Showing posts with label police state. Show all posts
Showing posts with label police state. Show all posts

Friday, February 28, 2014

Kaitlyn Roig at Sandy Hook: FEAR OF UNIFORMS

"When the door opened I observed numerous children in a small bathroom with blonde female teacher holding the children back.

The teacher began to yell at me, 'You're not the police, I don't believe you," she repeated this several times and [sic] which time Tpr. Poach grabbed a couple of children and the others followed.

 As the children exited the bathroom they were passed of to the officers and escorted out of the classroom.

I stayed kneeling and the teacher stayed motionless against the bathroom wall, continuously repeating, 'You're not the police, I don't believe you."

Once the last child exited the bathroom I reached in and grabbed the teacher, later identified as Kaitlin Roig and she became hysterical and I physically escorted Roig from the school exiting through a classroom door at the XXXX corner."

***

 According to officer Vanghele's written statement (among the report docs), he and fellow officer had to move a cabinet away from the front of the bathroom door where Roig and kids were hiding. Since neither Roig nor anyone else hiding there could have moved the cabinet in front of door (after entering bathroom) how in hell could that cabinet been moved into place to block the door (unless someone from the outside helped to hide them and then pushed cabinet into place). Who could that be?
StumbleUpon

Sunday, January 19, 2014

The "Lanza" / Haddad family is CIA connected

StumbleUpon

Wednesday, December 18, 2013

Martial Law In America

StumbleUpon

Saturday, December 7, 2013

Josie the Outlaw: Message to police

StumbleUpon

Saturday, April 13, 2013

BAE's superdrone Taranis to be tested at Woomera | Space, Military and Medicine | News.com.au

BAE's superdrone Taranis to be tested at Woomera | Space, Military and Medicine | News.com.au

Taranis
The unmanned stealth combat aircraft Taranis, made by BAE systems, which is being tested at Woomera. Picture: Supplied 
 
THE most secretive piece of airspace in Australia - the RAAF-run Woomera flight test range in South Australia - will make history later this year when the world's first unmanned supersonic stealth combat aircraft makes its maiden test flight above the desert. 

StumbleUpon

Friday, May 25, 2012

Patterico's Pontifications » Convicted Bomber Brett Kimberlin, Neal Rauhauser, Ron Brynaert, and Their Campaign of Political Terrorism

Patterico's Pontifications » Convicted Bomber Brett Kimberlin, Neal Rauhauser, Ron Brynaert, and Their Campaign of Political Terrorism


You’re about to listen to one of the most bone-chilling pieces of audio you will ever hear. At least, it was to me when I first heard it.

It’s a phone call that could have gotten me killed.

In this post you will hear that audio clip. You will also read about a months-long campaign of harassment carried out by at least three individuals: Ron Brynaert, Neal Rauhauser, and Brett Kimberlin — much of it directed at critics of Brett Kimberlin. This harassment includes repeated references to critics’ family members, workplace complaints, publication of personal information such as home addresses and pictures of residences, bogus allegations of criminal activity, whisper campaigns, frivolous legal actions, and frivolous State Bar complaints.

And finally, you will hear a comparison of one of those men’s voices to that of the man who made the call that sent police to my home. And you’ll read a declaration from a forensic audio expert comparing those two voices.

BREITBART TOLD THE STORY JUST BEFORE HE DIED



In the last radio interview Andrew Breitbart ever gave, on Hugh Hewitt’s radio show, Breitbart talked about a new ruthless tactic used by thugs against political opponents:
[O]ne of the things they’ve done to people who have worked with me in the past, including an L.A. prosecutor, is to “SWAT.” That means that they’re spoofing phones, pretending to be somebody else’s phone, calling 911, and saying “I killed somebody” and then the person’s home is met with the guns drawn, the SWAT and the helicopters, in a horrifying act. It’s happened twice: once in New Jersey, once in Los Angeles, with an L.A. County . . . prosecutor who [is] associated with me.”
I am that L.A. County prosecutor. And in this post, you’ll hear the hoax call that sent police to my house, pointing loaded guns at me.

THE NIGHT I COULD HAVE BEEN KILLED BECAUSE OF MY BLOGGING

At 12:35 a.m. on July 1, 2011, sheriff’s deputies pounded on my front door and rang my doorbell. They shouted for me to open the door and come out with my hands up.

When I opened the door, deputies pointed guns at me and ordered me to put my hands in the air. I had a cell phone in my hand. Fortunately, they did not mistake it for a gun.

They ordered me to turn around and put my hands behind my back. They handcuffed me. They shouted questions at me: IS THERE ANYONE ELSE IN THE HOUSE? and WHERE ARE THEY? and ARE THEY ALIVE?

I told them: Yes, my wife and my children are in the house. They’re upstairs in their bedrooms, sleeping. Of course they’re alive.

Deputies led me down the street to a patrol car parked about 2-3 houses away. At least one neighbor was watching out of her window as I was placed, handcuffed, in the back of the patrol car. I saw numerous patrol cars on my quiet street. There was a police helicopter flying overhead, shining a spotlight down on us as I walked towards the patrol car. Several neighbors later told us the helicopter woke them up. I saw a fire engine and an ambulance. A neighbor later told me they had a HazMat vehicle out on the street as well.

Meanwhile, police rushed into my home.

 They woke up my wife, led her downstairs and to the front porch, frisked her, and asked her where the children were. Then police ordered her to stand on the front porch with her hands against the wall while they entered my children’s bedrooms to make sure they were alive.

The call that sent deputies to my home was a hoax. Someone had pretended to be me. They called the police to say I had shot my wife. The sheriff’s deputies who arrived at my front door believed they were about to confront an armed man who had just shot his wife. I don’t blame the police for any of their actions. But I blame the person who made the call.

Because I could have been killed.

The weirdest part of the whole thing was that I halfway expected this might happen. Because I was not the first one it had happened to.

I think it’s about time you heard the call that sent police to my home.
StumbleUpon

Friday, May 18, 2012

What's the difference between the Soviet Union and the modern Western security state? Answer: the Soviet Union no longer officially exists.

False Flag: we shoot ourselves, to blame people who we "know" are "dangerous" because they would shoot us if they could, but we're too good at fighting them for that to be true. So, we shoot ourselves then squeeze their dead hand on the gun to get their prints on the murder weapon.

The question increasingly is why bother? The media are lying scum who are in the pocket of the corporate-socialist interests anyway so why bother even going through the farce?

The fact that details are still faked tells you something very crucial. That is, the control systems are nowhere near as perfect or powerful as the corporate-socialist propaganda makes it out to be.

It is still possible to be free, but freedom is not a charity given, it is a right protected.
StumbleUpon

Friday, May 11, 2012

Thing that officially doesn't exist and hasn't existed since 1982 now officially exists and pointed at UK public: Weapon that boiled people alive in Iraq deployed in Britain for Olympics

BBC News - 'Sonic weapon' deployed in London during Olympics


The Ministry of Defence has confirmed a device which can be used as a "sonic weapon" will be deployed in London during the Olympics.

The American-made Long Range Acoustic Device (LRAD) can be used to send verbal warnings over a long distance or emit a beam of pain-inducing tones.

The equipment was spotted fixed to a landing craft on the Thames at Westminster this week.
An MoD spokesman said it would be used "primarily in the loud hailer mode".

***

In Grenada it fried soldiers and blasted a VW bug in half. In Iraq it boiled people alive and filled a street with screaming wounded projectile vomiting and shitting blood. Tightbeam versions have been used to cause civilian deaths, especially of inconvenient researchers, and a version of it has even been used to assassinate a US Senator who had a saucer full of secrets. It's a MASER, and a fucking powerful one. Longtitudinal wave weaponry accelerates through denser material so throwing smoke to cover the scene first is a given, or just rely on the sledgehammer-hitting-a-watermelon effect on human flesh.

Welcome to the New World Order: nonlethal weapons that supposedly skip Geneva Convention bans and are "humane" (if your idea of humane is a man who ends up looking like half-digested raw pork with blisters the size of grapefruits, or on the other setting, a silent street full of bleeding corpses).

Even this alleged loudspeaker setting- it isn't a fucking concert speaker. It's longitudinal wave energy blasted parabolically like a diabolical shockwave that doesn't stop.

Final note: this is a Nazi invention. Just like in that Tintin comic.

Of course this makes it THE hot gift idea for the 2012 Olympics.

Despite all of the toys coming out of the cupboard and now officially existing (there will be more)- false flag terror is still a 99% certainty. I mean, look at all the predictive programming (media saying "gee, I sure hope we don't have a terror attack... yup! Gorsh") and as soon as we see Peter Power, the demo firm, a Bush relative or a devil's dozen of DIA or DISC on the manor- run for your fucking lives. StumbleUpon

Monday, April 30, 2012

NO ONE TO VOTE FOR: Britain's 9-11 Cover Up: WHAT WILL BECOME OF US?

NO ONE TO VOTE FOR: Britain's 9-11 Cover Up: WHAT WILL BECOME OF US?

 What will become of a people too mentally lazy and stupidly trusting to take an interest in their own survival?

Yesterday Mike Adams published an excellent article titled 'The Gullible Mind Explained'. It could have been describing the wall of uncritical and lazy reporting now hitting the airwaves regarding Lady Justice Hallett's report on the recent 7/7 Inquest.

The content of this report was easily predictable. Simply inevitable.

There are two competing narratives to explain this crime:

1) The official story of four suicide bombers murdering 52 people and injuring hundreds by exploding four bombs on three tube trains and one bus on the morning of 7/7.

2) Forces embedded within the establishment carried out a false-flag attack against the British people. As with nearly all false-flag events, patsies were set up to take the blame for the crime. The four Muslims were completely innocent actors paid to participate in a concurrent anti-terror 'drill'.


As you will have guessed, I am one of the many who subscribe to conspiracy theory number two.

StumbleUpon

Friday, April 13, 2012

THEY LIVE, WE SLEEP: The Obama Administration: All Your Privacy And All Your Stuff Belong To Us

The Obama Administration: All Your Privacy And All Your Stuff Belong To Us

 Did you know that the federal government claims that it can take away your constitutional rights any time that it wants to?  Over the past several decades, there have been an endless parade of laws and executive orders that have been slowly and methodically carving up our rights under the U.S. Constitution.  Most Americans are not even aware of the "creeping totalitarianism" that is happening.  Most Americans just trust the "authorities" when they tell us that certain things "must be done" in order to keep us all safe.  But even if we gave up all of our privacy, even if we gave up all of our liberties and our freedoms, and even if we gave the government all of our stuff they still would not be able to keep us safe.  It is inevitable that evil people are going to do evil things, and if you are counting on the Obama administration to keep you safe then you are being delusional.  Obama is not going to save us from anything.  But Obama will gladly take away our rights and our freedoms if the American people allow him to.  The Obama administration seems to have an endless lust for more power.  Sadly, if we do give away our rights it will have some very serious consequences.  If we freely give away all of the rights that we have been given under the U.S. Constitution it will be incredibly difficult to ever get them back.  Giving up liberty for security never works, and if we want to be worthy of being called Americans then we need to start standing up for the republic that our forefathers worked so hard to build. StumbleUpon

Thursday, April 12, 2012

The American Spectator : The Spectacle Blog : Look! Up in the Sky! It's a Bird? It's a Plane? It's a… Drone!?

The American Spectator : The Spectacle Blog : Look! Up in the Sky! It's a Bird? It's a Plane? It's a… Drone!?


Two months ago, the president signed into law the 2012 FAA Modernization and Reform Act.
Now the countdown is on.

The bill gave the FAA 90 days (a mere thirty days, hence) to allow police and first responders to fly small drones over domestic airspace. Within the next four years, the federal agency is charged with authorizing and certifying the flight assorted unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) -- quite literally -- over our heads. By the FAA's own estimates, by 2020, some 30,000 drones, of various shapes and sizes, could be patrolling America from above.

***

Way back in the 1990s a lady reported seeing a mechanical ie robotic dragonfly, no bigger than a real live large dragonfly, land on her car winsdhield and then just as suddenly fly off again.

Likewise there have been some really weird shaped "UFOs" reported in recent years, indicating a clear technological development.

As clear as some UFOs are energy beings, others are definitely secret technology. Official airships were entering service between 1907-1909, what makes anyone think that the technology didn't actually enter into secret use in the 1800s? It isn't difficult technology to produce.

Leaving aside putative aircraft from Ancient Egypt, there is documentary and physical evidence of multi-stage rocket launches in the fifteenth century.

These drones becoming public is another example of how decades after technology is created it finally goes into the public arena. Blackbird SR-71 has only leaked into the public domain after it left service. We're now THREE generations of spy "aircraft" later and we haven't seen much real information on even the first replacement.

Below is information on miniaturised drones from the year 1999... Ponder how far ahead real drone cutting edge tech must be given that the estimate of how far ahead black budget technology is ranges from 25 years (Cathy O'Brien) to 100 years (Janes). It's notable that between the Nazi designs from 1932-1944 and the British designs from 1936-1946, all stolen by the USA as "payment" for war loans and reparations, there were no new innovations until the early 1980s, the point at which the predominantly Nazi-English technology finally ran out. In other words it took 35 years of reverse engineering even with the vast money applied to the problem by the USA for that country to finally assimilate all of the discoveries from the golden age.

God only knows what else was reverse engineered and where the information came from- the thousands of stolen Tesla patents? Channelled information from nonhuman intelligences?

***


The Traffic Surveillance Drone project has received initial funding from the Georgia Department of Transportation and the Federal Highway Administration's Priority Technology Program. Aspects of this ducted fan drone are currently under development within the Georgia Tech Research Institute’s Advanced Vehicle Development and Integration Laboratory. It is designed around an aluminum chassis with a carbon composite body structure that also provides structural stability. It is the first rotary wing drone with twin engines and one-engine-out flight capability. It is designed with affordability and safety in mind. All propulsors are shrouded and the single-rotor design improves reliability while reducing weight and keeping the projected production price in a range that is attractive to law enforcement agencies, emergency search and rescue teams, as well as highway departments.
Present research centers on ways to reduce the size of the drone and to use advanced active flow control techniques to eliminate the need for a fully articulated rotor (replacing it with a fan or propeller) while at the same time obviating the need for deflector vanes. The following picture shows one of our active flow control experiments to demonstrate counter torque while using an unarticulated ducted propeller without deflector vanes (no moving control surfaces). A 46MB movie of the “Bagel” active flow control experiment shows purely acoustic control of antitorque in a ducted fan without the use of deflector vanes. Other experiments demonstrate that pitch and roll can be similarly controlled. In the movie, note that the test stand-mounted vehicle is allowed to completely twist under the effects of propeller torque until it hits the yaw stops on the test stand. A tone can then be heard (emitted by the vehicle under test) and the torque effects are completely neutralized

The Drone also has capabilities that make it attractive for military applications, especially in low intensity conflicts and urban warfare . Note that such a drone would fill a needed void in locations such as Sarajevo where high altitude reconnaissance from assets such as Predator only provide the “"big picture” from above, but do not allow one to look into windows, fly into parking decks, breach obstacles, or perch on a building roof as a sentry. A militarized version of the drone known as Dragon Stalker (see below) has been conceived and mocked up to illustrate its portability in the battlefield. A powered wind tunnel model has been constructed to verify flight envelope analyses.




Robert Michelson
Principal Research Engineer, Emeritus - Georgia Tech Research Institute
Adjunct Associate Professor (Ret.) - Georgia Institute of Technology
President - Millennial Vision, LLC 
 
***
 










***

Flying Saucers could soon start attacking Earthlings

We’re no way talking of an alien invasion, but British drone company Aesir probably thought that the mystery and fair associated with flying saucers could be put to good use. The company is creating UFO-like drones that vary from 30-centimeters to 1 meter in diameter. These unmanned aerial vehicles use the Coanda Effect to stay airborne. Their first prototype “Embler” has already taken the job of flying around, troubling humans. We have no idea if this product will be practical, but UFO sightings are about to increase dramatically. One UFO sighting, er.. video of the Embler in action, after the jump.
ember flying saucer drone gbmwe 54
StumbleUpon

Monday, April 2, 2012

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...