Top Ten Reasons: Jim Fetzer and Friends are Sunstein Shills
Top Ten Reasons: Jim Fetzer and Friends are Sunstein Shills
Update (February 21, 2014): Wolfgang Halbig
In an article Top Ten Reasons: Sandy Hook was an Elaborate Hoax by Dr.
Fetzer et al, the Fetzerians exhibit an uncharacteristic flash of logic
with statements about "the totality of the
evidence" and the probability of hypotheses. For example, "The
hypothesis that confers the highest probability on the evidence is the
preferable, which, when the evidence has 'settled down,' is acceptable as true
in the tentative and fallible fashion of science".
Here are the "top ten" reasons that support the conclusion that the
leading proponents of
Sandy Hook hoax / no-plane 'theories' are Sunstein shills.
1) The Sandy Hook hoax theorists (Sandy Hookers) promote outrageous claims such as 28 deaths were faked, 20 children
must pretend to be dead for the rest of their lives, some of these children
attended the Super Bowl by mistake instead of playing dead, dozens or hundreds of crisis actors
were hired to play the part of bereaved family members, the mass killings were merely
part of a
drill, and there was foreknowledge of the "drill". Their
'evidence' consists of the opinions of some YouTube commentators who think the relatives
should be shedding more tears, or shouldn't give a nervous laugh when preparing to face the
cameras. Or some internet 'detectives' spot a few glitches with Google's date logs,
and cite it as 'proof' that dastardly Sandy Hook conspirators slipped up and
made an error that only these latter-day Sherlocks were clever enough to spot.
If the events at Sandy Hook were a result of government chicanery, such
as an exploitation of Adam Lanza's "significant mental health issues", then the
investigation has been derailed by the Sandy Hookers' mass circulation of
outlandish claims about faked deaths, fake family members and a fake killer.
Unsurprisingly, the fakery claims have been
robustly refuted.
And whilst denying the abundance of evidence supporting the
official Sandy Hook narrative as broadly correct, the Sandy Hookers are
frequently found trying to sell other preposterous conspiracy
claims such as no-planes-hit-the-World-Trade-Center, WTC-was-nuked,
space-beam-weapon-zapped-WTC, and Boston-bomb-amputees-faked-injuries. For example,
Jim Fetzer is a no-planer and claims
mini-nukes demolished the WTC. Disinformation brokers such as Fetzer, Sofia Smallstorm, James Tracy, Simon Shack, Max Konrardy, Morgan
Reynolds, John Lear, Dave Shayler, John Friend and Judy Wood have skills
such as writing, video production, flying and spying, and at least four of them
qualified as professors (as did Cass Sunstein). One professor becoming senile and postulating crackpot
hypotheses about space-based beam weapons, faked planes or faked deaths could be
considered unlucky, two a coincidence, but three or four is a conspiracy.
Members of the general public who take a casual look at "conspiracy theories"
will encounter the lunatic claims of these professors, and will conclude that if
no-planers, mini-nukers and Sandy Hook / Boston bombings deniers are
indicative of the truth movement's finest brains, then there is no need for
further investigation and no need to doubt the government account of events such as 9/11.
Similarly, when dozens of people have skills in writing, video
production, flying,
spying, etc., demonstrating that they are not retards or lunatics, and
these people are promoting ideas that are so at odds with the evidence
that only retards
or lunatics
could possibly subscribe to them, then there is a contradiction that is
resolved
only by
assuming that these people are liars who pretend to be crazy. There is
not only no evidence that no
planes hit the WTC, or that the Sandy Hook deaths were "faked"; there
is also no
credible motive for anyone to believe such ridiculous ideas. There are,
however,
powerful motives for them to lie: tribal loyalty, bribery, blackmail,
bullying,
and a misguided belief that they are being patriotic by serving as
government assets
who counter "conspiracy theorists" by infiltrating truth-seeking circles
and
acting as if they believe the most outrageous bovine excrement.
2) A professor who is an "expert" in "critical
thinking" - as he's been telling everyone for decades
- should surely comprehend that it's
much easier for perpetrators of false-flag terror to crash a Boeing into a
building (especially with Dov Zakheim
and Daniel Lewin on the team) rather than
have to fake it with phony videos or invisible, inaudible aircraft capable of
projecting
Fetzer's postulated "sophisticated hologram[s]"
to fool hundreds or thousands of eyewitnesses into imagining they saw a plane or
planes crashing into the WTC, and to fool billions who would later see the
footage,
and planting of assorted physical evidence without anyone seeing or hearing the
fakers. This evidence includes a 255-pound piece of wreckage
"later identified as a trailing edge flap support structure from a Boeing 767",
with it needing to be wedged between an apartment building and a mosque, to be
finally removed twelve years later in 2013 in a two-hour operation using a
pulley system, a
fuselage
fragment on the roof of
WTC5, landing gear at the corner of West and Rector Streets and also in an
exterior panel knocked free from WTC1, aircraft
parts embedded in the back of a car, and an American Airlines plane seat and
life vest at the roof level of 130 Liberty Plaza (Deutsche Bank Building). And the fakers would need to create
impact holes in the WTC facade matching the
silhouette of a Boeing 767 by using cleverly placed shaped charges, guaranteed
to detonate at the right instant. The probability of being able to blow out the
correct shape is about zero.
Even if you try to imagine a "parallel world" in which Fetzer is telling the
truth and the WTC planes were faked, the problem is that it requires a
population that is so dumbed-down and a government that is so competent and
technically proficient, that the government would be able to exploit and enslave
the citizens as they pleased without having to go to all the trouble of faking planes and
staging false-flag terror. Just round them up, give them some pills and put them
in labor camps, they get all the water they need (as per the Guantanamo Bay
prisoners), rations as long as they perform their work, and tell them it's
perfectly normal and even desirable. The population would need to be so stupid
as to fail to see or hear "hologram-projector" planes flying away, or fail to
understand that it discredits the official story. And they would have to fail to
see or hear government agents smashing aircraft debris into the back of cars or
into walls or roofs, before the plane was supposed to have crashed. Or, again,
fail to recognize that it is inconsistent with the government's version of events.
On the whole, governments - in our world, in this reality - are not supremely
competent. Presidents can't always get away with relatively straightforward
schemes, such as bugging their opponents. Or having sex with some woman who
happens to be a co-religionist of the prime minister who arrived
in Washington three days after
news broke of the scandal, ostensibly for talks regarding the West
Bank, but most likely trying to blackmail the president into taking part in a
false-flag operation. Especially when the prime minister keeps in "close touch"
with a friend and co-religionist who obtained a 99-year lease on a couple of
towers and secured 12-layer, 22-company insurance coverage against
terrorist attacks aggregating $3,546,809,904
"per occurrence", and including
property damage and business interruption, six weeks before the buildings were
destroyed in two "occurrences" of terrorist attacks. And especially when
one of the target floors (94 of WTC1) has already had the "upgraded"
fireproofing installed, it's due to be installed later that year on
four more contiguous
floors in the target zone, compatriots of the
prime minister have already set up "moving
companies" that operate in
the states (NJ and NY) through which the fireproofing is to be transported, the
prime minister has already "predicted" that "Islamist" terrorists
would demolish the building, and "coincidentally" happens to be
ex-Sayeret Matkal,
an MIT alumnus, and lived in
Denver and Jerusalem, the very same as one of the passengers on the plane
that, three years later, was to fly into the building 102 minutes before it
collapsed. A plane, incidentally, from which one of the so-called "hijackers"
later turned up alive and well, and said his passport had been stolen
in 1995 when his Denver apartment was burgled. (And just for good measure, the woman also happens to be a
co-religionist of Cass Sunstein, Gordon Duff, the late Julius Springer, and
other principal players in these intrigues.)
Mossad agents are relatively competent, and yet Sivan Kurzberg, Oded Ellner
and Yaron Shmuel let themselves get so carried away with celebrating the first
plane impact that
they made a spectacle of themselves high-fiving, hugging each
other, flicking a lighter, and appearing "visibly happy on nearly all" of the 76
photographs that they had taken and were subsequently developed by the FBI. They
knew that their co-religionists' control of the media and ability to pull
strings in Washington would be their get-out-of-jail-free card.
The no-planes nonsense has been thoroughly debunked many times by people with
professional experience in video production,
and it is clear that any proponent of no-planes is either a lunatic or a liar.
A professor who qualified in history and philosophy of science would
surely be aware that a "micro-nuke" or "mini-nuke" produces an EMP and radioactive
fission products, and that it is not possible to incorporate devices into
satellites that can fire "direct energy" beams with a power output in
excess of the total power consumption of humankind. He would also be
aware that when another professor makes a claim about beam weapons being used to
demolish the WTC, yet doesn't even bother to do energy calculations and is easily refuted by a competent
scientist, and was reportedly in a coma for
six years, then her 'theories' are clearly not to be taken
seriously. When Fetzer says that he supports Judy Wood's 'research' but
doesn't necessarily
endorse her 'theories', Fetzer reveals his deception just as surely as
if he'd
given her his full backing.
The best explanation for Fetzer's behavior is that he is a highly intelligent
man who simply cannot believe that the government could be involved in massive
conspiracies such as 9/11. So he remains a government loyalist, his confirmation
bias, flawed
epistemology and world-view leads him to imagine that
all so-called "conspiracy theorists" are "goof-balls", and he believes he's
being patriotic in helping the government counter the conspiracy theorists by
promoting nonsensical claims about faked planes and faked deaths, effectively
parodying the real patriots and truth-tellers. Since Fetzer thinks that
conspiracy theorists are all a bunch of nuts, he isn't particularly concerned if
his claims have not even a shred of credibility. He knows that he's helping to
trash the image of those perceived by the wider audience as conspiracy
theorists or "twoofers", and he thinks he's doing the right thing.
3) A January 2008 paper by Cass Sunstein provides an example
of a recent "conspiracy theory" and contends that believers in such theories
create "risks":
"...the belief [...] that the attacks of 9/11 were carried out [...] by Israel
or the United States. Those who subscribe to conspiracy theories may create
serious risks, including risks of violence..."
The "risks" are not to ordinary members of the public, as Sunstein would like
people to believe, but to the true perpetrators of 9/11 and those involved in
the cover-up, i.e., Sunstein and his pals, following an independent
investigation, prosecutions, and fair trials.
According to Sunstein, the "best" way that "such theories might be undermined
[...] consists of cognitive infiltration of extremist groups." Sunstein claims
that "those who subscribe to such theories" do so because they have a "crippled
epistemology".
Sunstein needs infiltrators who will mimic the silliest type of "conspiracy
theorist" imaginable, by selectively accepting information only from the likes
of John Lear, Morgan Reynolds, Judy Wood, Mike Powers / Hollingsworth and others
who are part of the deception. A higher level infiltrator (e.g. Fetzer) will
build his crippled epistemology using John Lear, Morgan Reynolds, etc., as its
foundation, and will use the argument from authority fallacy against his
critics, e.g., "Do you
consider yourself as qualified as John Lear to address these issues?" Thus,
these infiltrators will act the role of an individual
whose epistemology is so "crippled" that they become parodies of genuine
truth-tellers.
In Sunstein's discussion of whether government should choose to ignore or rebut
a "conspiracy theory", he points out that the disadvantage for the government in
rebutting a particular theory is that it may "legitimate" the theory, and
a theory may gain rather than lose adherents when it is perceived as sufficiently plausible
that the government needs to counter it. Sunstein recommends a strategy of
"rebutting many conspiracy theories" because this yields a "synergistic gain"
for the government from reducing "the legitimating effect of rebutting any
one
of them".
Since Sunstein can hardly fail to be aware that Israel did 9/11, he knows that his best
strategy is to introduce many new conspiracy theories, each of them with various
degrees of craziness, but they all need to be crazier than the government's own
9/11 conspiracy theory
of nineteen hijackers with box cutters. Thus, Sunstein
recommends a policy of countering multiple theories and "cognitive
infiltration"
of truth seekers, and the disinformation agents promote preposterous
theories such as no-one-died-on-9/11, no-planes-hit-the-WTC,
WTC-was-nuked, and no-one-died-at-Sandy-Hook. Other agents can knock
down these
straw men, and will attempt to counter those who tell the facts about
9/11.
Theories such as no-planes and no-one-died-at-Sandy-Hook are promoted so
strongly that they appear more popular than evidence-based theories about
Israel's central role in 9/11. Government benefits from the "synergistic gain"
obtained from not legitimating a particular theory, specifically, Israel's
orchestrating of 9/11. Third-parties (the mass audience) form the impression
that "conspiracy theorists" are all a bunch of fruitcakes who think the 9/11
planes were holograms, the WTC was nuked, no children died at Sandy Hook, and "crisis actors"
pretended to be bereaved family members.
4) Jim Fetzer has authored, co-authored, edited or co-edited several books concerned with
epistemology and cognition. Moreover, a number of these books were published by
Springer, the company founded by Julius Springer, who was a co-religionist of Cass Sunstein.
These include:
break up the crippled epistemology of conspiracy-minded groups". Who better than
a professor whose expertise is in epistemology and cognition? Moreover, Fetzer had already
been flagged as operating a "campaign of disinformation" prior to 9/11/01,
and "he told one researcher that he begins by deciding what is the truth, and
then marshals evidence (selectively) to support that 'truth'."
A professor smart enough to understand epistemology, probability and the
philosophical aspects of cognitive systems would not be foolish enough to
imagine that a video (e.g., the infamous September Clues) that makes
ridiculous, unsubstantiated claims is a more reliable source of knowledge than a
plethora of evidence such as aircraft debris, eyewitnesses, photographs, video
and news reports, especially when the video producer's father served as a
controlled opposition Judas Goat to help counter allegations of collusion between
government members and the Mafia, and whose brother's Formula One racing career
was sponsored by Yeslam bin Laden. And he would know that a woman who was
in a coma for six years and rambles on about space-based directed energy weapons is not a
reliable source, when the energy required to
vaporize (or "dustify") the steel in the Towers is hundreds of terajoules,
and the "weapon" would need to sustain a power output over ten seconds in excess
of the total power output of humankind.
He would not be foolish enough to take at face value an ex-pilot's
claims about Flight 175's speed and impact being "physically impossible", especially when
the claims have been proven wrong,
and the ex-pilot used to fly missions for the CIA and other government agencies and
discredits himself with claims about the Moon having a breathable atmosphere and
"forests, meadows, lakes, rivers, people, [and] civilizations".
He would understand that cherry-picking of information sources,
e.g., blindly believing garbage propaganda videos that are intended to deceive such
as September Clues, and believing the claims of an 'ex'-CIA pilot and an
'ex'-Bush Admin member, whilst rejecting more reliable sources, will lead to
crazy conclusions typical of an individual with a crippled epistemology, and
that such an approach can be used to parody the wackiest type of conspiracy
theorist imaginable. Thus, Professor James H. Fetzer is ideally qualified for a
leading position on Sunstein's team of cognitive infiltrators.
5) Fetzer is not an honest debater. He has a system for
controlling debates on his forum when it's not going well for him - he bans his
opponent and closes the comments!
As mentioned above, Fetzer's "sophisticated hologram" scenario
requires invisible, inaudible plane(s) to project the "hologram-plane". One
problem for the fakers is the matter of getting the correct Doppler shift for
the engine roar, so that observers would hear, and amateur videos would record,
the appropriate sound for the location. For example, listen to the engine roar on this
video at around 04:15, seconds before Flight 175 smashes into WTC2 at
approximately 590 mph. The camera is located well to the south of the Tower, and
so the pitch audibly decreases as the plane passes overhead, slightly to the
left of the camera. The decrease in pitch is typical of a plane passing
roughly overhead. However, for an observer to the north of WTC2, the Doppler
effect would be much less. Although the angle of the plane's approach changes
slightly since it's hundreds of feet overhead, it never goes from approaching to receding from the observer.
See around 07:50 on the same video
for an example of that.
One option for the fakers would be to plant several very large, invisible
loudspeakers, with inbuilt invisible amplifiers and an array of invisible
batteries (or invisible cable going off to a mains power source) at various locations
on the streets of Manhattan, which is of course impossible. Alternatively, the "projector-planes"
would have to
incorporate extremely powerful, directional
loudspeakers with excellent bass extension mounted on their exterior, whilst
capable of silent and invisible flight as these hypothetical planes speed away after the
"hologram-plane" has supposedly crashed. All of this assumes that sophisticated hologram
technology capable of fooling thousands of people is available, and was
available in 2001 - which it isn't, and wasn't.
Amusingly, when Fetzer was called on this by a poster at Veterans Today
named Rollo, Fetzer continued to dodge the question. After getting the
last word in with ad hominems on how Rollo was obviously a "goof-ball or
an op" who was "posting
rubbish" (simply because he disagreed with Fetzer's no-planes lunacy),
Fetzer banned Rollo from
responding and closed the comments on spurious grounds that Rollo did
not
"even know [Fetzer's] position"!
6) Eyvind Hytten, the father of September Clues disinformation broker Simon Shack/Hytten, was a government asset who
served as a controlled opposition, in order to counter the work of anti-Mafia
crusader Danilo Dolci, who accused prominent members of the government of
colluding with the Mafia. Moreover, the Formula One racing career of Simon's
brother Mario Hytten was sponsored
by Yeslam bin Laden.
Simon Hytten and his sidekick Max Konrardy aka hoi.polloi make
the most outrageous claims, such as no-one-died-on-9/11. Hytten and Konrardy's lies are too
crazy even for the likes of Jim Fetzer. On the one hand, Fetzer aims to appear just sufficiently wacky
with his support of no-planes and mini-nukes that he can be instantly
flagged as a crank by non-conspiracy-minded members of society, whilst fooling a
few gullible, simple-minded people whose saving grace is that they trust the
"truth movement" more than the government. On the other hand, Fetzer does not
want to appear so cuckoo that not even the shills will support
him.
Thus, outsiders can become aware of the garbage 'theories' of Simon Hytten and
Max Konrardy, and will reject 9/11 truth as full of paranoid lunatics who imagine
that everything about 9/11 was fake. And a few in the truth movement are taken in by Fetzer and friends,
thereby destroying cohesion within the group as energy is devoted to claim
and counter-claim of shilling, rather than exposing the perpetrators.
7) The Sandy Hookers attempt to substantiate their material by citing dubious
sources such as Mike "Powers" aka Mike Hollingsworth aka Entryman
aka Scorpion commander aka Jsteele7707, the suspected federal informant who tried to have
Charles Dyer / July4Patriot jailed on charges of attempting to blow up federal
buildings, before they managed to get him jailed for 30 years for "child abuse".
"Powers" is touted as a so-called "professional military investigator and
ballistics expert" by Fetzer & Co in
Top Ten Reasons: Sandy Hook was an Elaborate Hoax, and is also cited
by Alex Jones, who claims Israel could not have carried out 9/11.
8) It's already been established that Zionist operatives
post on the internet
under multiple aliases, sometimes attacking 9/11 truth, and at other times posting
crazy conspiracy theories to make "conspiracy theorists" look nuts. For
example, one particular YouTuber (who at the time of writing operates the
channel Oliver Terrance)
posed
as a dumb 16YO kid who
swooned over Alex Jones (whom he described as "a very good looking man"!) and
swallowed every crazy conspiracy theory under the sun: no-planes, WTC-was-nuked,
directed-energy-weapons-toppled-WTC, etc. But part of the time he would attack
9/11 truth; for example, he said ae911truth are "faggots", and he would get
praised by the likes of ctcole77. One of his channels was UnitedChildrenOfZion,
and he also revealed his true allegiance with statements such as "Zionism will
save us, shalom."
This was all going on prior to Sandy Hook in 2012. Then, unsurprisingly, this Oliver Terrance
character came out as a staunch supporter and promoter of Sandy Hook hoax /
"crisis actor" theories.
9) John Lear, a promoter of no-planes, is an 'ex'-CIA asset in the same manner
that Osama bin Laden was an 'ex'-CIA/Zionist asset. Lear, who has earned himself
a reputation as "everyone's favorite crackpot", makes other kooky
assertions, such as the Moon has "64%" of Earth's gravity, and an "atmosphere"
in the craters that is dense enough to breathe in. People are well aware that
"[John Lear] is a nut,
which is why ATA Airlines fired him as a pilot several years ago".
(Lear's story is that ATA fired him in 1989 for believing in flying saucers.) Thus, Lear further discredits
himself in the eyes of "normal" people who are simply unaware of conspiracies
and government crimes, and will induce that "truthers" are nuts.
But Fetzer cites this "nut" as an authority!!
The no-planer Dave Shayler, a transvestite who is obsessed with Kabbalah and
declares himself to be the
"Son of God", is an 'ex'-MI5 asset. This is another example of an
'ex'-Zionist asset
who will lead ordinary people to imagine that "truthers" are lunatics and
weirdoes.
The no-planer Morgan Reynolds is supposed to be an 'ex'-Bush Admin asset. What a
"coincidence" that Lear, Shayler and Reynolds all peddle the no-planes spiel and
are all supposed to be 'ex'-Zionist assets, who either retired or had some sort
of falling out with their old paymasters!
10)
In October 2012, Gordon Duff, of Jewish descent, actually admitted that 40% of
his writing was "at least purposely partially false", and that about 30% of the
material on Veterans Today is "patently false". Duff, billed as
"one of the top global intelligence specialists", is the Chairman on the VT
Editorial Board, and Jim Fetzer writes much of the
"patently false" nonsense that may be found there.
"Consider the totality of the evidence", and "The hypothesis that
confers the highest probability on the evidence is the preferable",
let's ask which is the preferable hypothesis:
1) That the 9/11 planes were holograms and/or eyewitnesses were paid
to lie, physical evidence was faked, video and images were faked,
and so on, when it would have been far simpler to crash planes into
buildings with Zakheim's Flight Termination Systems. And hundreds of
crisis actors were hired for Sandy Hook, children were paid or
threatened to pretend to be dead and not talk about it throughout
adulthood, in order that the government has a stronger case against
gun control and the construction industry gets a few million dollars
worth of work, when it is far simpler to wait until some lone nut
with a gun goes on the rampage and not have to pay off the
construction industry. And Mike Piper, Keith Johnson and Mark Glenn
are part of the conspiracy, paid to help cover up the government's
subterfuge.
2) That four professors turn from brilliant academics into raving
lunatics who are suffering from a "crippled epistemology" -
including one who has co-authored and edited books and papers on
epistemology, and another who specializes in media and
communications. They not only subscribe to crackpot 'theories' about
faked Boeings and faked deaths, but promote the ideas with an
evangelical fervor. And others who can make videos, write, fly, spy,
provide economics advice, etc., are also peddling garbage that is
believable only by the certifiably insane or someone whose internet skills would
amount to no more than replying, "Hello
Mommy" in an e-mail.
3) That four professors along with dozens of others, all of them
otherwise rational people whose confirmation bias precludes them
from seriously considering evidence of government conspiracies such
as Israel's central role in 9/11, agree to act the role of
epistemologically-challenged conspiracy theorists, in order to help
the government counter "extremist groups". The leader is selected
because of his expertise in epistemology and cognitive systems.
He understands how limiting his sources of information to a narrow
range of crackpots such as John Lear will enable him to act the role of one of
Cass Sunstein's hypothetical "conspiracy theorists" with a "crippled
epistemology". Another is recruited because of his knowledge of
media and communications.
into lunatics and inexplicably develop a bizarre evangelical zeal to
promote their crackpot theories, at the expense of making themselves
look stupid, and even facing calls to resign in the case of James
Tracy. It doesn't make sense that the government would hire hundreds
of crisis actors, or that thousands of conspirators would fake
videos and images, write CGI scripts, plant aircraft debris, pay
eyewitnesses to lie, etc., when they could simply wait for some lone
nut with a gun or crash planes into buildings. It does make sense
that otherwise intelligent people, with an ideological blind spot
that prevents them from
accepting that it wasn't Osama bin Laden or Khalid Sheikh Mohammed
who masterminded 9/11, would agree to help the government, probably
for a fee, by cognitive infiltration of "extremist groups".
The epistemologically-blinkered shills mistakenly perceive truth-tellers as "extremists"
with a "crippled epistemology".
And of course, many activists know that Israel did 9/11, but are
motivated by tribal loyalty to play the part of no-planes,
micro-nukes, Sandy-Hook-hoax and Boston-bombings-hoax theorists.
It is not hundreds or thousands of
"crisis actors" who faked deaths
and faked plane crashes. It is Fetzer, Reynolds, Wood,
Tracy, Hytten,
Konrardy, Friend and their colleagues who are acting and faking.
Fetzer & Co are government loyalists who don't subscribe to any
conspiracy theories. Fetzer and his friends think that the Arabs did
9/11, Oswald was a lone assassin, and Israel's attack on the USS
Liberty was an accident. And they think they're being patriotic by
operating as Sunstein shills, disinformation agents, Judas Goats,
and by lying, faking and acting as crazed conspiracy theorists. In
reality, Fetzer & Co are traitors. However, in their blinkered
world-view, Fetzer & Co imagine they're doing the right thing.
(In the case of some of these people, such as Dave Shayler and John Lear, the
jury is still out. If they're not nuts, they're putting on an excellent act. And
if they are nuts, how convenient! But
for those such as Fetzer, the evidence is that they're too smart to believe the
rubbish that they spout.)
When Dr. Fetzer meets up with his friends or old colleagues, he
doesn't need to play the role of a crackpot whose cognitive powers
are in decline, leading him to fall for preposterous hypotheses
whilst developing an irresistible urge to broadcast his weird
beliefs to the world. He simply tells them that his "applied
philosophical research" includes his role in infiltrating
"conspiracy theorists". After all, his friends and colleagues
probably imagine that all "conspiracy theorists" are nuts who think
the 9/11 planes and the Sandy Hook deaths were faked.
If we go
back to Fetzer's
pre-9/11 admission that "he begins by deciding what is the
truth, and then marshals evidence (selectively) to support that 'truth'," this
is exactly how their scheme works. First they decide on a 'truth' such as
no-planes or Sandy-Hook-deaths-were-all-faked. Then the low-level shills - e.g.,
CIA, MI5, or Bush Admin assets (in the case of no-planes), or hasbara
trolls in the case of 'nuts' who seize on glitches in Google's Sandy Hook date
stamps - serve as the selective sources for the high-level shills such as Fetzer,
who will build their epistemologically-crippled personae with their crackpot
'theories' on the foundations of these liars and propagandists.
When the media reports on James Tracy's crazy theories about Sandy
Hook and the Boston bombings and he's facing calls for his
resignation, he'll tell the administrators that he's acting a role
for his conspiracy theories studies. Indeed, he needs to be as
belligerent as possible, not even receiving a
letter of reprimand until refusing for months to add a clear
disclaimer at his blog to confirm that his views are not those of
his university, and eventually relenting. (If they took no action
against him, his legend would look even more suspect.) Given that
Tracy is already on $64,650
per annum, there is no need for him to receive donations for his
spare-time activities. Yet
his website has a Donate
button, most likely a flypaper trap that gathers the names and
addresses of any patriots who are foolish enough to fall for it, for
the attention of government agencies.
Sunstein's best strategy
is to have a team of shills with wildly varying credibility, who start
out relatively good and then go downhill. If they're all like Fetzer and
post almost 100% bullshit, it's easy for
genuine patriots and truth-seekers to identify them. This tarnishes the
reputation of "conspiracy theorists" in the eyes of the mass audience
(the third
party), but doesn't achieve the shills' other aims of weakening morale
and sowing mistrust
and despondency in truth-seeking circles. When the Zionists put a lot
more investment into establishing an initial credibility, truth-seekers
are less able to distinguish the fakes from the real patriots, and the
counter-intelligence operatives
attain all of their objectives.
Sunstein would love truth-tellers to think that Fetzer, Shayler,
Reynolds, Lear & Co are part of their group - genuine, honest patriots who just
happen to be crazy, rather than actors posing as crazy, honest patriots by lying
and peddling bizarre claims.
In general, the various shills or disinformation agents
will initially
present themselves as relatively sane, genuine "truth-tellers", before
deteriorating into lunatics. Sunstein's strategy goes rather like this:
Each shill
is assigned a Starting Stupidity Number (SSN), with 10/10 being maximum
on the
stupidity scale. Over the months or years, the shill will progress along
the stupidity scale,
in effect, regressing or degenerating. At any given time, there are
plenty of "sleepers", ready to degenerate when the time is right.
For example, Jim Fetzer started at 8/10, based on how he would "accidentally"
plump for the craziest WTC demolition scenarios such as nukes or space beam weapons,
when other, far more reasonable scenarios were being advanced. People with
limited common sense and an aversion to
science might have been fooled into thinking that maybe the government had
developed a new, special type of small nuclear device, capable of reliable,
timely, controlled detonation whilst leaving no radioactive signature. Fetzer progressed to
9/10 as he became a keen no-planer, posting drivel about a Boeing 767 being
rather like a "flying empty beer can". He would
cite those such as 'ex'-CIA asset John Lear as an "expert" who would back his
claim that a Boeing 767 flying at approximately 590 mph whilst 1,000 feet above
sea level was "physically impossible". Lear, as a well-known crackpot who not only
supports no-planes but believes the moon to be inhabitable with a breathable
atmosphere in the craters, clearly had an SSN of 10/10.
Simon Hytten/Shack and Max
Konrardy/hoi.polloi would have been assigned an SSN of 9/10, based on their
peddling of no-planes propaganda. They later progressed to a stupidity factor of 10/10 with their
"vicsims"
imbecility, which claims that all 9/11 victims were faked.
Sofia Smallstorm began with a very low SSN on the basis of her 9/11
Mysteries video, which was reasonably good, but is now 9/10 or thereabouts after
showing her true colors with a deceptive Sandy Hooker propaganda video and
fully aligning with Fetzer and the rest of the disinformation gang. Eric Hufschmid's SSN was
also quite low;
he started out with a book and video shortly after 9/11. His stupidity rating
soon rocketed to 10/10 after he claimed people such as Ernst Zundel and Mahmoud
Ahmadinejad were secretly working for
the Zionists. As Hufschmid became an increasing irrelevance, he posted naked
rear-view pictures of himself on his website. We can only hope that Smallstorm
doesn't follow Hufschmid's example!
John Friend was installed as the token "white supremacist", whose criticisms
of organized Jewry would initially win him the confidence of some patriots and
qualify him for a fairly low SSN. After aligning himself with Fetzer and
becoming a no-planer and Sandy Hook denier, Friend advanced to 9/10 on the
stupidity scale. The ADL was readily able to denounce him as an "anti-Semite"
with "extreme views", and he serves as a brilliant example for
whenever they want to portray Judaism's critics as racist lunatics. As early as August
2012, Friend purportedly received a threatening e-mail from the JDL. Since Friend is not stupid enough to believe in no-planes,
he must be working for Cass Sunstein, the JDL, ADL or a similar organization.
Most likely the JDL, since they could then 'threaten' him in order to help
establish his legend, or "cred building", as a wise commentator said.
It is quite rare for a shill to be assigned an SSN of 10/10, but it does
happen. According to Dimitri Khalezov, each Tower was demolished by a 150
kiloton thermonuclear bomb that had been placed 50 meters (164 feet) below the
foundations when the Towers were built. Khalezov claimed the government (i.e.,
the Nixon Admin) was in on the plan, kept it a secret (i.e., successfully
prevented Washington Post or New York Times reporters from
uncovering the scheme), yet Soviet agents such as Khalezov became aware of it. And
Khalezov stated that, although the planes that crashed into the Towers were
really fake planes, New York officials believed them to be real. And because the
plane that hit the Pentagon was really a cruise missile, and because officials
had determined that it had an unexploded nuclear warhead, the New York officials
feared that the "planes" that crashed into the Towers were also carrying
unexploded nuclear warheads. And in order to save New York City from possible
atmospheric nuclear explosions, the City officials decided to detonate the 150
kt thermonuclear devices that were buried beneath the Towers. Khalezov didn't
explain why WTC7 was pulled. See
here for more
on Khalezov's particular brand of idiocy.
At any
given time, a shill may "expose" other shills who are higher on the stupidity scale. So Fetzer
exposes Hytten/Shack and his cronies, whose "vicsims" baloney made them a clear 10/10. Once a shill reaches 10/10, they can
do just about anything. Hytten has called Fetzer a shill.
In the same way that
government derives a synergistic gain from "rebutting many conspiracy theories", sincere truth-seekers
can avoid legitimizing one or two of the most obvious disinformation brokers by
rebutting many of them. However, it is now time for these shills to be
sidelined, ignored, and recognized for what they are: government stooges,
traitors and liars, for whom there can be no place in any truth or patriot movement.
origin) and his pre-Sandy Hook trolling and attempt to solicit money, click
here.
Wolfgang Halbig, in his interview with Dave Gahary, suggests that Sandy Hook was a conspiracy because when the police arrived, "they" parked a quarter of a mile from the front
door of the school.
In fact, according to the information in the Connecticut
State's Attorney's Final Report, the first police officer
arrived at Crestwood "Road" (actually Crestwood Drive) behind
and to the south of the school at 9:39:00, three minutes and 21 seconds
after the first 911 emergency call was received by the Police Department. It's a
little over 100 feet from the south end, and about 600 feet from the front entrance, which is
still less than an eighth of a mile.
misleading comments such as "Why would you park a quarter of a mile...?" yet
studiously avoids telling us that the next two police officers arrived a mere 13
seconds later - parking on the driveway near the ball field, barely more than a
hundred yards from the front entrance. And the police deliberately
decided to cover both approaches.
In any case, if a police car was approaching from the south, it's normally a two-minute
drive taking the long route from the
junction of Washington Avenue / Crestwood Drive around to the front entrance, whereas on foot from Crestwood
Drive, an officer would only need to do 6.82 mph in order to cover the 600
feet in a minute. Thus, even at high speed, there is little or no time advantage
from taking the long route.
The Connecticut Police Chiefs Association (CPCA) Final Report
states that the shift sergeant who was at the police station was among the first
responders. Whilst en route, he sent some units to the front and some to the
rear, as corroborated by radio recordings. "Local officers had knowledge
that Crestwood Drive passes within yards of the rear of the school."
The report provides an explanation as to why the police did not park very
close to the front door: "In analyzing the response, it is important to know the
accepted practice for officers responding to such a call. Officers arriving at
the school must do so in a manner that allows them quick access to the facility,
but must also be cognizant of their tactical positioning. Therefore, it is
expected that first arriving officers would park a reasonable distance from the
building in order to afford themselves the best view of the building and
surrounding space. This allows officers to begin assessing the status and
location of the threat. Officers are trained to prepare for more than one threat
or aggressor."
Halbig says [5:45], "And they're parking on Crest View, Crest something
Drive." If we overlook his errors of more than +100% in his distance calculations,
you'd think that Halbig would at least be able to get the name of the road
right, after supposedly "researching" Sandy Hook for more than a year.
took too long to go in. As shown above, police were searching the building and
quickly triaging any victims they found. The EMS had not been cleared to
approach the building at this time (since the possibility of additional shooters
had not been ruled out), and an officer scooped up a critically injured child
and sprinted towards the EMS staging area.
And the Connecticut Final Report says that at 9:39:34, a Newtown officer encountered an "unknown male running along the
east side of SHES with something in his hand", and there were a number of
factors that gave the police valid reasons to suspect that there may have been
more than one shooter. The initial unknown male "turned out to
be a parent with a cell telephone in his hand". At 9:40:03, the last
gunshot was heard, believed to be the final suicide shot of Lanza in classroom
10.
Anyone still curious about Sandy Hook, who hasn't really looked into it much,
should read those reports and see if there is anything that proves an "elaborate
hoax", or if the response was reasonable given the circumstances.
It's all very well for Halbig, with the benefit of hindsight, to speculate that
the responders should have done some things differently. There is nothing to
suggest that the police or paramedics made mistakes, based upon the
information available to them at the time. But even if mistakes were made, that
is not evidence of a conspiracy, and would do nothing to override the
overwhelming evidence that Sandy Hook was a real massacre, not a
hoax or
a drill. And it's rather telling that no other expert in school safety
has come up with Halbig's objections and gone public over the last
fourteen months.
The only people who have are liars and cranks who claim the 9/11 planes
were
holograms and the Boston bombings were faked with smoke bombs and
amputee
actors.
Halbig says he started contacting the Newtown public schools, probably "two months
after the incident". He claims "the pieces don't fit", and asks why the
FBI would "classify" the Sandy Hook report. The answer is that shortly after the
incident it was already known that there was a flock of conspiracy loons all over the internet
who, given half a chance, would post images of the dead children on their blogs and YouTube videos,
harass the parents, and accuse them of being liars who were part of a massive conspiracy. So it's
not surprising that the authorities redacted some images, in order to spare the
grieving relatives from the nutbars' antics. Halbig claims the FBI has
never "classified" such a report before, but prior to Sandy Hook, there has never been a
troop of internet trolls trying to "prove" the relatives are liars and actors.
It doesn't prove Sandy Hook was a hoax.
Halbig complains his phone calls are not returned, implying that it's
evidence of a conspiracy. What does he expect - that hard-pressed officials
would continue to humor some conspiracy crank and crackpot who bombards them for
months on end with demands for evidence to prove Sandy Hook wasn't a hoax? What if they
kept receiving demands for evidence that would prove the earth isn't flat? Isn't
there some point at which they would lose patience?
According to Halbig, Sandy Hook was a "script" that was in the planning for
two to two-and-a-half years. Halbig claims that all sorts of things don't fit, but presents not
one shred of
credible evidence - nothing more than the misguided opinions of a paranoid conspiracy
theorist. Halbig claims he does not believe that any children died at SH,
revealing himself as a liar or a fool. The only way that anyone could
possibly be duped into thinking Halbig is raising some valid questions is if
they hadn't yet read the reports and were very generous in giving him the
benefit of the doubt. More than two dozen did die at Sandy Hook Elementary, and
the only killer was Adam Lanza.
In any case, all you really need to
know is that Wolfgang Halbig chose to go to American Free Press (AFP) rather than a
mainstream publication that would have given him more credibility with the
general public. His Facebook page shows that he has
a strong interest in the mainstream
media: FOX 35 news anchors Sonni Abatta, Bob Frier, Amy Kaufeldt and others,
The Washington Post, Newsweek, Time magazine, and Larry King.
He also links to George W. Bush's Facebook page.
AFP has been
variously (and most unfairly) described as a "known
hate site, filled with anti-semitic and racist ideology", a
"conspiracy-oriented anti-Semitic newspaper",
a paper that "promotes anti-Semitic conspiracy theories",
and a "right-wing extremist publication". There are two possible explanations
for Halbig's choice.
Of course, the Sandy Hookers will claim Halbig couldn't go to the mainstream media
because they're all in on the "conspiracy". Let's look at the proceeds
from a hypothetical Sandy Hook "hoax". $49
million was allocated for demolition and reconstruction. Since such projects generally go over budget, it's unlikely that
there would be money left over to bribe newspaper bosses and hire "crisis
actors", etc. As of December 2013, there was some $12 million remaining to be
distributed, and much of that is to be allocated to "long-term
needs such
as providing mental health resources, scholarships for affected students
and funding for when Newtown comes to an agreement on a physical
memorial to the
victims". Some money went to an animal sanctuary, a local Boy Scout
troop, and to the gun-control lobby. The conspirators would also need to pay off hundreds of parents,
grandparents, aunts and uncles, cousins, schoolmates, colleagues and friends to
keep quiet for the rest of their lives, with the children having to play dead,
not go to the Super Bowl, and so on. "Lanza's" classmates would have
to be bribed to
pretend he existed, and those who didn't say anything would need to be bribed,
threatened, or killed to stop them from contradicting the others' statements.
The conspirators either had to pay for Andrew Wheeler's website's domain in
April 2003 and hire people to post on internet forums around 2009 as part of a
plot to fake his existence, or they had to hire a "crisis actor" to pretend to
be him, hope that the real Andrew Wheeler didn't find out, and pay an assassin
to stand by in Hawaii with instructions to shoot Wheeler if he was about to
talk. Or, if they got lucky, recruit Wheeler, somehow persuading him to suspend
his beloved island lifestyle for a new role as a "crisis actor". Then the
conspirators would have to pay off dozens or hundreds of other "crisis actors",
the Police Department, forensic scientists, the coroner, and anyone at Homeland
Security, BATF, the Connecticut Intelligence Center (CTIC) and other agencies
who had any doubts about the scheme.
Let's suppose (being very generous to the Sandy Hookers) that after siphoning
off money to bribe all these people, the fraudsters still have $1 million
remaining.
And then they must
pay off The Boston Globe, the Boston Herald, The Washington Post,
The New York
Times, The London Times, CNN, NBC, CBS, the BBC and countless thousands of other
national and local newspapers and radio / TV stations worldwide, each of whom
would love to have the scoop about any "hoax" at Sandy Hook. As of 2010,
it is reckoned there were 14,853 newspaper titles worldwide.
Just to be even more generous to the Sandy Hookers, let's forget TV and radio, and
say that 4,853 or almost one in three of the newspapers are "conspiracy-oriented",
which is a ridiculously generous assumption. If there are 10,000 mainstream
newspapers to bribe to keep quiet, so that it's worth their while to miss out on the Sandy Hook "hoax" story,
that leaves $100 per newspaper before
we
count transaction costs, telephone costs, etc. And how much would a newspaper be
willing to pay for such a scoop - $10,000? $100,000? $1 million? Whilst they
accept less than $100 to give up their chance to make big money? Then there is
the risk that some party involved in the negotiations with ten thousand
newspapers would talk, or anyone tapping any one of the tens of thousands of
telephone calls, or any of the "crisis actors", relatives,
colleagues, classmates, police, forensic scientists, the coroner, the uncle in Hawaii, the assassin in Hawaii ready to
shoot the uncle, etc.
And this supposes that all the proceeds are used to pay off the tens of
thousands of conspirators. Thus, the "hoaxers" do not stand to make any profit
from the scheme, and, moreover, must also borrow or put up their own money,
years before even a cent came rolling in. The Sandy
Hook "hoaxers" would have to be terribly incompetent buffoons with no
understanding of business or investment, who are prepared to lose money
(after interest charges and inflation) in return for the certainty of getting
caught and going to jail for fraud, since there would always be some media
outlets who would demand more than $100 for their silence.
The reality is that no mainstream newspaper would give any column-inches to a
fringe conspiracy theorist with no evidence. Halbig wanted to restrict circulation to spare
himself embarrassment. And by going to a "conspiracy-oriented" newspaper, the wider audience of non-conspiracy-minded folk
will see that he's
just playing games with the "conspiracy nuts". This is the very way
they would
play it if he was recruited to work for Sunstein to pose as a nutjob
"conspiracy
researcher". So Wolfgang "Walter Mitty" Halbig does all he can to
antagonize the cops for months on end, starting from February 2013,
effectively
accusing them of not doing their job properly. Then, after ten months,
they
eventually go round to his house "in plain clothes [...] right before
Christmas
[...] about 10:00 a.m." for a "15, 20 minutes" meeting to tell him that
they won't stand for it any more, and they'll file harassment
charges if he keeps wasting police time.
Thus, if we accept his tale of the police going to his home, that
doesn't prove there was a massive Sandy Hook global conspiracy, with Russia Today,
The
Guardian, Die Welt, etc., all in on it and having to be bribed from a conspiracy
that makes a loss and just about guarantees the perps will go to jail.
The fact that the Sunstein team had to get Halbig to broadcast his opinions -
and thereby advance him to 9/10 on the stupidity scale -
in order to prop up their
flagging conspiracy theory, after Michael Collins Piper's False Flags exposed their
deceptions, shows how desperate they have become.
A public schools security expert would be an ideal person for Sunstein to
recruit for acting the role of a dumb "conspiraloon" who could concoct some
imagined reasons for supposing the Sandy Hook events didn't "fit", and whose
childish crippled
epistemology and inability to think through the ramifications of his conclusion,
would lead him to imagine that more than two dozen deaths were faked at Sandy Hook.
In short, the Sunstein brigade's Operation Halbig smacks of desperation, and
shows that they are losing their battle to oppose truth-seekers by cognitive
infiltration.
Update: It turns out that Wolfgang Halbig is not only Jewish, but was already an
activist working to advance Jewish political interests as early as September
2012, months before Sandy Hook. He hates Obama, and was angry that someone did
not kill Hitler, which he claims would have saved 6 million of "our" people.
In his Feb 19, 2014 broadcast at BlogTalkRadio, Halbig says [17:57] his father
was in a "Nazi prison camp" for four years in Poland.
This is corroborated by a post
by Halbig of "a year ago", with the URL indicating
September 2012, in which Halbig claims Obama "hates the Jews".
mass killings occur, and Jewish political activists such as Halbig realise that
they can exploit the event for a propaganda advantage.
Thus, Halbig is not simply some ordinary person who happened to work in school
safety and thought there was something amiss about Sandy Hook. He is a Jewish
political activist, working to advance Jewish public relations - the very sort
of person needed for Sunstein's team of shills who trash truth-tellers by
promoting loony conspiracy theories.
On October 10, 2012, Wolfgang W. Halbig posted, and copied and
pasted multiple times, that he'd been "gathering
information about and evidence against Barack Hussein Obama, I have encountered
hundreds of coincidences that strike me as amazing. None of those coincidences,
by themselves, may mean much. But taken as a whole it is almost impossible to
believe they were all the result of chance." And then proceeds with a massive,
lengthy series of events, such as how "In late 1999 Obama purportedly engaged in
homosexual activities and cocaine-snorting in the back of a limousine with a man
named Larry Sinclair...".
One purpose of posting this would have been so that Cass Sunstein and his
minions could observe how people would react to the insertion of various
conspiracy theories, and who, if any, would pass it on. As they clearly did with
the Sandy Hook conspiracy theories.
And in October 2012, Wolfgang Halbig was posing as a nutty conspiracy
theorist, and provoking some interesting reactions. An excerpt included:
in fact consider Halbig's 'theory' to be "nuts", or if folk would perceive some
sort of "pattern" in his claims. The replies indicated a unanimous verdict:
Halbig was considered to be nuts. "The paranoia and racism run deep in this one", "Sir you
sound like a conspiracy theorist!! You have too much time on your hands.",
"Wow....real KKK marerial. [sic] Reminds me of the John Birchers back in the 60's.
True Tea Party material."
Halbig likes posting about the "uneducated" social class, and also posts
about "the blacks" and "Mexicans". For example:
idiot..........get a life.. How wrong can anyone be. You need mental health
counseling if that is how you feel".
A couple of people responded: "Wolfgang W Halbig A. He's wrong only on his last(and maybe his first) point(s.) But how
about pointing out how he is wrong instead of just throwing insults like a 9year
old!? Aren't you too old to be behaving this way? Losing your marbles???" And:
"Wolfgang W Halbig You're the idiot...this "racist cracker" not white people,
felt the need to "rid" the world of another (what he called) "coon" because he's
such coward that he goes after unarmed, young innocent black men".
On July 24, 2012, Halbig was attempting to solicit money from gullible folk, by exploiting a post about a
genuine donations campaign:
interview by Dave Gahary, Halbig says [21:36] "Well, I think the next thing I'm
gonna do is, right now I'm gonna try to raise a lot of money, some funds. I
think there are a lot of people out there who really, really believe in learning
the truth. You know, they call them conspiracy nuts; they call them all kind of
names... [...] But here's my point: What I'm trying to do is raise a lot of
money."
Indeed, Halbig hopes to make "a lot of money" from "a lot" of people
whom he also regards as "conspiracy nuts". You can be sure that anyone gullible enough to fall for the scam will have their
names and addresses passed on to Sunstein and agencies such as FEMA, Homeland Security,
the ADL or the SPLC, thereby allowing Halbig to profit several times over
from each person. Unfortunately, by the time truth-seekers "learn the truth"
about Halbig and his scam, he'll have scarpered with their money, and their
personal details will have been harvested.
Halbig doesn't doubt in the slightest that twenty children were killed at
Sandy Hook. His supposed "research" and asking "questions" is nothing more than
a masquerade, a means to a business and political end.
So, Halbig is an internet troll who inserts various conspiracy
theories so that the Sunstein team can monitor the reaction. And his
post "OBAM HATES THE JEWS"
reveals what Halbig, hero of the Sandy Hookers, truly thinks about Sandy
Hookers
- they are simply "uneducated Americans", to whom he feeds his bait
about faked
deaths and faked shootings, in the hope that some of them will be
"uneducated"
enough to swallow it. In
which case, they will have served their purpose, allowing themselves to
swell
his bank balance and be cited
as examples of wacky conspiracy loons, with the result that those who
present
evidence of real conspiracies - such as the undeniable proof of Israel's
central
role in 9/11 - are also tarred with the same brush. In the meantime,
Sunstein
and Zionist leaders are high-fiving and grinning as they celebrate the
success of their
counter-intelligence program against truth-seekers, who would otherwise
present
a much more serious threat against the perpetrators of false-flag
terror.
Top Ten Reasons: Jim Fetzer and Friends are Sunstein Shills
Update (February 21, 2014): Wolfgang Halbig
busted as a Jewish internet activist
In an article Top Ten Reasons: Sandy Hook was an Elaborate Hoax by Dr. Fetzer et al, the Fetzerians exhibit an uncharacteristic flash of logic
with statements about "the totality of the
evidence" and the probability of hypotheses. For example, "The
hypothesis that confers the highest probability on the evidence is the
preferable, which, when the evidence has 'settled down,' is acceptable as true
in the tentative and fallible fashion of science".
Here are the "top ten" reasons that support the conclusion that the
leading proponents of
Sandy Hook hoax / no-plane 'theories' are Sunstein shills.
1) The Sandy Hook hoax theorists (Sandy Hookers) promote outrageous claims such as 28 deaths were faked, 20 children
must pretend to be dead for the rest of their lives, some of these children
attended the Super Bowl by mistake instead of playing dead, dozens or hundreds of crisis actors
were hired to play the part of bereaved family members, the mass killings were merely
part of a
drill, and there was foreknowledge of the "drill". Their
'evidence' consists of the opinions of some YouTube commentators who think the relatives
should be shedding more tears, or shouldn't give a nervous laugh when preparing to face the
cameras. Or some internet 'detectives' spot a few glitches with Google's date logs,
and cite it as 'proof' that dastardly Sandy Hook conspirators slipped up and
made an error that only these latter-day Sherlocks were clever enough to spot.
If the events at Sandy Hook were a result of government chicanery, such
as an exploitation of Adam Lanza's "significant mental health issues", then the
investigation has been derailed by the Sandy Hookers' mass circulation of
outlandish claims about faked deaths, fake family members and a fake killer.
Unsurprisingly, the fakery claims have been
robustly refuted.
And whilst denying the abundance of evidence supporting the
official Sandy Hook narrative as broadly correct, the Sandy Hookers are
frequently found trying to sell other preposterous conspiracy
claims such as no-planes-hit-the-World-Trade-Center, WTC-was-nuked,
space-beam-weapon-zapped-WTC, and Boston-bomb-amputees-faked-injuries. For example,
Jim Fetzer is a no-planer and claims
mini-nukes demolished the WTC. Disinformation brokers such as Fetzer, Sofia Smallstorm, James Tracy, Simon Shack, Max Konrardy, Morgan
Reynolds, John Lear, Dave Shayler, John Friend and Judy Wood have skills
such as writing, video production, flying and spying, and at least four of them
qualified as professors (as did Cass Sunstein). One professor becoming senile and postulating crackpot
hypotheses about space-based beam weapons, faked planes or faked deaths could be
considered unlucky, two a coincidence, but three or four is a conspiracy.
Members of the general public who take a casual look at "conspiracy theories"
will encounter the lunatic claims of these professors, and will conclude that if
no-planers, mini-nukers and Sandy Hook / Boston bombings deniers are
indicative of the truth movement's finest brains, then there is no need for
further investigation and no need to doubt the government account of events such as 9/11.
Similarly, when dozens of people have skills in writing, video
production, flying,
spying, etc., demonstrating that they are not retards or lunatics, and
these people are promoting ideas that are so at odds with the evidence
that only retards
or lunatics
could possibly subscribe to them, then there is a contradiction that is
resolved
only by
assuming that these people are liars who pretend to be crazy. There is
not only no evidence that no
planes hit the WTC, or that the Sandy Hook deaths were "faked"; there
is also no
credible motive for anyone to believe such ridiculous ideas. There are,
however,
powerful motives for them to lie: tribal loyalty, bribery, blackmail,
bullying,
and a misguided belief that they are being patriotic by serving as
government assets
who counter "conspiracy theorists" by infiltrating truth-seeking circles
and
acting as if they believe the most outrageous bovine excrement.
2) A professor who is an "expert" in "critical
thinking" - as he's been telling everyone for decades
- should surely comprehend that it's
much easier for perpetrators of false-flag terror to crash a Boeing into a
building (especially with Dov Zakheim
and Daniel Lewin on the team) rather than
have to fake it with phony videos or invisible, inaudible aircraft capable of
projecting
Fetzer's postulated "sophisticated hologram[s]"
to fool hundreds or thousands of eyewitnesses into imagining they saw a plane or
planes crashing into the WTC, and to fool billions who would later see the
footage,
and planting of assorted physical evidence without anyone seeing or hearing the
fakers. This evidence includes a 255-pound piece of wreckage
"later identified as a trailing edge flap support structure from a Boeing 767",
with it needing to be wedged between an apartment building and a mosque, to be
finally removed twelve years later in 2013 in a two-hour operation using a
pulley system, a
fuselage
fragment on the roof of
WTC5, landing gear at the corner of West and Rector Streets and also in an
exterior panel knocked free from WTC1, aircraft
parts embedded in the back of a car, and an American Airlines plane seat and
life vest at the roof level of 130 Liberty Plaza (Deutsche Bank Building). And the fakers would need to create
impact holes in the WTC facade matching the
silhouette of a Boeing 767 by using cleverly placed shaped charges, guaranteed
to detonate at the right instant. The probability of being able to blow out the
correct shape is about zero.
Even if you try to imagine a "parallel world" in which Fetzer is telling the
truth and the WTC planes were faked, the problem is that it requires a
population that is so dumbed-down and a government that is so competent and
technically proficient, that the government would be able to exploit and enslave
the citizens as they pleased without having to go to all the trouble of faking planes and
staging false-flag terror. Just round them up, give them some pills and put them
in labor camps, they get all the water they need (as per the Guantanamo Bay
prisoners), rations as long as they perform their work, and tell them it's
perfectly normal and even desirable. The population would need to be so stupid
as to fail to see or hear "hologram-projector" planes flying away, or fail to
understand that it discredits the official story. And they would have to fail to
see or hear government agents smashing aircraft debris into the back of cars or
into walls or roofs, before the plane was supposed to have crashed. Or, again,
fail to recognize that it is inconsistent with the government's version of events.
On the whole, governments - in our world, in this reality - are not supremely
competent. Presidents can't always get away with relatively straightforward
schemes, such as bugging their opponents. Or having sex with some woman who
happens to be a co-religionist of the prime minister who arrived
in Washington three days after
news broke of the scandal, ostensibly for talks regarding the West
Bank, but most likely trying to blackmail the president into taking part in a
false-flag operation. Especially when the prime minister keeps in "close touch"
with a friend and co-religionist who obtained a 99-year lease on a couple of
towers and secured 12-layer, 22-company insurance coverage against
terrorist attacks aggregating $3,546,809,904
"per occurrence", and including
property damage and business interruption, six weeks before the buildings were
destroyed in two "occurrences" of terrorist attacks. And especially when
one of the target floors (94 of WTC1) has already had the "upgraded"
fireproofing installed, it's due to be installed later that year on
four more contiguous
floors in the target zone, compatriots of the
prime minister have already set up "moving
companies" that operate in
the states (NJ and NY) through which the fireproofing is to be transported, the
prime minister has already "predicted" that "Islamist" terrorists
would demolish the building, and "coincidentally" happens to be
ex-Sayeret Matkal,
an MIT alumnus, and lived in
Denver and Jerusalem, the very same as one of the passengers on the plane
that, three years later, was to fly into the building 102 minutes before it
collapsed. A plane, incidentally, from which one of the so-called "hijackers"
later turned up alive and well, and said his passport had been stolen
in 1995 when his Denver apartment was burgled. (And just for good measure, the woman also happens to be a
co-religionist of Cass Sunstein, Gordon Duff, the late Julius Springer, and
other principal players in these intrigues.)
Mossad agents are relatively competent, and yet Sivan Kurzberg, Oded Ellner
and Yaron Shmuel let themselves get so carried away with celebrating the first
plane impact that
they made a spectacle of themselves high-fiving, hugging each
other, flicking a lighter, and appearing "visibly happy on nearly all" of the 76
photographs that they had taken and were subsequently developed by the FBI. They
knew that their co-religionists' control of the media and ability to pull
strings in Washington would be their get-out-of-jail-free card.
The no-planes nonsense has been thoroughly debunked many times by people with
professional experience in video production,
and it is clear that any proponent of no-planes is either a lunatic or a liar.
A professor who qualified in history and philosophy of science would
surely be aware that a "micro-nuke" or "mini-nuke" produces an EMP and radioactive
fission products, and that it is not possible to incorporate devices into
satellites that can fire "direct energy" beams with a power output in
excess of the total power consumption of humankind. He would also be
aware that when another professor makes a claim about beam weapons being used to
demolish the WTC, yet doesn't even bother to do energy calculations and is easily refuted by a competent
scientist, and was reportedly in a coma for
six years, then her 'theories' are clearly not to be taken
seriously. When Fetzer says that he supports Judy Wood's 'research' but
doesn't necessarily
endorse her 'theories', Fetzer reveals his deception just as surely as
if he'd
given her his full backing.
The best explanation for Fetzer's behavior is that he is a highly intelligent
man who simply cannot believe that the government could be involved in massive
conspiracies such as 9/11. So he remains a government loyalist, his confirmation
bias, flawed
epistemology and world-view leads him to imagine that
all so-called "conspiracy theorists" are "goof-balls", and he believes he's
being patriotic in helping the government counter the conspiracy theorists by
promoting nonsensical claims about faked planes and faked deaths, effectively
parodying the real patriots and truth-tellers. Since Fetzer thinks that
conspiracy theorists are all a bunch of nuts, he isn't particularly concerned if
his claims have not even a shred of credibility. He knows that he's helping to
trash the image of those perceived by the wider audience as conspiracy
theorists or "twoofers", and he thinks he's doing the right thing.
3) A January 2008 paper by Cass Sunstein provides an example
of a recent "conspiracy theory" and contends that believers in such theories
create "risks":
"...the belief [...] that the attacks of 9/11 were carried out [...] by Israel
or the United States. Those who subscribe to conspiracy theories may create
serious risks, including risks of violence..."
The "risks" are not to ordinary members of the public, as Sunstein would like
people to believe, but to the true perpetrators of 9/11 and those involved in
the cover-up, i.e., Sunstein and his pals, following an independent
investigation, prosecutions, and fair trials.
According to Sunstein, the "best" way that "such theories might be undermined
[...] consists of cognitive infiltration of extremist groups." Sunstein claims
that "those who subscribe to such theories" do so because they have a "crippled
epistemology".
Sunstein needs infiltrators who will mimic the silliest type of "conspiracy
theorist" imaginable, by selectively accepting information only from the likes
of John Lear, Morgan Reynolds, Judy Wood, Mike Powers / Hollingsworth and others
who are part of the deception. A higher level infiltrator (e.g. Fetzer) will
build his crippled epistemology using John Lear, Morgan Reynolds, etc., as its
foundation, and will use the argument from authority fallacy against his
critics, e.g., "Do you
consider yourself as qualified as John Lear to address these issues?" Thus,
these infiltrators will act the role of an individual
whose epistemology is so "crippled" that they become parodies of genuine
truth-tellers.
In Sunstein's discussion of whether government should choose to ignore or rebut
a "conspiracy theory", he points out that the disadvantage for the government in
rebutting a particular theory is that it may "legitimate" the theory, and
a theory may gain rather than lose adherents when it is perceived as sufficiently plausible
that the government needs to counter it. Sunstein recommends a strategy of
"rebutting many conspiracy theories" because this yields a "synergistic gain"
for the government from reducing "the legitimating effect of rebutting any
one
of them".
Since Sunstein can hardly fail to be aware that Israel did 9/11, he knows that his best
strategy is to introduce many new conspiracy theories, each of them with various
degrees of craziness, but they all need to be crazier than the government's own
9/11 conspiracy theory
of nineteen hijackers with box cutters. Thus, Sunstein
recommends a policy of countering multiple theories and "cognitive
infiltration"
of truth seekers, and the disinformation agents promote preposterous
theories such as no-one-died-on-9/11, no-planes-hit-the-WTC,
WTC-was-nuked, and no-one-died-at-Sandy-Hook. Other agents can knock
down these
straw men, and will attempt to counter those who tell the facts about
9/11.
Theories such as no-planes and no-one-died-at-Sandy-Hook are promoted so
strongly that they appear more popular than evidence-based theories about
Israel's central role in 9/11. Government benefits from the "synergistic gain"
obtained from not legitimating a particular theory, specifically, Israel's
orchestrating of 9/11. Third-parties (the mass audience) form the impression
that "conspiracy theorists" are all a bunch of fruitcakes who think the 9/11
planes were holograms, the WTC was nuked, no children died at Sandy Hook, and "crisis actors"
pretended to be bereaved family members.
4) Jim Fetzer has authored, co-authored, edited or co-edited several books concerned with
epistemology and cognition. Moreover, a number of these books were published by
Springer, the company founded by Julius Springer, who was a co-religionist of Cass Sunstein.
These include:
Epistemology and Cognition (Studies in Cognitive Systems)
Sociobiology and Epistemology
The New Theory of Reference: Kripke, Marcus, and Its Origins
Aspects of Artificial Intelligence (Studies in Cognitive Systems)
Computers and Cognition: Why Minds are not Machines (Studies in Cognitive
Systems)
Definitions and Definability: Philosophical Perspectives
Philosophy, Language, and Artificial Intelligence: Resources for Processing
Natural Language (Studies in Cognitive Systems)
Philosophy, Mind, and Cognitive Inquiry: Resources for Understanding Mental
Processes (Studies in Cognitive Systems)
Probability and Causality: Essays in Honor of Wesley C. Salmon
Program Verification: Fundamental Issues in Computer Science (Studies in
Cognitive Systems)
Scientific Knowledge: Causation, Explanation, and Corroboration (Boston Studies
in the Philosophy and History of Science)
break up the crippled epistemology of conspiracy-minded groups". Who better than
a professor whose expertise is in epistemology and cognition? Moreover, Fetzer had already
been flagged as operating a "campaign of disinformation" prior to 9/11/01,
and "he told one researcher that he begins by deciding what is the truth, and
then marshals evidence (selectively) to support that 'truth'."
A professor smart enough to understand epistemology, probability and the
philosophical aspects of cognitive systems would not be foolish enough to
imagine that a video (e.g., the infamous September Clues) that makes
ridiculous, unsubstantiated claims is a more reliable source of knowledge than a
plethora of evidence such as aircraft debris, eyewitnesses, photographs, video
and news reports, especially when the video producer's father served as a
controlled opposition Judas Goat to help counter allegations of collusion between
government members and the Mafia, and whose brother's Formula One racing career
was sponsored by Yeslam bin Laden. And he would know that a woman who was
in a coma for six years and rambles on about space-based directed energy weapons is not a
reliable source, when the energy required to
vaporize (or "dustify") the steel in the Towers is hundreds of terajoules,
and the "weapon" would need to sustain a power output over ten seconds in excess
of the total power output of humankind.
He would not be foolish enough to take at face value an ex-pilot's
claims about Flight 175's speed and impact being "physically impossible", especially when
the claims have been proven wrong,
and the ex-pilot used to fly missions for the CIA and other government agencies and
discredits himself with claims about the Moon having a breathable atmosphere and
"forests, meadows, lakes, rivers, people, [and] civilizations".
He would understand that cherry-picking of information sources,
e.g., blindly believing garbage propaganda videos that are intended to deceive such
as September Clues, and believing the claims of an 'ex'-CIA pilot and an
'ex'-Bush Admin member, whilst rejecting more reliable sources, will lead to
crazy conclusions typical of an individual with a crippled epistemology, and
that such an approach can be used to parody the wackiest type of conspiracy
theorist imaginable. Thus, Professor James H. Fetzer is ideally qualified for a
leading position on Sunstein's team of cognitive infiltrators.
5) Fetzer is not an honest debater. He has a system for
controlling debates on his forum when it's not going well for him - he bans his
opponent and closes the comments!
As mentioned above, Fetzer's "sophisticated hologram" scenario
requires invisible, inaudible plane(s) to project the "hologram-plane". One
problem for the fakers is the matter of getting the correct Doppler shift for
the engine roar, so that observers would hear, and amateur videos would record,
the appropriate sound for the location. For example, listen to the engine roar on this
video at around 04:15, seconds before Flight 175 smashes into WTC2 at
approximately 590 mph. The camera is located well to the south of the Tower, and
so the pitch audibly decreases as the plane passes overhead, slightly to the
left of the camera. The decrease in pitch is typical of a plane passing
roughly overhead. However, for an observer to the north of WTC2, the Doppler
effect would be much less. Although the angle of the plane's approach changes
slightly since it's hundreds of feet overhead, it never goes from approaching to receding from the observer.
See around 07:50 on the same video
for an example of that.
One option for the fakers would be to plant several very large, invisible
loudspeakers, with inbuilt invisible amplifiers and an array of invisible
batteries (or invisible cable going off to a mains power source) at various locations
on the streets of Manhattan, which is of course impossible. Alternatively, the "projector-planes"
would have to
incorporate extremely powerful, directional
loudspeakers with excellent bass extension mounted on their exterior, whilst
capable of silent and invisible flight as these hypothetical planes speed away after the
"hologram-plane" has supposedly crashed. All of this assumes that sophisticated hologram
technology capable of fooling thousands of people is available, and was
available in 2001 - which it isn't, and wasn't.
Amusingly, when Fetzer was called on this by a poster at Veterans Today
named Rollo, Fetzer continued to dodge the question. After getting the
last word in with ad hominems on how Rollo was obviously a "goof-ball or
an op" who was "posting
rubbish" (simply because he disagreed with Fetzer's no-planes lunacy),
Fetzer banned Rollo from
responding and closed the comments on spurious grounds that Rollo did
not
"even know [Fetzer's] position"!
6) Eyvind Hytten, the father of September Clues disinformation broker Simon Shack/Hytten, was a government asset who
served as a controlled opposition, in order to counter the work of anti-Mafia
crusader Danilo Dolci, who accused prominent members of the government of
colluding with the Mafia. Moreover, the Formula One racing career of Simon's
brother Mario Hytten was sponsored
by Yeslam bin Laden.
Simon Hytten and his sidekick Max Konrardy aka hoi.polloi make
the most outrageous claims, such as no-one-died-on-9/11. Hytten and Konrardy's lies are too
crazy even for the likes of Jim Fetzer. On the one hand, Fetzer aims to appear just sufficiently wacky
with his support of no-planes and mini-nukes that he can be instantly
flagged as a crank by non-conspiracy-minded members of society, whilst fooling a
few gullible, simple-minded people whose saving grace is that they trust the
"truth movement" more than the government. On the other hand, Fetzer does not
want to appear so cuckoo that not even the shills will support
him.
Thus, outsiders can become aware of the garbage 'theories' of Simon Hytten and
Max Konrardy, and will reject 9/11 truth as full of paranoid lunatics who imagine
that everything about 9/11 was fake. And a few in the truth movement are taken in by Fetzer and friends,
thereby destroying cohesion within the group as energy is devoted to claim
and counter-claim of shilling, rather than exposing the perpetrators.
7) The Sandy Hookers attempt to substantiate their material by citing dubious
sources such as Mike "Powers" aka Mike Hollingsworth aka Entryman
aka Scorpion commander aka Jsteele7707, the suspected federal informant who tried to have
Charles Dyer / July4Patriot jailed on charges of attempting to blow up federal
buildings, before they managed to get him jailed for 30 years for "child abuse".
"Powers" is touted as a so-called "professional military investigator and
ballistics expert" by Fetzer & Co in
Top Ten Reasons: Sandy Hook was an Elaborate Hoax, and is also cited
by Alex Jones, who claims Israel could not have carried out 9/11.
8) It's already been established that Zionist operatives
post on the internet
under multiple aliases, sometimes attacking 9/11 truth, and at other times posting
crazy conspiracy theories to make "conspiracy theorists" look nuts. For
example, one particular YouTuber (who at the time of writing operates the
channel Oliver Terrance)
posed
as a dumb 16YO kid who
swooned over Alex Jones (whom he described as "a very good looking man"!) and
swallowed every crazy conspiracy theory under the sun: no-planes, WTC-was-nuked,
directed-energy-weapons-toppled-WTC, etc. But part of the time he would attack
9/11 truth; for example, he said ae911truth are "faggots", and he would get
praised by the likes of ctcole77. One of his channels was UnitedChildrenOfZion,
and he also revealed his true allegiance with statements such as "Zionism will
save us, shalom."
This was all going on prior to Sandy Hook in 2012. Then, unsurprisingly, this Oliver Terrance
character came out as a staunch supporter and promoter of Sandy Hook hoax /
"crisis actor" theories.
9) John Lear, a promoter of no-planes, is an 'ex'-CIA asset in the same manner
that Osama bin Laden was an 'ex'-CIA/Zionist asset. Lear, who has earned himself
a reputation as "everyone's favorite crackpot", makes other kooky
assertions, such as the Moon has "64%" of Earth's gravity, and an "atmosphere"
in the craters that is dense enough to breathe in. People are well aware that
"[John Lear] is a nut,
which is why ATA Airlines fired him as a pilot several years ago".
(Lear's story is that ATA fired him in 1989 for believing in flying saucers.) Thus, Lear further discredits
himself in the eyes of "normal" people who are simply unaware of conspiracies
and government crimes, and will induce that "truthers" are nuts.
But Fetzer cites this "nut" as an authority!!
The no-planer Dave Shayler, a transvestite who is obsessed with Kabbalah and
declares himself to be the
"Son of God", is an 'ex'-MI5 asset. This is another example of an
'ex'-Zionist asset
who will lead ordinary people to imagine that "truthers" are lunatics and
weirdoes.
The no-planer Morgan Reynolds is supposed to be an 'ex'-Bush Admin asset. What a
"coincidence" that Lear, Shayler and Reynolds all peddle the no-planes spiel and
are all supposed to be 'ex'-Zionist assets, who either retired or had some sort
of falling out with their old paymasters!
10)
In October 2012, Gordon Duff, of Jewish descent, actually admitted that 40% of
his writing was "at least purposely partially false", and that about 30% of the
material on Veterans Today is "patently false". Duff, billed as
"one of the top global intelligence specialists", is the Chairman on the VT
Editorial Board, and Jim Fetzer writes much of the
"patently false" nonsense that may be found there.
Are they right, lunatics or liars?
Returning to Dr. Fetzer's principles that we should"Consider the totality of the evidence", and "The hypothesis that
confers the highest probability on the evidence is the preferable",
let's ask which is the preferable hypothesis:
1) That the 9/11 planes were holograms and/or eyewitnesses were paid
to lie, physical evidence was faked, video and images were faked,
and so on, when it would have been far simpler to crash planes into
buildings with Zakheim's Flight Termination Systems. And hundreds of
crisis actors were hired for Sandy Hook, children were paid or
threatened to pretend to be dead and not talk about it throughout
adulthood, in order that the government has a stronger case against
gun control and the construction industry gets a few million dollars
worth of work, when it is far simpler to wait until some lone nut
with a gun goes on the rampage and not have to pay off the
construction industry. And Mike Piper, Keith Johnson and Mark Glenn
are part of the conspiracy, paid to help cover up the government's
subterfuge.
2) That four professors turn from brilliant academics into raving
lunatics who are suffering from a "crippled epistemology" -
including one who has co-authored and edited books and papers on
epistemology, and another who specializes in media and
communications. They not only subscribe to crackpot 'theories' about
faked Boeings and faked deaths, but promote the ideas with an
evangelical fervor. And others who can make videos, write, fly, spy,
provide economics advice, etc., are also peddling garbage that is
believable only by the certifiably insane or someone whose internet skills would
amount to no more than replying, "Hello
Mommy" in an e-mail.
3) That four professors along with dozens of others, all of them
otherwise rational people whose confirmation bias precludes them
from seriously considering evidence of government conspiracies such
as Israel's central role in 9/11, agree to act the role of
epistemologically-challenged conspiracy theorists, in order to help
the government counter "extremist groups". The leader is selected
because of his expertise in epistemology and cognitive systems.
He understands how limiting his sources of information to a narrow
range of crackpots such as John Lear will enable him to act the role of one of
Cass Sunstein's hypothetical "conspiracy theorists" with a "crippled
epistemology". Another is recruited because of his knowledge of
media and communications.
Conclusion
It doesn't make sense that these esteemed professors should turninto lunatics and inexplicably develop a bizarre evangelical zeal to
promote their crackpot theories, at the expense of making themselves
look stupid, and even facing calls to resign in the case of James
Tracy. It doesn't make sense that the government would hire hundreds
of crisis actors, or that thousands of conspirators would fake
videos and images, write CGI scripts, plant aircraft debris, pay
eyewitnesses to lie, etc., when they could simply wait for some lone
nut with a gun or crash planes into buildings. It does make sense
that otherwise intelligent people, with an ideological blind spot
that prevents them from
accepting that it wasn't Osama bin Laden or Khalid Sheikh Mohammed
who masterminded 9/11, would agree to help the government, probably
for a fee, by cognitive infiltration of "extremist groups".
The epistemologically-blinkered shills mistakenly perceive truth-tellers as "extremists"
with a "crippled epistemology".
And of course, many activists know that Israel did 9/11, but are
motivated by tribal loyalty to play the part of no-planes,
micro-nukes, Sandy-Hook-hoax and Boston-bombings-hoax theorists.
It is not hundreds or thousands of
"crisis actors" who faked deaths
and faked plane crashes. It is Fetzer, Reynolds, Wood,
Tracy, Hytten,
Konrardy, Friend and their colleagues who are acting and faking.
Fetzer & Co are government loyalists who don't subscribe to any
conspiracy theories. Fetzer and his friends think that the Arabs did
9/11, Oswald was a lone assassin, and Israel's attack on the USS
Liberty was an accident. And they think they're being patriotic by
operating as Sunstein shills, disinformation agents, Judas Goats,
and by lying, faking and acting as crazed conspiracy theorists. In
reality, Fetzer & Co are traitors. However, in their blinkered
world-view, Fetzer & Co imagine they're doing the right thing.
(In the case of some of these people, such as Dave Shayler and John Lear, the
jury is still out. If they're not nuts, they're putting on an excellent act. And
if they are nuts, how convenient! But
for those such as Fetzer, the evidence is that they're too smart to believe the
rubbish that they spout.)
When Dr. Fetzer meets up with his friends or old colleagues, he
doesn't need to play the role of a crackpot whose cognitive powers
are in decline, leading him to fall for preposterous hypotheses
whilst developing an irresistible urge to broadcast his weird
beliefs to the world. He simply tells them that his "applied
philosophical research" includes his role in infiltrating
"conspiracy theorists". After all, his friends and colleagues
probably imagine that all "conspiracy theorists" are nuts who think
the 9/11 planes and the Sandy Hook deaths were faked.
If we go
back to Fetzer's
pre-9/11 admission that "he begins by deciding what is the
truth, and then marshals evidence (selectively) to support that 'truth'," this
is exactly how their scheme works. First they decide on a 'truth' such as
no-planes or Sandy-Hook-deaths-were-all-faked. Then the low-level shills - e.g.,
CIA, MI5, or Bush Admin assets (in the case of no-planes), or hasbara
trolls in the case of 'nuts' who seize on glitches in Google's Sandy Hook date
stamps - serve as the selective sources for the high-level shills such as Fetzer,
who will build their epistemologically-crippled personae with their crackpot
'theories' on the foundations of these liars and propagandists.
When the media reports on James Tracy's crazy theories about Sandy
Hook and the Boston bombings and he's facing calls for his
resignation, he'll tell the administrators that he's acting a role
for his conspiracy theories studies. Indeed, he needs to be as
belligerent as possible, not even receiving a
letter of reprimand until refusing for months to add a clear
disclaimer at his blog to confirm that his views are not those of
his university, and eventually relenting. (If they took no action
against him, his legend would look even more suspect.) Given that
Tracy is already on $64,650
per annum, there is no need for him to receive donations for his
spare-time activities. Yet
his website has a Donate
button, most likely a flypaper trap that gathers the names and
addresses of any patriots who are foolish enough to fall for it, for
the attention of government agencies.
Sunstein's best strategy
is to have a team of shills with wildly varying credibility, who start
out relatively good and then go downhill. If they're all like Fetzer and
post almost 100% bullshit, it's easy for
genuine patriots and truth-seekers to identify them. This tarnishes the
reputation of "conspiracy theorists" in the eyes of the mass audience
(the third
party), but doesn't achieve the shills' other aims of weakening morale
and sowing mistrust
and despondency in truth-seeking circles. When the Zionists put a lot
more investment into establishing an initial credibility, truth-seekers
are less able to distinguish the fakes from the real patriots, and the
counter-intelligence operatives
attain all of their objectives.
Sunstein would love truth-tellers to think that Fetzer, Shayler,
Reynolds, Lear & Co are part of their group - genuine, honest patriots who just
happen to be crazy, rather than actors posing as crazy, honest patriots by lying
and peddling bizarre claims.
In general, the various shills or disinformation agents
will initially
present themselves as relatively sane, genuine "truth-tellers", before
deteriorating into lunatics. Sunstein's strategy goes rather like this:
Each shill
is assigned a Starting Stupidity Number (SSN), with 10/10 being maximum
on the
stupidity scale. Over the months or years, the shill will progress along
the stupidity scale,
in effect, regressing or degenerating. At any given time, there are
plenty of "sleepers", ready to degenerate when the time is right.
For example, Jim Fetzer started at 8/10, based on how he would "accidentally"
plump for the craziest WTC demolition scenarios such as nukes or space beam weapons,
when other, far more reasonable scenarios were being advanced. People with
limited common sense and an aversion to
science might have been fooled into thinking that maybe the government had
developed a new, special type of small nuclear device, capable of reliable,
timely, controlled detonation whilst leaving no radioactive signature. Fetzer progressed to
9/10 as he became a keen no-planer, posting drivel about a Boeing 767 being
rather like a "flying empty beer can". He would
cite those such as 'ex'-CIA asset John Lear as an "expert" who would back his
claim that a Boeing 767 flying at approximately 590 mph whilst 1,000 feet above
sea level was "physically impossible". Lear, as a well-known crackpot who not only
supports no-planes but believes the moon to be inhabitable with a breathable
atmosphere in the craters, clearly had an SSN of 10/10.
Simon Hytten/Shack and Max
Konrardy/hoi.polloi would have been assigned an SSN of 9/10, based on their
peddling of no-planes propaganda. They later progressed to a stupidity factor of 10/10 with their
"vicsims"
imbecility, which claims that all 9/11 victims were faked.
Sofia Smallstorm began with a very low SSN on the basis of her 9/11
Mysteries video, which was reasonably good, but is now 9/10 or thereabouts after
showing her true colors with a deceptive Sandy Hooker propaganda video and
fully aligning with Fetzer and the rest of the disinformation gang. Eric Hufschmid's SSN was
also quite low;
he started out with a book and video shortly after 9/11. His stupidity rating
soon rocketed to 10/10 after he claimed people such as Ernst Zundel and Mahmoud
Ahmadinejad were secretly working for
the Zionists. As Hufschmid became an increasing irrelevance, he posted naked
rear-view pictures of himself on his website. We can only hope that Smallstorm
doesn't follow Hufschmid's example!
John Friend was installed as the token "white supremacist", whose criticisms
of organized Jewry would initially win him the confidence of some patriots and
qualify him for a fairly low SSN. After aligning himself with Fetzer and
becoming a no-planer and Sandy Hook denier, Friend advanced to 9/10 on the
stupidity scale. The ADL was readily able to denounce him as an "anti-Semite"
with "extreme views", and he serves as a brilliant example for
whenever they want to portray Judaism's critics as racist lunatics. As early as August
2012, Friend purportedly received a threatening e-mail from the JDL. Since Friend is not stupid enough to believe in no-planes,
he must be working for Cass Sunstein, the JDL, ADL or a similar organization.
Most likely the JDL, since they could then 'threaten' him in order to help
establish his legend, or "cred building", as a wise commentator said.
It is quite rare for a shill to be assigned an SSN of 10/10, but it does
happen. According to Dimitri Khalezov, each Tower was demolished by a 150
kiloton thermonuclear bomb that had been placed 50 meters (164 feet) below the
foundations when the Towers were built. Khalezov claimed the government (i.e.,
the Nixon Admin) was in on the plan, kept it a secret (i.e., successfully
prevented Washington Post or New York Times reporters from
uncovering the scheme), yet Soviet agents such as Khalezov became aware of it. And
Khalezov stated that, although the planes that crashed into the Towers were
really fake planes, New York officials believed them to be real. And because the
plane that hit the Pentagon was really a cruise missile, and because officials
had determined that it had an unexploded nuclear warhead, the New York officials
feared that the "planes" that crashed into the Towers were also carrying
unexploded nuclear warheads. And in order to save New York City from possible
atmospheric nuclear explosions, the City officials decided to detonate the 150
kt thermonuclear devices that were buried beneath the Towers. Khalezov didn't
explain why WTC7 was pulled. See
here for more
on Khalezov's particular brand of idiocy.
At any
given time, a shill may "expose" other shills who are higher on the stupidity scale. So Fetzer
exposes Hytten/Shack and his cronies, whose "vicsims" baloney made them a clear 10/10. Once a shill reaches 10/10, they can
do just about anything. Hytten has called Fetzer a shill.
In the same way that
government derives a synergistic gain from "rebutting many conspiracy theories", sincere truth-seekers
can avoid legitimizing one or two of the most obvious disinformation brokers by
rebutting many of them. However, it is now time for these shills to be
sidelined, ignored, and recognized for what they are: government stooges,
traitors and liars, for whom there can be no place in any truth or patriot movement.
Operation Halbig
Update (Feb. 21, 2014): For new information on Wolfgang Halbig (of Jewishorigin) and his pre-Sandy Hook trolling and attempt to solicit money, click
here.
Wolfgang Halbig, in his interview with Dave Gahary, suggests that Sandy Hook was a conspiracy because when the police arrived, "they" parked a quarter of a mile from the front
door of the school.
In fact, according to the information in the Connecticut
State's Attorney's Final Report, the first police officer
arrived at Crestwood "Road" (actually Crestwood Drive) behind
and to the south of the school at 9:39:00, three minutes and 21 seconds
after the first 911 emergency call was received by the Police Department. It's a
little over 100 feet from the south end, and about 600 feet from the front entrance, which is
still less than an eighth of a mile.
Source: Google
Maps
Halbig deceptively keeps waffling on with Maps
misleading comments such as "Why would you park a quarter of a mile...?" yet
studiously avoids telling us that the next two police officers arrived a mere 13
seconds later - parking on the driveway near the ball field, barely more than a
hundred yards from the front entrance. And the police deliberately
decided to cover both approaches.
In any case, if a police car was approaching from the south, it's normally a two-minute
drive taking the long route from the
junction of Washington Avenue / Crestwood Drive around to the front entrance, whereas on foot from Crestwood
Drive, an officer would only need to do 6.82 mph in order to cover the 600
feet in a minute. Thus, even at high speed, there is little or no time advantage
from taking the long route.
The Connecticut Police Chiefs Association (CPCA) Final Report
states that the shift sergeant who was at the police station was among the first
responders. Whilst en route, he sent some units to the front and some to the
rear, as corroborated by radio recordings. "Local officers had knowledge
that Crestwood Drive passes within yards of the rear of the school."
The report provides an explanation as to why the police did not park very
close to the front door: "In analyzing the response, it is important to know the
accepted practice for officers responding to such a call. Officers arriving at
the school must do so in a manner that allows them quick access to the facility,
but must also be cognizant of their tactical positioning. Therefore, it is
expected that first arriving officers would park a reasonable distance from the
building in order to afford themselves the best view of the building and
surrounding space. This allows officers to begin assessing the status and
location of the threat. Officers are trained to prepare for more than one threat
or aggressor."
Halbig says [5:45], "And they're parking on Crest View, Crest something
Drive." If we overlook his errors of more than +100% in his distance calculations,
you'd think that Halbig would at least be able to get the name of the road
right, after supposedly "researching" Sandy Hook for more than a year.
Source: CPCA Newtown
Final Report
Halbig suggests that another reason it's a conspiracy is that the paramedics Final Report
took too long to go in. As shown above, police were searching the building and
quickly triaging any victims they found. The EMS had not been cleared to
approach the building at this time (since the possibility of additional shooters
had not been ruled out), and an officer scooped up a critically injured child
and sprinted towards the EMS staging area.
And the Connecticut Final Report says that at 9:39:34, a Newtown officer encountered an "unknown male running along the
east side of SHES with something in his hand", and there were a number of
factors that gave the police valid reasons to suspect that there may have been
more than one shooter. The initial unknown male "turned out to
be a parent with a cell telephone in his hand". At 9:40:03, the last
gunshot was heard, believed to be the final suicide shot of Lanza in classroom
10.
Anyone still curious about Sandy Hook, who hasn't really looked into it much,
should read those reports and see if there is anything that proves an "elaborate
hoax", or if the response was reasonable given the circumstances.
It's all very well for Halbig, with the benefit of hindsight, to speculate that
the responders should have done some things differently. There is nothing to
suggest that the police or paramedics made mistakes, based upon the
information available to them at the time. But even if mistakes were made, that
is not evidence of a conspiracy, and would do nothing to override the
overwhelming evidence that Sandy Hook was a real massacre, not a
hoax or
a drill. And it's rather telling that no other expert in school safety
has come up with Halbig's objections and gone public over the last
fourteen months.
The only people who have are liars and cranks who claim the 9/11 planes
were
holograms and the Boston bombings were faked with smoke bombs and
amputee
actors.
Halbig says he started contacting the Newtown public schools, probably "two months
after the incident". He claims "the pieces don't fit", and asks why the
FBI would "classify" the Sandy Hook report. The answer is that shortly after the
incident it was already known that there was a flock of conspiracy loons all over the internet
who, given half a chance, would post images of the dead children on their blogs and YouTube videos,
harass the parents, and accuse them of being liars who were part of a massive conspiracy. So it's
not surprising that the authorities redacted some images, in order to spare the
grieving relatives from the nutbars' antics. Halbig claims the FBI has
never "classified" such a report before, but prior to Sandy Hook, there has never been a
troop of internet trolls trying to "prove" the relatives are liars and actors.
It doesn't prove Sandy Hook was a hoax.
Halbig complains his phone calls are not returned, implying that it's
evidence of a conspiracy. What does he expect - that hard-pressed officials
would continue to humor some conspiracy crank and crackpot who bombards them for
months on end with demands for evidence to prove Sandy Hook wasn't a hoax? What if they
kept receiving demands for evidence that would prove the earth isn't flat? Isn't
there some point at which they would lose patience?
According to Halbig, Sandy Hook was a "script" that was in the planning for
two to two-and-a-half years. Halbig claims that all sorts of things don't fit, but presents not
one shred of
credible evidence - nothing more than the misguided opinions of a paranoid conspiracy
theorist. Halbig claims he does not believe that any children died at SH,
revealing himself as a liar or a fool. The only way that anyone could
possibly be duped into thinking Halbig is raising some valid questions is if
they hadn't yet read the reports and were very generous in giving him the
benefit of the doubt. More than two dozen did die at Sandy Hook Elementary, and
the only killer was Adam Lanza.
In any case, all you really need to
know is that Wolfgang Halbig chose to go to American Free Press (AFP) rather than a
mainstream publication that would have given him more credibility with the
general public. His Facebook page shows that he has
a strong interest in the mainstream
media: FOX 35 news anchors Sonni Abatta, Bob Frier, Amy Kaufeldt and others,
The Washington Post, Newsweek, Time magazine, and Larry King.
He also links to George W. Bush's Facebook page.
AFP has been
variously (and most unfairly) described as a "known
hate site, filled with anti-semitic and racist ideology", a
"conspiracy-oriented anti-Semitic newspaper",
a paper that "promotes anti-Semitic conspiracy theories",
and a "right-wing extremist publication". There are two possible explanations
for Halbig's choice.
Of course, the Sandy Hookers will claim Halbig couldn't go to the mainstream media
because they're all in on the "conspiracy". Let's look at the proceeds
from a hypothetical Sandy Hook "hoax". $49
million was allocated for demolition and reconstruction. Since such projects generally go over budget, it's unlikely that
there would be money left over to bribe newspaper bosses and hire "crisis
actors", etc. As of December 2013, there was some $12 million remaining to be
distributed, and much of that is to be allocated to "long-term
needs such
as providing mental health resources, scholarships for affected students
and funding for when Newtown comes to an agreement on a physical
memorial to the
victims". Some money went to an animal sanctuary, a local Boy Scout
troop, and to the gun-control lobby. The conspirators would also need to pay off hundreds of parents,
grandparents, aunts and uncles, cousins, schoolmates, colleagues and friends to
keep quiet for the rest of their lives, with the children having to play dead,
not go to the Super Bowl, and so on. "Lanza's" classmates would have
to be bribed to
pretend he existed, and those who didn't say anything would need to be bribed,
threatened, or killed to stop them from contradicting the others' statements.
The conspirators either had to pay for Andrew Wheeler's website's domain in
April 2003 and hire people to post on internet forums around 2009 as part of a
plot to fake his existence, or they had to hire a "crisis actor" to pretend to
be him, hope that the real Andrew Wheeler didn't find out, and pay an assassin
to stand by in Hawaii with instructions to shoot Wheeler if he was about to
talk. Or, if they got lucky, recruit Wheeler, somehow persuading him to suspend
his beloved island lifestyle for a new role as a "crisis actor". Then the
conspirators would have to pay off dozens or hundreds of other "crisis actors",
the Police Department, forensic scientists, the coroner, and anyone at Homeland
Security, BATF, the Connecticut Intelligence Center (CTIC) and other agencies
who had any doubts about the scheme.
Let's suppose (being very generous to the Sandy Hookers) that after siphoning
off money to bribe all these people, the fraudsters still have $1 million
remaining.
And then they must
pay off The Boston Globe, the Boston Herald, The Washington Post,
The New York
Times, The London Times, CNN, NBC, CBS, the BBC and countless thousands of other
national and local newspapers and radio / TV stations worldwide, each of whom
would love to have the scoop about any "hoax" at Sandy Hook. As of 2010,
it is reckoned there were 14,853 newspaper titles worldwide.
Just to be even more generous to the Sandy Hookers, let's forget TV and radio, and
say that 4,853 or almost one in three of the newspapers are "conspiracy-oriented",
which is a ridiculously generous assumption. If there are 10,000 mainstream
newspapers to bribe to keep quiet, so that it's worth their while to miss out on the Sandy Hook "hoax" story,
that leaves $100 per newspaper before
we
count transaction costs, telephone costs, etc. And how much would a newspaper be
willing to pay for such a scoop - $10,000? $100,000? $1 million? Whilst they
accept less than $100 to give up their chance to make big money? Then there is
the risk that some party involved in the negotiations with ten thousand
newspapers would talk, or anyone tapping any one of the tens of thousands of
telephone calls, or any of the "crisis actors", relatives,
colleagues, classmates, police, forensic scientists, the coroner, the uncle in Hawaii, the assassin in Hawaii ready to
shoot the uncle, etc.
And this supposes that all the proceeds are used to pay off the tens of
thousands of conspirators. Thus, the "hoaxers" do not stand to make any profit
from the scheme, and, moreover, must also borrow or put up their own money,
years before even a cent came rolling in. The Sandy
Hook "hoaxers" would have to be terribly incompetent buffoons with no
understanding of business or investment, who are prepared to lose money
(after interest charges and inflation) in return for the certainty of getting
caught and going to jail for fraud, since there would always be some media
outlets who would demand more than $100 for their silence.
The reality is that no mainstream newspaper would give any column-inches to a
fringe conspiracy theorist with no evidence. Halbig wanted to restrict circulation to spare
himself embarrassment. And by going to a "conspiracy-oriented" newspaper, the wider audience of non-conspiracy-minded folk
will see that he's
just playing games with the "conspiracy nuts". This is the very way
they would
play it if he was recruited to work for Sunstein to pose as a nutjob
"conspiracy
researcher". So Wolfgang "Walter Mitty" Halbig does all he can to
antagonize the cops for months on end, starting from February 2013,
effectively
accusing them of not doing their job properly. Then, after ten months,
they
eventually go round to his house "in plain clothes [...] right before
Christmas
[...] about 10:00 a.m." for a "15, 20 minutes" meeting to tell him that
they won't stand for it any more, and they'll file harassment
charges if he keeps wasting police time.
Thus, if we accept his tale of the police going to his home, that
doesn't prove there was a massive Sandy Hook global conspiracy, with Russia Today,
The
Guardian, Die Welt, etc., all in on it and having to be bribed from a conspiracy
that makes a loss and just about guarantees the perps will go to jail.
The fact that the Sunstein team had to get Halbig to broadcast his opinions -
and thereby advance him to 9/10 on the stupidity scale -
in order to prop up their
flagging conspiracy theory, after Michael Collins Piper's False Flags exposed their
deceptions, shows how desperate they have become.
A public schools security expert would be an ideal person for Sunstein to
recruit for acting the role of a dumb "conspiraloon" who could concoct some
imagined reasons for supposing the Sandy Hook events didn't "fit", and whose
childish crippled
epistemology and inability to think through the ramifications of his conclusion,
would lead him to imagine that more than two dozen deaths were faked at Sandy Hook.
In short, the Sunstein brigade's Operation Halbig smacks of desperation, and
shows that they are losing their battle to oppose truth-seekers by cognitive
infiltration.
Update: It turns out that Wolfgang Halbig is not only Jewish, but was already an
activist working to advance Jewish political interests as early as September
2012, months before Sandy Hook. He hates Obama, and was angry that someone did
not kill Hitler, which he claims would have saved 6 million of "our" people.
In his Feb 19, 2014 broadcast at BlogTalkRadio, Halbig says [17:57] his father
was in a "Nazi prison camp" for four years in Poland.
This is corroborated by a post
by Halbig of "a year ago", with the URL indicating
September 2012, in which Halbig claims Obama "hates the Jews".
wolfgang halbigSo that was from around September 2012. Then, three months later, the Sandy Hook
• a year agoOBAM HATES THE JEWS AND DOES NOT EVEN ACKNOWLEDGE THAT JERUSALEM IS THE CAPITAL.
HIS DEMOCRATIC PLATFORM REMOVED GOD FROM OUR FOUNDATION AS AMERICANS
Today I am as angry as anyone can get. What is it going to take for the
uneducated Americans to get educated and start thinking about how they have
responsibilities and not just rights that they throw in our faces everyday.
My father for four years I learned was in a NAZI PRISON in POSEN, POLAND.
Thank God that the Americans found him.
The letters I have now found in GERMANY makes me sick to my stomach as to what
Hitler did to the Jewish Race. To this day I cannot believe that someone did not
kill him which would have saved 6 million of our people there not just a jewish
race they are people just like you and me."
mass killings occur, and Jewish political activists such as Halbig realise that
they can exploit the event for a propaganda advantage.
Thus, Halbig is not simply some ordinary person who happened to work in school
safety and thought there was something amiss about Sandy Hook. He is a Jewish
political activist, working to advance Jewish public relations - the very sort
of person needed for Sunstein's team of shills who trash truth-tellers by
promoting loony conspiracy theories.
On October 10, 2012, Wolfgang W. Halbig posted, and copied and
pasted multiple times, that he'd been "gathering
information about and evidence against Barack Hussein Obama, I have encountered
hundreds of coincidences that strike me as amazing. None of those coincidences,
by themselves, may mean much. But taken as a whole it is almost impossible to
believe they were all the result of chance." And then proceeds with a massive,
lengthy series of events, such as how "In late 1999 Obama purportedly engaged in
homosexual activities and cocaine-snorting in the back of a limousine with a man
named Larry Sinclair...".
One purpose of posting this would have been so that Cass Sunstein and his
minions could observe how people would react to the insertion of various
conspiracy theories, and who, if any, would pass it on. As they clearly did with
the Sandy Hook conspiracy theories.
And in October 2012, Wolfgang Halbig was posing as a nutty conspiracy
theorist, and provoking some interesting reactions. An excerpt included:
Wolfgang HalbigAround 1979 Obama started college at Occidental in California . He is verySunstein and his pals would have been interest to find out whether people did
open about his two years at Occidental, he tried all kinds of drugs and was
wasting his time but, even though he had a brilliant mind, did not apply himself
to his studies.
[...]
Now, we have Obama running for President. Valerie Jarrett was Michele Obama's
boss. She is now Obama's chief advisor and he does not make any major decisions
without talking to her first. Where was Jarrett born? Ready for this? Shiraz,
Iran! Am I going nuts or is there a pattern here?
Source
in fact consider Halbig's 'theory' to be "nuts", or if folk would perceive some
sort of "pattern" in his claims. The replies indicated a unanimous verdict:
Halbig was considered to be nuts. "The paranoia and racism run deep in this one", "Sir you
sound like a conspiracy theorist!! You have too much time on your hands.",
"Wow....real KKK marerial. [sic] Reminds me of the John Birchers back in the 60's.
True Tea Party material."
Halbig likes posting about the "uneducated" social class, and also posts
about "the blacks" and "Mexicans". For example:
[...] How can so many people be that stupid and not see the big picture.On March 23, 2012, Halbig was trolling, telling someone: "Your an
I picked fruit at age 12 all through High School to help my mother and I
liked it because I got paid for my work.
The Mexicans are taking the blacks jobs because the blacks see those jobs as
demeaning to their status in America. [..]
idiot..........get a life.. How wrong can anyone be. You need mental health
counseling if that is how you feel".
A couple of people responded: "Wolfgang W Halbig A. He's wrong only on his last(and maybe his first) point(s.) But how
about pointing out how he is wrong instead of just throwing insults like a 9year
old!? Aren't you too old to be behaving this way? Losing your marbles???" And:
"Wolfgang W Halbig You're the idiot...this "racist cracker" not white people,
felt the need to "rid" the world of another (what he called) "coon" because he's
such coward that he goes after unarmed, young innocent black men".
On July 24, 2012, Halbig was attempting to solicit money from gullible folk, by exploiting a post about a
genuine donations campaign:
Please donate and investigate what we can do inMore recently, he hopes to part Sandy Hookers from their money. On his
saving children from committing suicide. I need $100,000 thousand dollars [sic]
and probably pay it back once the company is up and running. wolfgang
interview by Dave Gahary, Halbig says [21:36] "Well, I think the next thing I'm
gonna do is, right now I'm gonna try to raise a lot of money, some funds. I
think there are a lot of people out there who really, really believe in learning
the truth. You know, they call them conspiracy nuts; they call them all kind of
names... [...] But here's my point: What I'm trying to do is raise a lot of
money."
Indeed, Halbig hopes to make "a lot of money" from "a lot" of people
whom he also regards as "conspiracy nuts". You can be sure that anyone gullible enough to fall for the scam will have their
names and addresses passed on to Sunstein and agencies such as FEMA, Homeland Security,
the ADL or the SPLC, thereby allowing Halbig to profit several times over
from each person. Unfortunately, by the time truth-seekers "learn the truth"
about Halbig and his scam, he'll have scarpered with their money, and their
personal details will have been harvested.
Halbig doesn't doubt in the slightest that twenty children were killed at
Sandy Hook. His supposed "research" and asking "questions" is nothing more than
a masquerade, a means to a business and political end.
So, Halbig is an internet troll who inserts various conspiracy
theories so that the Sunstein team can monitor the reaction. And his
post "OBAM HATES THE JEWS"
reveals what Halbig, hero of the Sandy Hookers, truly thinks about Sandy
Hookers
- they are simply "uneducated Americans", to whom he feeds his bait
about faked
deaths and faked shootings, in the hope that some of them will be
"uneducated"
enough to swallow it. In
which case, they will have served their purpose, allowing themselves to
swell
his bank balance and be cited
as examples of wacky conspiracy loons, with the result that those who
present
evidence of real conspiracies - such as the undeniable proof of Israel's
central
role in 9/11 - are also tarred with the same brush. In the meantime,
Sunstein
and Zionist leaders are high-fiving and grinning as they celebrate the
success of their
counter-intelligence program against truth-seekers, who would otherwise
present
a much more serious threat against the perpetrators of false-flag
terror.
