Showing posts with label rant. Show all posts
Showing posts with label rant. Show all posts

Tuesday, July 31, 2012

Effeminate controlled opposition is scared of China: Olympic Medal Tally predictions

image
Missing from both calculations is political will. China wants to send a signal, and will only grow stronger with each Games in the foreseeable future.

As for Australia, after fourth and fifth placings in the past three Games, we’re in for a let-down. Busse tips just 25 medals this time, down from 46.

***

Olympic Medal tallies- now we have theoretical ones- and we're supposed to be scared of China for getting lots of medals. For. Fucks. Sake.

Andrew Bolt: not just effeminate, not just a beta male, not just a closet case (socialist)... not even just controlled opposition: worst of all he prates on with delusional shit like this.
StumbleUpon

Monday, July 30, 2012

London 2012 Olympics Medal Table - Team GB

London 2012 Olympics Medal Table - Team GB

We’re only a few days into the 16 day Seb Coe-Ca-Cola Sports Day but I thought we’d take a quick look at the London 2012 Olympics medal table … just to see what kind of return we’re getting on our £25 billion investment :
London 2012 Olympics Medal Table olympic medals Team GB Great Britain gold silver bronze total
Just 2 medals. So that’s £12.5 billion each so far then, which seems a tad expensive to me, and no sign of any gold yet. I was kind of hoping that we might get a few of those … in lieu of all the gold that the mono-eyed prime mentalist sold off so cheaply.
Early days yet though.
Still time for Team GB to come up with the goods.
That’s Great Britain. Not Gordon Brown. Obviously.
StumbleUpon

Sunday, July 29, 2012

Take your OLYMPIC BOLLOCKS and BOG OFF

Odd how an event that is intended to be about amateurs has turned into this orgy of awful spectacle and wasteful vomiting of the worst lowest common denominator jingoism, all paid for by the victim-citizen.

As for athletes- elevating them to some special status for anything other than their specific "sport" is hilariously inappropriate. Not many of them can even string two words together. And as for the sports themselves- tae kwon do is a "sport" because the crime boss IOC member from Korea bribed it into being one, meanwhile karate do and kung fu- both vastly more popular, and superior in self defence terms... Are not "sports" at the olympics.

Not only is the olympics a steaming chud of decadence, not only is it classical bread and circuses, it has now finally achieved the "aim" of lauding useless skills and activities, and deterring people from physical fitness with its false concept of elitism in athleticism.

There are stronger men on most building sites, faster runners in most large cities' ghettoes, more agile athletes in most martial arts dojo and parqueur clubs and more intense competitors in virtually every large army on Earth.

It's just that normal people won't go through the cycle of child molestation, warped parents bullying them and drug use to become "elite" olympic performing monkeys.


StumbleUpon

Tuesday, December 6, 2011

NASA tells story: Earth-ish planet a mere 600 light years away

Given that according to public versions of space travel it's impossible to ever go there, who gives a flying fuck sideways whether there is an Earth 600 light years away or not?

Or will there soon be a sudden 1984 moment where we have star travel and we always had star travel, etc.?

Given how many other once discredited things (NWO, CIA assassination of JFK, non-citizen elected President) have happened lately, nothing would surprise. StumbleUpon

Saturday, December 3, 2011

Spanky Ham Is Tired Of Your Bullshit

StumbleUpon

Wednesday, April 20, 2011

Resurrection Day approaches

Heard of the JFK assassination? High cabal acts to kill a president, put things back on track for what even retards now call the NWO? Heard of that? Super.

Now.

Heard of the assassination of the president of DeutscheBank? It was just as important.

THAT's the NWO at work. You never heard of it, there's no such thing as a free press. And if you think mainstream bloggers who are promoted by old media are any freer than the old media itself- wake the fuck up. StumbleUpon

Why does Spider-Man sell 5% of what it used to? It isn't the death of comicbook shops. It's shit like this:

Source: CRACKED.


Spider-Man Gives Birth to Himself
In a storyline titled "Changes," Spider-Man has to fight The Queen, a ridiculously powerful villainess no one has ever heard of before. Her powers are insect-related, so she picks Spider-Man to make spider-babies with (spiders aren't actually insects but just go with it). The Queen kicks his ass in their first fight and then proceeds to rape him in the mouth. Which looks like this:
The Queen eventually lets Spider-Man escape, having accomplished her goal. Later that night Peter finds out that the kiss had a side-effect: it's turning him in a real spider.
The Queen then tracks Spider-Spider-Man down and takes him to her lair, where he can finish his transformation into Frodo's worst nightmare. Oh, and she also reveals that he's pregnant.
So even though Spider-Spider-Man is still male, and The Queen never boned him as promised (tease!), he's somehow been genetically altered to become pregnant. Well, okay. So, what does Spider-Spider-Man do with this news? Nothing, because he's a fucking spider who can't understand what the hell people are saying. Instead, he starts to have a seizure and his body topples over dead, leaving The Queen genuinely heartbroken.

"Oh well. Off to molest a horse, then."
But The Queen leaves just in time to miss ...
... Spider-Man emerging from the dead shell of his own body. Trying to figure out how that makes sense? It doesn't, so don't bother. He's even got all his memories and knows where he is when he pops out, which means somehow Spider-Spider-Man was pregnant with Peter Parker, in human form, fully aged, and then died giving birth to himself. Of all the sentences we thought we'd never get to write, that was easily in our top twenty. Then we finally get to the reason why this horrible story has been going for five god damn issues.
Organic webslingers. You see, the first Spider-Man movie had come out not too long before this storyline, and one of the changes they made was that Spider-Man no longer used webshooters of his invention, he simply shot the webbing from his wrists (because that's clearly more realistic). The writers at Marvel were tasked with coming up with a way to introduce this development on the comic, and "having Spider-Man morph into a giant spider and give birth to himself" seemed like the simplest option.
Also, he discovers that he can also talk to bugs now. This is such an incredibly useful superpower that he has never used it again in like eight years.
StumbleUpon

Wednesday, April 13, 2011

Identifying With The Oppressor: Comics are independent or big business, can't be both

There's a lot of sycophancy in any form of fandom. Fans range from the sincere, the devout and the casual to the all-too-frequent blind sheep who ignore all failings in their chosen passion and sing from the corporate songsheet at all times.

With a Ned Flanders- like blindness they follow along whatever the big business behind their favourite show or comicbook universe preaches.

It is absolutely necessary for corporate lackeys to do this sort of cheerleading. Maintaining as much economic health as possible in the company that writes their cheques is logical. It can be contemptible, when they cover up the failings of monstrous or manifestly inbred or retarded corporate cultures; but nevertheless- it's business. They are stoking the fire running the boiler from which the steam that drives their own welfare comes.

There is no such excuse for fans and wannabes who do the same and gain no advantage. Its pretty sad, actually. In fact, the independents who cheerlead for big business are the saddest of the lot.

2% of the American population is confirmed as having some form of Aspergers type mental illness. That at least explains the remaining DC / Marvel fans for the most part. But beyond that there is a disturbingly large contingent of comicbook creators who are independent - ie self-employed and in most cases poor - who defend the practices and mythology of the corporations who own and run DC and Marvel brands. It's long past the time when there's any meaningful continuity at either company in terms of their universes. The excuse of sentiment is ludicrous amongst people who are supposed to be indie creators- they should love their own "children", not someone else's. The only remaining reason for being a useless idiot for Marvel or DC is a deep seated desire to get a job at one of them.

In the same way that so-called independent movies are all too often just vanity projects done in spare time by studio suits and their actor friends, likewise all too many independent comics are the equivalent projects cranked out behind the scenes by Marvel and DC brand managers and their "independent" artists. This distorts the entire marketplace for comics, with the connivance of an infantile and sycophantic comic press, especially the "top" sites which are nothing more than PR mills for DC, Marvel or both, with a patina of other larger company news and the occasional quirky story in approved format with approved content.

And yet, when I surf around the world of webcomics, there are sexy and extremely amazingly good comics, like Oglaf, which regularly beats Spider-Man for readership; the creepy and very avant garde Riotfish, which has been going for years, and unlike anything from Vertigo makes sense all the way through.

Independent means just that- being independent of outsider influence, and independent of being coopted by the larger corporate monstrosities which are killing comics. And the biggies are truly killing the comic industry. They're exhausted. Totally out of ideas. No matter how pretty the artwork, if the stories fail, if the narrative is spastic, careless or filled with contempt for itself and/or its audience- it's over.

The biggies have two choices: innovate, or kill the competition.

Their real competition is from the true independents. That is who their aggressive strategies are really targeted at. The biggies have the Asperger 40,000 but that's nowhere near enough people to keep their doors open. They face absorption into their larger corporate parents. A matter of no concern to the brand managers, but to the would-be tyrants of the two "comicbook companies" (little more than departments of Disney and Warner) a matter of great import. There are people they can corrupt, recruit, assimilate, warp the market with. But beyond their control there is an entire world of comicbooks, including webcomics, digitals and all kinds of traditional media, which they are now too ossified to understand or adapt to. The end of Marvel and DC has come, sadly for their fans. They are dead already. The brands will continue, in the same way that Mickey Mouse and Flash Gordon have continued. But the mythology, the awe inspiring story telling of Stan Lee and Jack Kirby?

That's deader than disco. StumbleUpon

Saturday, April 9, 2011

WHY LOST SUCKS

Open thread for people who hate the show LOST and have nowhere to vent now that the WHY LOST SUCKS domain has gone down. StumbleUpon

Saturday, April 2, 2011

Entitlements: the Slavery of the 21st Century

Prior to the War Between The States there was a single corrosive issue.

Slavery.

It was dressed up as a states' rights issue, sovereignty issue, racial issue, immigration issue, industrial issue- even a medical issue. But it wasn't any of those things.

It was an entitlement issue.

A financially impossible lifestyle had been maintained beyond its normal life expectancy, and the country was bleeding to death as a result- first figuratively, then literally. The slavery issue distorted every other issue.

The slavery issue of the 21st Century is Entitlements.

No one wants to touch them or talk about them, in the same way no one wanted to talk about slavery, or do anything about it. Both slavery and entitlements create the need for special dispensations. And disgracefully, Democrats are on the wrong side of both issues. Oh the merciless cycles of history, and how little we learn. StumbleUpon

Tuesday, March 22, 2011

Letter of Obama to Harvard Law Record

"I must say, however, as someone who has undoubtedly benefitted from affirmative action programs during my academic career, and as someone who may have benefitted from the Law Review's affirmative action policy when I was selected to join the Review last year, I have not felt stigmatized within the broader law school community or as a staff member of the Review."

-Barry Soetoro aka Barack Hussein Obama

Source: DECONSTRUCTING OBAMA, New York 2011, Simon & Schuster Threshold Edition, Jack Cashill, p 173

Affirmative action for a lazy, undisciplined and far from gifted foreign student.

Milli Vanilli. StumbleUpon

Monday, March 21, 2011

Tea Party in Captain America: a long way from anti-war messages in Steve Gerber's Defenders

The low point of the current stale output of Disney-owned "Marvel" comics came when a Brubaker issue of Captain America showed a crowd of tea party protesters, who, unlike the real tea party, were 100% white anglo-saxon protestants. And of course, ignorant extremists!

Stan Lee and Jack Kirby, despite being much older than their then-fans, created a miracle with the original Marvel Comics continuity from 1961 to roughly 1974. There were many anti-war sentiments expressed, and Stever Gerber, who stands out as the greatest comicbook writer of the period in many respects, had his share of anti-war messages.

However, Gerber's pacificism tendencies were balanced by the need as he saw it to fight for principles- in his own life during his battle with Marvel, and in his fictional creations who not only had to undergo formulaic battles but also had some violent confrontations forced upon them.

All that subtelty is lost in modern Disney (and Warner for that matter) comics. The almost pornographic prurience of too much of their output in terms of plot and artwork is obscured by the sheer mastery of some of the art, but underlying Disney comics is a sour attitude. It is the attitude of the eternally-adolescent left winger, the college attendee (possibly graduate) who never matures, goes from spotty kid to overweight adult with no creative phase inbetween, and completes their education by entering the echo chamber of small L liberal behaviour. Never popular people, one might surmise, the crop of comic writers at Disney seem to be overcompensating to try and fit in with the perceived cool kids of the socialist media and political scene.

Hence all of those awful, awful Obama covers and stories. Cringe inducing stuff to any normal soul.

Jack Kirby's run on Captain America during the bicentennial is hallucinatory, absurd- and yet can not fail to be deeply true to the character. After all Kirby (and Simon) created the character. Captain America now is a shadow puppet, his once permanently dead kid sidekick returned from the dead for cheap and extremely clumsy storytelling- turns out he was a soviet agent then in hiding and... whatever.

Bringing back Bucky robbed Captain America of more of his historicity than any sliding time scale ever did. It invalidated the message of sacrifice, and it makes those early stories written by Lee a nonsense. This is the curse of the revolving door of death.

It also makes the living symbol of America at her most heroic in war a mockery.

Once again the movie will no doubt be far truer to the original in continuity stories from 1961-1974 than any amount of the current low-selling pamphlets ever will. StumbleUpon

Sunday, February 13, 2011

Digital Comics: time to kill the middlemen

Reading through an article recently which was pretty much 90% gaily spinning the middlemen position re: Diamond and digital comics, we were struck that back in the days of dinosaurs when the interweb was newish, Cafe Press and Lulu.com both let people buy digital versions of books (or comics) and the price was generally lower than a print version, for commonsense reasons.

Given the sophistication of modern browsing tools for example on mobile phones, why is there any necessity for "apps" at all, other than to spin money for middlemen? Middlemen in comics, just as in music, are a parasitic drain that impedes the traffic between consumer and creator. It's a payola inspired model and it has the worst aspects of old fashioned ...American... let's say, exploitative capitalism.

To read a digital comic, or any digital work, it isn't much more difficult than to buy it, download it, and open it- often in Adobe because so many "ebooks" are PDF format.

Leaving the format to one side, because it is increasingly irrelevant, the only real concern the larger comicbook players have in relation to digitial delivery seems to be how to screw the most money out of their remaining fans. The recent experiences a few people have described where prematurely released comics were deleted off their reading devices- a clear breach of privacy, an offence under Australian, if not American, law, and so on- shows that it isn't about putting digital versions of comics up for people at a nominal fee. It's about recreating the absurd Diamond / LCS monopoly again for the online era.

Fortunately such dreams of empire seem utterly doomed from the outset, but the fact that so much effort and self-expostulation is devoted to justifying the unjustifiable grab for monopolies indicates where Disney and Warner are focused- capturing and controlling a market and making it impossible for democractic digital to exist. The shills at most comics sites are of course complicit in this. StumbleUpon

Saturday, February 5, 2011

Comic sales for January are terrible. By which the comics commentariat essentially mean...

...that sales for January are terrible for Disney (Marvel) and Warner (DC). The big companies are in all sorts of strife with their comicbook sales, but really, so what? The books themselves have never looked prettier but the content would frequently be insulting to a retarded person, let alone the putative adult "sophisticated" audience they claim- which is really a dwindling audience of western middle class super-consumer types, totally disconnected from the broader world of comics.

Case in point- Archie comics. Year in, year out, there they are at the mainstream locations Marvel and DC have long since given up on, and as a consequence Archie's female audience numbers quite possible in the millions, certainly in the 100,000s, and its Sonic the Hedgehog and soon Rockman / Megaman titles are robust to the point of absurdity.

What really pisses me off to no end about the whining re: falling comic sales is that it is classic solipsism. The fat tubs of lard that consume DC and Marvel are pissing and moaning over falling sales etcetera- whilst many other types of comicbooks have in fact increased sales. Yes, I admit, I'm an indie myself so yes, I have an agenda. Like DC and Marvel don't? I would love to see DC and Marvel collapse, and I say that as someone who was once a rabid Marvelite. It isn't the same company at all any more, and likewise its characters are vile parodies of what they once were. Meanwhile over at Indyplanet there is a literal world of comics, of all conceivable types, crossing all cultures and interests. And the best of them are absolutely fantastic in terms of art, execution and finish. Marvel and DC are cranking out these insulting "stories" and fomenting endless ennui with their bottomless chumbucket of crossovers, whilst godlike artists and writers are marching into the future by the day.

So what if Disney and Warner take a bath on the comics operations? They'll never do anything genuinely creative anyway. They bought the comics companies to get the brands, which is all the characters have been since the 1990s. They have less soul than Dracula.

Well that turned into quite the rant. Time for some water and rain watching. StumbleUpon
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...