Showing posts with label rules for radicals. Show all posts
Showing posts with label rules for radicals. Show all posts

Monday, January 27, 2014

So where is the ABC’s twin? | Herald Sun Andrew Bolt Blog

So where is the ABC’s twin? | Herald Sun Andrew Bolt Blog



What ?????




Ask the Ultimo Branch of the ALP to apologize ?


I urge as many readers to write to Malcolm.Turnbull@aph.govt.au A tsunami of mail may just drive the message “enough is enough”.




StumbleUpon

Wednesday, November 6, 2013

Fight Club 2 2607

Pearson Towers- -a place to be somebody
SCAT - senior citizen taxi service
Controlled Demolition of the towers
Project Mayhem -- or is it KAOS?

and so on.

Someone at CIA must have REALLY liked that film. After all the book it was adapted from was written by one of their Mockingbird assets.
StumbleUpon

Tuesday, January 8, 2013

50 Shades of Red: Marxists not sexy at all... The Greens make their true intentions very, very clear - Christine Milne and Lee Rhiannon say crimes OK for climate change - Michael Smith News

StumbleUpon

Wednesday, November 14, 2012

Come At Me, Bro, Australian Edition: Our current PM is a lowdown lying bitch.

Michael Smith News

Julia Gillard was a partner in the industrial practice of Slater and Gordon.   The other partner was Bernard Murphy, now His Honour.

Ms Gillard dealt with about 21 unions as clients.   Not one of those unions had an incorporated entity as recommended by Ms Gillard and established through her free advice which it used as a slush fund.   She did not give any of those unions the advice that she says she gave Wilson about the necessity to incorporate his unique slush fund.   Slater and Gordon did not offer the value-added-service of free incorporation advice to its other valued clients.

You probably know that Wilson had a genuine slush fund for re-election purposes in Western Australia.   It had a bank account.   Wilson apparently neglected to take Ms Gillard's advice about the benefits of incorporation when it came to the crunch.
StumbleUpon

Tuesday, May 1, 2012

Occupy Twitter: Top Ten Dirty Tricks Leftists Play Online

Occupy Twitter: Top Ten Dirty Tricks Leftists Play Online

Twitter has become the battleground for the 2012 elections and the fight to push the country further left or closer to the right. It is the vehicle that not only informs and influences the opinions of others, but often it is Twitter that actually drives the news cycle. Protest movements like Occupy and Anonymous are using Twitter and other online media as a key mechanism in fighting the battle for ideas and opinions. However, for months now, there has been a coordinated campaign on the part of some leftists to silence conservatives on Twitter in an effort to reduce the impact of the right’s voice on public opinion and the news.  

It’s a campaign that has been obvious to many of those who’ve been experiencing this first-hand.  And Sunday night, more sunlight was shone on the issue as thousands witnessed an attack on a higher profile target when Chris Loesch, the husband of Big Journalism editor and CNN contributor, Dana Loesch, had his Twitter account suspended suddenly and unexpectedly--for “sending multiple unsolicited mentions to other users.”

The action sparked an outpouring of support, sending the hashtag #FreeChrisLoesch to the top of the trending tags, and once more with #FreeChrisLoeschAGAIN when his account was suspended yet again (and again) after less than a minute or so of having been restored. In reviewing the tweets that lead up to the incident, there is no evidence whatsoever that Chris abused Twitter’s terms of service. His “infraction” was the mere act of defending his wife by responding to those targeting her with vile, disgraceful tweets, all of which Dana has aptly reported here on Big Journalism.

It was later discovered that the cause of Chris’s suspension stemmed from a coordinated effort to abuse Twitter’s “block and report” features to trigger Twitter’s algorithm that flags an account as spam, thereby automatically suspending the account temporarily until human eyes could review the situation.  Many outlets have since covered Sunday night’s incident, including, but not limited to, Human Events, Newsbusters, Twitchy and The Washington Times. The truth is, this isn’t the first time that this has happened to a conservative on Twitter, either. In fact, many have experienced this and other attacks in recent months.  Sunday night was simply the first time that conservatives fought back--en masse.

We’ve all seen tactics like this in action online in one form or another.  Over time, countless numbers of activists on the right have sent me examples of similar attacks, and I’ve even spoken directly with many of them. StumbleUpon

Monday, February 6, 2012

The REAL 99%: Heterosexuals.

What is the percentage of the population is homosexuals and Lesbian? | how many gay and lesbians are there? | Christian Apologetics and Research Ministry

Australia - 1.2%
  1. 1.2% of Australians are gay
    1. "Number of homosexuals in Australia Nationwide statistics - 1.2% of adults identify as homosexual or lesbian. * 1.6% of adult men identified as homosexual and 0.8% of women as lesbian. * 1.4% of women and 0.9% of men said they were bisexual. Source: The 2003 'Sex in Australia' survey of 20,000 people, with a special weighting to Sydney's homosexual centre. Conducted by the Australian Research Centre in Sex, Health & Society(ARCSHS) at La Trobe University. Published in Australian & NZ Journal of Public Health, Vol 27 No 2 2003 ISSN 1326 0200." (saltshakers.org.au/issues/homosexuality/199-statistics-homosexuality)


Wasting time on tiny minorities instead of addressing the substantial issues of the day is another Frankfurt School inspired tactic to destroy Western Civilisation. And if it isn't, why is that the effect it is having? StumbleUpon
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...