Nake nula wauŋ welo! Flying Tiger Comics - comics, graphic novels and books for the new Aeon
Friday, July 5, 2013
Thursday, July 4, 2013
A lesson from a Davy Crockett constituent | Tea Party
A lesson from a Davy Crockett constituent | Tea Party
The following story is an excerpt from the book ” The Life of Davy Crockett” by Edward Sylvester and re-printed in the Ted Nugent book “Ted, White and Blue”:
Several years ago I was one evening standing on the steps of the Capitol with some members of congress, when our attentions was attracted by a great light over in Georgetown. It was evidently a large fire. We jumped into a hack and drove over as fast as we be done, many houses were burned and many families made houseless, and besides, some of them had lost all but the clothes they had on. The weather was very cold, and when I saw so many children suffering, I felt something had to be done for them. The next morning a bill was introduced appropriating $20,000 for their relief. We put aside all other business and rushed it through as soon as it could be done.
The next summer, when it began to be time to think about election, I concluded I would take a scout around among the boys of my district. When riding one day in a part of my district in which I was more of a stranger than any other, I was a man plowing the field and coming toward the road. I spoke to the man and he replied politely, but I thought rather coldly.
I began: “Well friend, I am one of those unfortunate beings called candidates and—”
The men replied “Yes I know you; you are Colonel Crockett. I have seen you once before, and voted for you the last time you were elected. I suppose you are out electioneering now, but you had better not waste your time or mine, I shall not vote for you again.”
I begged him to tell me what was the matter.
Well Colonel, it is hardly worthwhile to waste your time or words upon it. I do not see how it can be mended but you gave your vote last winter which shows that either you have not capacity to understand the Constitution, or that you are wanting in the honesty and firmness to be guided by it. In either case you are not the man to represent me. I intend this only to say that your understanding of the Constitution is very different from mine;
And I will say to you what but for my rudeness, I should not have said, that I believe you to be honest.
The man continued “But an understanding of the Constitution different from mine I cannot overlook, because the Constitution, to be worth anything, must be held sacred, and rigidly observed in all its provisions. The man who wields power and misinterprets it is the more dangerous the honest he is.
“I admit the truth in all you say, but there must be some mistake. Through I live in the back woods and seldom go from home, I take the papers from Washington and read very carefully all the proceedings of Congress. My papers say you voted for a bill to appropriate $20,000 to some sufferers by fire in Georgetown. Is that true?
Colonel Crockett said, “Well my friend; I may as well own up. You have got me there. But certainly nobody will complain that a great and rich country like ours should give the insignificant sum of $20,000 to relieve its suffering women and children, particularly with a full and overflowing treasury, and I am sure, if you had been there, you would have done just the same as I did.”
The farmer replied, “It is not the amount Colonel, that I complain of; it is the principle.
In the first place, the government ought to have in the Treasury no more than enough for its legitimate purposes.
But that has nothing with the question.
The power of collecting and disbursing money at pleasure is the most dangerous power that can be entrusted to man, particularly under our system of collecting revenue by a tariff, which reaches every man in the country, no matter how poor he may be.
What is worse, it presses upon him without his knowledge where the weight centers, for there is not a man in the U.S. who can ever guess how much he pays to the government. So you see, that while you are contributing to relieve one, you are drawing it from thousands who are even worse off than he. If you have the right to give anything, the amount was simply a matter of discretion with you, and you had as much right to give $20,000,000 as $20,000. If you have the right to give it all; and as the Constitution neither defines charity nor stipulates the amount, you are at liberty to give to any and everything which you may believe, or profess to believe, is a charity and to any amount you may think proper. You will very easily perceive what a wide door this could open for fraud and corruption and favoritism, on the one hand, and for robbing the people on the other.
No, Colonel, Congress has no right to give charity.
The farmer continues; “Individual members give as much of their own money as they please, but they have no right to touch a dollar of the public money for that purpose.
If twice as many houses had been burned in this country as in Georgetown, neither you nor any other member of Congress would have thought of appropriating a dollar for our relief.
There are about 240 members of Congress. If they had shown their sympathy for the sufferers by contributing each one week’s pay, it would have made over $13,000. There are plenty of wealthy men around Washington who could have given $20,000 without depriving themselves of even a luxury of life. The congressmen chose to keep their own money, which, if reports be true, some of them spend not very creditably; and the people about Washington, no doubt, applauded you for relieving them from necessity by giving what was not yours to give. The people have delegated to Congress, by the Constitution, the power to do certain things. To do these, it is authorized to collect and pay moneys, and for nothing else. Everything beyond this is usurpation, and a violation of the Constitution. So you see Colonel, you have violated the Constitution in what I consider a vital point. It is precedent fraught with danger to the country, for when Congress once begins to stretch its power beyond the limits of the Constitution, there is no limit to it, and no security for the people. I have no doubt you acted honestly, but that does not make it any better, except as far as you are personally concerned, and you see that I cannot vote for you.”
Colonel Crockett thought; I felt streaked. I saw if I should have opposition, and this man should go to talking and in that district I was a gone fawn-skin. I could not answer him, and the fact is, I was fully convinced he was right, I did not want to. But I must satisfy him and I said to him:
“Well. my friend, you hit the nail upon the head when you said I had not sense enough to understand the Constitution. I intended to be guided by it, and thought I had studied it fully. I have heard many speeches in Congress about the powers of Congress, but what you have said here at your plow has got more hard sound sense in it than all the fine speeches I ever heard. If I had ever taken the view of it that you have, I would have put my head into the fire before I would have given that vote; and if you will forgive me and vote for me again, if I ever vote for another unconstitutional law I may wish to be shot.”
The following story is an excerpt from the book ” The Life of Davy Crockett” by Edward Sylvester and re-printed in the Ted Nugent book “Ted, White and Blue”:
Several years ago I was one evening standing on the steps of the Capitol with some members of congress, when our attentions was attracted by a great light over in Georgetown. It was evidently a large fire. We jumped into a hack and drove over as fast as we be done, many houses were burned and many families made houseless, and besides, some of them had lost all but the clothes they had on. The weather was very cold, and when I saw so many children suffering, I felt something had to be done for them. The next morning a bill was introduced appropriating $20,000 for their relief. We put aside all other business and rushed it through as soon as it could be done.
The next summer, when it began to be time to think about election, I concluded I would take a scout around among the boys of my district. When riding one day in a part of my district in which I was more of a stranger than any other, I was a man plowing the field and coming toward the road. I spoke to the man and he replied politely, but I thought rather coldly.
I began: “Well friend, I am one of those unfortunate beings called candidates and—”
The men replied “Yes I know you; you are Colonel Crockett. I have seen you once before, and voted for you the last time you were elected. I suppose you are out electioneering now, but you had better not waste your time or mine, I shall not vote for you again.”
I begged him to tell me what was the matter.
Well Colonel, it is hardly worthwhile to waste your time or words upon it. I do not see how it can be mended but you gave your vote last winter which shows that either you have not capacity to understand the Constitution, or that you are wanting in the honesty and firmness to be guided by it. In either case you are not the man to represent me. I intend this only to say that your understanding of the Constitution is very different from mine;
And I will say to you what but for my rudeness, I should not have said, that I believe you to be honest.
The man continued “But an understanding of the Constitution different from mine I cannot overlook, because the Constitution, to be worth anything, must be held sacred, and rigidly observed in all its provisions. The man who wields power and misinterprets it is the more dangerous the honest he is.
“I admit the truth in all you say, but there must be some mistake. Through I live in the back woods and seldom go from home, I take the papers from Washington and read very carefully all the proceedings of Congress. My papers say you voted for a bill to appropriate $20,000 to some sufferers by fire in Georgetown. Is that true?
Colonel Crockett said, “Well my friend; I may as well own up. You have got me there. But certainly nobody will complain that a great and rich country like ours should give the insignificant sum of $20,000 to relieve its suffering women and children, particularly with a full and overflowing treasury, and I am sure, if you had been there, you would have done just the same as I did.”
The farmer replied, “It is not the amount Colonel, that I complain of; it is the principle.
In the first place, the government ought to have in the Treasury no more than enough for its legitimate purposes.
But that has nothing with the question.
The power of collecting and disbursing money at pleasure is the most dangerous power that can be entrusted to man, particularly under our system of collecting revenue by a tariff, which reaches every man in the country, no matter how poor he may be.
What is worse, it presses upon him without his knowledge where the weight centers, for there is not a man in the U.S. who can ever guess how much he pays to the government. So you see, that while you are contributing to relieve one, you are drawing it from thousands who are even worse off than he. If you have the right to give anything, the amount was simply a matter of discretion with you, and you had as much right to give $20,000,000 as $20,000. If you have the right to give it all; and as the Constitution neither defines charity nor stipulates the amount, you are at liberty to give to any and everything which you may believe, or profess to believe, is a charity and to any amount you may think proper. You will very easily perceive what a wide door this could open for fraud and corruption and favoritism, on the one hand, and for robbing the people on the other.
No, Colonel, Congress has no right to give charity.
The farmer continues; “Individual members give as much of their own money as they please, but they have no right to touch a dollar of the public money for that purpose.
If twice as many houses had been burned in this country as in Georgetown, neither you nor any other member of Congress would have thought of appropriating a dollar for our relief.
There are about 240 members of Congress. If they had shown their sympathy for the sufferers by contributing each one week’s pay, it would have made over $13,000. There are plenty of wealthy men around Washington who could have given $20,000 without depriving themselves of even a luxury of life. The congressmen chose to keep their own money, which, if reports be true, some of them spend not very creditably; and the people about Washington, no doubt, applauded you for relieving them from necessity by giving what was not yours to give. The people have delegated to Congress, by the Constitution, the power to do certain things. To do these, it is authorized to collect and pay moneys, and for nothing else. Everything beyond this is usurpation, and a violation of the Constitution. So you see Colonel, you have violated the Constitution in what I consider a vital point. It is precedent fraught with danger to the country, for when Congress once begins to stretch its power beyond the limits of the Constitution, there is no limit to it, and no security for the people. I have no doubt you acted honestly, but that does not make it any better, except as far as you are personally concerned, and you see that I cannot vote for you.”
Colonel Crockett thought; I felt streaked. I saw if I should have opposition, and this man should go to talking and in that district I was a gone fawn-skin. I could not answer him, and the fact is, I was fully convinced he was right, I did not want to. But I must satisfy him and I said to him:
“Well. my friend, you hit the nail upon the head when you said I had not sense enough to understand the Constitution. I intended to be guided by it, and thought I had studied it fully. I have heard many speeches in Congress about the powers of Congress, but what you have said here at your plow has got more hard sound sense in it than all the fine speeches I ever heard. If I had ever taken the view of it that you have, I would have put my head into the fire before I would have given that vote; and if you will forgive me and vote for me again, if I ever vote for another unconstitutional law I may wish to be shot.”
Where would the seats come from? - Mumble Blog | The Australian
Where would the seats come from? - Mumble Blog | The Australian
I am very surprised Mumble isn't using Kristina Keneally's historic surprise win in NSW to see where the ALP will pick up seats.
Oh wait.
I am very surprised Mumble isn't using Kristina Keneally's historic surprise win in NSW to see where the ALP will pick up seats.
Oh wait.
Krudd level rising
In the few short days since Kevin Rudd became Prime Minister for a second time, it has become clear that nothing has changed. Once again Kevin Rudd is announcing grandiose plans, but without setting out any details – and he is again obsessing with political games and machinations, rather than getting on and governing in the interests of the Australian people. If Mr Rudd is serious about fixing up Labor’s failures before the election, then he needs to do the following: 1. Release the briefings he and the new Treasurer Mr Bowen have now received from Treasury about the true state of the economy and the true state of the books. Mr Rudd needs to be frank with the Australian people about the true state of the Budget, the deficit, and the debt. 2. Admit he got it wrong when, five years ago, he dismantled the Coalition’s proven border protection policies – and return Australia to the proven policies that work. 3. Scrap the Carbon Tax – which is a bad tax and an unnecessary burden on every Australian household and business. 4. Be frank with the Australian people by naming the election date and ending the uncertainty. 5. Stop playing political games. We all know that 30 years of Labor corruption in NSW cannot be ended in 30 days. There’s no way Labor’s problems can be fixed by a Labor leader who owes his comeback to the faceless men. Australians need a government that is focused on the Australian people. Only the Coalition has a Plan (http://www.liberal.org.au/real-solutions?utm_source=Liberal+Party+E-news&utm_campaign=15d7009fe2-Who+does+he+think+he+is+kidding%3F&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_51af948dc8-15d7009fe2-57325113) to build a strong, prosperous economy and a safe, secure Australia. Kevin Rudd proved last time that a ‘one-man-band’ cannot run a strong, stable and competent government. In contrast to Mr Rudd, the Coalition’s team includes 16 people in the Shadow Cabinet who were Ministers in the last Coalition Government. The Coalition, led by Tony Abbott, offers Australia the only truly united team. There is no doubt that after years of civil war Labor remain deeply divided and are merely papering over their differences to get them through the election. The next election is the clearest choice in a generation: between the Coalition and our Real Solutions Plan (http://www.liberal.org.au/real-solutions?utm_source=Liberal+Party+E-news&utm_campaign=15d7009fe2-Who+does+he+think+he+is+kidding%3F&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_51af948dc8-15d7009fe2-57325113) to build a stronger Australia and a better future, or a divided and dysfunctional Labor Party that is making it up as it goes along. Regards, Brian Loughnane
Tuesday, July 2, 2013
"It's simply not possible to stop and turn a boat around."
Michael Smith News
Here's a Prime Minister who at least had the right attitude. Spoke quietly, meant what he said, said what he meant and carried a very big stick.
"It's simply not possible to stop and turn a boat around."
Maybe not for you Kev. But you are like the Tin Man with galvanised hair and no heart. You are a backroomer old mate, a schemer who's wafer thin and goes to water when confronted. And, you weak spirited loser, you're happy to send the world the message that we can't stop wooden boats. Insh-Allah, the will of God, que se ra, se ra, whatever will be, will be. Grow a spine mate, that's what you're there to do. STOP THE BOATS, THIS IS OUR HOME, YOU ARE PAID TO KEEP THE BORDER IN GOOD ORDER - DO YOUR JOB.Here's a Prime Minister who at least had the right attitude. Spoke quietly, meant what he said, said what he meant and carried a very big stick.
Winston Churchill facing maritime invasion in his Island home, London 4 June, 1940.
I have, myself, full confidence that if all do their duty, if nothing is neglected, and if the best arrangements are made, as they are being made, we shall prove ourselves once more able to defend our island home, to ride out the storm of war, and to outlive the menace of tyranny, if necessary for years, if necessary alone. At any rate, that is what we are going to try to do. That is the resolve of His Majesty's Government — every man of them. That is the will of Parliament and the nation. The British Empire and the French Republic, linked together in their cause and in their need, will defend to the death their native soil, aiding each other like good comrades to the utmost of their strength.
Even though large tracts of Europe and many old and famous States have fallen or may fall into the grip of the Gestapo and all the odious apparatus of Nazi rule, we shall not flag or fail. We shall go on to the end. We shall fight in France, we shall fight on the seas and oceans, we shall fight with growing confidence and growing strength in the air, we shall defend our island, whatever the cost may be. We shall fight on the beaches, we shall fight on the landing grounds, we shall fight in the fields and in the streets, we shall fight in the hills; we shall never surrender.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
That’s the constitution.
Parliament rose on the basis of the election date being Sept 14. Now it could be as late as late November.
What? Five months with no scrutiny of Kevin None For Seven’s running the country?
Hardly as if the media will do it. Too busy NOT asking about debt boatpeople, power pricing, carbon taxes etc.
Tue 02 Jul 13 (12:30pm)
Tue 02 Jul 13 (02:30pm)
Stick to Sep 14 or desolve government as unelected and not sitting.