http://blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/andrewbolt/index.php/heraldsun/comments/aborigines_cant_be_expected_to_keep_appointments
Let's be perfectly, exquisitely clear as to where both the inspiration, and the expertise in relation to this difficult question of science and racial hygiene (as it was once called) comes from:
The Nazis defined a Jew as anyone who either 1) had three or four racially full Jewish grandparents, 2) belonged to a Jewish religious community or joined one after September 15 when the Nuremberg Laws came into force. Also regarded as Jews was anyone married to a Jew or the children of Jewish parents. This included illegitimate children of even the non-Jewish partner. There appears to have been no serious public objection to these laws.
The intent of these laws was to define a Jew so that the policies towards Jews and their property could be carried out without the confusion of who is a Jew and who is not. The Nuremberg Laws had the unexpected result of causing confusion and heated debate over who was a "full Jew." The Nazis then issued instructional charts to help distinguish Jews from Mischlinge (Germans of mixed race) and Aryans.
Source: http://www.wzaponline.com/WhowasaJewinNaziGermany.pdf
Unhappily, we have extended the mischlinge principle FURTHER THAN THE NAZIS DID.
That is some freaking achievement right there.