Showing posts with label fugue for a darkening island. Show all posts
Showing posts with label fugue for a darkening island. Show all posts

Sunday, February 16, 2014

The Black Steam Train: Success - we like it white

The Black Steam Train: Success - we like it white



Success - we like it white


Why are these people smiling?





Picture



The two on the left are smiling because they've not long returned from
Harvard.  The two on the right are smiling because they're about to
depart for Oxford.



The 2012 Charlie Perkins Trust Scholars



These three (excluding of course, the not-for-much-longer PM) are smiling because they're off to Oxford & Cambridge.



And yes, they're all Aboriginal.  All helped to achieve their dreams and
more success than they imagined by the generous people at the Roberta
Sykes Indigenous Education Foundation & The Charlie Perkins
Scholarship Trust, with help from the faithful taxpayers of course. 



Both organisations make some pretty high aims.  Some of them I even
agree with, like needing more positive Aboriginal role models and
mentors out there, however, I disagree with having an overwhelming
majority of white faces cast to play those roles.  That is not to say
that each of those people in the photo above won't be a great role model
due to their achievements and efforts for their own family, or their
friends, but a nationwide beacon of hope to all Aboriginal people? You
can't even hope to claim such a thing is true.



What these opportunities have done is help these specific people.  Not
all Aboriginal people .  We have no end of Doctors, Lawyers, Academics,
Artists and Authors who identify as Aboriginal, however - it seems a
smaller and smaller number of those are easily identifiable as
Aboriginal - and therein lies the difference.  Whilst someone of a
similarly fair complexion who identifies as Aboriginal may be able to
look up to the group above and see one or more of them as someone whose
achievements they can aspire to, that is just not the case for me. 



Perhaps, what is most disappointing, is the fact that when we question
this lack of black faces among those receiving assistance in the name of
Aboriginal Equality, we're called racist, or perpetrators of Lateral
Violence.   Whilst taking part in the 'Aboriginal or Not' SBS program,
Greg Lehmann stressed the point that those of us questioning the motives
of those like him were guilty of Lateral Violence and responsible for
much of the infighting amongst Aboriginal people.









A pretty comfortable position to take when you're on the blackfella dollar at Oxford, bruz. 



Similarly, Kyle Turner, recipient of a scholarship in excess of $50,000
for Aboriginal students, wrote a piece denouncing any questioning of
heritage in a piece in The Global Mail in
August last year, using the tired line of 'Bolt is a neo-con', rather
than address the questions people like Bolt have even raised. It is just
easier to keep labelling people I guess, as engaging in a dialogue on
the issues may just bring to the surface some uncomfortable truths that
cast some of us in an unfavourable light.



But who is that helping to succeed?
StumbleUpon

Why did floods agency spend hundreds on 'equali-tea' gay awareness mugs... and £30,000 on gay pride marches? As Britain counts cost of shoddy defences, we reveal bizarre spending by quango bosses | Mail Online

Why did floods agency spend hundreds on 'equali-tea' gay awareness mugs... and £30,000 on gay pride marches? As Britain counts cost of shoddy defences, we reveal bizarre spending by quango bosses | Mail Online



Why did floods agency spend hundreds on 'equali-tea' gay awareness
mugs... and £30,000 on gay pride marches? As Britain counts cost of
shoddy defences, we reveal bizarre spending by quango bosses

  • Investigation shows the
    Environment Agency, headed by Lord Chris Smith - Britain's first openly
    gay Cabinet Minister - spent £639 on gay rights mugs
  • EA also spent £30,000 sponsoring Birmingham's Gay Pride festival in 2009
  • Comes as EA faces growing criticism of its handling of the flooding crisis
StumbleUpon

Thursday, February 13, 2014

Jerry Seinfeld takes down racial bean counters at Buzzfeed, Gawker over ‘anti-comedy’ political correctness « Douglas Ernst

Jerry Seinfeld takes down racial bean counters at Buzzfeed, Gawker over ‘anti-comedy’ political correctness « Douglas Ernst



Surely, Chayka researched this post before he went off on a tear. He
must know that Seinfeld called Pryor “the Picasso of our profession,”
or that he hosted an event honoring Cosby and called himself “not that
funny” by comparison, or that Ansari regularly joins Seinfeld’s
exclusive inner circle of comedians. Et cetera, et cetera.


In fact, there are few working comedians who do not have a story to
tell about how Seinfeld and his encouraging cohorts aided in the
development of their careers.


Surely, he knew all this and merely sought to intentionally mislead
his audience. The alternative would be that Chayka just did not care so
much about the subject as his preconceived opinion before publishing it
in what he must have known was a public forum… Which just couldn’t be.


StumbleUpon

Friday, January 17, 2014

Preliminary Notes - Atomic Rockets

StumbleUpon

Sunday, December 22, 2013

By all means be nice to boat people. But let’s also respect the facts | Herald Sun Andrew Bolt Blog

StumbleUpon

Sunday, July 7, 2013

Rudd created the illegal boat problem. He can't fix what he broke. So according to Fairfax that clearly makes it Abbott's fault. - Michael Smith News

Rudd created the illegal boat problem. He can't fix what he broke. So according to Fairfax that clearly makes it Abbott's fault. - Michael Smith News

President Yudhoyono is steeped in Javanese culture.  He's seldom direct, never rude and often speaks in the adorned metaphors that the animist Javanese illustrate their conversations with.   When he speaks of Australia leaving the sugar on the table, he's pointing to wayward Indonesian children whose job it is to clean up after meals.   Every child knows that if you leave sugar on the table, you'll see one or two ants pop up to have a taste.  Wait a minute and there will be several continuous line of ants established in Ibu's nice clean kitchen.   Small Indonesian children know that you don't leave the family's sugar spilt on the table.   Families that value their stuff look after it and they don't encourage visitors to come and help themselves.

Got the message Kev?   How does Fairfax morph the fact that The Rudd created a huge problem into a chance to whack Abbott?  What motivates them to see it from that perspective?

StumbleUpon

Saturday, July 6, 2013

UK: Immigrants Create Overcrowding and Fuel Tensions, Report Finds



UK: Immigrants Create Overcrowding and Fuel Tensions, Report Finds
Asylum seekers, refugees and low-skilled immigrants are creating overcrowding, fueling community tensions and putting pressure on the NHS, a government report has found.

Home Office researchers have assessed for the first time the ground-level impact of immigration on British communities by conducting a survey of local authorities and service providers.

They found that immigrants were likely to lead to longer waiting times at GP surgeries, be involved in anti-social behaviour and create pest control issues because of overcrowding.

Mark Harper, the immigration minister, said: “This report highlights the significant impact high levels of migration have had on UK communities.

“It emphasises the importance of protecting our public services and taking a robust approach against those who come here to exploit our welfare system.

“While we have always recognised and believed in the benefits of immigration, uncontrolled immigration causes a number of problems for the United Kingdom."

StumbleUpon

Saturday, June 1, 2013

Why white genocide, blackenisation and the attack on Anglo-Saxon Civilisation (there's no such thing as "Western Civilisation') matters.

“Unless people start life with a culture of their own, exposure to other cultures will seldom enhance their moral or even aesthetic awareness. Without home culture, as it used to be called – a background of firmly held standards and beliefs – people will encounter the “other” merely as consumers of impressions and sensations, as cultural shoppers in pursuit of the latest novelties. It is important for people to measure their own values against others and to run the risk of changing their minds; but exposure to others will do them very little good if they have no minds to risk. New perspectives presuppose a pre-existing point of view.”

Christopher Lasch.

StumbleUpon

Sunday, May 26, 2013

EDL: attacked by the ruling class for trying to stop the anti-white genocide.

StumbleUpon

Here. Have a reality check about islamofags and their satanic cult.

StumbleUpon

Wednesday, May 22, 2013

Welcome to the Planet of the Apes

Mum talked down Woolwich terrorists who told her: 'We want to start a war in London tonight' - Telegraph

Ingrid Loyau-Kennett ... was a passenger on a number 53 bus which was travelling past the scene, and jumped off to check the soldier’s pulse.

“Being a cub leader I have my first aid so when I saw this guy on the floor I thought it was an accident then I saw the guy was dead and I could not feel any pulse.

“And then when I went up there was this black guy with a revolver and a kitchen knife, he had what looked like butcher’s tools and he had a little axe, to cut the bones, and two large knives and he said ‘move off the body’.

“So I thought ‘OK, I don’t know what is going on here’ and he was covered with blood. I thought I had better start talking to him before he starts attacking somebody else. I thought these people usually have a message so I said ‘what do you want?’…

“...he said ‘I killed him because he killed Muslims and I am fed up with people killing Muslims in Afghanistan they have nothing to do there."… I started to notice more weapons and the guy behind him with more weapons as well. By then, people had started to gather around. So I thought OK, I should keep him talking to me before he noticed everything around him…

“I said ’right now it is only you versus many people, you are going to lose...’
“The other one was much shier and I went to him and I said ‘well, what about you? Would you like to give me what you have in your hands?’...”
Mrs Loyau-Kennett was not the only woman to show extraordinary courage. Others shielded the soldier’s body as the killers stood over them. 
***
Women doing men's jobs in effeminate beta male dominated Britain. A total fucking disgrace on British manhood.

StumbleUpon

Tuesday, May 14, 2013

How muslims and their supporters destroy anglo-saxon culture and the working class

StumbleUpon

Saturday, February 9, 2013

The only trouble with socialism is, sooner or later you run out of other people's money. -Margaret Thatcher

StumbleUpon

Monday, December 3, 2012

NO MORE BLACKENISATION: two different flavours of unwanted immigrant kill each other, destroy fabric of local culture

Man, 21, charged with murder following death of teen at Woodridge party on Saturday night | Herald Sun

A 21-year-old man has been charged with murder and remanded in custody following the death of a teenager at a party on Saturday night. 
 
Charles Greene from Woodridge has been charged with murder, dangerous operation of a motor vehicle and callous disregard.

He was represented by duty lawyer Lex Weddell during a mention in Beenleigh Magistrates Court this morning before Magistrate Trevor Morgan.

He is now due to appear via video link in the Beenleigh Magistrates Court on January 21, when a full brief of evidence is due to be presented.

Greene has been charged over the death of 17-year-old Jordan Matehaere Tukaki after a brawl broke out at a party in Woodridge.
StumbleUpon

Thursday, November 15, 2012

Reality Check or Right-Wing Rant? Can't it be both?

StumbleUpon

Thursday, November 8, 2012

Richard Nixon, you are officially off the hook.

Looks more like Frank Davis by the day.
StumbleUpon

Tuesday, October 30, 2012

French Youth oppose multiculturalism and cultural marxism of all kinds

StumbleUpon

Friday, October 26, 2012

Articles: Darkness Descending in England

Articles: Darkness Descending in England

The arrest of over 53 people in the United Kingdom is the beginning of the end for once-great Britain.
StumbleUpon

Monday, October 15, 2012

Was Mass Immigration a Conspiracy?

MigrationWatchUK

Official figures to be published on Thursday will confirm that foreign immigration under Labour added more than three million to our population.

At the same time nearly one million British citizens voted with their feet, some saying that they were leaving because England was no longer a country that they recognised.

How could all this have happened in the teeth of public opposition? Even the Labour government’s own survey last February showed that 77 per cent of the public wanted immigration reduced, including 54 per cent of the ethnic communities, while 50 per cent of the public wanted it reduced ‘by a lot’.

There are, of course, good arguments for controlled and limited immigration. Migration in both directions is a natural part of an open economy. And there are many immigrants who are valuable both to our economy and our society.

Mass immigration is an entirely different matter. The question now is how did it happen and what can be done about it. Was it all a Labour conspiracy? Was it sheer incompetence in government? Or was it wholesale retreat in front of the race relations lobby?

Landmark
The strongest evidence for conspiracy comes from one of Labour’s own. Andrew Neather, a previously unheard-of speechwriter for Blair, Straw and Blunkett, popped up with an article in the Evening Standard in October 2009 which gave the game away.

Immigration, he wrote, ‘didn’t just happen; the  deliberate policy of Ministers from late 2000…was to open up the UK to mass immigration’.

He was at the heart of policy in September 2001, drafting the landmark speech by the then Immigration Minister Barbara Roche, and he reported ‘coming away from some discussions with the clear sense that the policy was intended - even if this wasn’t its main purpose - to rub the Right’s nose in diversity and render their arguments out of date’.

That seemed, even to him, a manoeuvre too far.

The result is now plain for all to see. Even Blair’s favourite think tank, the Institute for Public Policy Research (IPPR), commented recently: ‘It is no exaggeration to say that immigration under New Labour has changed the face of the country.’

It is not hard to see why Labour’s own apparatchiks supported the policy. Provided that the white working class didn’t cotton on, there were votes in it.

Research into voting patterns conducted for the Electoral Commission after the 2005 general election found that 80 per cent of Caribbean and African voters had voted Labour, while only about 3 per cent had voted Conservative and roughly 8 per cent for the Liberal Democrats.

The Asian vote was split about 50 per cent for Labour, 10 per cent Conservatives  and 15 per cent Liberal Democrats.

Nor should we underestimate the power of ‘community leaders’ who have strong influence in constituency Labour parties and who, of course, benefit from a growth in numbers.
Other activists, nurtured in the anti-apartheid movement of the last century, had no difficulty promoting the interests of minority groups — almost, it seems, regardless of the impact on the white working class.

There were also economic factors. A collection of essays published recently by the IPPR underlined the role of Gordon Brown’s Treasury in this affair. A high level of immigration made economic growth look better and helped keep wages and, therefore, inflation down.

Others, too, saw economic benefits for themselves. The employers’ organisations kept their heads down, but there is little doubt that they were privately encouraging a supply of cheap labour which was good for profits, whatever its impact on society.

Then there were those members of the middle classes who found it convenient to have cheap exotic restaurants and even cheaper domestic help, but were blind to the wider consequences of this population inflow which were, of course, felt in the poorer neighbourhoods.

Another major factor was the attitude of the BBC and, in particular, its devotion to multiculturalism. For years it avoided discussing immigration if it possibly could.

Although in the autumn of 2005 official statistics for the previous year showed an increase of 50 per cent in net immigration, there was no mention of this on the BBC. Its own report into impartiality, published in June 2007, concluded that its coverage of immigration amounted to bias by omission.

Covert
Last December the corporation’s director-general admitted: ‘There are some areas, immigration, business and Europe, where the BBC has historically been rather weak and rather nervous about letting that entire debate happen.’ Indeed so.

The overall effect was to deter any serious discussion of immigration and to give plenty of space to the Left to accuse anyone who raised the subject of being a covert racist. On this matter the BBC failed to meet its own standards of objectivity.

How about Labour’s competence in government? A succession of six home secretaries and eight ministers of immigration was a testament to their utter failure to focus on a subject of crucial importance to Britain’s future.

Labour ministers had no sooner grasped the elements of the problem than they were moved to a new post. Government policy was that immigration was good for the economy, so why make difficulties about it?

The first Labour Home  Secretary even to inquire about the numbers was  Jacqui Smith. But she, too, was gone in the twinkling of an eye.

The reality is there was no government focus on the scale of immigration and no serious effort made to reduce it.

In the end, Labour paid the price.

Anger over mass immigration was a major reason why so many of Labour’s working-class supporters did not vote at the last election.

They were not alone in their verdict. An intriguing opinion survey found that, when the public were asked what they regarded as the greatest failures of Tony Blair’s time as Prime Minister, 62 per cent pointed to the fact that immigration had reached unacceptable levels — even more than the 56 per cent who chose the invasion of Iraq.

Blair himself shows no remorse. His memoirs, which run to 690 pages, contain only one page on immigration.

Uphill
The reference describes his strategy for handling the  policy at the 2005 election, saying: ‘Because our position was sophisticated enough - a sort of “confess and avoid”, as the lawyers say - we  won out.’
If Blair thinks his immigration policy was a success, he is almost alone.

So, what about the future? What can be done?

The current government has taken one vital step. It has established an overall target range for immigration policy — to get net immigration down to tens of thousands by the end of this Parliament.
It is looking at the issue of work permits and dependants, seeing what can be done to tighten up numbers.

It has also made a start on economic migration and is ready to address the issue of foreign students, marriage and false asylum claimants which are the other main elements of immigration.

This will be uphill work, and the Liberal Democrat partners in the Coalition can be expected to make difficulties (so it will be essential to remain vigilant).

Nevertheless, Home Office ministers are showing some determination — and the official machine is at last responding to the overwhelming and democratically expressed wish of the British public.

Sir Andrew Green is a former British Ambassador  to Saudi Arabia and Syria
© Copyright of Sir Andrew Green
StumbleUpon

Wednesday, September 26, 2012

Soldiers, Listen

StumbleUpon
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...