Unflushable shit: Khloe Kardashian slams Sunrise as 'f---ing desperate'

Khloe Kardashian slams Sunrise as 'f---ing desperate'



Armytage used Khloe's baby clothing line to ask how North was
progressing, to which Kardashian answered warmly, "North is fabulous.
She's so beautiful, she's awesome." She added that the cousin "dynamic"
between Kourtney Kardashian's daughter Penelope and North was great to
see, before being abruptly cut off.





The show tweeted that Khloe's handlers had pulled the interview after Armytage's question about North.



Kardashian immediately responded saying, "Get over yourself Sunrise ... stop reaching for a story", and later called the show "f---ing desperate".





The show maintains its position, however. Producer Michael Pell tweeted that the situation was a "good lesson for publicists".





"Don't try to censor natural conversations," he posted.
























Armytage and Koch later responded to Khloe Kardashian's
tweets on the show, saying they had been told by their LA bureau that it
had been pulled by her staff because they had strayed from the agreed
questioning. Koch related Kardashian's tweets, which bizarrely pointed
out that Kardashian's Twitter reach of 9.5 million followers was "about
double the size of Rwanda and New Zealand".

Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/entertainment/tv-and-radio/khloe-kardashian-slams-sunrise-as-fing-desperate-20140318-34z35.html#ixzz2wLwuxDIB

Canberra: a town council pretending to be an Australian state.

Why is a ban on sugary drinks (like orange juice) in schools any more legal than deviant marriage in the ACT?

The "legislature" of the ACT has no inherent powers, it is a creature of the Commonwealth. As such, virtually every regulatory law that pretends to apply to private behaviour of any kind is ultra vires.

Black and White and Green All Over: gillard regime politician recognition chart

Black and White and Green All Over: gillard regime politician recognition chart

Friday, 12 August 2011

gillard regime politician recognition chart

In the interests of specifically pinning down just what the differences are between a smooth soft Type 4 socialist like Peter Garrett, a fellow traveller like Noni Hazelhurst (Type 2) or the ever-unpleasant Type 3 Craig Thomson, here is a simple to use classification chart for the ALP-Greens axis and their morally bankrupt enablers such as the ABC and the independents.

Joyless shitpail nitpicks fantasy film

BBC News - Viewpoint: James Bond fails the tech test in Skyfall

Charles Fort's legacy stolen, perverted and destroyed.

How did joyless shitpail cheapjack debunker fuckwits end up "owning" the Charles Fort legacy? Who let that happen?

The original term from 1946 through the late 1960s for what is now called "ufology" was actually "Fortean"- for example official American military documents from the 1950s talk about the need to silence Forteans and stop them from spreading the truth about UFOs (amongst other things).

So it is no accident that Forteana has been hijacked by the typical close minded, not very intelligent big mouthed fuckwits who spoil pretty much every modern pursuit for knowledge. These classic products of the modern social collapse and tenth rate education processes have turned Charles Fort and his legacy into just another dead end of clueless and creditless debunking of genuine mysteries, with the usual awful tone of- not skepticism, which is valuable- but rather debunking, which has been accurately described as a kind of immature schoolyard bully type psychological defect.

Charles Fort and his legacy needs to be totally revitalised, not left in the paws of these utterly irredeemable assclowns. He was once known and honoured for his outside-the-box thinking, and although his prose is purple to the point of incomprehensibility at times, his central tenet- that we cannot be certain of ANYTHING, and that ALL categories are arbitrary, contains a lot of common sense.

We need to fight to take back Forteana.