Memory Hole: The Dawn Hochsprung File » Insanemedia

Memory Hole: The Dawn Hochsprung File » Insanemedia

If
the “Superintendent Reports” cache date is correct then the Hochsprung
cache date is also correct. And if the Dawn Hochsprung cache date is
correct then the article was prepared in advance, the entire event was
very likely planned in advance and Dawn Lafferty-Hochsprung was supposed
to survive but didn’t.

This brings up many more
questions. Why did she die? What happened? Was it a drill gone wrong? If
it was a drill gone wrong would we really expect that NO participant
would come forward to speak up for Dawn?

Could she still be alive?
If so, why would media report her dead thereby messing up the prepared
story and putting the Bee in the uncomfortable position of having to
make an embarrassing retraction?

- See more at: http://www.insanemedia.net/memory-hole-the-dawn-hochsprung-file/4717#sthash.Up39K5MR.dpuf

 If the “Superintendent Reports” cache date is correct then the Hochsprung cache date is also correct. And if the Dawn Hochsprung cache date is correct then the article was prepared in advance, the entire event was very likely planned in advance and Dawn Lafferty-Hochsprung was supposed to survive but didn’t.

This brings up many more questions. Why did she die? What happened? Was it a drill gone wrong? If it was a drill gone wrong would we really expect that NO participant would come forward to speak up for Dawn?

Could she still be alive? If so, why would media report her dead thereby messing up the prepared story and putting the Bee in the uncomfortable position of having to make an embarrassing retraction?

- See more at: http://www.insanemedia.net/memory-hole-the-dawn-hochsprung-file/4717#sthash.Up39K5MR.dpuf

***

The official report - the official redacted one mind you- states 20 children and ONE staff member died, and that the police / law enforcement shot a shooter inside the school.

It's at total variance to the previous official versions and of course contradicts the self serving lies of some of the small players in the drill gine false flag.

If
the “Superintendent Reports” cache date is correct then the Hochsprung
cache date is also correct. And if the Dawn Hochsprung cache date is
correct then the article was prepared in advance, the entire event was
very likely planned in advance and Dawn Lafferty-Hochsprung was supposed
to survive but didn’t.

This brings up many more
questions. Why did she die? What happened? Was it a drill gone wrong? If
it was a drill gone wrong would we really expect that NO participant
would come forward to speak up for Dawn?

Could she still be alive?
If so, why would media report her dead thereby messing up the prepared
story and putting the Bee in the uncomfortable position of having to
make an embarrassing retraction?

- See more at: http://www.insanemedia.net/memory-hole-the-dawn-hochsprung-file/4717#sthash.Up39K5MR.dpuf

Fact Finding of a Crime « Memory Hole

Fact Finding of a Crime « Memory Hole



Have you ever tried to put a puzzle together? If you have then this
puzzle will blow your socks off because no matter how hard you try to
make these pieces fit they just won’t.

Woody Box: The smothered arrest of a Boston Bombing suspect on April 17th

Woody Box: The smothered arrest of a Boston Bombing suspect on April 17th



 In two blog entries (here and here) I already have highlighted the turbulent news releases two days after the Boston Marathon bombings.



John King of CNN has played the most prominent role here: first, he reported that law enforcement had identified a suspicious dark-skinned male on a surveillance video who placed a black backpack in front of the Forum restaurant. An hour later, he reported that an arrest had been made, in succession of a twitter message from Associated Press.

As an instant reaction to this AP tweet, several hundred journalists gathered in front of the Boston federal courthouse in anticipation of the arrival of the arrested suspect. Some of them, like Kelley Tuthill of the Boston TV station WCVB, went inside.



Court staff told her that a courtroom (Nr. 18) was prepared for "some kind of appearance". But soon authorities denied that an arrest had been made, and at the same time the courthouse was evacuated due to a "code red" security alert, a very rare event. A bomb threat was later given as an explanation, but without any details.

After the crowd was forced back from the entrance and the street, a white van with tinted windows and a US marshal clinging to the passenger door passed by and entered the building via the back driveway. This incident was quickly brushed under the carpet and has raised no queries by anyone afterwards, but it is well documented by photos, video footage and twitter messages.



 In this WCVB video

http://www.kaltura.com/index.php/kwidget/wid/_557781/uiconf_id/21039792/entry_id/1_mzq8y0f4

you can see the van right from the start as he arrives at the courthouse, turns left and drives into the building.



These circumstances don't allow any other conclusion that the van transported an arrested and potentially dangerous person to be arraigned at the courthouse. The conclusion that the courthouse was evacuated to expel the journalists inside lest they got a glimpse at the arrested individual is nearly inevitable. The presence of several Homeland Security cars in front of the building shows that the arrest was terror-related. The timely correlation to the messages of the arrest and their retraction strongly suggests that the person in the van was the subject of these messages - almost certainly the dark-skinned male reported by King.

The "Lanza" / Haddad family is CIA connected

When a drill goes live, people die.

Rehearsing Reality

In primitive and savage societies, complex nonverbal communication occurs before all important events. No public event, good or bad, is then a surprise.

If it were important, as it is to the luciferians seeking to maintain a strangehold over anglo-saxon civilisation, to make sure that the victims or targets of an event "had notice" beforehand, and therefore in some skewed way could be said to have had warning and a chance to avoid it (how exactly?) and therefore in turn could be said to have chosen of their own free will to experience the event, this nonverbal communication is essential.

For the non-technological societies- dances and feasts. For the fascist state: terror drills.

AGAIN?!? Eyewitness: Authorities Announced “Drill” Before Boston Explosions |

Eyewitness: Authorities Announced “Drill” Before Boston Explosions |

University of Mobile’s Cross Country Coach, who was near the finish line of the Boston Marathon when a series of explosions went off, said he thought it was odd there were bomb sniffing dogs at the start and finish lines.

“They kept making announcements to the participants do not worry, it’s just a training exercise,” Coach Ali Stevenson told Local 15.

Stevenson said he saw law enforcement spotters on the roofs at the start of the race. He’s been in plenty of marathons in Chicago, D.C., Chicago, London and other major metropolitan areas but has never seen that level of security before.

“Evidently, I don’t believe they were just having a training exercise,” Stevenson said. “I think they must have had some sort of threat or suspicion called in.”

Stevenson had just finished the marathon before the explosions. Stevenson said his wife had been sitting in one of the seating sections where an explosion went off, but thankfully she left her seat and was walking to meet up with him.

“We are just so thankful right now,” Stevenson said.

////////////////////////////

An eyewitness to the two explosions at the Boston Marathon today said that a “drill” was repeatedly announced before the bombs exploded and that he “thought it was odd” bomb sniffing dogs were in place before the blast.

Image: Twitter

University of Mobile’s Cross Country Coach Ali Stevenson told Local 15 News, “They kept making announcements on the loud speaker that it was just a drill and there was nothing to worry about. “It seemed like there was some sort of threat, but they kept telling us it was just a drill.”

The news station also reports that Stevenson “thought it was odd there were bomb sniffing dogs at the start and finish lines.”

Stevenson then describes hearing the explosions as he ran away from the scene, having just completed the marathon.

If this report is accurate, it clearly suggests there could have been some degree of prior knowledge of the bombing, which killed two people and injured at least 23.

The fact that the explosions were preceded and overlapped by a”drill” of an almost identical nature mirrors other major terror attacks, such as the 7/7 bombings in London.

It is important to emphasize that the New York Times recently reported that most of the recent domestic terror plots in the United States “were facilitated by the F.B.I.,” suggesting that today’s incident in Boston may have been part of such an operation.

It remains to be seen how the media and the Obama administration will exploit this incident depending who gets the blame, but Rahm Emanuel’s “never let a serious crisis go to waste” advisory is sure to be in play.

Fundraiser gone wrong. Once (WTC 93) could be an accident. Twice (OKC bombing) looks like negligence. Three times (911) ... Is enemy action.

30 111041

Caller (rep. Istook): "I don't think they expected the truck to blow up. I believe, and I've believed this for a long time... I believe that number two — John Doe #2 — was a federal agent working undercover. And I believe that he helped McVeigh steal the goods and helped buy the equipment, and I believe that he helped McVeigh make the bomb, and I believe that his whole task in this whole thing... his only real task was to render the device safe so that the federal agents could pretend to remove it and move in. They did not want to move in until he was cleared of the scene so that they wouldn't tip their hands. See what I'm saying? And the odds are pretty good that whole reason behind this is because they were after someone bigger than McVeigh, which means they probably think he was linked to somebody in the Militia movement or something like that. "So I think what you're saying... you know I understand what you're saying... but I don't think you see the big picture. I don't think that , you know, I'd only divulge a look at the big picture if that's the actual scenario. If that's the actual scenario, which I believe it to be, I think there really is no claim that the agent, that was John Doe #2, did not render the bomb safe. Which he very well may have rendered the bomb safe, and then McVeigh may have put in a second fail-safe which he didn't know about. Which is probably what's happened.... "I would bet money on that's, in fact, the way this whole thing came down. Yes, they stood out in front of the building. Yes, they followed him directly to the building. Yes, they watched him get out of the building... get out of the truck. Yes, they watched him drive off. That's not ... that was their plan. I don't believe they ever planned to apprehend him anywhere near the building. I believe that John Doe #2 was a federal witness. His job was to render the device safe. Therefore, the only thing sitting out in front of that building was a bomb... a truck loaded with a bomb that would not go off. And I think that's the situation. In fact I know it is."

McDonald: "Okay... so... so why didn't they just come out and explain that to everybody?"

Caller: "The public doesn't have to know that. When it comes to the national security and things like this, the public does not have to know... the public is not required to know. First of all, by doing that, they would've, uh, put their witness, which is the federal agent John Doe #2, they would have blown his cover, first of all. Which possibly he's involved in something right now that you have no idea about. You know, there very well may have been numerous plots involving numerous buildings. See what I'm saying? You don't have the whole picture... without full knowledge... what you may do may cost them their lives. You should be very aware of that."

 McDonald: "Okay. Well, that's what I've been trying to be very careful of. I don't want to see anyone else get hurt. At the same time..."

Caller: "...Well, if that guy's cover's been blown, he'd dead already."

 McDonald: "Do you think so?"

 Caller: "Sure... I'm sure. Once you have gone up to this point, it has gotten out, which I'm sure it has, because there are moles everywhere... the chances are good that he's been terminated already and this whole thing has blown up in their face. I don't believe that, out of an act of negligence, these highly trained professionals would have allowed that man to leave that truck out in front of that building with its live bomb in it."

McDonald: No, no, no. It stood out there for the whole time, from the time it pulled up until it went off."

Caller: "That's what I'm saying. They would not have allowed it. The only reason they allowed the truck to sit there so long, is because in my opinion they were under the impression that that bomb was rendered safe. And I'd say that there was no rush... there was no reason... to evacuate the building. There was no rush to make an arrest. The truck was just going to sit out there until they went and towed it off. So I don't think they thought it was an emergency and I think either that John Doe #2 made a mistake in rendering the bomb safe, or McVeigh was smart enough to plant a second fail-safe. Which most bomb makers do."

McDonald: "Do you think that's why they didn't tell anybody?"

 Caller: "No. The bomb was safe as far as they knew."

McDonald: "Okay. Well, that explains why there was so many of them (federal agents) there so fast."

Caller: "Exactly. They followed him to the building, their agent was in the truck with him when they followed him to the building, everything was under control, as far as they thought, all they had was the man who built the bomb that was not going to go off, because their agent had rendered it safe. And their whole thing was not a problem. Let him drive his truck right in front of his target, then they allowed him to drive off. "Once he drives off, he renders the truck safe, and then we can have the trooper arrest him on the interstate for bogus charges. Which they did, and this was all planned out 1 00 percent. I . . . I . . . I don't believe they allowed that truck. . . "

 McDonald: "You don't think they intentionally let the bomb go off?"

Caller: "No, that's right. I'll never believe that."

 McDonald: "Well, I mean, that's the only thing about this that I found so hard to believe."

Caller: "They... they thought the bomb was safe. They thought that their agent, who was in the truck and who helped prepare the bomb, would set it so it would not go off. Now, whether McVeigh went back to the truck... where the agent did not know... and put a second fail- safe... or the agent made a mistake and did not actually render the bomb safe like he was supposed to... that's what's going on here."

McDonald: "Well, see, that's it then. I wanted someone that would be able to tell us for a fact if this was, like, deliberate or not. You know what I'm saying?"

Caller: "I'm not gong to tell you that. Let me tell you something. I'm sure they had... everything was under surveillance there. So I'm sure they do have pictures of the building blowing up, and I'm sure they do have pictures of federal agents, and I'm sure they do have audio tapes of them saying: Let 'em go, let 'em go. . . Wait, wait, wait. . . " there was no rush in their mind. In their mind, there was no rush to get that truck away from that building... that bomb... was not supposed to go off. "Therefore, everything they did, fits, if you think about it. they followed it, they allowed it to drive up there knowing that there was a bomb in the truck. Their idea was to let John Doe #2 — their federal agent — they would be able to use him in further investigations of these bombings of these groups that are in militia groups. And this was a perfect entry in, because he could have went through there. "After McVeigh was arrested, John Doe #2 would have become a hero to the cause of the militias. And the militias would have taken him in and hid him, which would have made him part of the infrastructure of the militias. Which is what their goal was forthis whole thing... waste bust the militias. If you take the big picture, and look at the big picture, there were very few mistakes made on this sting operation,  with the exception that John Doe #2, the federal agent, did not render the bomb safe. Just think of it this way, Ramona."

McDonald: "I've always been a big fan of the United States and that, but then... I've always been... this was the one thing that bothered me."

Caller: "They didn't let the building fall intentionally. Their opinion was that this bomb was rendered safe and this bomb would not go off. And their whole thing on this thing... if you think about it... it makes sense from a tactical standpoint. You would follow the truck to the building. You allow your lead suspect to get away from the building because it didn't blow up, because it's not supposed to. You take John Doe #2... he gets away, which is your federal agent. John Doe #1 — McVeigh — is arrested on a bogus charge and then later proven that he's the one who planted the bomb that did not go off."

McDonald: "But you honestly don't think that they really intended..."

Caller: "Not at all. Not at all. They would not have to. No.... Basically, what happened is, this was a mistake. Someone screwed up and the only one that screwed up... The agents on the scene? They didn't screw up. They did exactly what their orders were: Wait... allow the suspect to leave the scene. Once the suspect had left the scene, then render the truck safe, which is already safe. All they have to do is get in, give it a hot-wire, and drive it off to a safe location and then open up the back and disarm the bomb. Which was supposedly rendered safe to begin with. Okay? "And then, from there... they charge in... See, the plan... this plan was put in motion before the bomb ever went off. Their intent was to allow McVeigh to be arrested later on... John Doe#2 to get away... and then, John Doe #2, the Federal Government would have released a sketch or picture. And then, that man would have had to go underground and hide. Where would he hide? He would have hid with the militias. The militias would take him in as a hero. The militias would give him hero status in the Militia movement, which would allow him to be privy to information that the government could use later on... "...they did not want that building to blow up. I guarantee you this... their whole intent was that that bomb was rendered safe before it was ever parked in frontof that building... otherwise, they would have quietly..."

 McDonald: "...Got everybody out of the building?"

 Caller: "Got everybody out of the building, before the bomb ever even pulled up in front of the building. There was no reason for them to do that, because according to their plan, the bomb was safe now. There was no reason to evacuate the building and the panic... because there was a truck loaded with a bomb that was not going to blow up. . . . "

McDonald: "Okay." Caller: "See what I'm saying? And John Doe#2.... By going this far with it... Let me explain something to you. Your actions have consequences. There are a lot of witnesses. There are a lot of agents right now in the hills that are infiltrating these militia groups, and... all these people will get killed. Their blood will be on your hands. I understand that you want... If I really thought that the government allowed the building to blow up, I would be with you 100 percent. But I know... and I believe... they were horrified when the bomb went off... really horrified."

 McDonald: "Yeah, they all looked like they were in shock."


 Caller: "They figured, as soon as McVeigh got free, as soon as he got... drove off in his car... and I'll tell you something they did. Do you what they did?"

McDonald: "What?"

 Caller: ""They stole his license plate off that car. You know why? So they"d have probable cause to stop him on the interstate.... They stole his plate. Why do you think the plate was never found? His plate was stolen from the vehicle and the Federal Government stole the plate from the vehicle, so that he would be arrested... John Doe #2 would go free, they would put a sketch out that would make him "America"s Most Wanted." The only place that a man that would be wanted by the government can hide would be to be hid by the militia groups inside their infrastructure. ""But once he infiltrates the infrastructure... and he"s in... all of a sudden he"s a hero. And right now, you know, these groups probably believe that they have John Doe #2 and that they"re hiding him from the government and they"re doing the patriotic thing... and they believe that the building should have blown up. So they"re holding him. Now, this man"s privy to all kinds of information about future bombings, which we don"t even know how many bombs they have stopped because the agents... how many lives have been saved because that agent"s now in the militia. And if this comes to light... this operation...""

What the caller does is attempt to instill guilt in McDonald over her efforts to reveal the truth.

Yet McDonald did not allow 169 innocent people to be killed through her negligence and stupidity.

TWA 800: Silenced

Ryder Mystery: McVeigh as patsy, mind control victim, FBI's impossible bomb theory creates new laws of math and physics, 'Bomb Factory' image analyzed as commercial grade ANFO factory

Ryder Mystery: McVeigh as patsy, mind control victim, FBI's impossible bomb theory creates new laws of math and physics, 'Bomb Factory' image analyzed as commercial grade ANFO factory

 The Ryder Truck 'Bomb Factory' Images Made Public
This affair is a great enigma. The anonymously supplied images shown here would, as claimed by the source, seem to potentially portray a secret bomb manufacturing facility for the bomb used on the Federal Building in Oklahoma City -- actually capturing the Ryder rental truck on film. The images were reportedly taken over the US Army base of Camp Gruber, Braggs Oklahoma, in early April of 1995, just prior to the explosion at the Murrah Building. There are reasons to consider this might be so -- just as there are reasons to be wary...
 
The original image pair was posted in 1997 at <http://www.speedtrap.com/speedtrap>, which no longer offers the material (makes sense as the site has nothing to do with such matters.) The holder of the original images wished, at that time, to remain anonymous out of reasonable fear from harm. Subsequently, a second image was released through <http://members.aol.com/bardsquill/truck.htm>, a site which remains very active on topic and offers a significant collection of material, mostly opinions rather than evidential. I posted both images along with critical evaluation about a year later. Since then, the holder of the originals has come forward: Norio Hayakawa is an outspoken and controversial expert on Area 51 who has since retired and who has not personally promoted the images. He was affiliated with Ted L. Gunderson, a well known figure active in civilian investigations into the OK bombing, and it is likely that relationship which prompted release of the images. 



Unretouched, uncorrected images as taken from original Web postings (no copyright - see corrected image versions here)
We are right to express a healthy doubt the images are as claimed. The source of the images was not known (anonymous pilot), the story behind acquisition unverifiable. Flaws within the images and an extremely poor color and contrast quality suggest the "originals" are second generation. The original presenter is both controversial (as am I) and has himself never personally promoted the images. It was originally claimed by Mr. Hayakawa that the photographer would soon come forward to tell his story. This did not happen, increasing the natural skepticism factor, though there is now a growing body of evidence, presented herein, that the pilot has died under mysterious circumstance - in an amazing and suspicious coincidence, within a few hundred feet of the actual sit of the images. There is also a third party who has come forward to a certain government official to claim himself to be the pilot, but under circumstances which make his motives suspicious and his claims false - things even the official found peculiar.
 
Further, it would have been logical for Mr. Hayakawa to have given the images to his consort and OK activist, Ted Gunderson. That he did not implies that Ted did NOT want to be associated with the images, perhaps out of concerns they might be proven fraud and result in harm to his work and reputation. Many persons have already rushed forward to claim the image a fraud, or impossible to be as portrayed for many reasons. Even I found that high-magnification and image enhancement of the vehicle indicates it is likely a 1996 Honda Civic manufactured well after the bombing. That finding was immediately challenged by many as flawed analysis subject to human error and suffering technical limitations which made any such conclusion little more than 'a guess.' But if any of the cited negatives were true, the image and its relevance becomes suspect. However, new proof reveals the image was indeed taken prior to the availability of such a Honda.  I yield to it with a graceful 'Oops!' and point out that I myself had warned that the Honda conclusion was questionable.

But we are also right to consider the image as possibly being exactly as claimed. An amazing number of persons who have attacked the validity of these images have intelligence community and military ties, applying disinformation tactics, a matter in which I am considered expert.  A large number of them are also the same persons who have come forward to attempt to deflate other conspiracy claims regarding Oklahoma, Flight 800, and so forth. This smacks of orchestrated disinformation tactics and, in my mind, renders the images more likely to be genuine. At the least, it makes me want to take a closer look at the matter.
 
The issue of harassment attacks on Mr. Hayakawa which caused him to retire not too long after these images were widely circulated and discussed, fits the profile of similar government attacks used against proponents of Flight 800 friendly fire, myself included. This, too, gives me reason to lean towards acceptance of the images. The image content, reviewed with the knowledge I possess about CIA's METC bomb technology lends great credibility in my mind that this is indeed a bomb factory. Late breaking discoveries show it could also be a facility for production of high-performance commercial grade ANFO bombs, and will be shortly presented as a cornerstone of this presentation..
Finally, in my book, Fatal Rebirth, I discuss a former CIA operative historically associated with CIA weapons research projects, such as the Ingram submachine gun and B.R. Fox killing devices (exploding light bulbs, etc.) A  former operative with a background in a number of agencies contacted me to suggest this same man, Jim Werbell, was peripherally involved with the bombing. And still another former operative told me (prior to any discovery by news or government) about a notorious German named Andreas Strassmeir who has ties to the East German Secret Police (the STASI) and who was alleged to be illegally in the country at the time, and thought to have been involved in terrorist bombings of night clubs in Europe which killed American servicemen.  Both he and Werbell are exactly the type of people who would be logically assigned to a covert bombing, and both were apparently in the same places at the same times, and met with McVeigh. All these things suggest suspicion is justified, especially since many of the elements have since been confirmed true.  A good place to test that suspicions validity is government's response through media about the aerial images.
 
The original images were posted in 1997, existing at first in only two places on the Web - note thus seen as particularly important 'national issue.'  Yet it did create at least some public concern, and this in turn resulted in citizens talking to their Congressmen and asking if they had seen the image and what was going on with it.  Mainstream media was also being contacted, but not one elected to investigate or write about the matter.  The reader might be wise to ask why not?
 
Still, one might reasonably assume that, if a military conspiracy was involved in the bombing (the photographs being a bomb factory as claimed), that some tactic would be in order that might insure Congressmen would not put too much thought into the matter... concluding the images was not a bomb factory at all, and the Ryder truck was mere coincidence blown out of proportion by 'conspiracy theorists.'  That thought will be revisited.  Something did happen to serve these ends, and it happened very quick on the heels of the debut of the images.  An article would finally appear in the Washington Post, and no where else. Congress dumbed down on the images.  I would hope the reader would ask why the issue was carried only in D.C., and want to take a closer look at the story and consider if it was legitimate, or disinformation.


Secret DARPA Weapon Project Tied to Ryder Truck 'Bomb Factory' Site by Washington Post 
 
The Oklahoma National Guard is cited in a 06/14/1997 newspaper article by  Washington Post Staff Writer, Richard Leiby, as admitting that  the facility in question was a classified DARPA weapon testing  project.  In the article MANY MILITIA GROUPS SCALE BACK, DISTANCE THEMSELVES FROM MCVEIGH, the author avoids pointing readers to any specific Web site, merely alluding to their existence.  This denies readers any means of looking for themselves to see what the writer is talking about, a matter which might arguably be described as an indicator that the purpose of the article is less than sincere, not willing to let readers be fully informed or draw their own conclusions.  Quoting...
 

"Other Web sites carry photos of a Ryder truck parked at a  military installation in Oklahoma, where conspiracy-minded  investigators contend the fertilizer bomb was assembled. The Oklahoma National Guard confirmed Friday that the aerial photos were indeed taken above Camp Gruber in the fall of 1994 and said the classified project involved weapons sensors and was overseen by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency.  The National Guard's statement said the truck 'had no association  whatsoever with the tragedy at the Alfred P. Murrah Building."

Note a bit of smoke? The traditional derogatory (disinformation) tactic of labeling anyone showing the image as  'conspiracy-minded' sounds a bit familiar.  Such 'conclusion' labeling has no place in a newspaper-of-record journalistic effort which is supposed to report the facts and allow the reader  to deduce for themselves.  This tactic was first employed successfully in  like manner to cause anyone to shy away from asking questions about the Kennedy assassination - those who dared being labeled 'conspiracy theorists.' 

The tactic is still used today in general media,  despite hard facts which have surfaced to clearly show there was  indeed a conspiracy which involved CIA... facts which would likely not have come to light without the so-called 'conspiracy-minded'  citizens so villainized by media such as the Washington Post - who failed to do the investigation themselves.  Another good example is media's continued labeling of Randy Weaver as White Separatist/Supremist even though courtroom testimony has proven otherwise according to at least one honest local paper willing to publish the pertinent transcripts.  But government handed media a  piece of paper with those words on it in a press release, and  thus, media has dutifully reprinted and repeated (endlessly, unceasingly, and joyfully) the racial hate group labels as gospel ever since. Hitler's propaganda machine master mind, Dr. Gobels, explained the technique this way: "If you repeat a lie often enough, the people will believe it."
 
Of course, I should talk.  I use such labels extensively in my  own writing.  I use labels like 'disinformation' and  'disinformationalist', 'cover up' and 'conspiracy' to describe whatever seems to me to represent those particular ducks.  The  difference is,  They use such terms to suppress inquiry and challenges to their brand of truth, and I use them to challenge the reader to demand the truth.  The other difference, of course, is that I serve no master, am owned by no corporate entity, certainly not a military contractor, as are many of the major news organs of today. Thus, my labels are not friendly to  the NWO or  military-industrial- intelligence-media complex (MIIM, a term I originated in my book, Fatal Rebirth), and  theirs are. Seems to me someone has to challenge spoon-fed  journalism of the Fourth Column. I am thankful that at least one Political Science and one Journalism professor has seen fit to use my 25 Rules of Disinformation as part of their curriculum in two different universities.

Clearly, media (even such as the Washington Post) was not up to  the task to question government's actions and tell us the truth  in those instances.  In point of fact, I maintain there is hardly a mainstream media source which is not part and parcel of the general disinformation problem which would send Diogenes home empty handed. The ancient Greek searched all his life for one honest man, and if alive today, I suggest that media is the last place he should look.  Any superficial examination of CIA's Operation Mockingbird which started almost immediately after formation of the Agency in 1947 will reveal a deliberate ongoing policy of infiltrating major media groups to specifically control what is distributed through the American press and broadcast networks. It represents nothing less than an illegal covert attack upon the people of the United States which exactly mirrors the kind of subversive tactics and methods CIA applies when overthrowing the leadership of any other country.  Do you wonder why they do it, and why, Congress knowing they do it, allows it?  It is, in point of fact, a form of mind control.

More to the point, the Washington Post was quick to willingly sign onto that program, and actively play 'pocket paper' for CIA ever since. Now deceased (shotgunned to death under what some describe as 'spooky' circumstances) Philip Graham, publisher and senior editor of the Post has been cited as believing "...the function of the press was more often than not to mobilize consent for the policies of the government."  He is further cited as an architect of Mockingbird -  the use and manipulation of journalists by the CIA. Where were these citations from?  A critical book on topic by Deborah Davis titled Katharine The Great (the successor heir to the Post empire being his wife, "Kate".)  What happened to that book is equally telling. Some 20,000 copies (almost the entire production) were purchased by CIA and destroyed. So we might not want to believe everything we read in the Post - or any other mainstream media. Learn more here.

In this case, the photograph clearly  deserves that the posed questions to be asked, but we obviously  cannot well rely on media to do its job and ask on our behalf. Further, I object to the  inference that "conspiracy-minded investigators contend the fertilizer bomb was assembled"

2012 Olympics LIHOP

Whistleblower sacked after speaking out about G4S cutting corners when vetting security staff | Mail Online

A whistleblower who claims staff cut corners while vetting security staff for the London Olympics was escorted from her place of work.

Data input clerk Sarah Hubble was interviewed by bosses, then told not to return after contacting the media about her experiences working for G4S.

Miss Hubble, 27, from Darlington, County Durham, claimed the system was creaking under the pressure of processing thousands of applications ahead of this summer’s games.

She said staff had to process a minimum of ten applications an hour and that the documents ended up piled in corners at the office in Stockton-on-Tees.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2153783/Whistleblower-sacked-speaking-G4S-cutting-corners-vetting-security-staff.html#ixzz1wmLzft41

What's the difference between the Soviet Union and the modern Western security state? Answer: the Soviet Union no longer officially exists.

False Flag: we shoot ourselves, to blame people who we "know" are "dangerous" because they would shoot us if they could, but we're too good at fighting them for that to be true. So, we shoot ourselves then squeeze their dead hand on the gun to get their prints on the murder weapon.

The question increasingly is why bother? The media are lying scum who are in the pocket of the corporate-socialist interests anyway so why bother even going through the farce?

The fact that details are still faked tells you something very crucial. That is, the control systems are nowhere near as perfect or powerful as the corporate-socialist propaganda makes it out to be.

It is still possible to be free, but freedom is not a charity given, it is a right protected.

CIA fundraiser exposed

BBC News - Al-Qaeda underwear bomber 'was double agent'

Reports from the US say the would-be suicide attacker in a foiled "underwear bomb" plot was in fact a double agent.

US officials are quoted as saying that the person dispatched by Yemen-based al-Qaeda to attack a US-bound plane had infiltrated the group.

***

Best way to sell umbrellas: make it rain.

NO ONE TO VOTE FOR: Britain's 9-11 Cover Up: WHAT WILL BECOME OF US?

NO ONE TO VOTE FOR: Britain's 9-11 Cover Up: WHAT WILL BECOME OF US?

 What will become of a people too mentally lazy and stupidly trusting to take an interest in their own survival?

Yesterday Mike Adams published an excellent article titled 'The Gullible Mind Explained'. It could have been describing the wall of uncritical and lazy reporting now hitting the airwaves regarding Lady Justice Hallett's report on the recent 7/7 Inquest.

The content of this report was easily predictable. Simply inevitable.

There are two competing narratives to explain this crime:

1) The official story of four suicide bombers murdering 52 people and injuring hundreds by exploding four bombs on three tube trains and one bus on the morning of 7/7.

2) Forces embedded within the establishment carried out a false-flag attack against the British people. As with nearly all false-flag events, patsies were set up to take the blame for the crime. The four Muslims were completely innocent actors paid to participate in a concurrent anti-terror 'drill'.

As you will have guessed, I am one of the many who subscribe to conspiracy theory number two.