Malcolm Roberts replies to wolf in sheep's clothing controlled opposition girlyman Andrew Bolt.

Andrew is referring to an article by Ben Cubby in SMH. In Ben’s interview I did not raise or discuss religion nor any religious sect. I did not imply any religious affiliation to be associated with the drivers of BS AGW. In reporting our conversation, Ben Cubby’s article did not mention religion.
I’m wondering why Andrew now introduces religion into the climate discussion.

In the interview I was asked by SMH’s Ben Cubby about the motives driving BS AGW. I discussed the usual: academics feeding off taxpayer grants, pollies seeking to make an issue for their own politcal benefit, major international bankers harvesting carbon credits, ... and raised the UN and global governance.

Facts:
Sa.04.08.12, 11:49am my computer received an email from The Galileo Movement’s co-founder Case Smit. Around 2:00pm I checked emails and immediately started drafting a response for Case to send to Andrew. (I wouldn’t go behind Case’s back by replying directly to Andrew.)

Sa.04.08.12, 3:14pm I sent a response to Case for forwarding to Andrew. Yes, it was a long and detailed email. It provides plenty of references for Andrew. Case is travelling across Australia so I don’t know when/whether he’s collected emails yet.

Among many points, I advised Case that:

1. quote: “I agree with Andrew in that I dislike discussing anything about groups of people based on religion, race, nationality, etc.”

As I advised Case, religion is irrelevant. Raising it diminishes the core argument and leaves one open to being discredited.

2. I provided Case with plenty of solid books and other references supporting my comments on the cabal of narrow political and financial interests pushing global governance.

3. I offered to arrange for Andrew to talk with people who’ve done their research on global governance.

(They will discuss the erosion of Australia’s sovereignty and competitiveness with him too if he wants.)

4. Miscellaneous points such as prominent courageous American TV journalist Glenn Beck identifying UN Agenda 21, the banking families, UN, Maurice Strong, ... Glenn has laid out his research publicly.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=esJY2SK_4tE
 
Is Andrew aware that one of the world’s most powerful entities, the USA Federal Reserve Bank, is not a government agency? It’s a private entity controlled by the major international banking families, mainly European. Documented.

The Fed’s owners and controllers are much more powerful than the Fed.

Is Andrew aware of how money is created? David Evans and Jo Nova are. They discuss it publicly and have written fabulous material about it.

I did not raise the word ‘conspiracy’ with Ben Cubby. I don’t know why Andrew did.

Even though their deliberations are secretive, the cabal is working quite openly. Documented. Not a conspiracy.

I agree with Andrew and have publicly and privately objected to people discussing religion in the manner to which Andrew refers. I’ve counselled them against it. Some of my friends and those who I respect, admire and value enormously for their achievements are Jewish. Some are Christians. Some Buddhist, Some Muslim, Some Hindu. Some atheists. Some agnostic. Some not interested.

I’ve never spoken to or met Andrew. I’ve enjoyed email correspondence with him. I’ve given him tips for which he has expressed appreciation.

Andrew has my street address, my email address and my phone numbers. I’m wondering why he didn’t discuss it with me?

I’d be happy to discuss any of these topics with him privately or publicly on air. Preferably after he’s done the research.

It’s ironic that climate alarmists criticise The Galileo Movement for listing Andrew as an adviser (on media). They say TGM’s listing of Andrew Bolt discredits TGM. (We disagree.) Now Andrew seems worried about being being discredited by association with TGM. Gotta laugh.

Maybe Andrew is Aging. Or maybe he’s upset with another part of Fairfax, Mike Carlton who did raise religion in association with climate:

http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/anthems-to-stir-the-common-man-20120803-23knh.html
 
Until learning of Mike Carlton a few minutes ago I was at a loss as to Andrew’s reason for raising religion. It seems Andrew didn’t. Mike Carlton did the day before.

I wonder if Mikey’s the same Mike Carlton who ran from me when I inadvertently sent him facts in response to emails received in a conversation with some alarmist ‘scientists’ funded by government. Mike doesn’t seem to like facts. He runs from them. Either directly as he did by email on 08.03.2010 or by cleverly implied smear on August 4th, 2012.

Notice the pattern in Fairfax Press? And they wonder why circulation plummets and losses grow?

Malcolm Roberts 

 ***

Several crucial absolutely essential points out of this:

1. Malcolm Roberts is absolutely right in what he says.

2. Andrew Bolt is nothing more than a dog whistler and judas goat. He's not a conservative, he is a controlled opposition talking head intended to divert true conservatives and dissipate their energy.

3. Andrew Bolt is an egomaniac, which is how his real bosses control him.

4. Funny how Bolt claims to have all these mod issues but finds the time and resources for his scurrilous hit piece on Roberts.

5. Bolt is two faced in every issue he embraces. AVOID HIM.

6. Bolt is the one smearing here. The Age- who cares, no one reads that wad of toilet paper anyway. Bolt is using his bully pulpit -again- and getting material facts wrong -again. Since this is now a pattern, see it for what it is- controlled opposition. Bolt fakes conservative so when he attacks on behalf of socialism- his real alignment- he clings to his fake credibility to try and hurt real conservatives. AVOID HIM.