Showing posts with label EUSSR. Show all posts
Showing posts with label EUSSR. Show all posts

Tuesday, February 18, 2014

10 Lefty Lies About The Floods Which Have Devastated Britain

10 Lefty Lies About The Floods Which Have Devastated Britain



Breitbart London's new Executive Editor James Delingpole looks at the ten 'best' lefty lies about the UK flooding...
then debunks them:

StumbleUpon

Sunday, February 16, 2014

Why did floods agency spend hundreds on 'equali-tea' gay awareness mugs... and £30,000 on gay pride marches? As Britain counts cost of shoddy defences, we reveal bizarre spending by quango bosses | Mail Online

Why did floods agency spend hundreds on 'equali-tea' gay awareness mugs... and £30,000 on gay pride marches? As Britain counts cost of shoddy defences, we reveal bizarre spending by quango bosses | Mail Online



Why did floods agency spend hundreds on 'equali-tea' gay awareness
mugs... and £30,000 on gay pride marches? As Britain counts cost of
shoddy defences, we reveal bizarre spending by quango bosses

  • Investigation shows the
    Environment Agency, headed by Lord Chris Smith - Britain's first openly
    gay Cabinet Minister - spent £639 on gay rights mugs
  • EA also spent £30,000 sponsoring Birmingham's Gay Pride festival in 2009
  • Comes as EA faces growing criticism of its handling of the flooding crisis
StumbleUpon

The real reason for flooding in Somerset Levels? Not global warming – the pump was turned off! | Watts Up With That?

The real reason for flooding in Somerset Levels? Not global warming – the pump was turned off! | Watts Up With That?



Bishop Hill writes: Commenter “Corporal Jones’ Ghost’ left this comment on one of the flooding threads. It looks to be quite important.


============================================================


I want to tell you what really has happened on the Somerset Levels.




I am remaining anonymous for good reason, I think you’ll understand why.




You have to go back to 1939, when the MOD decided that they needed a
new Munitions factory for HDX explosives, HDX uses a lot of water, all
munitions manufacture does, but HDX is greedy. 


The levels had too much water and so we built one on the Levels, ROF37 or ROF Bridgewater or ROF Woolavington, it’s all the same place.




To ensure that there was enough water even on the waterlogged Levels,
we built the Huntspill River, we then connected it to the River Brue to
the North and the Kings Sedgemoor Drain via a pipe to the South, we
also widened the River Sowy to get water to our factory.




We would use >5 thousand million litres every year, rain or shine.




We then disposed of it into the sea, we had to do this regardless of
the tidal conditions and we had steam pumps that did this remarkable
task, they pumped out at the Huntspill sluice 3 thousand million ltrs a
year, the rest was either evaporated, too contaminated and shipped
off-site or left the factory in the product!




Part of the legacy f the fall of Communism was that we didn’t need quite so much ordnance to practice killing the deadly foe.




In the mid 1990s the decision was made and we ran down the ROFs.


By 2000 ROF37 was given an execution date of 2008 and like all state executions, it was carried out on time.




We all knew that the ‘run-on’ from our departure would be that the
EA/Levels Boards needed to take over pumping, they couldn’t afford our
old system as it was very old and on restricted land.


I should explain at this point that the ONLY pumping done was ours,
we could and did pump no matter the tides, we’d taken over the
responsibility/control in 1940 for all high volume pumping on the
Levels.




We advised that the Huntspill be automated and the Kings Sedgemoor
Drain be pumped and made strong representation to that effect.




But every meeting with the EA ended in frustration as they never sent
a single seriously knowledgeable Drainage Engineer to any meeting. The
Levels Boards understood the issues and tried to get the pumps
installed.




It didn’t happen.

StumbleUpon

Monday, January 13, 2014

The BBC: less trustworthy, more dangerous than a cannibal polar bear – Telegraph Blogs

The BBC: less trustworthy, more dangerous than a cannibal polar bear – Telegraph Blogs

The first was the BBC’s betrayal of its statutory obligation to report on the world with ‘impartially’. In its own mind it got round this by creating its own definition of the meaning of the word.

 The IPCC, the scientific and political establishments, Al Gore, the developers of wind turbines and heaven knows who else were all so unanimously convinced that man-made global warming was an unchallengeable fact that the BBC decreed that these were the only people who should be listened to. Anyone who dissented from this orthodoxy could be ignored as belonging to just a tiny minority of cranks, or venally corrupted hirelings of Big Oil, whose views it would be improper for the BBC to publicise.

The problem was that, outside the ‘bubble’, all sorts of things were beginning to contradict this cosy scenario. Ever more serious scientists were beginning to question the orthodox theory of what was influencing the world’s climate. It emerged ever more clearly that the projections made by over-simplistic computer models no longer matched up with the observed evidence of what was actually happening to the climate. Ever more evidence came to light to suggest that the IPCC was not the unimpeachably objective and honest scientific body it was claimed to be.

It was all this which helped to illuminate the extent of the second ‘betrayal’ in the BBC’s coverage of the story, the way it betrayed the principles of professional journalism. So committed to the cause were its journalists that, when important questions began to be raised as to whether the story was really as unarguable as it was claimed to be, their only real response was simply to dig in their toes to defend it. They could no longer step outside the ‘bubble’, as independent-minded journalists should have been able to do, to consider all these questions in their own right. They could only stay within the mindset they knew, talking only to those within the orthodoxy who could provide them with the answers they needed to fend off all these tiresome ‘deniers’ appearing from outside the ‘bubble’ to ask awkward questions – such as how genuinely scientific were the methods used to create the ‘hockey stick’ graph?

One of the impressions it is hard to avoid in reviewing the BBC’s coverage of this story is that its journalists, and those shadowy figures behind them in the BBC hierarchy, are not particularly well-informed about many of the issues they report on. This point was made as long ago as 2006 by the journalist Richard D. North, when he described his experience in attending that day-long seminar organised by Roger Harrabin, As North observed:

I was frankly appalled by the level of ignorance of the issue which the BBC people showed …I heard nothing which made me think any of them read any broadsheet newspaper coverage of the topic (except maybe the Guardian and that lazily) … it seemed to me that none of them had shown even a modicum of professional curiosity on the subject … I spent the day discussing the subject and I don’t recall anyone showing any sign of having read anything serious at all.

This may help to explain the third of the three ‘betrayals’ to which I referred at the start, the consistency with which the BBC’s coverage of this story has shown so little understanding of the basic principles of science. We have seen how again and again they have put out programmes designed to promote their cause which have contained quite rudimentary scientific errors. They have loved to wheel on front men such as Sir David Attenborough, Dr Iain Stewart or Sir Paul Nurse, claiming to speak with all the authority of being ‘a scientist’ – but who have then been shown, on matters outside their own disciplines, to be out of their depth. These people have been used to lend the prestige of ‘science’ for the purposes of what amounted to no more than clumsy exercises in propaganda.

Perhaps the most revealing example of all of this misuse of the prestige of science was that truly bizarre report produced in 2011 for the BBC Trust by Professor Jones, arguing that, far from being too biassed, the BBC’s coverage of the story should in future become even more biassed still.

The sheer Alice in Wonderland dottiness of this report might serve as a suitable epitaph on what has been one of the saddest chapters in the BBC’s history. Here is a hugely important and far-reaching issue on which for years it has been comprehensively misleading the audience from which it derives its funding. Yet the tragedy is that it seems so incapable of recognising just how badly it has failed us that there is little realistic prospect of it ever being likely to change its ways.

***


Add the E.U. to developing nations that are all too happy to get what they can from wealth redistribution, and you get a majority of nations that then try to fascistically bully and shame remaining countries to relent, e.g. India, China, U.S., Canada.

The last few days of the conference, particularly the overtime on Saturday, made it all too clear that this is all about global wealth redistribution, probably with an element of a thieves' cartel via. Brussels (and the U.N.), rather than anything to do with science or the environment.
Let's remember these classic quotes:

Emma Brindal, Friends of the Earth, 2007 UN climate conference:
"A climate change response must have at its heart a redistribution of wealth and resources”
---

Ottmar Edenhofer, co-chair IPCC WG III (and a lead author)
"First of all, developed countries have basically expropriated the atmosphere of the world community. But one must say clearly that we redistribute de facto the world's wealth by climate policy. Obviously, the owners of coal and oil will not be enthusiastic about this. One has to free oneself from the illusion that international climate policy is environmental policy. This has almost nothing to do with environmental policy anymore, with problems such as deforestation or the ozone hole."


StumbleUpon

Friday, November 22, 2013

Monocultural jews want white europe to commit suicide by multiculturalism. Mind your own fucking business for heaven's sake!

StumbleUpon

Monday, November 11, 2013

The truth that EuroDave Cameron dare not speak | Autonomous Mind

The truth that EuroDave Cameron dare not speak | Autonomous Mind

Of course, there is no mention by EuroDave or the BBC, replete with its alloted task and funding from the EU to spread the federalist word, that this sales push has limitations.  This is because the UK and China do not have a trade agreement.

The truth is the UK is not allowed to makes its own agreement with China.  The trade deal and the relationship is between the EU and China.  The UK therefore has to work within the confines of the EU-Sino agreement.  This trade delegation is nothing more than a sales team working within someone else’s rules.

The EU elephant is right there, standing proudly in the room.  But EuroDave and the BBC are desperately pointing away from it and inviting everyone to watch the birdie instead.   Rather than developing a truly Global Britain, EuroDave and his fellow EU cheerleaders are trying to keep this country wrapped in the suffocating straitjacket of Little Europe.

In the absence of candid honesty from the political class and the media, please help to spread word of the reality by sharing this information.

StumbleUpon

Sunday, October 6, 2013

Thank heavens the allies defeated Hitler, so his mad socialist dream of a united states of europe could never be realised!

Amongst the avalanche of deceptive nonsense written about Hitler and Nazism is that they were "right wing" or indeed that such things as right wing and left wing exist in any meaningful sense. Nazism is a socialist subtype, its fascist element is nothing more than the marriage of corporate and national interests- in fact the substitution of the needs of corporations for the needs of the people. As a socialist movement from its earliest beginnings to its end Nazism emphasized the typical jewish bolshevistic elements, even though the anti-semitism of the Nazis (and many other europeans) masked its origins. As a hostile offshoot of bolshevism, and as a movement violently opposed to marxism, it is easy for academic historians and other totally unreliable narrative peddlars to conflate Nazism with wholly separate elitist ideologies.

There was no elitist element to Nazism. The addition of racial and anti-semitic beliefs made Nazism an evolutionary dead end, but it is still comfortably within the socialist family. Indeed the constantly repeated refrain of Nazism was that worker and intellectual were on an equal footing. And indeed in Nazi germany they were.

Moreover, the EU and its socialist bureaucrat ruling class are spiritual inheritors of fascism. Their attempt to create a mongrelised underclass across europe to function as the epsilon semi moron workers of a new united states of europe is the explanation for the mass influx of third world illegal immigrants. Likewise the dominion germany holds over the EU is Hitler's dream made real.

StumbleUpon

Tuesday, July 9, 2013

UK needs to quit the EU right the F now.

A major revolt against Europe’s influence over British affairs was triggered tonight after judges in Strasbourg ruled that “life means life” sentences given to the most heinous criminals breach their human rights.

The European Court of Human Rights agreed that a “whole life” tariff, which forces murderers to die in jail, was “inhuman and degrading” after an appeal was brought by Jeremy Bamber, who killed five members of his family in 1985.

The court proposed that those serving life with no possibility of parole should have their cases reviewed after 25 years, following which they could be freed.

The decision means that prisoners serving whole life tariffs, including some of Britain’s most notorious killers such as Peter Sutcliffe, the Yorkshire Ripper, and Ian Brady, the Moors Murderer, could be granted permission to seek parole.

The ruling prompted a furious reaction from the Prime Minister, the Home Secretary and the Justice Secretary. But ministers have no right of appeal against the ruling and the Government has six months to act upon the decision.
 ***

Ever since Word War 2 and Britain's magnificent part in it, the slime east of Dover have connived in their jealous, gutless and incompetent left-leaning way to fuck over the UK and rob it not only of its dignity but its culture and its racial composition.

The job's largely done now, but the UK elite and other conspirators, if they can't be executed for treason, should at least now be forced out of their positions. And whether the corrupt westminster regime allows an in-out vote for Great Britain to leave the EU- Great Britain must leave the EU. Its Commonwealth aches to see the mother country back in the fold.
 
StumbleUpon

Sunday, June 9, 2013

“The EU Stands for Everything That is Wrong in Europe” | Gates of Vienna

“The EU Stands for Everything That is Wrong in Europe” | Gates of Vienna

A demographic catastrophe is about to happen.

During the past three decades, so many people rooted in a culture entirely different from Europe’s own Judeo-Christian and humanist tradition have entered Europe that its heritage, its freedoms, its prosperity, and its culture are in danger.

The signs are there for all to see.

Look at the names people give to their children. Mohammed is today the most popular name among newborn boys in many French, Belgian and Dutch cities. Mohammed is even the most popular name among all newborns in England and Wales.

Look at Europe’s inner cities. Visit Europe and you will see that they have come to resemble Northern Africa and the Middle East. They have become areas ruled by Islamic Sharia law. Only last month, a Dutch newspaper reported that a neighborhood barely two miles from our parliament building in The Hague is now a Sharia zone.

Islamic areas also border the EU headquarters in Brussels. And less than 10 miles from Westminster, the mother of all parliaments, a British soldier’s throat was slit by Islamic murderers.

Paris, the capital of France, is surrounded by largely Islamic suburbs. And so are other cities. The French authorities have even drawn up a list of 751 so-called “sensible urban areas,” where it is dangerous to go, especially for native Frenchmen. These are the lost territories of the French Republic, even though a staggering 5 million people, or 8 percent of the total French population, live in them.
Even soldiers are no longer safe in Europe’s streets, as the recent horrible events in Britain and France have shown. But neither are Jews. Anti-Semitism has risen, and keeps rising the more Islamic immigration we get.

Indeed, my friends, after Nazism and Communism, another totalitarian ideology is threatening Europe: the evil ideology called Islam.

In Europe, we are experiencing that the more Islamic a society becomes — even when the majority of Muslims are moderates — the less free and tolerant it will be.

Atrocities, similar to the recent bombing in Boston, where Islamic immigrants massacred innocent onlookers at the marathon, occur in Europe as well. In my own country a few years ago, Theo van Gogh, a film maker critical of Islam, was butchered in the streets of Amsterdam.

Today, hundreds of young Islamic inhabitants of our countries have flocked to Syria to wage jihad there. They will return as experienced jihadists, trained in urban guerrilla warfare. But while you in America are still able to do something about it, while you can control and close your borders, while Congress can vote legislation to protect American citizens, we in Europe have been robbed of this possibility by the European Union.

And there is not only the threat of terrorism or violence; there is also the phenomenon of non-violent jihad. The rise of Islam means the rise of Islamic sharia law in our judicial systems. In Europe, we have sharia wills, sharia schools, sharia banks. In Britain, they even have official sharia courts.
Europe is gradually Islamizing. People who criticize Islam, such as myself, are threatened by Al Qaeda and dragged to court by Islamic and leftist groups. There is not just me, there is the journalist Lars Hedegaard, the author Salman Rushdie, the cartoonist Kurt Westergaard, and many others.
We criticize Islam and we will keep on doing so, because it is a dangerous ideology. It is intolerant, it is violent. And, worst of all, it cannot be reformed. It cannot because it believes that the Koran is a book written directly by Allah himself. And it cannot because it calls on Muslims to follow Muhammad as the role model for their personal life. There could not be a worse model than this man, who was a warlord, a terrorist, and a pedophile.

While most Muslims are moderate people, those who think that they have to follow Muhammad’s example are not. That is exactly the reason why the more Islamic a country becomes, the more unfree and violent it will be.

Europe needs to be protected against this new totalitarian threat.

That is why I say: No more immigrants from the Islamic world! My party wants to close our borders to immigration from Islamic countries.

And ever more people support us.

A poll, which we commissioned ten days ago, shows that 77% of the Dutch do not see Islam as an enrichment for our country, 68% say there is more than enough Islam in the Netherlands already. A majority of the voters of all the major parties in my country — even the voters from leftist parties — agree with these two principles.

The poll also showed that 55% of the Dutch want a stop on immigration from Islamic countries, 63% want no more mosques, 72% see a relationship between Islam and the recent terror attacks in Boston, London and Paris, 72% want a constitutional ban on Islamic Sharia law.

Ordinary people in Europe want three things.

One — They want their politicians to tackle the problem of Islamization and mass immigration. They want to control their own borders.

Two — They want to restore their national sovereignty. They do not want their countries to become provinces of a pan-European superstate.

Three — They do not want their money to be used to pay for mistakes made elsewhere. They do not want a transfer union where they have to pay higher taxes to bail out other countries, whose leaders were either corrupt or incompetent.

Poll after poll show that ordinary Europeans do not want their democracy to be subverted. Last April, a pan-European poll showed that a clear majority of the population in the major EU member states no longer trust the EU as an institution. Even in Germany the number has reached almost 60%.

This week a Gallup poll showed that for the first time in history in the Netherlands as many people want to leave the EU as stay in. A few years ago, this was unthinkable.

The strength of Europe is its diversity. Europe is not a nation; it is a cluster of nations, bound by a common Judeo-Christian and humanist culture, but with different national identities.

StumbleUpon

Sunday, May 26, 2013

EDL: attacked by the ruling class for trying to stop the anti-white genocide.

StumbleUpon

Sunday, March 17, 2013

Turns out bludging off Germany and UK, letting unelected assholes dictate to you and abridge what passes for sovereignty in pretend-land Europe: Not such a fantastic idea.

BBC News - Cyprus parliament to hold bailout crisis session

So why exactly did the UK bankrupt itself and lose its highly civilised and effective empire to let these weaklings in Europe ponce around and get dictated to?

If Hitler doing it was so fucking evil, why isn't it evil when the EU does exactly the same thing?

If Stalin and the rest of the jewish-bolshevik assclowns doing it was a crime against humanity, why are their marxist successors in the EU allowed to abridge sovereignty and destroy the veneer of civilisation that the primitives of Europe force the Anglosphere to prop up?

EUSSR: LET. IT. BURN.

LET THE MOTHERFUCKER BURN.

UK- stop letting leftwing governments commit white genocide and destroy your proud culture. Smash the EU by quitting it forever and dynamite the Chunnel. UK's got enough rabies and third worlder illegals now.


LET. IT. BURN.

StumbleUpon

Monday, March 11, 2013

Message in this article from Brussels Broadcasting Commission: disagreeing with EU assclowns or putting your own culture and people first makes you literally worse than Hitler. BBC News - Hungary defies critics over change to constitution

BBC News - Hungary defies critics over change to constitution

Fidesz argues the changes are necessary to make a clean break with the previous constitution, which was adopted in 1989 when Hungary threw off communist rule.

Mr Orban had been under pressure at least to postpone Monday's vote until experts from the Council of Europe - Europe's main human rights watchdog - could examine the amendment, our correspondent says.
German MEP Alexander Lambsdorff urged the European Commission to investigate a possible "systematic violation of European values" by the Hungarian government ahead of the vote, the newspaper Der Tagesspiegel reports.

In a separate development, the prime minister described as "scandalous" a court decision against the government over state-imposed gas price cuts.

He said he would not accept the ruling scrapping recent 10% price cuts and would instead submit a new proposal to lower prices even further.

The government's measure is popular with many Hungarians who are struggling to pay their bills, but energy companies have complained that they have to foot the bill.

StumbleUpon

Tuesday, October 30, 2012

French Youth oppose multiculturalism and cultural marxism of all kinds

StumbleUpon

Saturday, October 20, 2012

EUSSR: no longer hidden.


I used to find the EUSSR trope tedious, but now…
Take a close look at this promotional poster. Notice anything? Alongside the symbols of Christianity, Judaism, Jainism and so on is one of the wickedest emblems humanity has conceived: the hammer and sickle.

For three generations, the badge of the Soviet revolution meant poverty, slavery, torture and death. It adorned the caps of the chekas who came in the night. It opened and closed the propaganda films which hid the famines. It advertised the people's courts where victims of purges and show-trials were condemned. It fluttered over the re-education camps and the gulags. For hundreds of millions of Europeans, it was a symbol of foreign occupation. Hungary, Lithuania and Moldova have banned its use, and various  former communist countries want it to be treated in the same way as Nazi insignia.
Yet here it sits on a poster in the European Commission, advertising the moral deafness of its author (I hope that's what it is, rather than lingering nostalgia). The Bolshevist sigil celebrates the ideology which, in strict numerical terms, must be reckoned the most murderous ever devised by our species. That it can be passed unremarked day after day in the corridors of Brussels is nauseating.
StumbleUpon

Monday, July 30, 2012

Nice work if EU can get it! Brussels sets up £2million Barbados HQ with 39 staff to hand out hundreds of millions in grants to banana growers | Mail Online

Nice work if EU can get it! Brussels sets up £2million Barbados HQ with 39 staff to hand out hundreds of millions in grants to banana growers | Mail Online

EU chiefs have set up an office on the Caribbean island of Barbados employing 39 staff and costing taxpayers £2 million a year.

The headquarters on the exclusive west coast of the island where pop mogul Simon Cowell holidays, has breathtaking views of the white sandy beaches and the sea.
Officials have £230 million of funding to dole out on projects which include retraining banana growers.
Idyllic: The sun-kissed Caribbean island of Barbados where the EU has set up a headquarters to hand out money for projects
Idyllic: The sun-kissed Caribbean island of Barbados where the EU has set up a headquarters to hand out money for projects
StumbleUpon

Sunday, July 1, 2012

Britain on the brink: EU story

StumbleUpon

Friday, June 8, 2012

Say No To Socialism

Say No To Socialism

In his Manifesto of the Communist Party, Marx urged his followers to replace capitalism with communism via a “socialist redistribution of wealth,” which “should displace capitalism and precede communism.” Marx advocated ten “despotic inroads on the rights of property,” and he called them the ten planks of communism. The most important are:
  • A progressive or graduated income tax;
  • Abolition of rights of inheritance;
  • Centralization of credit in the hands of the state;
  • Extension of factories and instruments of production owned by the state;
  • Centralization of the means of communication and transport in the hands of the state.[iii]
If you know the Manifesto, you will think Marx himself wrote the Democratic Party’s 2012 electoral campaign, which contains all of the above planks of Marxism. If you don’t know the Manifesto, click here and you’ll get it from the horse’s mouth.

***

All well and good, but it was RICHARD NIXON who championed all of the above Communist points. Nixon.

And for that matter there is qualitative difference in political platform on these matters between red-blue Hegelian puppets in any Western country.

The only leader who seems remotely opposed to stealth Marxism let alone overt Marxism... is Tony Abbott of Australia.
StumbleUpon

Sunday, June 3, 2012

A Case for Treason

A Case for Treason

We would like to share with you the unbelievable amount of evidence that is available that proves beyond all doubt that Treason was committed by the Heath Government in the beginning of the 1970’s and as a direct result of the treason committed we are now locked into an illegal treaty with the EU (then the EEC). and consequently - due to continued treasonous activities of present-day politicians in Parliament - this government is upholding all six illegal & treasonous EU treaties, which is wholly against the freedoms and rights granted to the people of the UK by the 'British Constitution'.
StumbleUpon

Friday, June 1, 2012

Cranmer: The Germans are not as stupid or as euro-fanatical as their leaders

Cranmer: The Germans are not as stupid or as euro-fanatical as their leaders

 Here follows a letter from Dr Hans Penner to German MPs. Thanks to Rodney Atkinson for the translation, who writes: ‘Dr Penner is not an economics expert, but he clearly understands far more than any German politician - and certainly more than the purblind Chancellor Merkel who is driving Europe to destruction.’

Dipl.-Chem. Dr. rer. nat. Hans Penner, Linkenheim-Hochstetten 22.05.2012

To the Members of the German Parliament

Dear Ladies and Gentlemen,

The recent election in North Rhein-Westphalia must be seen as a referendum on Mrs Merkel's European policy. Only 15% of those entitled to vote voted for that policy.

1. The calls by Mrs Merkel for savings and cuts are a deceit. Under her Government Germany's National Debt rose and to support other corrupt states it is to rise by a further 190 billion Euros.

2. Mrs Merkel wants to transfer German budget sovereignty to a non controllable foreign fiscal authority. That is against the German Constitution.

3. Mrs Merkel wants to abolish the Federal Republic of Germany and integrate it into a centrally controlled European State which will be characterised by a Fiscal dictatorship. This is also against the German Constitution.

4. Mrs Merkel seeks to burden Germany with the debts of corrupt European States. This is against the terms of the Maastricht Treaty.

5. Mrs Merkel's contention that taking on such a liability would further economic growth is an illusion.

6. Mrs Merkel is splitting Europe into a Euro Europe and a non Euro Europe she is thereby driving a wedge between Germany and Great Britain.

7. Mrs Merkel's policies have caused political chaos in Greece and extreme anti-Germanism.

8. Greek elections have totally rejected Mrs Merkel's European policies.

9. French elections have totally rejected Mrs Merkel's European policies.

10. Mrs Merkel shows despotic tendencies and ignores the warnings of experts and economists.

Christian Democrat politicians have been misled by Mrs Merkel and have no idea what the anti-democratic and authoritarian ESM (European Stability Mechanism) actually means. Let us hope there are sufficient MPs who will understand and vote against the ESM.

Yours etc

Hans Penner
StumbleUpon

Saturday, May 26, 2012

SS-KGB: THe EmPire NeVer FeLL

Our national tragedy (as well as the tragedy of all other former communist countries) is that there was no clear defeat of the ruling communist system, no Nuremberg-style trial of its crimes, no vigorous lustration (de-communisation) process. The West was quick to celebrate the end of the Cold War and the victory of democracy in the former Iron Curtained countries, but in reality there was no change of "elites" there. The former communist "nomenklatura" has remained in the position of power in all branches of the government, albeit under a different name.

One particular part of the communist "nomenklatura" - the KGB - is of special interest to us. The Soviet secret police/intelligence service, originally called VChK, was defined by Lenin as an "armed detachment of the Party," and remained as such throughout Soviet history, while changing its name every few years (VChK, OGPU, NKVD, MGB, KGB, FSB...). Its prime task was to safeguard the interests of the Party and of its ideology, both at home and abroad.

By the 1970s, like anybody else, they came to resent the ideological supervision of the Party which they perceived as hampering their efficiency. They vigorously supported Gorbachev in his "perestroika" campaign, and he, in turn, has heavily relied on their services. Their task, (as it was the task of Gorbachev's leadership), was to salvage the remnants of the Soviet system, not to abandon it.

- Vladimir Bukovsky, 2004

 "Today the Soviet system can no longer seriously strive toward the spectre of Communism - but at the same time it cannot yet abandon the grandeur of its tasks, for otherwise it would have to answer for fruitless sacrifices which are truly innumerable. But in what then can the Soviet system find its justification? Only in the consciousness that it was unconsciously in the past, as it is now quite consciously, God's instrument for constructing a new Christian world. It has no other justification, and this is . . . a genuine and great justification. By adopting it, our state will discover in itself a truly inexhaustable source of Truth, spiritual energy and strength, which has never before existed in history . . . The old pagan world has now finally outlived its era . . . In order not to perish with it we must build a new civilization - but is Western society, whose foundations have been destroyed, really capable of this? Only the Soviet sytem, having adopted Russian Orthodoxy . . . is capable of beginning THE GREAT TRANSFORMATION OF THE WORLD."

 (Passage written by Russian nationalist G.M. Shimanov quoted in Yanov's The Russian Challenge, p.236)
StumbleUpon
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...