The Real Evidence Vs COINTELPRO
There seems to be a thread of "fakery" claims that run from 9/11 (the
'blue screen planes' theory) through Sandy Hook (another 'staged event')
and Boston which, when looked at from a broad perspective, seems to
have been deliberately invented and disseminated in order to discredit
the serious evidence for government complicity in these specific
The problem here is that, as concerns the Boston bombings, there is hard evidence that:
- There was a drill on the day of the marathon
- There were spotters on roofs and dog sniffing teams
- There were announcements made about the drills
- There were two tweets from the Boston Globe on their
marathon update page that "authorities have announced that a controlled
explosion will take opposite the library in 1 minute" (this was two
hours before a bomb went off at that exact location)
- The FBI have admitted that they had been in contact with the two brothers for about 5 years
- The NY Times ran an article stating that virtually all previous "terror plots" that were "foiled" by the FBI were actually created by the FBI.
bombing is the alleged testimony of Bauman and, more importantly, the
allegation that they killed a policeman a few days later at MIT. All
that is really known is that the policeman, officer Sean Collier, was approached by an unknown person(s)
as he sat in his car and shot multiple times. The only evidence linking
the Tsarnaev brothers to this killing is the claim made by the unnamed
man who was allegedly taken hostage by the brothers after they allegedly
killed officer Collier. The story goes that after he was taken hostage
in his own car by the brothers, the older brother asked him if he had
heard about the Boston bombing. The unnamed hostage replied that he had,
and the older Tsarnaev brother then allegedly said;
"I did that, and I just killed a policeman in Cambridge."So basically, the only real evidence linking the brothers to the
bombing is the claim by an unnamed alleged hostage that the brothers
made their bizarre confession to him that they had killed Collier and
were responsible for the bombing.
Coincidentally, the traffic cop who was the first on the scene of Colliers murder (officer Richard Donohue) was a close friend of Collier.
Even more coincidentally, officer Donohue was involved later that
evening in the alleged shoot out with the brothers in the Watertown area
of Boston, where he was, coincidentally, the only officer to be shot by "friendly fire". And to round off the coincidence-fest:
"Officer Donohue of the MBTA Transit Police remembers almost nothingWhat are the odds, eh?
of the night he was shot during chaotic gunfire on a normally quiet
Watertown street, or of the murder of his close friend, MIT police
Officer Sean Collier, hours before in Cambridge."
Do you know who J. D. Tippit is? J. D. Tippit was the Dallas policeman
who was allegedly shot by Lee Harvey Oswald. The shooting of Tippit was
instrumental in framing Oswald, at least in the public mind, for the
murder of Kennedy.
Jim Garrison stated that, "If Oswald was innocent of the Tippit murder, the foundation of the government's case against him collapsed."
And indeed, it appears that the Warren Commission ignored a lot of evidence in the form of conflicting eyewitness testimony that strongly suggests Oswald did NOT kill Tippit.
That's just some of the hard evidence that could be used to make a case
for the Boston bombings being a govt. operation. But when you add in the
idea that the bombings were actually 'staged' by 'actors', and proceed
to back it up with very subjective 'evidence', virtually all of which
can be exposed as bogus, thereby making those who claim it as 'evidence'
look like fools and/or liars, well....you've destroyed any usefulness
of the hard evidence by associating it with the bogus evidence. For me,
therefore, the 'actors' and 'fakery' meme is more than likely a
deliberate attempt to do exactly that.
Of course, there is the other all-important element, without which
government/intel attempts to spread disinformation would be useless i.e.
the many, many individuals who have bought the story and disseminated
the disinfo. I don't for a second believe that owners of respectable
websites like Globalresearch.ca and many respected bloggers are
consciously playing a part in the disinfo campaign, but the reality is
that they have been aiding and abetting what is most likely a COINTELPRO
operation by giving the 'actors' theory legs (so to speak). I won't
pretend to know why such previously sober and serious journalists and
authors have uncharacteristically been taken in by a con-job (and a
rather obvious one at that), except to hypothesize that, as the world
continues to spiral down into ever-increasing lies, social hysteria and
madness, we may expect to see more and more people begin to 'lose the
plot' in more ways than one.