500 million out of the current $1.5 billion New Car Plan and has promised a Productivity Commission review into the sector after 2015.
"I prefer the coalition plan of encouraging Ford rather than the Gillard and union plan of using taxpayers money to pay high wages and keep car prices artificially high. If Ford cant survive then so be it."
BBC News - Woolwich attack 'incredibly hard' to stop
BBC News - Woolwich attack 'incredibly hard' to stop
Preventing the killing of Drummer Lee Rigby outside Woolwich Barracks would have been "incredibly hard", an ex-senior intelligence officer has said.
***
BULLSHIT.
It's easy to stop. No more mass immigration of third worlders, especially islamic third worlders.
If you don't want to be bitten by a baboon, stop letting baboons loose in your back garden, dickheads.
Preventing the killing of Drummer Lee Rigby outside Woolwich Barracks would have been "incredibly hard", an ex-senior intelligence officer has said.
***
BULLSHIT.
It's easy to stop. No more mass immigration of third worlders, especially islamic third worlders.
If you don't want to be bitten by a baboon, stop letting baboons loose in your back garden, dickheads.
Thursday, May 23, 2013
Make These Laws Take Effect!!!
Make These Laws Take Effect!!!
Make sure you read after it says " TOO STRICT "
New Immigration Laws: PLEASE read to the bottom or you will miss the message....
1) There will be no special bilingual programs in the schools.
2) All ballots will be in this nation's language. 3) All government business will be conducted in our language.
4) Non-residents will NOT have the right to vote no matter how long they are here. 5) Non-citizens will NEVER be able to hold political office.
6) Foreigners will not be a burden to the taxpayers. No welfare No food stamps, No health care, Or other government assistance programmes. Any burden will be deported. 7) Foreigners can invest in this country, but it must be an amount at least equal to 40,000 times the daily minimum wage.
8) If foreigners come here and buy land... Options will be restricted certain parcels including waterfront property are reserved for citizens naturally born into this country.
2) All ballots will be in this nation's language. 3) All government business will be conducted in our language.
4) Non-residents will NOT have the right to vote no matter how long they are here. 5) Non-citizens will NEVER be able to hold political office.
6) Foreigners will not be a burden to the taxpayers. No welfare No food stamps, No health care, Or other government assistance programmes. Any burden will be deported. 7) Foreigners can invest in this country, but it must be an amount at least equal to 40,000 times the daily minimum wage.
8) If foreigners come here and buy land... Options will be restricted certain parcels including waterfront property are reserved for citizens naturally born into this country.
9) Foreigners may have
No protests
No demonstrations No waving of a foreign flag
No political organizing
No bad-mouthing our politicians or their policies.
These will lead to imprisonment and deportation.
No protests
No demonstrations No waving of a foreign flag
No political organizing
No bad-mouthing our politicians or their policies.
These will lead to imprisonment and deportation.
10) If you do come to this country illegally, you will be actively hunted & when caught, sent to jail until your deportation can be arranged.
ALL assets will be taken from you.
Too strict?
The above laws are the current immigration laws of the Muslim countries!
AND… These sound fine to me. NOW, how can we get these laws to be the laws of our country?
The above laws are the current immigration laws of the Muslim countries!
AND… These sound fine to me. NOW, how can we get these laws to be the laws of our country?
THIS IS MY COUNTRY!
And, because I make this statementDOES NOT Mean I'm against immigration!!!
And, because I make this statementDOES NOT Mean I'm against immigration!!!
YOU ARE WELCOME HERE,
IN MY COUNTRY!
IN MY COUNTRY!
Welcome...
To come through legally:
To come through legally:
1. Get a sponsor!
2. Get a place to lay your head!
3. Get a job!
4. Live By OUR Rules!
5. Pay YOUR Taxes!
2. Get a place to lay your head!
3. Get a job!
4. Live By OUR Rules!
5. Pay YOUR Taxes!
And
6. Learn the LANGUAGE like immigrants
Have in the past!!!
Have in the past!!!
AND
7. Please don't demand that we hand over our lifetime
Savings of welfare benefits to you.
If you don't want to forward this for fear of offending someone,
Savings of welfare benefits to you.
If you don't want to forward this for fear of offending someone,
Then… YOU'RE PART OF THE PROBLEM!
When will AUSTRALIANS STOP giving awayTHEIR RIGHTS?
When will AUSTRALIANS STOP giving awayTHEIR RIGHTS?
We've gone so far the other way...
Bent over backwards not to offend anyone.
But it seems no one cares about the
AUSTRALIAN CITIZEN
who's being offended!
Bent over backwards not to offend anyone.
But it seems no one cares about the
AUSTRALIAN CITIZEN
who's being offended!
WAKE UP AUSTRALIA!!!!
If you agree....Pass this on.
If you agree....Pass this on.
If you don't agree...Delete it!!
BBC News - Woolwich attack: Suspects known to security services (as per fucking usual)
BBC News - Woolwich attack: Suspects known to security services
One of the suspects is understood to be 28-year-old Muslim convert Michael Adebolajo, according to sources.
He and another man are under arrest in hospital after being shot by police after Wednesday's attack in Woolwich.
***
Corrupt and incompetent "security services" which are far too busy oppressing law abiding white citizens strike again.
Time for some truth telling. And some mass deportations of zoo animals.
Both suspects in the killing of a serving soldier in London were known to security services, senior Whitehall sources have confirmed to the BBC.
He and another man are under arrest in hospital after being shot by police after Wednesday's attack in Woolwich.
***
Corrupt and incompetent "security services" which are far too busy oppressing law abiding white citizens strike again.
Time for some truth telling. And some mass deportations of zoo animals.
Wednesday, May 22, 2013
Welcome to the Planet of the Apes
Mum talked down Woolwich terrorists who told her: 'We want to start a war in London tonight' - Telegraph
Women doing men's jobs in effeminate beta male dominated Britain. A total fucking disgrace on British manhood.
Ingrid Loyau-Kennett ... was a passenger on a number 53 bus which was travelling past the scene, and jumped off to check the soldier’s pulse.
“Being a cub leader I have my first aid so when I saw this guy on the floor I thought it was an accident then I saw the guy was dead and I could not feel any pulse.
“And then when I went up there was this black guy with a revolver and a kitchen knife, he had what looked like butcher’s tools and he had a little axe, to cut the bones, and two large knives and he said ‘move off the body’.
“So I thought ‘OK, I don’t know what is going on here’ and he was covered with blood. I thought I had better start talking to him before he starts attacking somebody else. I thought these people usually have a message so I said ‘what do you want?’…
“...he said ‘I killed him because he killed Muslims and I am fed up with people killing Muslims in Afghanistan they have nothing to do there."… I started to notice more weapons and the guy behind him with more weapons as well. By then, people had started to gather around. So I thought OK, I should keep him talking to me before he noticed everything around him…
“I said ’right now it is only you versus many people, you are going to lose...’***
“The other one was much shier and I went to him and I said ‘well, what about you? Would you like to give me what you have in your hands?’...”
Mrs Loyau-Kennett was not the only woman to show extraordinary courage. Others shielded the soldier’s body as the killers stood over them.
Women doing men's jobs in effeminate beta male dominated Britain. A total fucking disgrace on British manhood.
Police 'covered up' violent campaign to turn London area 'Islamic' - Telegraph
Police 'covered up' violent campaign to turn London area 'Islamic' - Telegraph
Victims say that officers in the borough of Tower Hamlets have ignored or downplayed outbreaks of hate crime, and suppressed evidence implicating Muslims in them, because they fear being accused of racism.
The claims come as four Tower Hamlets Muslims were jailed for at least 19 years for attacking a local white teacher who gave religious studies lessons to Muslim girls.
The Sunday Telegraph has uncovered more than a dozen other cases in Tower Hamlets where both Muslims and non-Muslims have been threatened or beaten for behaviour deemed to breach fundamentalist “Islamic norms.”
One victim, Mohammed Monzur Rahman, said he was left partially blind and with a dislocated shoulder after being attacked by a mob in Cannon Street Road, Shadwell, for smoking during the Muslim holy month of Ramadan last year.
“Two guys stopped me in the street and asked me why I was smoking,” he said. “I just carried on, and before I knew another dozen guys came and jumped me. The next thing I knew, I was waking up in hospital.”
Tolerance Strikes Again | The Dana Show
Tolerance Strikes Again | The Dana Show
***
We are at war.
Tolerance Strikes Again
In case you missed it:‘Drop dead, you C*NT’: Vicious lefties attack Dana Loesch for believing in self-defense
That hurts: Piers Morgan unfollows Dana Loesch, bans her from his show; Update: Ace shreds:
Dana Loesch may have been the only reason anyone watched Piers Morgan’s low-rated talk show, but he’s putting the kibosh on any future interactions with her.From Politico:
Following the news that an unarmed ritish soldier was beheaded in broad daylight, Loesch, an ardent proponent of self-defense, took a page from the liberal handbook and sarcastically asked if the attacker was an NRA member. After all, the Left’s knee-jerk response to deadly crimes is to blame the NRA, right?
“Regarding Piers, what I saw was a man who doesn’t realize when his ideology of disarmament is being mocked,” Loesch told POLITICO. “I had more respect for his intellect until I watched him turn it around and make it about mocking a soldier, which is grotesque, and something I would never in a million years do — much less Photoshop photos of soldiers which the Queen’s Lancashire Regiment said endangered the lives of British troops.”
***
We are at war.
SHORT & TO THE POINT: Putin's speech
I wonder how he'd like a Prime Minister's job?
Putin's Speech on Feb. 04, 2013 this is one time our elected leaders
should pay attention to the advice of Vladimir Putin....
On February 4th, 2013, Vladimir Putin, the Russian president, addressed
the Duma, (Russian Parliament), and gave a speech about the tensions
with minorities in Russia:
"In Russia live Russians. Any minority, from anywhere, if it wants to
live in Russia, to work and eat in Russia, should speak Russian, and
should respect the Russian laws. If they prefer Sharia Law, then we
advise them to go to those places where that's the state law. Russia
does not need minorities. Minorities need Russia, and we will not grant
them special privileges, nor try to change our laws to fit their desires,
no matter how loud they yell 'discrimination'. We better learn from the
suicides of America, England, Holland and France, if we are to survive
as a nation. The Russian customs and traditions are not compatible with
the lack of culture or the primitive ways of most minorities. When this
honourable legislative body thinks of creating new laws, it should have
in mind the national interest first, observing that the minorities are
not Russians.
The politicians in the Duma gave Putin a standing ovation for five
minutes.
Please don't keep this to yourself, I didn't by sending it to you.
Putin's Speech on Feb. 04, 2013 this is one time our elected leaders
should pay attention to the advice of Vladimir Putin....
On February 4th, 2013, Vladimir Putin, the Russian president, addressed
the Duma, (Russian Parliament), and gave a speech about the tensions
with minorities in Russia:
"In Russia live Russians. Any minority, from anywhere, if it wants to
live in Russia, to work and eat in Russia, should speak Russian, and
should respect the Russian laws. If they prefer Sharia Law, then we
advise them to go to those places where that's the state law. Russia
does not need minorities. Minorities need Russia, and we will not grant
them special privileges, nor try to change our laws to fit their desires,
no matter how loud they yell 'discrimination'. We better learn from the
suicides of America, England, Holland and France, if we are to survive
as a nation. The Russian customs and traditions are not compatible with
the lack of culture or the primitive ways of most minorities. When this
honourable legislative body thinks of creating new laws, it should have
in mind the national interest first, observing that the minorities are
not Russians.
The politicians in the Duma gave Putin a standing ovation for five
minutes.
Please don't keep this to yourself, I didn't by sending it to you.
CBS News star hacked: the big chill | Jon Rappoport's Blog
CBS News star hacked: the big chill | Jon Rappoport's Blog
Sharyl Atkisson is the one thing CBS News has going for it. She’s the real article. As real as you can be in the current news climate, while still working for a major media outlet.
She crashed the credibility of the CDC, as it was lying through its teeth about numbers of Swine Flu cases and overplaying the fake “epidemic.”
She’s taken on the horrific effects of vaccines, to the point where her Wikipedia page, through a series of unethical maneuvers, continues to characterize her as irrationally “anti-vaccine.”
She broke key elements of Fast&Furious. She’s a hound on Benghazi, and the Obama administration’s funding of “green programs.”
Now, she states that her computer was compromised in 2011, as she was covering Fast&Furious. She’s still working to find out what happened.
From Politico:
“Sharyl Attkisson, the Emmy-award winning CBS News investigative reporter, says that her personal and work computers have been compromised and are under investigation.
“‘I can confirm that an intrusion of my computers has been under some investigation on my end for some months but I’m not prepared to make an allegation against a specific entity today as I’ve been patient and methodical about this matter,’ Attkisson told POLITICO on Tuesday. ‘I need to check with my attorney and CBS to get their recommendations on info we make public.’
“Attkisson told WPHT that irregular activity on her computer was first identified in Feb. 2011, when she was reporting on the Fast and Furious gun-walking scandal and on the Obama administration’s green energy spending, which she said ‘the administration was very sensitive about.’”
Sharyl Atkisson is the one thing CBS News has going for it. She’s the real article. As real as you can be in the current news climate, while still working for a major media outlet.
She crashed the credibility of the CDC, as it was lying through its teeth about numbers of Swine Flu cases and overplaying the fake “epidemic.”
She’s taken on the horrific effects of vaccines, to the point where her Wikipedia page, through a series of unethical maneuvers, continues to characterize her as irrationally “anti-vaccine.”
She broke key elements of Fast&Furious. She’s a hound on Benghazi, and the Obama administration’s funding of “green programs.”
Now, she states that her computer was compromised in 2011, as she was covering Fast&Furious. She’s still working to find out what happened.
From Politico:
“Sharyl Attkisson, the Emmy-award winning CBS News investigative reporter, says that her personal and work computers have been compromised and are under investigation.
“‘I can confirm that an intrusion of my computers has been under some investigation on my end for some months but I’m not prepared to make an allegation against a specific entity today as I’ve been patient and methodical about this matter,’ Attkisson told POLITICO on Tuesday. ‘I need to check with my attorney and CBS to get their recommendations on info we make public.’
“Attkisson told WPHT that irregular activity on her computer was first identified in Feb. 2011, when she was reporting on the Fast and Furious gun-walking scandal and on the Obama administration’s green energy spending, which she said ‘the administration was very sensitive about.’”
BREAKING: KMOV Fires Larry Conners *UPDATED | The Dana Show
BREAKING: KMOV Fires Larry Conners *UPDATED | The Dana Show
Larry Conners will be on my program tomorrow. My staff has also reached out to Pimentel to join as well.
Developing …
Larry Conners will be on my program tomorrow. My staff has also reached out to Pimentel to join as well.
Developing …
Ugly as an asshole, stupider than paint and now her husband has a soft job at ALPBC too. And there's even a remote possibility some fuckwits think the ABC and the racist anti-white fuckscum at SBS shouldn't be sold off?
The ABC’s Trioli farewells a conservative guest | Herald Sun Andrew Bolt Blog
It’s true, I’m afraid. Trioli did indeed show her far-Left colors after interviewing the Nationals’ Senate leader, revealing what most ABC hosts try their poor best to hide. And people still defend the ABC from charges of bias.
Mind you, even among the ABC crowd, Trioli stands out for her reflexive, knee-jerk and frankly absurd Leftism.
Tuesday, May 21, 2013
Top IRS official takes the Fifth: what it means | Jon Rappoport's Blog
Top IRS official takes the Fifth: what it means | Jon Rappoport's Blog
Lois Lerner, head of the IRS division that oversees tax-exempt filings, will take the Fifth in front of Congress tomorrow.
She won’t answer questions. She won’t say, for example, why she never informed Congress that she knew there was criminal fiddling going on at the IRS, where employees “gave extra scrutiny” to tea party, conservative, patriot, and other groups during the application process.
Instead, as the DOJ launches a criminal investigation, Lerner will tell the House Oversight Committee, “I decline to answer. I invoke my Fifth Amendment right.” Multiple times she will say this.
Meaning: “If I answer, I could incriminate myself.”
Lois Lerner, head of the IRS division that oversees tax-exempt filings, will take the Fifth in front of Congress tomorrow.
She won’t answer questions. She won’t say, for example, why she never informed Congress that she knew there was criminal fiddling going on at the IRS, where employees “gave extra scrutiny” to tea party, conservative, patriot, and other groups during the application process.
Instead, as the DOJ launches a criminal investigation, Lerner will tell the House Oversight Committee, “I decline to answer. I invoke my Fifth Amendment right.” Multiple times she will say this.
Meaning: “If I answer, I could incriminate myself.”
Would journalists tell you if there really were a bust-up? | Herald Sun Andrew Bolt Blog
Would journalists tell you if there really were a bust-up? | Herald Sun Andrew Bolt Blog
Guess she's found another AWU slush fund and a married man to go with it.
What these beta males see in this shave-necked witch is beyond me.
Guess she's found another AWU slush fund and a married man to go with it.
What these beta males see in this shave-necked witch is beyond me.
The Good Guys Are NOT Coming To Save Us | Freeman's Perspective
The Good Guys Are NOT Coming To Save Us | Freeman's Perspective
"The balanced powers of the US Constitution, however, were trashed within fifteen years and doubly-trashed just a century ago.
In the Constitution, the states balanced the power of the national government (the one now in Washington, DC.) Not only did the states control half of the legislature, but they decided if and how they would implement the edicts of the national government. And that included deciding whether a law was constitutional or not.
This changed in 1803 with the Marbury v. Madison ruling. This ruling – taught as a work of genius in American schools – was a fraud against the US Constitution. In it, the Supreme Court held that they understood the Constitution better than James Madison, the man who wrote it!
But worse than even this, they held – with absolutely no basis – that it was they who would decide what was constitutional or not. The states were tossed aside. Even the sitting President of the United States, Thomas Jefferson, called it “a very dangerous doctrine indeed, and one which would place us under the despotism of an oligarchy.”"
Monday, May 20, 2013
CARERS' TEARS ARE REAL, JULIA - The Pickering Post
CARERS' TEARS ARE REAL, JULIA - The Pickering Post
Hi Larry,
I just wanted to send you a note to say how much I appreciate you bringing to the attention of the public the joke that is the NDIS. I am the mother of a 22-year old profoundly disabled daughter.
I had to give up my career to care for her once she left 'school' as we were granted only 15 hours a week respite. My husband (not the father of my daughter) will be paying the increased levy for SIX-SEVEN years before we can even hope to benefit from this scheme. He also, apparently, earns too much (we struggle week to week) for me to be eligible for the Carer's Pension so we have simply had to suck it up for four years now minus my $70,000 salary. I wept when "she who shall not be named" did in parliament when making the announcement - not because she was crying - but because I could not believe the gall of the woman to do so when she knows the truth of it all ... it was beyond CRUEL. She wouldn't last a week in my shoes ... perhaps she would then cry and the tears would be real and not of the crocodile variety.
This is a cut and paste from the last "update" I got about the NDIS;
"National Disability Insurance Scheme Update 43
Dear Friends,
Welcome, Queensland!
DisabilityCare Australia, the national disability insurance scheme, will roll out – in full – across Queensland by July 2019.
Today’s historic agreement with the Queensland Government will see DisabilityCare Australia become a reality for around 97,000 Queenslanders with disability.
We have now secured full agreements with most state and territory governments meaning almost 90 per cent of Australians will be covered by DisabilityCare Australia.
People with disability will have choice and control over the supports they receive, and their families and carers can be sure they’ll get a helping hand.
All Queenslanders will have the peace of mind that in the event of significant and permanent disability, or if they have a child with disability, that leaves them needing daily care and support, they’ll get the care and support they need.
To cover all people in Queensland, in 2019-20 the Queensland Government will provide $2.03 billion and the Australian Government will contribute around $2.14 billion to the scheme for Queenslanders.
Today’s agreement builds on those with the governments of New South Wales, Victoria, South Australia, Tasmania and the Australian Capital Territory and the agreement to launch the scheme in the Barkly region of the Northern Territory.
The countdown to launch in New South Wales, Victoria, South Australia and Tasmania is on – it’s just over seven weeks away. Stay tuned to progress towards launch by checking in on the website –www.ndis.gov.au – and we’ll continue to keep you updated through NDIS Updates.
Jenny Macklin & Amanda Rishworth."
SHAME ON HER.
Thanks so much if you have made it this far into my rant but I really did want to tell you how much I appreciate you using your platform to educate as many as possible on the sheer untruths these bottom feeders are spreading/buying votes with.
Take care,
Mia
Maybe If The AP And James Rosen Had Made “Zero Dark Thirty” … | The Dana Show
Maybe If The AP And James Rosen Had Made “Zero Dark Thirty” … | The Dana Show
For five days, reporters at the Associated Press had been sitting on a big scoop about a foiled al-Qaeda plot at the request of CIA officials. Then, in a hastily scheduled Monday morning meeting, the journalists were asked by agency officials to hold off on publishing the story for just one more day.
The CIA officials, who had initially cited national security concerns in an attempt to delay publication, no longer had those worries, according to individuals familiar with the exchange. Instead, the Obama administration was planning to announce the successful counterterrorism operation that Tuesday.
AP balked and proceeded to publish that Monday afternoon. Its May 2012 report is now at the center of a controversial and broad seizure of phone records of AP reporters’ home, office and cellphone lines. Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. said the unauthorized disclosure about an intelligence operation to stop al-Qaeda from detonating explosives aboard a U.S. airliner was among the most serious leaks he could remember, and justified secretly obtaining records from a handful of reporters and editors over a span of two months.
***
This is communist control of the press. Identical in intent and function to that exercised in the soviet union. Or indeed gillardist Australia.
For five days, reporters at the Associated Press had been sitting on a big scoop about a foiled al-Qaeda plot at the request of CIA officials. Then, in a hastily scheduled Monday morning meeting, the journalists were asked by agency officials to hold off on publishing the story for just one more day.
The CIA officials, who had initially cited national security concerns in an attempt to delay publication, no longer had those worries, according to individuals familiar with the exchange. Instead, the Obama administration was planning to announce the successful counterterrorism operation that Tuesday.
AP balked and proceeded to publish that Monday afternoon. Its May 2012 report is now at the center of a controversial and broad seizure of phone records of AP reporters’ home, office and cellphone lines. Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. said the unauthorized disclosure about an intelligence operation to stop al-Qaeda from detonating explosives aboard a U.S. airliner was among the most serious leaks he could remember, and justified secretly obtaining records from a handful of reporters and editors over a span of two months.
***
This is communist control of the press. Identical in intent and function to that exercised in the soviet union. Or indeed gillardist Australia.
White House Explains: Obama Didn't Know What He Knew When Everyone Else Knew What He Should Have Known | Zero Hedge
White House Explains: Obama Didn't Know What He Knew When Everyone Else Knew What He Should Have Known | Zero Hedge
Yesterday, when we reported that as a result of new disclosures regarding the timing of who learned what, but most importantly when, in the White House regarding the IRS persecution (if not prosecution) of conservative groups, we made it quite clear that the narrative enacted by the White House, which could simply be summarized as "we'll make it up as we go along", was nothing more than damage control in total disarray. Because once caught lying, the best solution usually is to stop lying and tell the truth, tying up all those loose ends that eventually lead to Watergate-type outcomes unless addressed early on. No such luck here.
Instead, the White House has doubled down on its crash and burn storyline and in doing so is merely guaranteeing that the very same conservatives, and all others who would rather not have a very political IRS on their back, who have smelled blood are not going to let go until someone at the very top takes responsibility for what, together with the AP-fiasco, is rapidly becoming Obama's Nixonian scandal.
***
What didn't he know, and when didn't he know it?
This is the end result of affirmative action. A bisexual talentless mulatto rises to the top of the republic because no one ever checks his transcripts or even asks basic questions like where was he actually born, is he actually a communist, is he a psychotic, does he have any normal emotional range at all, why is he married to such a mannish peculiar woman, why do homosexuals of his acquaintance keep dying violent deaths, is there a more racist world leader outside his beloved islamic world, and so on.
Yesterday, when we reported that as a result of new disclosures regarding the timing of who learned what, but most importantly when, in the White House regarding the IRS persecution (if not prosecution) of conservative groups, we made it quite clear that the narrative enacted by the White House, which could simply be summarized as "we'll make it up as we go along", was nothing more than damage control in total disarray. Because once caught lying, the best solution usually is to stop lying and tell the truth, tying up all those loose ends that eventually lead to Watergate-type outcomes unless addressed early on. No such luck here.
Instead, the White House has doubled down on its crash and burn storyline and in doing so is merely guaranteeing that the very same conservatives, and all others who would rather not have a very political IRS on their back, who have smelled blood are not going to let go until someone at the very top takes responsibility for what, together with the AP-fiasco, is rapidly becoming Obama's Nixonian scandal.
***
What didn't he know, and when didn't he know it?
This is the end result of affirmative action. A bisexual talentless mulatto rises to the top of the republic because no one ever checks his transcripts or even asks basic questions like where was he actually born, is he actually a communist, is he a psychotic, does he have any normal emotional range at all, why is he married to such a mannish peculiar woman, why do homosexuals of his acquaintance keep dying violent deaths, is there a more racist world leader outside his beloved islamic world, and so on.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
